BIBLES NET. COM

Matthew Henry’s Commentary – Genesis, Chapter XI

Matthew Henry’s Complete Commentary

on the Whole Bible

Back to Biblesnet.com Home Page


[Table of Contents]

[Previous]

[Next]

Matthew Henry
Commentary on the Whole Bible (1706)





G E N E S I S

CHAP. XI.



     

The old distinction between the sons of God and the sons of men

(professors and profane) survived the flood, and now appeared

again, when men began to multiply: according to this distinction

we have, in this chapter,

I. The dispersion of the sons of

men at Babel

(ver. 1-9),

where we have,

1. Their presumptuous

provoking design, which was to build a city and a tower,

ver. 1-4.

2. The righteous judgment of God upon them in disappointing

their design, by confounding their language, and so

scattering them,

ver. 5-9.

II. The pedigree of the sons of

God down to Abraham

(ver. 10-26),

with a general account of

his family, and removal out of his native country,

ver. 27,

&c.






The Confusion of Tongues. B. C. 2247.

     

1 And the whole earth was of one

language, and of one speech.

  2 And it came to pass, as they

journeyed from the east, that they

found a plain in the land of Shinar;

and they dwelt there.

  3 And they

said one to another, Go to, let us

make brick, and burn them thoroughly.

And they had brick for stone, and

slime had they for mortar.

  4 And

they said, Go to, let us build us a city

and a tower, whose top may reach

unto heaven; and let us make us a

name, lest we be scattered abroad

upon the face of the whole earth.

     

The close of the foregoing chapter tells

us that by the sons of Noah, or among

the sons of Noah, the nations were divided

in the earth after the flood, that is, were

distinguished into several tribes or colonies;

and, the places having grown too strait for them,

it was either appointed by Noah, or agreed

upon among his sons, which way each several

tribe or colony should steer its course,

beginning with the countries that were next

them, and designing to proceed further and

further, and to remove to a greater distance

from each other, as the increase of their several

companies should require. Thus was

the matter well settled, one hundred years

after the flood, about the time of Peleg’s

birth; but the sons of men, it should seem,

were loth to disperse into distant places; they

thought the more the merrier and the safer,

and therefore they contrived to keep together,

and were slack to go to possess the land

which the Lord God of their fathers had given

them

(Josh. xviii. 3),

thinking themselves wiser

than either God or Noah. Now here we have,

     

I. The advantages which befriended their

design of keeping together,

1. They were

all of one language,
v. 1.

If there were any

different languages before the flood, yet

Noah’s only, which it is likely was the same

with Adam’s, was preserved through the flood,

and continued after it. Now, while they all

understood one another, they would be the

more likely to love one another, and the more

capable of helping one another, and the less

inclinable to separate one from another.

2. They found a very convenient commodious

place to settle in

(v. 2),

a plain in the land of

Shinar, a spacious plain, able to contain them

all, and a fruitful plain, able, according as

their present numbers were, to support them

all, though perhaps they had not considered

what room there would be for them when

their numbers should be increased. Note,

Inviting accommodations, for the present,

often prove too strong temptations to the

neglect of both duty and interest, as it respects

futurity.

     

II. The method they took to bind themselves

to one another, and to settle together

in one body. Instead of coveting to enlarge

their borders by a peaceful departure under

the divine protection, they contrived to fortify

them, and, as those that were resolved to

wage war with Heaven, they put themselves

into a posture of defence. Their unanimous

resolution is, Let us build ourselves a city

and a tower. It is observable that the first

builders of cities, both in the old world

(ch. iv. 17),

and in the new world here, were not

men of the best character and reputation:

tents served God’s subjects to dwell in;

cities were first built by those that were

rebels against him and revolters from him.

Observe here,

     

1. How they excited and encouraged one

another to set about this work. They said,

Go to, let us make brick

(v. 3),

and again,

(v. 4),

Go to, let us build ourselves a city; by

mutual excitements they made one another

more daring and resolute. Note, Great things

may be brought to pass when the undertakers

are numerous and unanimous, and stir up

one another. Let us learn to provoke one

another to love and to good works, as sinners

stir up and encourage one another to wicked

works. See

Ps. cxxii. 1; Isa. ii. 3, 5; Jer. l. 5.

     

2. What materials they used in their building.

The country, being plain, yielded neither

stone nor mortar, yet this did not discourage

them from their undertaking, but they made

brick to serve instead of stone, and slime or

pitch instead of mortar. See here,

(1.) What

shift those will make that are resolute in

their purposes: were we but zealously

affected in a good thing, we should not stop

our work so often as we do, under pretence

that we want conveniences for carrying it on.

(2.) What a difference there is between men’s

building and God’s; when men build their

Babel, brick and slime are their best materials;

but, when God builds his Jerusalem, he lays

even the foundations of it with sapphires, and

all its borders with pleasant stones,
Isa. liv. 11, 12; Rev. xxi. 19.

     

3. For what ends they built. Some think

they intended hereby to secure themselves

against the waters of another flood. God

had told them indeed that he would not again

drown the world; but they would trust to

a tower of their own making, rather than to

a promise of God’s making or an ark of his

appointing. If, however, they had had this

in their eye, they would have chosen to build

their tower upon a mountain rather than

upon a plain, but three things, it seems, they

aimed at in building this tower:–

     

(1.) It seems designed for an affront to

God himself; for they would build a tower

whose top might reach to heaven, which bespeaks

a defiance of God, or at least a rivalship

with him. They would be like the Most

High, or would come as near him as they could,

not in holiness but in height. They forgot

their place, and, scorning to creep on the

earth, resolved to climb to heaven, not by the

door or ladder, but some other way.

     

(2.) They hoped hereby to make themselves

a name; they would do something to

be talked of now, and to give posterity to

know that there had been such men as they

in the world. Rather than die and leave no

memorandum behind them, they would leave

this monument of their pride, and ambition,

and folly. Note,

[1.] Affectation of honour

and a name among men commonly inspires

with a strange ardour for great and difficult

undertakings, and often betrays to that which

is evil and offensive to God.

[2.] It is just

with God to bury those names in the dust

which are raised by sin. These Babel-builders

put themselves to a great deal of foolish expense

to make themselves a name; but they

could not gain even this point, for we do not

find in any history the name of so much as

one of these Babel-builders. Philo Judæus

says, They engraved every one his name upon

a brick, in perpetuam rei memoriam–as a

perpetual memorial; yet neither did this serve

their purpose.

     

(3.) They did it to prevent their dispersion:

Lest we be scattered abroad upon the face of

the earth. “It was done” (says Josephus)

“in disobedience to that command

(ch. ix. 1),

Replenish the earth.” God orders them to

disperse. “No,” say they, “we will not, we

will live and die together.” In order hereunto,

they engage themselves and one another in

this vast undertaking. That they might

unite in one glorious empire, they resolve to

build this city and tower, to be the metropolis

of their kingdom and the centre of their unity.

It is probable that the band of ambitious

Nimrod was in all this. He could

not content himself with the command of a

particular colony, but aimed at universal

monarchy, in order to which, under pretence

of uniting for their common safety, he contrives

to keep them in one body, that, having

them all under his eye, he might not fail

to have them under his power. See the daring

presumption of these sinners. Here is,

[1.] A bold opposition to God: “You shall be

scattered,” says God. “But we will not,”

say they. Woe unto him that thus strives

with his Maker.

[2.] A bold competition

with God. It is God’s prerogative to be universal

monarch, Lord of all, and King of

kings; the man that aims at it offers to step

into the throne of God, who will not give his

glory to another.





     

5 And the LORD came down to

see the city and the tower, which the

children of men builded.

  6 And the

LORD said, Behold, the people is one,

and they have all one language; and

this they begin to do: and now nothing

will be restrained from them,

which they have imagined to do.

  7 Go to, let us go down, and there

confound their language, that they

may not understand one another’s

speech.

  8 So the LORD scattered

them abroad from thence upon the

face of all the earth: and they left

off to build the city.

  9 Therefore is

the name of it called Babel; because

the LORD did there confound the

language of all the earth: and from

thence did the LORD scatter them

abroad upon the face of all the earth.

     

We have here the quashing of the project

of the Babel-builders, and the turning of the

counsel of those froward men headlong, that

God’s counsel might stand in spite of them.

Here is,

     

I. The cognizance God took of the design

that was on foot: The Lord came down to see the

city,
v. 5.

It is an expression after the manner

of men; he knew it as clearly and fully as men

know that which they come to the place to

view. Observe,

1. Before he gave judgment

upon their cause, he enquired into it; for

God is incontestably just and fair in all his

proceedings against sin and sinners, and condemns none

unheard.

2. It is spoken of as

an act of condescension in God to take notice

even of this building, which the undertakers

were so proud of; for he humbles himself

to behold the transactions, even the

most considerable ones, of this lower world,

Ps. cxiii. 6..

3. It is said to be the tower

which the children of men built, which intimates,

(1.) Their weakness and frailty as

men. It was a very foolish thing for the

children of men, worms of the earth, to defy

Heaven, and to provoke the Lord to jealousy.

Are they stronger than he?

(2.) Their sinfulness

and obnoxiousness. They were the sons

of Adam, so it is in the Hebrew; nay, of that

Adam, that sinful disobedient Adam, whose

children are by nature children of disobedience,

children that are corrupters.

(3.) Their

distinction from the children of God, the professors

of religion, from whom these daring

builders had separated themselves, and built

this tower to support and perpetuate the separation.

Pious Eber is not found among

this ungodly crew; for he and his are called

the children of God, and therefore their souls

come not into the secret, nor unite themselves

to the assembly, of these children of men.

     

II. The counsels and resolves of the Eternal

God concerning this matter; he did not

come down merely as a spectator, but as a

judge, as a prince, to look upon these proud

men, and abase them,
Job xl. 11-14.

Observe,

     

1. He suffered them to proceed a good

way in their enterprise before he put a

stop to it, that they might have space to

repent, and, if they had so much consideration

left, might be ashamed of it and weary

of it themselves; and if not that their disappointment

might be the more shameful, and

every one that passed by might laugh at

them, saying, These men began to build, and

were not able to finish, that so the works of

their hands, from which they promised themselves

immortal honour, might turn to their

perpetual reproach. Note, God has wise and

holy ends in permitting the enemies of his glory

to carry on their impious projects a great way,

and to prosper long in their enterprises.

     

2. When they had, with much care and

toil, made some considerable progress in their

building, then God determined to break their

measures and disperse them. Observe,

     

(1.) The righteousness of God, which

appears in the considerations upon which

he proceeded in this resolution,

v. 6.

Two things he considered:–

[1.] Their oneness,

as a reason why they must be scattered:

Behold, the people are one, and they have all

one language. If they continue one, much of

the earth will be left uninhabited; the power

of their prince will soon be exorbitant; wickedness

and profaneness will be insufferably

rampant, for they will strengthen one another’s

hands in it; and, which is worst of

all, there will be an overbalance to the church,

and these children of men, if thus incorporated,

will swallow up the little remnant of

God’s children.” Therefore it is decreed that

they must not be one. Note, Unity is a policy,

but it is not the infallible mark of a true

church; yet, while the builders of Babel,

though of different families, dispositions, and

interests, were thus unanimous in opposing

God, what a pity is it, and what a shame, that

the builders of Sion, though united in one

common head and Spirit, should be divided,

as they are, in serving God! But marvel not

at the matter. Christ came not to send peace.

[2.] Their obstinacy: Now nothing will be

restrained from them; and this is a reason

why they must be crossed and thwarted in

their design. God had tried, by his commands

and admonitions, to bring them off

from this project, but in vain; therefore he

must take another course with them. See

here, First, The sinfulness of sin, and the

wilfulness of sinners; ever since Adam would

not be restrained from the forbidden tree, his

unsanctified seed have been impatient of restraint

and ready to rebel against it. Secondly,

See the necessity of God’s judgments

upon earth, to keep the world in some order

and to tie the hands of those that will not be

checked by law.

     

(2.) The wisdom and mercy of God in the

methods that were taken for the defeating of

this enterprise

(v. 7):

Go to, let us go down,

and there confound their language. This was

not spoken to the angels, as if God needed

either their advice or their assistance, but

God speaks it to himself, or the Father to the

Son and Holy Ghost. They said, Go to, let

us make brick, and Go to, let us build a tower,

animating one another to the attempt; and

now God says, Go to, let us confound their

language; for, if men stir up themselves to

sin, God will stir up himself to take vengeance,

Isa. lix. 17, 18.

Now observe here,

[1.] The mercy of God, in moderating the

penalty, and not making it proportionable to

the offence; for he deals not with us according

to our sins. He does not say, “Let us go

down now in thunder and lightning, and consume

those rebels in a moment;” or, “Let

the earth open, and swallow up them and

their building, and let those go down quickly

into hell who are climbing to heaven the

wrong way.” No; only, “Let us go down,

and scatter them.” They deserved death,

but are only banished or transported; for the

patience of God is very great towards a provoking

world. Punishments are chiefly reserved

for the future state. God’s judgments

on sinners in this life, compared with those

which are reserved, are little more than restraints.

[2.] The wisdom of God, in pitching

upon an effectual expedient to stay

proceedings, which was the confounding of

their language, that they might not understand

one another’s speech, nor could they

well join hands when their tongues were

divided; so that this would be a very proper

method both for taking them off from their

building (for, if they could not understand

one another, they could not help one another)

and also for disposing them to scatter; for,

when they could not understand one another,

they could not take pleasure in one another.

Note, God has various means, and effectual

ones, to baffle and defeat the projects of

proud men that set themselves against him,

and particularly to divide them among themselves,

either by dividing their spirits

(Judg. ix. 23),

or by dividing their tongues, as David

prays,

Ps. lv. 9.

     

III. The execution of these counsels of

God, to the blasting and defeating of the

counsels of men,

v. 8, 9.

God made them

know whose word should stand, his or theirs,

as the expression is,

Jer. xliv. 28.

Notwithstanding

their oneness and obstinacy, God

was too hard for them, and wherein they dealt

proudly he was above them; for who ever

hardened his heart against him and prospered?

Three things were done:–

     

1. Their language was confounded. God,

who, when he made man, taught him to

speak, and put words into his mouth fit to

express the conceptions of his mind by, now

caused these builders to forget their former

language, and to speak and understand a new

one, which yet was common to those of the

same tribe or family, but not to others: those

of one colony could converse together, but

not with those of another. Now,

(1.) This

was a great miracle, and a proof of the power

which God has upon the minds and tongues

of men, which he turns as the rivers of water.

(2.) This was a great judgment upon these

builders; for, being thus deprived of the

knowledge of the ancient and holy tongue,

they had become incapable of communicating

with the true church, in which it was retained,

and probably it contributed much to their

loss of the knowledge of the true God.

(3.) We

all suffer by it, to this day. In all the inconveniences

we sustain by the diversity of languages,

and all the pains and trouble we are

at to learn the languages we have occasion

for, we smart for the rebellion of our ancestors

at Babel. Nay, and those unhappy

controversies which are strifes of words, and

arise from our misunderstanding one another’s

language, for aught I know are owing

to this confusion of tongues.

(4.) The project

of some to frame a universal character,

in order to a universal language, how desirable

soever it may seem, is yet, I think, but

a vain thing to attempt; for it is to strive

against a divine sentence, by which the languages

of the nations will be divided while

the world stands.

(5.) We may here lament

the loss of the universal use of the Hebrew

tongue, which from this time was the vulgar

language of the Hebrews only, and continued

so till the captivity in Babylon, where, even

among them, it was exchanged for the Syriac.

(6.) As the confounding of tongues divided

the children of men and scattered them

abroad, so the gift of tongues, bestowed upon

the apostles

(Acts ii.),

contributed greatly to

the gathering together of the children of God,

who were scattered abroad, and the uniting of

them in Christ, that with one mind and one

mouth they might glorify God,

Rom. xv. 6.

     

2. Their building was stopped: They left

off to build the city. This was the effect of

the confusion of their tongues; for it not

only incapacitated them for helping one another,

but probably struck such a damp upon

their spirits that they could not proceed,

since they saw, in this, the hand of the Lord

gone out against them. Note,

(1.) It is wisdom

to leave off that which we see God fights

against.

(2.) God is ale to blast and bring

to nought all the devices and designs of

Babel-builders. He sits in heaven, and

laughs at the counsels of the kings of the

earth against him and his anointed; and will

force them to confess that there is no wisdom

nor counsel against the Lord,

Prov. xxi. 30; Isa. viii. 9, 10.

     

3. The builders were scattered abroad upon

the face of the whole earth,

v. 8, 9.

They

departed in companies, after their families,

and after their tongues

(ch. x. 5, 20, 31),

to the several countries and places allotted to

them in the division that had been made,

which they knew before, but would not go to

take possession of till now that they were

forced to it. Observe here,

(1.) The very

thing which they feared came upon them.

That dispersion which sought to evade by

an act of rebellion they by this act brought

upon themselves; for we are most likely to fall

into that trouble which we seek to evade by

indirect and sinful methods.

(2.) It was

God’s work: The Lord scattered them. God’s

hand is to be acknowledged in all scattering

providences; if the family be scattered, relations

scattered, churches scattered, it is the

Lord’s doing.

(3.) Though they were as

firmly in league with one another as could

be, yet the Lord scattered them; for no man

can keep together what God will put asunder.

(4.) Thus God justly took vengeance on them

for their oneness in that presumptuous attempt

to build their tower. Shameful dispersions

are the just punishment of sinful

unions. Simeon and Levi, who had been

brethren in iniquity, were divided in Jacob,

ch. xlix. 5, 7; Ps. lxxxiii. 3-13.

(5.) They left behind them a perpetual memorandum

of their reproach, in the name given to the

place. It was called Babel, confusion. Those

that aim at a great name commonly come off

with a bad name.

(6.) The children of men

were now finally scattered, and never did, nor

ever will, come all together again, till the

great day, when the Son of man shall sit

upon the throne of his glory, and all nations

shall be gathered before him,

Matt. xxv. 31, 32.

















     

10 These are the generations of

Shem: Shem was a hundred years old,

and begat Arphaxad two years after the

flood:

  11 And Shem lived after he

begat Arphaxad five hundred years,

and begat sons and daughters.

  12 And Arphaxad lived five and thirty

years, and begat Salah:

  13 And Arphaxad

lived after he begat Salah

four hundred and three years, and

begat sons and daughters.

  14 And

Salah lived thirty years, and begat

Eber:

  15 And Salah lived after he

begat Eber four hundred and three

years, and begat sons and daughters.

  16 And Eber lived four and thirty

years, and begat Peleg:

  17 And

Eber lived after he begat Peleg four

hundred and thirty years, and begat

sons and daughters.

  18 And Peleg

lived thirty years, and begat Reu:

  19 And Peleg lived after he begat

Reu two hundred and nine years, and

begat sons and daughters.

  20 And

Reu lived two and thirty years, and

begat Serug:

  21 And Reu lived

after he begat Serug two hundred

and seven years, and begat sons and

daughters.

  22 And Serug lived thirty

years, and begat Nahor:

  23 And

Serug lived after he begat Nahor two

hundred years, and begat sons and

daughters.

  24 And Nahor lived nine

and twenty years, and begat Terah:

  25 And Nahor lived after he begat

Terah a hundred and nineteen years,

and begat sons and daughters.

  26 And Terah lived seventy years, and

begat Abram, Nahor, and Haran.

     

We have here a genealogy, not an endless

genealogy, for here it ends in Abram, the

friend of God, and leads further to Christ,

the promised seed, who was the son of Abram,

and from Abram the genealogy of Christ is

reckoned

(Matt. i. 1,

&c.);

so that put

ch. v., ch. xi., and Matt. i,

together, and you have

such an entire genealogy of Jesus Christ as

cannot be produced, for aught I know, concerning

any person in the world, out of his line,

and at such a distance from the fountain-head.

And, laying these three genealogies

together, we shall find that twice ten,

and thrice fourteen, generations or descents,

passed between the first and second Adam,

making it clear concerning Christ that he was

not only the Son of Abraham, but the Son of

man, and the seed of woman. Observe here,

1. Nothing is left upon record concerning

those of this line but their names and

ages, the Holy Ghost seeming to hasten

through them to the story of Abram. How

little do we know of those that have gone before

us in this world, even those that lived in

the same places where we live, as we likewise

know little of those that are our contemporaries

in distant places! we have enough

to do to mind the work of our own day, and

let God alone to require that which is past,
Eccl. iii. 15.

2. There was an observable

gradual decrease in the years of their lives.

Shem reached to 600 years, which yet fell

short of the age of the patriarchs before the

flood; the next three came short of 500; the

next three did not reach to 300; after them

we read not of any that attained to 200, except

Terah; and, not many ages after this, Moses

reckoned seventy, or eighty, to be the utmost

men ordinarily arrive at. When the earth

began to be replenished, men’s lives began to

shorten; so that the decrease is to be imputed

to the wise disposal of Providence,

rather than to any decay of nature. For the

elect’s sake, men’s days are shortened; and,

being evil, it is well they are few, and attain

not to the years of the lives of our fathers,
ch. xlvii. 9.

3. Eber, from whom the Hebrews

were denominated, was the longest-lived

of any that was born after the flood,

which perhaps was the reward of his singular

piety and strict adherence to the ways of God.







The Generations of Terah. B. C. 1921.

     

27 Now these are the generations

of Terah: Terah begat Abram, Nahor,

and Haran; and Haran begat Lot.

  28 And Haran died before his father

Terah in the land of his nativity, in

Ur of the Chaldees.

  29 And Abram

and Nahor took them wives: the

name of Abram’s wife was Sarai; and

the name of Nahor’s wife, Milcah,

the daughter of Haran, the father of

Milcah, and the father of Iscah.

  30 But Sarai was barren; she had no

child.

  31 And Terah took Abram

his son, and Lot the son of Haran

his son’s son, and Sarai his daughter

in law, his son Abram’s wife; and

they went forth with them from Ur,

of the Chaldees, to go into the land

of Canaan; and they came unto Haran,

and dwelt there.

  32 And the

days of Terah were two hundred and

five years: and Terah died in Haran.

     

Here begins the story of Abram, whose

name is famous, henceforward, in both Testaments.

We have here,

     

I. His country: Ur of the Chaldees. This

was the land of his nativity, an idolatrous

country, where even the children of Eber

themselves had degenerated. Note, Those

who are, through grace, heirs of the land of

promise, ought to remember what was the

land of their nativity, what was their corrupt

and sinful state by nature, the rock out of

which they were hewn.

     

II. His relations, mentioned for his sake,

and because of their interest in the following

story.

1. His father was Terah, of whom it

is said

(Josh. xxiv. 2)

that he served other

gods, on the other side of the flood, so early

did idolatry gain footing in the world, and

so hard is it even for those that have some

good principles to swim against the stream.

Though it is said

(v. 26)

that when Terah

was seventy years old he begat Abram,

Nahor, and Haran (which seems to tell us

that Abram was the eldest son of Terah, and

was born in his seventieth year), yet, by

comparing

v. 32,

which makes Terah to die

in his 205th year, with

Acts vii. 4

(where it

is said that he was but seventy-five

years old when he removed from Haran), it

appears that he was born in the 130th year

of Terah, and probably was his youngest

son; for, in God’s choices, the last are often

first and the first last. We have,

2. Some

account of his brethren.

(1.) Nahor, out of

whose family both Isaac and Jacob had

their wives.

(2.) Haran, the father of Lot, of

whom it is here said

(v. 28)

that he died before his father Terah. Note, Children

cannot be sure that they shall survive their

parents; for death does not go by seniority,

taking the eldest first. The shadow of death

is without any order,
Job x. 22.

It is likewise

said that he died in Ur of the Chaldees, before

the happy removal of the family out of that

idolatrous country. Note, It concerns us

to hasten out of our natural state, lest death

surprise us in it.

3. His wife was Sarai,

who some think, was the same with Iscah,

the daughter of Haran. Abram himself says

of her that she was the daughter of his father,

but not the daughter of his mother,

ch. xx. 12.

She was ten years younger than Abram.

     

III. His departure out of Ur of the Chaldees,

with his father Terah, his nephew Lot,

and the rest of his family, in obedience to

the call of God, of which we shall read more,

ch. xii. 1,

&c. This chapter leaves them in

Haran, or Charran, a place about mid-way

between Ur and Canaan, where they dwelt

till Terah’s head was laid, probably because

the old man was unable, through the infirmities

of age, to proceed in his journey.

Many reach to Charran, and yet fall short of

Canaan; they are not far from the kingdom

of God, and yet never come thither.


[Table of Contents]

[Previous]

[Next]

Matthew Henry
Commentary on the Whole Bible (1706)


Back to Bibles Net . Com – Online Christian Library

Matthew Henry’s Complete Commentary – Free Download

Contact Us


Top