BIBLES NET. COM

Matthew Henry’s Commentary – Genesis, Chapter XXXIX

Matthew Henry’s Complete Commentary

on the Whole Bible

Back to Biblesnet.com Home Page


[Table of Contents]

[Previous]

[Next]

Matthew Henry
Commentary on the Whole Bible (1706)





G E N E S I S

CHAP. XXXIX.



     

At this chapter we return to the story of Joseph. We have him

here,

I. A servant, a slave in Potiphar’s house

(ver. 1),

and yet

there greatly honoured and favoured,

1. By the providence of God,

which made him, in effect, a master,

ver. 2-6.

2. By the grace of

God, which made him more than a conqueror over a strong temptation

to uncleanness,

ver. 7-12.

II. We have him here a sufferer,

falsely accused

(ver. 13-18),

imprisoned

(ver. 19, 20),

and yet his imprisonment made both honourable and comfortable by

the tokens of God’s special presence with him,

ver. 21-23.

And herein Joseph was a type of Christ, “who took upon him

the form of a servant,” and yet then did that which made it

evident that “God was with him,” who was tempted by Satan,

but overcame the temptation, who was falsely accused and bound,

and yet had all things committed to his hand.








The History of Joseph. B. C. 1721.

     

1 And Joseph was brought down

to Egypt; and Potiphar, an officer

of Pharaoh, captain of the guard,

an Egyptian, bought him of the hands

of the Ishmeelites, which had brought

him down thither.

  2 And the LORD

was with Joseph, and he was a prosperous

man; and he was in the house

of his master the Egyptian.

  3 And

his master saw that the LORD was

with him, and that the LORD made all

that he did to prosper in his hand.

  4 And Joseph found grace in his sight,

and he served him: and he made him

overseer over his house, and all that

he had he put into his hand.

  5 And

it came to pass from the time that he

had made him overseer in his house,

and over all that he had, that the

LORD blessed the Egyptian’s house

for Joseph’s sake; and the blessing

of the LORD was upon all that he had

in the house, and in the field.

  6 And

he left all that he had in Joseph’s

hand; and he knew not ought he had,

save the bread which he did eat. And

Joseph was a goodly person, and well

favoured.

     

Here is,

I. Joseph bought

(v. 1),

and he

that bought him, whatever he gave for him,

had a good bargain of him; it was better

than the merchandise of silver. The Jews

have a proverb, “If the world did not know

the worth of good men, they would hedge

them about with pearls.” He was sold to

an officer of Pharaoh, with whom he might

get acquainted with public persons and public

business, and so be fitted for the preferment

for which he was designed. Note, 1. What

God intends men for he will be sure, some

way or other, to qualify them for.

2. Providence

is to be acknowledged in the disposal

even of poor servants and in their settlements,

and therein may perhaps be working towards

something great and important.

     

II. Joseph blessed, wonderfully blessed,

even in the house of his servitude.

     

1. God prospered him,

v. 2, 3.

Perhaps

the affairs of Potiphar’s family had remarkably

gone backward before; but, upon Joseph’s

coming into it, a discernible turn was given

to them, and the face and posture of them

altered on a sudden. Though, at first, we

may suppose that his hand was put to the

meanest services, even in those appeared his

ingenuity and industry; a particular blessing

of Heaven attended him, which, as he rose

in his employment, became more and more

discernible. Note,

(1.) Those that have wisdom

and grace have that which cannot be

taken away from them, whatever else they

are robbed of. Joseph’s brethren had stripped

him of his coat of many colours, but they

could not strip him of his virtue and prudence.

(2.) Those that can separate us

from all our friends, yet cannot deprive

us of the gracious presence of our God.

When Joseph had none of all his relations

with him, he had his God with him, even in

the house of the Egyptian. Joseph was

separated from his brethren, but not from

his God; banished from his father’s house,

but the Lord was with him, and this comforted

him.

(3.) It is God’s presence with

us that makes all we do prosperous. Those

that would prosper must therefore make

God their friend; and those that do prosper

must therefore give God the praise.

     

2. His master preferred him, by degrees

made him steward of his household,

v. 4.

Note,

(1.) Industry and honesty are the

surest and safest way both of rising and

thriving: Seest thou a man prudent, and

faithful, and diligent in his business? He shall

stand before kings at length, and not always

before mean men.

(2.) It is the wisdom of

those that are in any sort of authority to

countenance and employ those with whom

it appears that the presence of God is,

Ps. ci. 6.

Potiphar knew what he did when he

put all into the hands of Joseph; for he

knew it would prosper better there than in

his own hand.

(3.) He that is faithful in a

few things stand fair for being made ruler

over many things,

Matt. xxv. 21.

Christ goes by this rule with his servants.

(4.) It

is a great ease to a master to have those employed

under him that are trusty. Potiphar

was so well satisfied with Joseph’s conduct

that he knew not aught he had, save the bread

which he did eat,
v. 6.

The servant had all

the care and trouble of the estate; the master

had only the enjoyment of it: an example

not to be imitated by any master, unless he

could be sure that he had one in all respects

like Joseph for a servant.

     

3. God favoured his master for his sake

(v. 5):

He blessed the Egyptian’s house,

though he was an Egyptian, a stranger to

the true God, for Joseph’s sake; and he himself,

like Laban, soon learned it by experience,

ch. xxx. 27.

Note,

(1.) Good men

are the blessings of the places where they

live; even good servants may be so, though

mean, and lightly esteemed.

(2.) The prosperity

of the wicked is, one way or other,

for the sake of the godly. Here was a

wicked family blessed for the sake of one

good servant in it.






     

7 And it came to pass after these

things, that his master’s wife cast her

eyes upon Joseph; and she said, Lie

with me.

  8 But he refused, and said

unto his master’s wife, Behold, my

master wotteth not what is with me

in the house, and he hath committed

all that he hath to my hand;

  9 There

is none greater in this house than I;

neither hath he kept back any thing

from me but thee, because thou art

his wife: how then can I do this great

wickedness, and sin against God?

  10 And it came to pass, as she spake to

Joseph day by day, that he hearkened

not unto her, to lie by her, or to be

with her.

  11 And it came to pass

about this time, that Joseph went into

the house to do his business; and

there was none of the men of the house

there within.

  12 And she caught

him by his garment, saying, Lie with

me: and he left his garment in her

hand, and fled, and got him out.

     

Here is,

I. A most shameful instance of impudence

and immodesty in Joseph’s mistress,

the shame and scandal of her sex, perfectly

lost to all virtue and honour, and not to be

mentioned, nor thought of, without the utmost

indignation. It was well that she was

an Egyptian; for we must have shared in

the confusion if such folly had been found

in Israel. Observe,

     

I. Her sin began in the eye: She cast her

eyes upon Joseph

(v. 7),

who was a goodly

person, and well-favoured,
v. 6.

Note,

(1.) Remarkable beauty, either of men or women,

often proves a dangerous snare both to themselves

and others, which forbids pride in it

and commands constant watchfulness against

the temptation that attends it; favour is

deceitful–deceiving.

(2.) We have great

need to make a covenant with our eyes

(Job xxxi. 1),

lest the eye infect the heart.

Joseph’s mistress had a husband that ought

to have been to her for a covering of the

eyes from all others,

ch. xx. 16.

     

2. She was daring and shameless in the

sin. With an impudent face, and a harlot’s

forehead, she said, Lie with me, having

already, by her wanton looks and unchaste

desires, committed adultery with him in her

heart. Note, Where the unclean spirit gets

possession and dominion in a soul, it is as

with the possessed of the devils

(Luke viii. 27, 29),

the clothes of modesty are thrown

off and the bands and fetters of shame are

broken in pieces. When lust has got head,

it will stick at nothing, blush at nothing;

decency, and reputation, and conscience, are

all sacrificed to that Baal-peor.

3. She was

urgent and violent in the temptation. Often

she had been denied with the strongest

reasons, and yet as often renewed her vile

solicitations. She spoke to him day by day,
v. 10.

Now this was,

(1.) Great wickedness

in her, and showed her heart fully set to do

evil.

(2.) A great temptation to Joseph.

The hand of Satan, no doubt, was in it, who,

when he found he could not overcome him

with troubles and the frowns of the world

(for in them he still held fast his integrity),

assaulted him with soft and charming pleasures,

which have ruined more than the

former, and have slain their ten-thousands.

     

II. Here is a most illustrious instance of

virtue and resolved chastity in Joseph, who,

by the grace of God, was enabled to resist

and overcome this temptation; and, all

things considered, his escape was, for aught

I know, as great an instance of the divine

power as the deliverance of the three children

out of the fiery furnace.

     

1. The temptation he was assaulted with

was very strong. Never was a more violent

onset made upon the fort of chastity than

this recorded here.

(1.) The sin he was

tempted to was uncleanness, which considering

his youth, his beauty, his single state,

and his plentiful living at the table of a ruler,

was a sin which, one would think, might

most easily beset him and betray him.

(2.) The tempter was his mistress, a person of

quality, whom it was his place to obey and

his interest to oblige, whose favour would

contribute more than any thing to his preferment,

and by whose means he might

arrive at the highest honours of the court.

On the other hand, it was at his utmost peril

if he slighted her, and made her his enemy.

(3.) Opportunity makes a thief, makes an

adulterer, and that favoured the temptation.

The tempter was in the house with him; his

business led him to be, without any suspicion,

where she was; none of the family were

within

(v. 11);

there appeared no danger of

its being ever discovered, or, if it should be

suspected, his mistress would protect him.

(4.) To all this was added importunity,

frequent constant importunity, to such a degree

that, at last, she laid violent hands on him.

     

2. His resistance of the temptation was

very brave, and the victory truly honourable.

The almighty grace of God enabled him to

overcome this assault of the enemy,

     

(1.) By strength of reason; and wherever

right reason may be heard, religion no

doubt will carry the day. He argues from

the respect he owed both to God and his

master,

v. 8, 9.

[1.] He would not wrong

his master, nor do such an irreparable injury

to his honour. He considers, and urges,

how kind his master had been to him, what

a confidence he had reposed in him, in how

many instances he had befriended him, for

which he abhorred the thought of making

such an ungrateful return. Note, We are

bound in honour, as well as justice and

gratitude, not in any thing to injure those

that have a good opinion of us and place a

trust in us, how secretly soever it may be

done. See how he argues

(v. 9):

There

is none greater in this house than I, therefore

I will not do it.” Note, Those that are

great, instead of being proud of their greatness,

should use it as an argument against

sin. “Is none greater than I? Then I will

scorn to do a wicked thing; it is below me

to serve a base lust; I will not disparage

myself so much.”

[2.] He would not offend

his God. This is the chief argument with

which he strengthens his aversion to the

sin. How can I do this? not only, How shall

I? or, How dare I? but, How can I? Id possumus,

quod jure possumus–We can do that

which we can do lawfully. It is good to shut

out sin with the strongest bar, even that of

an impossibility. He that is born of God

cannot sin,

1 John iii. 9.

Three arguments

Joseph urges upon himself. First, He considers

who he was that was tempted. “I;

others may perhaps take their liberty, but I

cannot. I that am an Israelite in covenant

with God, that profess religion, and relation

to him: it is next to impossible for me to do

so.” Secondly, What the sin was to which

he was tempted: This great wickedness.

Others might look upon it as a small matter,

a peccadillo, a trick of youth; but Joseph

had another idea of it. In general, when at

any time we are tempted to sin, we must consider

the great wickedness there is in it, let

sin appear sin

(Rom. vii. 13),

call it by its

own name, and never go about to lessen it.

Particularly let the sin of uncleanness always

be looked upon as great wickedness, as an

exceedingly sinful sin, that wars against

the soul as much as any other. Thirdly,

Against whom he was tempted to sin–against

God; not only, “How shall I do it, and sin

against my master, my mistress, myself, my

own body and soul; but against God?”

Note, Gracious souls look upon this as the

worst thing in sin that it is against God,

against his nature and his dominion, against

his love and his design. Those that love

God do for this reason hate sin.

     

(2.) By stedfastness of resolution. The

grace of God enabled him to overcome the

temptation by avoiding the tempter.

[1.] He hearkened not to her, so much as to be

with her,

v. 10.

Note, Those that would be

kept from harm must keep themselves out of

harm’s way. Avoid it, pass not by it. Nay,

[2.] When she laid hold of him, he left his garment

in her hand,
v. 12.

He would not stay so

much as to parley with the temptation, but

flew out from it with the utmost abhorrence;

he left his garment, as one escaping for his

life. Note, It is better to lose a good coat

than a good conscience.






     

13 And it came to pass, when she

saw that he had left his garment in her

hand, and was fled forth,

  14 That she

called unto the men of her house, and

spake unto them, saying, See, he hath

brought in an Hebrew unto us to

mock us; he came in unto me to lie

with me, and I cried with a loud voice:

  15 And it came to pass, when he heard

that I lifted up my voice and cried,

that he left his garment with me, and

fled, and got him out.

  16 And she

laid up his garment by her, until his

lord came home.

  17 And she spake

unto him according to these words,

saying, The Hebrew servant, which

thou hast brought unto us, came in

unto me to mock me:

  18 And it came

to pass, as I lifted up my voice and

cried, that he left his garment with

me, and fled out.

     

Joseph’s mistress, having tried in vain to

make him a criminal, now endeavours to represent

him as one; so to be revenged on

him for his virtue. Now was her love turned

into the utmost rage and malice, and she

pretends she cannot endure the sight of him

whom awhile ago she could not endure out

of her sight. Chaste and holy love will

continue, though slighted; but sinful love,

like Amnon’s to Tamar, is easily changed

into sinful hatred.

1. She accused him to

his fellow servants

(v. 13-15)

and gave him

a bad name among them. Probably they

envied him his interest in their master’s

favour, and his authority in the house; and

perhaps found themselves aggrieved sometimes

by his fidelity, which prevented their

purloining; and therefore they were glad to

hear any thing that might tend to his disgrace,

and, if there was room for it, incensed

their mistress yet more against him. Observe,

When she speaks of her husband, she

does not call him her husband, or her lord,

but only he; for she had forgotten the covenant

of her God, that was between them.

Thus the adulteress

(Prov. vii. 19)

calls her

husband the good man. Note, Innocence

itself cannot secure a man’s reputation. Not

every one that keeps a good conscience can

keep a good name.

2. She accused him to

his master, who had power in his hand to

punish him, which his fellow servants had

not,

v. 17, 18.

Observe,

(1.) What an improbable

story she tells, producing his garment

as an evidence that he had offered

violence to her, which was a plain indication

that she had offered violence to him. Note,

Those that have broken the bonds of modesty

will never be held by the bonds of truth. No

marvel that she who had impudence enough

to say, Lie with me, had front enough to say,

“He would have lien with me.” Had the

lie been told to conceal her own crime it

would have been bad enough, yet, in some

degree, excusable; but it was told to be revenged

upon his virtue, a most malicious

lie. And yet,

(2.) She manages it so as to

incense her husband against him, reflecting

upon him for bringing this Hebrew servant

among them, perhaps at first against her

mind, because he was a Hebrew. Note, It

is no new thing for the best of men to be

falsely accused of the worst of crimes by

those who themselves are the worst of

criminals. As this matter was represented,

one would have thought chaste Joseph a

very bad man and his wanton mistress a

virtuous woman; it is well that there is a

day of discovery coming, in which all shall

appear in their true characters. This was

not the first time that Joseph’s coat was

made use of as a false witness concerning

him; his father had been deceived by it

before, now his master.





     

19 And it came to pass, when his

master heard the words of his wife,

which she spake unto him, saying, After

this manner did thy servant to me;

that his wrath was kindled.

  20 And

Joseph’s master took him, and put

him into the prison, a place where the

king’s prisoners were bound: and he

was there in the prison.

  21 But the

LORD was with Joseph, and showed

him mercy, and gave him favour in

the sight of the keeper of the prison.

  22 And the keeper of the prison committed

to Joseph’s hand all the prisoners

that were in the prison; and

whatsoever they did there, he was the

doer of it.

  23 The keeper of the

prison looked not to any thing that

was under his hand; because the

LORD was with him, and that which

he did, the LORD made it to prosper.

     

Here is,

1. Joseph wronged by his master.

He believed the accusation, and either Joseph

durst not make his defence by telling the

truth, as it would reflect too much upon his

mistress, or his master would not hear it, or

would not believe it, and there is no remedy,

he is condemned to perpetual imprisonment,

v. 19, 20.

God restrained his wrath, else he

had put him to death; and that wrath which

imprisoned him God made to turn to his

praise, in order to which Providence so disposed

that he should be shut up among the

king’s prisoners, the state-prisoners. Potiphar,

it is likely, chose that prison because

it was the worst; for there the iron entered

into the soul

(Ps. cv. 18),

but God designed

to pave the way to his enlargement. He was

committed to the king’s prison, that he might

thence be preferred to the king’s person.

Note, Many an action of false imprisonment

will, in the great day, be found to lie against

the enemies and persecutors of God’s people.

Our Lord Jesus, like Joseph here, was bound,

and numbered with the transgressors.

2. Joseph

owned and righted by his God, who is,

and will be, the just and powerful patron of oppressed

innocence. Joseph was at a distance

from all his friends and relations, had not them

with him to comfort him, or to minister to him,

or to mediate for him; but the Lord was with

Joseph, and showed him mercy,
v. 21.

Note,

(1.) God despises not his prisoners,

Ps. lxix. 33.

No gates nor bars can shut out his

gracious presence from his people; for he

has promised that he will never leave them.

(2.) Those that have a good conscience in a

prison have a good God there. Integrity

and uprightness qualify us for the divine

favour, wherever we are. Joseph is not long

a prisoner before he becomes a little ruler

even in the prison, which is to be attributed,

under God,

[1.] To the keeper’s favour. God

gave him favour in the sight of the keeper of

the prison. Note, God can raise up friends

for his people even where they little expect

to find them, and can make them to be pitied

even of those that carry them captive,

Ps. cvi. 46.

[2.] To Joseph’s fitness for business.

The keeper saw that God was with

him, and that every thing prospered under

his hand; and therefore entrusted him with

the management of the affairs of the prison,

v. 22, 23.

Note, Wisdom and virtue will

shine in the narrowest spheres. A good man

will do good wherever he is, and will be a

blessing even in bonds and banishment; for

the Spirit of the Lord is not bound nor

banished, witness St. Paul,

Phil. i. 12, 13.


[Table of Contents]

[Previous]

[Next]

Matthew Henry
Commentary on the Whole Bible (1706)


Back to Bibles Net . Com – Online Christian Library

Matthew Henry’s Complete Commentary – Free Download

Contact Us


Top