BIBLES NET. COM

Matthew Henry’s Commentary – Genesis, Chapter II

Matthew Henry’s Complete Commentary

on the Whole Bible

Back to Biblesnet.com Home Page


[Table of Contents]

[Previous]

[Next]

Matthew Henry
Commentary on the Whole Bible (1706)





G E N E S I S

CHAP. II.



     

This chapter is an appendix to the history of the creation, more

particularly explaining and enlarging upon that part of the history

which relates immediately to man, the favourite of this

lower world. We have in it,

I. The institution and sanctification

of the sabbath, which was made for man, to further his holiness

and comfort

(ver. 1-3).

II. A more particular account of man’s

creation, as the centre and summary of the whole work

(ver. 1-7).

III. A description of the garden of Eden, and the placing of man

in it under the obligations of a law and covenant

(ver. 8-17).

IV. The creation of the woman, her marriage to the man, and

the institution of the ordinance of marriage

(ver. 18, &c.).





The Creation. B. C. 4004.

     

1 Thus the heavens and the earth

were finished, and all the host of

them.

  2 And on the seventh day

God ended his work which he had

made; and he rested on the seventh

day from all his work which he had

made.

  3 And God blessed the

seventh day, and sanctified it: because

that in it he had rested from all

his work which God created and made.

     

We have here,

I. The settlement of the

kingdom of nature, in God’s resting from the

work of creation,

v. 1, 2.

Here observe,

1. The creatures made both in heaven and

earth are the hosts or armies of them, which

denotes them to be numerous, but marshalled,

disciplined, and under command.

How great is the sum of them! And yet

every one knows and keeps his place. God

uses them as his hosts for the defence of his

people and the destruction of his enemies;

for he is the Lord of hosts, of all these hosts,

Dan. iv. 35.

2. The heavens and the earth

are finished pieces, and so are all the creatures

in them. So perfect is God’s work that

nothing can be added to it nor taken from it,

Eccl. iii. 14.

God that began to build showed

himself well able to finish.

3. After the end

of the first six days God ceased from all

works of creation. He has so ended his work

as that though, in his providence, he worketh

hitherto

(John v. 17),

preserving and governing

all the creatures, and particularly forming

the spirit of man within him, yet he does not

make any new species of creatures. In miracles,

he has controlled and overruled nature,

but never changed its settled course, nor repealed

nor added to any of its establishments.

4. The eternal God, though infinitely happy

in the enjoyment of himself, yet took a satisfaction

in the work of his own hands. He

did not rest, as one weary, but as one well-pleased

with the instances of his own goodness

and the manifestations of his own glory.

     

II. The commencement of the kingdom of

grace, in the sanctification of the sabbath

day,

v. 3.

He rested on that day, and took

a complacency in his creatures, and then

sanctified it, and appointed us, on that day,

to rest and take a complacency in the Creator;

and his rest is, in the fourth commandment,

made a reason for ours, after six days’ labour.

Observe,

1. The solemn observance of one

day in seven, as a day of holy rest and holy

work, to God’s honour, is the indispensable

duty of all those to whom God has revealed

his holy sabbaths.

2. The way of sabbath-sanctification

is the good old way,

Jer. vi. 16.

Sabbaths are as ancient as the world; and I

see no reason to doubt that the sabbath,

being now instituted in innocency, was religiously

observed by the people of God

throughout the patriarchal age.

3. The

sabbath of the Lord is truly honourable, and

we have reason to honour it–honour it for

the sake of its antiquity, its great Author,

the sanctification of the first sabbath by the

holy God himself, and by our first parents in

innocency, in obedience to him.

4. The

sabbath day is a blessed day, for God blessed

it, and that which he blesses is blessed

indeed. God has put an honour upon it, has

appointed us, on that day, to bless him, and

has promised, on that day, to meet us and

bless us.

5. The sabbath day is a holy day,

for God has sanctified it. He has separated

and distinguished it from the rest of the

days of the week, and he has consecrated it

and set it apart to himself and his own service

and honour. Though it is commonly

taken for granted that the Christian sabbath

we observe, reckoning from the creation, is

not the seventh but the first day of the week,

yet being a seventh day, and we in it, celebrating

the rest of God the Son, and the

finishing of the work of our redemption, we

may and ought to act faith upon this original

institution of the sabbath day, and to commemorate

the work of creation, to the honour

of the great Creator, who is therefore worthy

to receive, on that day, blessing, and honour,

and praise, from all religious assemblies.




The Creation. B. C. 4004.

     

4 These are the generations of the

heavens and of the earth when they

were created, in the day that the

LORD God made the earth and the

heavens,

  5 And every plant of the

field before it was in the earth, and

every herb of the field before it grew:

for the LORD God had not caused it to

rain upon the earth, and there was not

a man to till the ground.

  6 But there

went up a mist from the earth, and watered

the whole face of the ground.

  7 And the LORD God formed man

of the dust of the ground, and breathed

into his nostrils the breath of life;

and man became a living soul.

     

In these verses,

I. Here is a name given

to the Creator which we have not yet met

with, and that is Jehovah–the LORD, in

capital letters, which are constantly used in

our English translation to intimate that in

the original it is Jehovah. All along, in the

first chapter, he was called Elohim–a God

of power; but now Jehovah Elohim–a God

of power and perfection, a finishing God. As

we find him known by his name Jehovah

when he appeared to perform what he had

promised

(Exod. vi. 3),

so now we have him

known by that name, when he had perfected

what he had begun. Jehovah is that great

and incommunicable name of God which

denotes his having his being of himself, and

his giving being to all things; fitly therefore

is he called by that name now that heaven

and earth are finished.

     

II. Further notice taken of the production

of plants and herbs, because they were made

and appointed to be food for man,

v. 5, 6.

Here observe,

1. The earth did not bring

forth its fruits of itself, by any innate virtue

of its own but purely by the almighty power

of God, which formed every plant and every

herb before it grew in the earth. Thus

grace in the soul, that plant of renown, grows

not of itself in nature’s soil, but is the work

of God’s own hands.

2. Rain also is the

gift of God; it came not till the Lord God

caused it to rain. If rain be wanted, it is

God that withholds it; if rain come plentifully

in its season, it is God that sends it; if

it come in a distinguishing way, it is God

that causeth it to rain upon one city and not

upon another,
Amos iv. 7.

3. Though God,

ordinarily, works by means, yet he is not tied

to them, but when he pleases he can do his

own work without them. As the plants were

produced before the sun was made, so they

were before there was either rain to water

the earth or man to till it. Therefore though

we must not tempt God in the neglect of

means, yet we must trust God in the want

of means.

4. Some way or other God will

take care to water the plants that are of his

own planting. Though as yet there was no

rain, God made a mist equivalent to a shower,

and with it watered the whole face of the

ground. Thus he chose to fulfil his purpose

by the weakest means, that the excellency of the

power might be of God. Divine grace descends

like a mist, or silent dew, and waters

the church without noise,

Deut. xxxii. 2.

     

III. A more particular account of the

creation of man,

v. 7.

Man is a little world,

consisting of heaven and earth, soul and body.

Now here we have an account of the origin

of both and the putting of both together:

let us seriously consider it, and say, to our

Creator’s praise, We are fearfully and wonderfully

made,
Ps. cxxxix. 14.

Elihu, in the

patriarchal age, refers to this history when

he says

(Job xxxiii. 6),

I also am formed out

of the clay, and

(v. 4),

The breath of the Almighty

hath given me life, and

(ch. xxxii. 8),

There is a spirit in man. Observe then,

     

1. The mean origin, and yet the curious

structure, of the body of man.

(1.) The matter

was despicable. He was made of the dust of

the ground, a very unlikely thing to make a

man of; but the same infinite power that

made the world of nothing made man, its

master-piece, of next to nothing. He was

made of the dust, the small dust, such as is

upon the surface of the earth. Probably,

not dry dust, but dust moistened with the

mist that went up,

v. 6.

He was not made

of gold-dust, powder of pearl, or diamond

dust, but common dust, dust of the ground.

Hence he is said to be of the earth, choikosdusty,
1 Cor. xv. 47.

And we also are of the

earth, for we are his offspring, and of the

same mould. So near an affinity is there

between the earth and our earthly parents

that our mother’s womb, out of which we

were born, is called the earth

(Ps. cxxxix. 15),

and the earth, in which we must be buried,

is called our mother’s womb,
Job i. 21.

Our foundation is in the earth,

Job iv. 19.

Our fabric is earthly, and the fashioning of it like

that of an earthen vessel,

Job x. 9.

Our food

is out of the earth,

Job xxviii. 5.

Our familiarity is with the earth,

Job xvii. 14.

Our fathers are in the earth, and our own

final tendency is to it; and what have we

then to be proud of?

(2.) Yet the Maker

was great, and the make fine. The Lord

God, the great fountain of being and power,

formed man. Of the other creatures it is

said that they were created and made; but of

man that he was formed, which denotes a

gradual process in the work with great

accuracy and exactness. To express the

creation of this new thing, he takes a new

word, a word (some think) borrowed from

the potter’s forming his vessel upon the

wheel; for we are the clay, and God the

potter,

Isa. lxiv. 8.

The body of man is

curiously wrought,

Ps. cxxxix. 15, 16.

Materiam superabat opus–The workmanship exceeded

the materials. Let us present our

bodies to God as living sacrifices

(Rom. xii. 1),

as living temples

(1 Cor. vi. 19),

and then

these vile bodies shall shortly be new-formed

like Christ’s glorious body,

Phil. iii. 21.

     

2. The high origin and the admirable serviceableness

of the soul of man.

(1.) It

takes its rise from the breath of heaven, and

is produced by it. It was not made of the

earth, as the body was; it is a pity then that

it should cleave to the earth, and mind earthly

things. It came immediately from God; he

gave it to be put into the body

(Eccl. xii. 7),

as afterwards he gave the tables of stone of

his own writing to be put into the ark, and

the urim of his own framing to be put into

the breast-plate. Hence God is not only the

former but the Father of spirits. Let the soul

which God has breathed into us breathe after

him; and let it be for him, since it is from

him. Into his hands let us commit our

spirits, for from his hands we had them.

(2.) It takes its lodging in a house of clay, and is

the life and support of it. It is by it that

man is a living soul, that is, a living man;

for the soul is the man. The body would

be a worthless, useless, loathsome carcase,

if the soul did not animate it. To God that

gave us these souls we must shortly give an

account of them, how we have employed

them, used them, proportioned them, and

disposed of them; and if then it be found

that we have lost them, though it were

to gain the world, we shall be undone for

ever. Since the extraction of the soul is so

noble, and its nature and faculties are so

excellent, let us not be of those fools that

despise their own souls, by preferring their

bodies before them,

Prov. xv. 32.

When our Lord Jesus anointed the blind man’s

eyes with clay perhaps he intimated that it

was he who at first formed man out of the

clay; and when he breathed on his disciples,

saying, Receive you the Holy Ghost, he intimated

that it was he who at first breathed

into man’s nostrils the breath of life. He

that made the soul is alone able to new-make

it.









The Garden of Eden. B. C. 4004.

     

8 And the LORD God planted a

garden eastward in Eden; and there

he put the man whom he had formed.

  9 And out of the ground made the

LORD God to grow every tree

that is pleasant to the sight, and good for

food; the tree of life also in the

midst of the garden, and the tree of

knowledge of good and evil.

  10 And

a river went out of Eden to water the

garden; and from thence it was

parted, and became into four heads.

  11 The name of the first is Pison:

that is it which compasseth the whole

land of Havilah, where there is gold;

  12 And the gold of that land is good;

there is bdellium and the onyx stone.

  13 And the name of the second river

is Gihon: the same is it that compasseth

the whole land of Ethiopia.

  14 And the name of the third river is

Hiddekel: that is it which goeth toward

the east of Assyria. And the

fourth river is Euphrates.

  15 And the LORD God took the man, and put

him into the garden of Eden to dress

it and to keep it.

     

Man consisting of body and soul, a body

made out of the earth and a rational immortal

soul the breath of heaven, we have, in

these verses, the provision that was made

for the happiness of both; he that made him

took care to make him happy, if he could

but have kept himself so and known when

he was well off. That part of man by which

he is allied to the world of sense was made

happy; for he was put in the paradise of

God: that part by which he is allied to the

world of spirits was well provided for; for

he was taken into covenant with God. Lord,

what is man that he should be thus dignified–man

that is a worm! Here we have,

     

I. A description of the garden of

Eden, which was intended for the mansion and

demesne of this great lord, the palace of this

prince. The inspired penman, in this history,

writing for the Jews first, and calculating

his narratives for the infant state of

the church, describes things by their outward

sensible appearances, and leaves us,

by further discoveries of the divine light, to

be led into the understanding of the mysteries

couched under them. Spiritual things

were strong meat, which they could not yet

bear; but he writes to them as unto carnal,

1 Cor. iii. 1.

Therefore he does not so much

insist upon the happiness of Adam’s mind as

upon that of his outward state. The Mosaic

history, as well as the Mosaic law, has

rather the patterns of heavenly things than

the heavenly things themselves,

Heb. ix. 23.

Observe,

     

1. The place appointed for Adam’s residence

was a garden; not an ivory house nor

a palace overlaid with gold, but a garden,

furnished and adorned by nature, not by art.

What little reason have men to be proud of

stately and magnificent buildings, when it

was the happiness of man in innocency that

he needed none! As clothes came in with

sin, so did houses. The heaven was the roof

of Adam’s house, and never was any roof so

curiously ceiled and painted. The earth was

his floor, and never was any floor so richly

inlaid. The shadow of the trees was his

retirement; under them were his

dining-rooms, his lodging-rooms, and never were any

rooms so finely hung as these: Solomon’s,

in all their glory, were not arrayed like them.

The better we can accommodate ourselves to

plain things, and the less we indulge ourselves

with those artificial delights which

have been invented to gratify men’s pride and

luxury, the nearer we approach to a state of

innocency. Nature is content with a little

and that which is most natural, grace with

less, but lust with nothing.

     

2. The contrivance and furniture of this

garden were the immediate work of God’s

wisdom and power. The Lord God planted

this garden, that is, he had planted it–upon

the third day, when the fruits of the earth

were made. We may well suppose to have

been the most accomplished place for pleasure

and delight that ever the sun saw, when the

all-sufficient God himself designed it to be

the present happiness of his beloved creature,

man, in innocency, and a type and a figure

of the happiness of the chosen remnant in

glory. No delights can be agreeable nor satisfying

to a soul but those that God himself

has provided and appointed for it; no true

paradise, but of God’s planting. The light

of our own fires, and the sparks of our own

kindling, will soon leave us in the dark,

Isa. l. 11.

The whole earth was now a paradise

compared with what it is since the fall and

since the flood; the finest gardens in the

world are a wilderness compared with what

the whole face of the ground was before it

was cursed for man’s sake: yet that was not

enough; God planted a garden for Adam.

God’s chosen ones shall have distinguishing

favours shown them.

     

3. The situation of this garden was extremely

sweet. It was in Eden, which signifies

delight and pleasure. The place is here

particularly pointed out by such marks and

bounds as were sufficient, I suppose, when

Moses wrote, to specify the place to those

who knew that country; but now, it seems,

the curious cannot satisfy themselves concerning

it. Let it be our care to make sure

a place in the heavenly paradise, and then

we need not perplex ourselves with a search

after the place of the earthly paradise. It is

certain that, wherever it was, it had all desirable

conveniences, and (which never any

house nor garden on earth was) without any

inconvenience. Beautiful for situation, the

joy and the glory of the whole earth, was this

garden: doubtless it was earth in its highest

perfection.

     

4. The trees with which this garden was

planted.

(1.) It had all the best and choicest

trees in common with the rest of the ground.

It was beautiful and adorned with every tree

that, for its height or breadth, its make or

colour, its leaf or flower, was pleasant to the

sight and charmed the eye; it was replenished

and enriched with every tree that yielded

fruit grateful to the taste and useful to the

body, and so good for food. God, as a tender

Father, consulted not only Adam’s profit,

but his pleasure; for there is a pleasure

consistent with innocency, nay, there is a true

and transcendent pleasure in innocency.

God delights in the prosperity of his servants,

and would have them easy; it is owing to

themselves if they be uneasy. When Providence

puts us into an Eden of plenty and

pleasure, we ought to serve him with joyfulness

and gladness of heart, in the abundance

of the good things he gives us. But,

(2.) It

had two extraordinary trees peculiar to itself;

on earth there were not their like.

[1.] There was the tree of life in the midst of the

garden, which was not so much a memorandum

to him of the fountain and author of his

life, nor perhaps any natural means to preserve

or prolong life; but it was chiefly intended

to be a sign and seal to Adam, assuring

him of the continuance of life and

happiness, even to immortality and everlasting

bliss, through the grace and favour of

his Maker, upon condition of his perseverance

in this state of innocency and obedience.

Of this he might eat and live. Christ

is now to us the tree of life

(Rev. ii. 7; xxii. 2),

and the bread of life,
John vi. 48, 53.

[2.] There was the tree of the knowledge of

good and evil, so called, not because it had

any virtue in it to beget or increase useful

knowledge (surely then it would not have

been forbidden), but, First, Because there

was an express positive revelation of the

will of God concerning this tree, so that by

it he might know moral good and evil. What

is good? It is good not to eat of this tree.

What is evil? It is evil to eat of this tree.

The distinction between all other moral good

and evil was written in the heart of man by

nature; but this, which resulted from a positive

law, was written upon this tree. Secondly,

Because, in the event, it proved to

give Adam an experimental knowledge of

good by the loss of it and of evil by the

sense of it. As the covenant of grace has in

it, not only Believe and be saved, but also,

Believe not and be damned

(Mark xvi. 16),

so the covenant of innocency had in it, not only

“Do this and live,” which was sealed and

confirmed by the tree of life, but, “Fail and

die,” which Adam was assured of by this

other tree: “Touch it at your peril;” so that,

in these two trees, God set before him good and

evil, the blessing and the curse,
Deut. xxx. 19.

These two trees were as two sacraments.

     

5. The rivers with which this garden was

watered,

v. 10-14.

These four rivers (or

one river branched into four streams) contributed

much both to the pleasantness and

the fruitfulness of this garden. The land of

Sodom is said to be well watered every where,

as the garden of the Lord,
ch. xiii. 10.

Observe, That which God plants he will take

care to keep watered. The trees of righteousness

are set by the rivers,

Ps. i. 3.

In the

heavenly paradise there is a river infinitely

surpassing these; for it is a river of the

water of life, not coming out of Eden, as this,

but proceeding out of the throne of God and

of the Lamb

(Rev. xxii. 1),

a river that makes

glad the city of our God,
Ps. xlvi. 4.

Hiddekel and Euphrates are rivers of Babylon, which

we read of elsewhere. By these the captive

Jews sat down and wept, when they remembered

Sion

(Ps. cxxxvii. 1);

but methinks

they had much more reason to weep (and so

have we) at the remembrance of Eden.

Adam’s paradise was their prison; such

wretched work has sin made. Of the land

of Havilah it is said

(v. 12),

The gold of that

land is good, and there is bdellium and the

onyx-stone: surely this is mentioned that the

wealth of which the land of Havilah boasted

might be as foil to that which was the glory

of the land of Eden. Havilah had gold, and

spices, and precious stones; but Eden had

that which was infinitely better, the tree of

life, and communion with God. So we may

say of the Africans and Indians: “They have

the gold, but we have the gospel. The gold

of their land is good, but the riches of ours

are infinitely better.”

     

II. The placing of man in this paradise of

delight,

v. 15,

where observe,

     

1. How God put him in possession of it:

The Lord God took the man, and put him into

the garden of Eden; so

v. 8, 15.

Note here,

(1.) Man was made out of paradise; for, after

God had formed him, he put him into the

garden: he was made of common clay, not

of paradise-dust. He lived out of Eden before

he lived in it, that he might see that all

the comforts of his paradise-state were owing

to God’s free grace. He could not plead a

tenant-right to the garden, for he was not

born upon the premises, nor had any thing

but what he received; all boasting was hereby

for ever excluded.

(2.) The same God that

was the author of his being was the author

of his bliss; the same hand that made him a

living soul planted the tree of life for him,

and settled him by it. He that made us is

alone able to make us happy; he that is the

former of our bodies and the Father of our

spirits, he, and none but he, can effectually

provide for the felicity of both.

(3.) It adds

much to the comfort of any condition if we

have plainly seen God going before us and

putting us into it. If we have not forced

providence, but followed it, and taken the

hints of direction it has given us, we may

hope to find a paradise where otherwise we

could not have expected it. See

Ps. xlvii. 4.

     

2. How God appointed him business and

employment. He put him there, not like

Leviathan into the waters, to play therein,

but to dress the garden and to keep it. Paradise

itself was not a place of exemption

from work. Note, here,

(1.) We were none

of us sent into the world to be idle. He that

made us these souls and bodies has given us

something to work with; and he that gave us

this earth for our habitation has made us

something to work on. If a high extraction,

or a great estate, or a large dominion, or

perfect innocency, or a genius for pure contemplation,

or a small family, could have

given a man a writ of ease, Adam would not

have been set to work; but he that gave us

being has given us business, to serve him and

our generation, and to work out our salvation:

if we do not mind our business, we are

unworthy of our being and maintenance.

(2.) Secular employments will vary well consist

with a state of innocency and a life of

communion with God. The sons and heirs

of heaven, while they are here in this world,

have something to do about this earth, which

must have its share of their time and thoughts;

and, if they do it with an eye to God, they

are as truly serving him in it as when they

are upon their knees.

(3.) The husbandman’s

calling is an ancient and honourable

calling; it was needful even in paradise.

The garden of Eden, though it needed not

to be weeded (for thorns and thistles were

not yet a nuisance), yet must be dressed and

kept. Nature, even in its primitive state,

left room for the improvements of art and

industry. It was a calling fit for a state of

innocency, making provision for life, not for

lust, and giving man an opportunity of admiring

the Creator and acknowledging his

providence: while his hands were about his

trees, his heart might be with his God.

(4.) There is a true pleasure in the business which

God calls us to, and employs us in. Adam’s

work was so far from being an allay that it

was an addition to the pleasures of paradise;

he could not have been happy if he had

been idle: it is still a law, He that will not

work has no right to eat,

2 Thess. iii. 10; Prov. xxvii. 23.

     

III. The command which God gave to

man in innocency, and the covenant he then

took him into. Hitherto we have seen God

as man’s powerful Creator and his bountiful

Benefactor; now he appears as his Ruler and

Lawgiver. God put him into the garden of

Eden, not to live there as he might list, but

to be under government. As we are not

allowed to be idle in this world, and to do

nothing, so we are not allowed to be wilful,

and do what we please. When God had

given man a dominion over the creatures, he

would let him know that still he himself was

under the government of his Creator.



The Tree of Knowledge Prohibited. B. C. 4004.

     

16 And the LORD God commanded

the man, saying, Of every tree of the

garden thou mayest freely eat:

  17 But of the tree of the knowledge of

good and evil, thou shalt not eat of

it: for in the day that thou eatest

thereof thou shalt surely die.

     

Observe here,

I. God’s authority over man,

as a creature that had reason and freedom of

will. The Lord God commanded the man,

who stood now as a public person, the father

and representative of all mankind, to receive

law, as he had lately received a nature, for

himself and all his. God commanded all the

creatures, according to their capacity; the

settled course of nature is a law,

Ps. cxlviii. 6; civ. 9.

The brute-creatures have their

respective instincts; but man was made capable

of performing reasonable service, and

therefore received, not only the command of

a Creator, but the command of a Prince and

Master. Though Adam was a very great

man, a very good man, and a very happy

man, yet the Lord God commanded him;

and the command was no disparagement to

his greatness, no reproach to his goodness,

nor any diminution at all to his happiness.

Let us acknowledge God’s right to rule us,

and our own obligations to be ruled by him;

and never allow any will of our own in contradiction

to, or competition with, the holy

will of God.

     

II. The particular act of this authority, in

prescribing to him what he should do, and

upon what terms he should stand with his

Creator. Here is,

     

1. A confirmation of his present happiness

to him, in that grant, Of every tree in

the garden thou mayest freely eat. This was

not only an allowance of liberty to him, in

taking the delicious fruits of paradise, as a

recompence for his care and pains in dressing

and keeping it

(1 Cor. ix. 7, 10),

but it

was, withal, an assurance of life to him, immortal

life, upon his obedience. For the

tree of life being put in the midst of the garden

(v. 9),

as the heart and soul of it, doubtless

God had an eye to that especially in this

grant; and therefore when, upon his revolt,

this grant is recalled, no notice is taken of

any tree of the garden as prohibited to him,

except the tree of life

(ch. iii. 22),

of which it

is there said he might have eaten and lived

for ever, that is, never died, nor ever lost his

happiness. “Continue holy as thou art, in

conformity to thy Creator’s will, and thou

shalt continue happy as thou art in the enjoyment

of thy Creator’s favour, either in this

paradise or in a better.” Thus, upon condition

of perfect personal and perpetual obedience,

Adam was sure of paradise to himself

and his heirs for ever.

     

2. A trial of his obedience, upon pain of

the forfeiture of all his happiness: “But of

the other tree which stood very near the tree

of life (for they are both said to be in the

midst of the garden), and which was called

the tree of knowledge, in the day thou eatest

thereof, thou shalt surely die;” as if he had

said, “Know, Adam, that thou art now

upon thy good behaviour, thou art put into

paradise upon trial; be observant, be obedient,

and thou art made for ever; otherwise

thou wilt be as miserable as now thou art

happy.” Here,

     

(1.) Adam is threatened with death in case

of disobedience: Dying thou shalt die, denoting

a sure and dreadful sentence, as, in

the former part of this covenant, eating thou

shalt eat, denotes a free and full grant. Observe

[1.] Even Adam, in innocency, was

awed with a threatening; fear is one of the

handles of the soul, by which it is taken hold

of and held. If he then needed this hedge,

much more do we now.

[2.] The penalty

threatened is death: Thou shalt die, that is,

“Thou shalt be debarred from the tree of

life, and all the good that is signified by it,

all the happiness thou hast, either in possession

or prospect; and thou shalt become

liable to death, and all the miseries that preface

it and attend it.”

[3.] This was

threatened as the immediate consequence of

sin: In the day thou eatest, thou shalt die,

that is, “Thou shalt become mortal and

capable of dying; the grant of immortality

shall be recalled, and that defence shall depart

from thee. Thou shalt become obnoxious

to death, like a condemned malefactor

that is dead in the law” (only, because Adam

was to be the root of mankind, he was reprieved);

“nay, the harbingers and forerunners

of death shall immediately seize thee,

and thy life, thenceforward, shall be a dying

life: and this, surely; it is a settled rule, the

soul that sinneth, it shall die.

     

(2.) Adam is tried with a positive law, not

to eat of the fruit of the tree of knowledge.

Now it was very proper to make trial of his

obedience by such a command as this,

[1.] Because the reason of it is fetched purely

from the will of the Law-maker. Adam had

in his nature an aversion to that which was

evil in itself, and therefore he is tried in a

thing which was evil only because it was

forbidden; and, being in a small thing, it

was the more fit to prove his obedience by.

[2.] Because the restraint of it is laid upon

the desires of the flesh and of the mind,

which, in the corrupt nature of man, are the

two great fountains of sin. This prohibition

checked both his appetite towards sensitive

delights and his ambitions of curious knowledge,

that his body might be ruled by his

soul and his soul by his God.

     

Thus easy, thus happy, was man in a state

of innocency, having all that heart could

wish to make him so. How good was God

to him! How many favours did he load

him with! How easy were the laws he gave

him! How kind the covenant he made with

him! Yet man, being in honour, understood

not his own interest, but soon became

as the beasts that perish.




Adam’s Dominion. B. C. 4004.

     

18 And the LORD God said, It is

not good that the man should be

alone; I will make him an help meet

for him.

  19 And out of the ground

the LORD God formed every beast of

the field, and every fowl of the air;

and brought them unto Adam to see

what he would call them: and whatsoever

Adam called every living creature,

that was the name thereof.

  20 And Adam gave names to all cattle,

and to the fowl of the air, and to

every beast of the field; but for Adam

there was not found an help meet for

him.

     

Here we have,

I. An instance of the

Creator’s care of man and his fatherly concern

for his comfort,

v. 18.

Though God

had let him know that he was a subject, by

giving him a command,

(v. 16, 17),

yet here

he lets him know also, for his encouragement

in his obedience, that he was a friend,

and a favourite, and one whose satisfaction

he was tender of. Observe,

     

1. How God graciously pitied his solitude:

It is not good that man, this man,

should be alone. Though there was an upper

world of angels and a lower world of brutes,

and he between them, yet there being none

of the same nature and rank of beings with

himself, none that he could converse familiarly

with, he might be truly said to be

alone. Now he that made him knew both

him and what was good for him, better than

he did himself, and he said, “It is not good

that he should continue thus alone.”

(1.) It

is not for his comfort; for man is a sociable

creature. It is a pleasure to him to exchange

knowledge and affection with those of his

own kind, to inform and to be informed, to

love and to be beloved. What God here

says of the first man Solomon says of all

men

(Eccl. iv. 9,

&c.), that two are better than

one, and woe to him that is alone. If there

were but one man in the world, what a melancholy

man must he needs be! Perfect

solitude would turn a paradise into a desert,

and a palace into a dungeon. Those therefore

are foolish who are selfish and would be

place alone in the earth.

(2.) It is not for

the increase and continuance of his kind.

God could have made a world of men at first,

to replenish the earth, as he replenished

heaven with a world of angels: but the place

would have been too strait for the designed

number of men to live together at once;

therefore God saw fit to make up that number

by a succession of generations, which, as

God had formed man, must be from two,

and those male and female; one will be

ever one.

     

2. How God graciously resolved to provide

society for him. The result of this reasoning

concerning him was this kind resolution,

I will make a help-meet for him; a help like

him (so some read it), one of the same nature

and the same rank of beings; a help near him

(so others), one to cohabit with him, and to

be always at hand; a help before him (so

others), one that he should look upon with

pleasure and delight. Note hence,

(1.) In

our best state in this world we have need of

one another’s help; for we are members one

of another, and the eye cannot say to the hand,

I have no need of thee,
1 Cor. xii. 21.

We must therefore be glad to receive help from

others, and give help to others, as there is

occasion.

(2.) It is God only who perfectly

knows our wants, and is perfectly able to

supply them all,

Phil. iv. 19.

In him alone

our help is, and from him are all our helpers.

(3.) A suitable wife is a help-meet, and is

from the Lord. The relation is then likely

to be comfortable when meetness directs and

determines the choice, and mutual helpfulness

is the constant care and endeavour,

1 Cor. vii. 33, 34.

(4.) Family-society, if it is agreeable,

is a redress sufficient for the grievance

of solitude. He that has a good God, a good

heart, and a good wife, to converse with, and

yet complains he wants conversation, would

not have been easy and content in paradise;

for Adam himself had no more: yet, even

before Eve was created, we do not find that

he complained of being alone, knowing that

he was not alone, for the Father was with him.

Those that are most satisfied in God and his

favour are in the best way, and in the best

frame, to receive the good things of this life,

and shall be sure of them, as far as Infinite

Wisdom sees good.

     

II. An instance of the creatures’ subjection

to man, and his dominion over them

(v. 19, 20):

Every beast of the field and every fowl of the

air God brought to Adam, either by the ministry

of angels, or by a special instinct,

directing them to come to man as their master,

teaching the ox betimes to know his

owner. Thus God gave man livery and seisin

of the fair estate he had granted him, and

put him in possession of his dominion over

the creatures. God brought them to him,

that he might name them, and so might give,

1. A proof of his knowledge, as a creature

endued with the faculties both of reason and

speech, and so taught more than the beasts of

the earth and made wiser than the fowls of

heaven,
Job xxxv. 11.

And,

2. A proof of

his power. It is an act of authority to impose

names

(Dan. i. 7),

and of subjection to

receive them. The inferior creatures did now,

as it were, do homage to their prince at his

inauguration, and swear fealty and allegiance

to him. If Adam had continued faithful to

his God, we may suppose the creatures themselves

would so well have known and remembered

the names Adam now gave them

as to have come at his call, at any time, and

answered to their names. God gave names

to the day and night, to the firmament, to

the earth, and to the sea; and he calleth the

stars by their names, to show that he is the

supreme Lord of these. But he gave Adam

leave to name the beasts and fowls, as their

subordinate lord; for, having made him in

his own image, he thus put some of his honour

upon him.

     

III. An instance of the creatures’ insufficiency

to be a happiness for man: But (among

them all) for Adam there was not found a help

meet for him. Some make these to be the

words of Adam himself; observing all the

creatures come to him by couples to be named,

he thus intimates his desire to his Maker:–“Lord,

these have all helps meet for them;

but what shall I do? Here is never a one

for me.” It is rather God’s judgment upon

the review. He brought them all together,

to see if there were ever a suitable match for

Adam in any of the numerous families of the

inferior creatures; but there was none. Observe

here,

1. The dignity and excellency of

the human nature. On earth there was not

its like, nor its peer to be found among all

visible creatures; they were all looked over,

but it could not be matched among them all.

2. The vanity of this world and the things of

it; put them all together, and they will not

make a help-meet for man. They will not

suit the nature of his soul, nor supply its

needs, nor satisfy its just desires, nor run

parallel with its never-failing duration. God

creates a new thing to be a help-meet for

man–not so much the woman as the seed

of the woman.






The Formation of Eve; Marriage Instituted. B. C. 4004.

     

21 And the LORD God caused a

deep sleep to fall upon Adam, and he

slept: and he took one of his ribs, and

closed up the flesh instead thereof;

  22 And the rib, which the LORD

God had taken from man, made he

a woman, and brought her unto the

man.

  23 And Adam said, This is

now bone of my bones, and flesh of

my flesh: she shall be called Woman,

because she was taken out of Man.

  24 Therefore shall a man leave his

father and his mother, and shall

cleave unto his wife: and they shall

be one flesh.

  25 And they were

both naked, the man and his wife,

and were not ashamed.

     

Here we have,

I. The making of the woman,

to be a help-meet for Adam. This was

done upon the sixth day, as was also the

placing of Adam in paradise, though it is

here mentioned after an account of the seventh

day’s rest; but what was said in general

(ch. i. 27),

that God made man male and female,

is more distinctly related here. Observe,

1. That Adam was first formed, then

Eve

(1 Tim. ii. 13),

and she was made of the

man, and for the man

(1 Cor. xi. 8, 9),

all which are urged there as reasons for the humility,

modesty, silence, and submissiveness,

of that sex in general, and particularly the

subjection and reverence which wives owe to

their own husbands. Yet man being made

last of the creatures, as the best and most

excellent of all, Eve’s being made after Adam,

and out of him, puts an honour upon that

sex, as the glory of the man,

1 Cor. xi. 7.

If man is the head, she is the crown, a crown to

her husband, the crown of the visible creation.

The man was dust refined, but the woman

was dust double-refined, one remove further

from the earth.

2. That Adam slept while

his wife was in making, that no room might

be left to imagine that he had herein directed

the Spirit of the Lord, or been his counsellor,
Isa. xl. 13.

He had been made sensible of

his want of a meet help; but, God having

undertaken to provide him one, he does not

afflict himself with any care about it, but lies

down and sleeps sweetly, as one that had cast

all his care on God, with a cheerful resignation

of himself and all his affairs to his

Maker’s will and wisdom. Jehovah-jireh,

let the Lord provide when and whom he

pleases. If we graciously rest in God, God

will graciously work for us and work all for

good.

3. That God caused a sleep to fall on

Adam, and made it a deep sleep, that so the

opening of his side might be no grievance to

him; while he knows no sin, God will take

care he shall feel no pain. When God, by

his providence, does that to his people which

is grievous to flesh and blood, he not only

consults their happiness in the issue, but by

his grace he can so quiet and compose their

spirits as to make them easy under the

sharpest operations.

4. That the woman

was made of a rib out of the side of Adam;

not made out of his head to rule over him,

nor out of his feet to be trampled upon by

him, but out of his side to be equal with him,

under his arm to be protected, and near his

heart to be beloved. Adam lost a rib, and

without any diminution to his strength or

comeliness (for, doubtless, the flesh was closed

without a scar); but in lieu thereof he had a

help meet for him, which abundantly made

up his loss: what God takes away from his

people he will, one way or other, restore with

advantage. In this (as in many other things)

Adam was a figure of him that was to come;

for out of the side of Christ, the second

Adam, his spouse the church was formed,

when he slept the sleep, the deep sleep, of

death upon the cross, in order to which his

side was opened, and there came out blood

and water, blood to purchase his church and

water to purify it to himself. See

Eph. v. 25, 26.

     

II. The marriage of the woman to Adam.

Marriage is honourable, but this surely was

the most honourable marriage that ever was,

in which God himself had all along an immediate

hand. Marriages (they say) are

made in heaven: we are sure this was, for

the man, the woman, the match, were all

God’s own work; he, by his power, made

them both, and now, by his ordinance, made

them one. This was a marriage made in

perfect innocency, and so was never any

marriage since,

1. God, as her Father,

brought the woman to the man, as his

second self, and a help-meet for him. When

he had made her, he did not leave her to

her own disposal; no, she was his child, and

she must not marry without his consent.

Those are likely to settle to their comfort

who by faith and prayer, and a humble dependence

upon providence, put themselves

under a divine conduct. That wife that is

of God’s making by special grace, and of

God’s bringing by special providence, is

likely to prove a help-meet for a man.

2. From God, as his Father, Adam received her

(v. 23):

This is now bone of my bone. Now

I have what I wanted, and which all the

creatures could not furnish me with, a help

meet for me.” God’s gifts to us are to be

received with a humble thankful acknowledgment

of his wisdom in suiting them to

us, and his favour in bestowing them on us.

Probably it was revealed to Adam in a vision,

when he was asleep, that this lovely creature,

now presented to him, was a piece of himself,

and was to be his companion and the

wife of his covenant. Hence some have

fetched an argument to prove that glorified

saints in the heavenly paradise shall know

one another. Further, in token of his acceptance

of her, he gave her a name, not

peculiar to her, but common to her sex:

She shall be called woman, Isha, a she-man,

differing from man in sex only, not in nature–made

of man, and joined to man.

     

III. The institution of the ordinance of

marriage, and the settling of the law of it,

v. 24.

The sabbath and marriage were two

ordinances instituted in innocency, the

former for the preservation of the church,

the latter for the preservation of the world of

mankind. It appears (by

Matt. xix. 4, 5)

that it was God himself who said here, “A

man must leave all his relations, to cleave

to his wife;” but whether he spoke it by

Moses, the penman, or by Adam (who spoke,

v. 23),

is uncertain. It should seem, they

are the words of Adam, in God’s name,

laying down this law to all his posterity.

1. See here how great the virtue of a divine ordinance

is; the bonds of it are stronger even

than those of nature. To whom can we be

more firmly bound than the fathers that

begat us and the mothers that bore us? Yet

the son must quit them, to be joined to his

wife, and the daughter forget them, to cleave

to her husband,

Ps. xlv. 10, 11.

2. See how

necessary it is that children should take their

parents’ consent along with them in their

marriage, and how unjust those are to their

parents, as well as undutiful, who marry

without it; for they rob them of their right

to them, and interest in them, and alienate

it to another, fraudulently and unnaturally.

3. See what need there is both of prudence

and prayer in the choice of this relation,

which is so near and so lasting. That had

need be well done which is to be done for

life.

4. See how firm the bond of marriage

is, not to be divided and weakened by

having many wives

(Mal. ii. 15)

nor to be

broken or cut off by divorce, for any cause

but fornication, or voluntary desertion.

5. See how dear the affection ought to be between

husband and wife, such as there is to

our own bodies,

Eph. v. 28.

These two are

one flesh; let them then be one soul.

     

IV. An evidence of the purity and innocency

of that state wherein our first parents

were created,

v. 25.

They were both naked.

They needed no clothes for defense against

cold nor heat, for neither could be injurious

to them. They needed none for ornament.

Solomon in all his glory was not arrayed like

one of these. Nay, they needed none for

decency; they were naked, and had no

reason to be ashamed. They knew not what

shame was, so the Chaldee reads it. Blushing

is now the colour of virtue, but it was not

then the colour of innocency. Those that

had no sin in their conscience might well

have no shame in their faces, though they

had no clothes to their backs.


[Table of Contents]

[Previous]

[Next]

Matthew Henry
Commentary on the Whole Bible (1706)


Back to Bibles Net . Com – Online Christian Library

Matthew Henry’s Complete Commentary – Free Download

Contact Us


Top