BIBLES NET. COM

Matthew Henry’s Commentary – Exodus, Chapter IV

Matthew Henry’s Complete Commentary

on the Whole Bible

Back to Biblesnet.com Home Page


[Table of Contents]

[Previous]

[Next]

Matthew Henry
Commentary on the Whole Bible (1706)




E X O D U S

CHAP. IV.



     

This chapter,

I. Continues and concludes God’s discourse with Moses at the bush

concerning this great affair of bringing Israel out of Egypt.

1. Moses objects the people’s unbelief

(ver. 1),

and God answers that objection by giving him a power to work miracles,

(1.) To turn his rod into a serpent, and then into a rod again,

ver. 2-5.

(2.) To make his hand leprous, and then whole again,

ver. 6-8.

(3.) To turn the water into blood,

ver. 9.

2. Moses objects his own slowness of speech

(ver. 10),

and begs to be excused

(ver. 13);

but God answers this objection,

(1.) By promising him his presence,

ver. 11, 12.

(2.) By joining Aaron in commission with him,

ver. 14-16.

(3.) By putting an honour upon the very staff in his hand,

ver. 17.

II. It begins Moses’s execution of his commission.

1. He obtains leave of his father-in-law to return into Egypt,

ver. 18.

2. He receives further instructions and encouragements from God,

ver. 19, 21-23.

3. He hastens his departure, and takes his family with him,

ver. 20.

4. He meets with some difficulty in the way about the circumcising of

his son,

ver. 24-26.

5. He has the satisfaction of meeting his brother Aaron,

ver. 27, 28.

6. He produces his commission before the elders of Israel, to their

great joy,

ver. 29-31.

And thus the wheels were set a going towards that great

deliverance.











The Objections of Moses Overruled. B. C. 1491.

     

1 And Moses answered and said, But, behold, they will not

believe me, nor hearken unto my voice: for they will say, The

LORD hath not appeared unto thee.

  2 And the LORD said unto him, What is that in thine hand? And

he said, A rod.

  3 And he said, Cast it on the ground. And he cast it on the

ground, and it became a serpent; and Moses fled from before it.

  4 And the LORD said unto Moses, Put forth thine hand, and take

it by the tail. And he put forth his hand, and caught it, and it

became a rod in his hand:

  5 That they may believe that the LORD God of their fathers, the

God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob, hath

appeared unto thee.

  6 And the LORD said furthermore unto him, Put now thine hand

into thy bosom. And he put his hand into his bosom: and when he

took it out, behold, his hand was leprous as snow.

  7 And he said, Put thine hand into thy bosom again. And he put

his hand into his bosom again; and plucked it out of his bosom,

and, behold, it was turned again as his other flesh.

  8 And it shall come to pass, if they will not believe thee,

neither hearken to the voice of the first sign, that they will

believe the voice of the latter sign.

  9 And it shall come to pass, if they will not believe also

these two signs, neither hearken unto thy voice, that thou shalt

take of the water of the river, and pour it upon the dry

land: and the water which thou takest out of the river shall

become blood upon the dry land.

     

It was a very great honour that Moses was called to when God

commissioned him to bring Israel out of Egypt; yet he is with

difficulty persuaded to accept the commission, and does it at last with

great reluctance, which we should rather impute to a humble diffidence

of himself and his own sufficiency than to any unbelieving distrust of

God and his word and power. Note, Those whom God designs for preferment

he clothes with humility; the most fit for service are the least

forward.

     

I. Moses objects that in all probability the people would not

hearken to his voice

(v. 1),

that is, they would not take his bare word, unless he showed them some

sign, which he had not been yet instructed to do. This objection cannot

be justified, because it contradicts what God had said

(ch. iii. 18),

They shall hearken to thy voice. If God says, They will,

does it become Moses to say, They will not? Surely he means,

“Perhaps they will not at first, or some of them will not.” If there

should be some gainsayers among them who would question his commission,

how should he deal with them? And what course should he take to

convince them? He remembered how they had once rejected him, and feared

it would be so again. Note,

1. Present discouragements often arise from former disappointments. 2.

Wise and good men have sometimes a worse opinion of people than they

deserve. Moses sad

(v. 1),

They will not believe me; and yet he was happily mistaken, for

it is said

(v. 31),

The people believed; but then the signs which God appointed in

answer to this objection were first wrought in their sight.

     

II. God empowers him to work miracles, directs him to three

particularly, two of which were now immediately wrought for his own

satisfaction. Note, True miracles are the most convincing external

proofs of a divine mission attested by them. Therefore our Saviour

often appealed to his works (as

John v. 36),

and Nicodemus owns himself convinced by them,

John iii. 2.

And here Moses, having a special commission given him as a judge and

lawgiver to Israel, has this seal affixed to his commission, and comes

supported by these credentials.

     

1. The rod in his hand is made the subject of a miracle, a double

miracle: it is but thrown out of his hand and it becomes a serpent; he

resumes it and it becomes a rod again,

v. 2-4.

Now,

(1.) Here was a divine power manifested in the change itself, that a

dry stick should be turned into a living serpent, a lively one, so

formidable a one that Moses himself, on whom, it should seem, it turned

in some threatening manner, fled from before it, though we may

suppose, in that desert, serpents were no strange things to him; but

what was produced miraculously was always the best and strongest of the

kind, as the water turned to wine: and, then, that this living serpent

should be turned into a dry stick again, this was the Lord’s doing.

(2.) Here was an honour put upon Moses, that this change was wrought

upon his throwing it down and taking it up, without any spell, or

charm, or incantation: his being empowered thus to act under God, out

of the common course of nature and providence, was a demonstration of

his authority, under God, to settle a new dispensation of the kingdom

of grace. We cannot imagine that the God of truth would delegate such a

power as this to an impostor.

(3.) There was a significancy in the miracle itself. Pharaoh had turned

the rod of Israel into a serpent, representing them as dangerous

(ch. i. 10),

causing their belly to cleave to the dust, and seeking their ruin; but

now they should be turned into a rod again: or, thus Pharaoh had turned

the rod of government into the serpent of oppression, from which Moses

had himself fled into Midian; but by the agency of Moses the scene was

altered again.

(4.) There was a direct tendency in it to convince the children of

Israel that Moses was indeed sent of God to do what he did,

v. 5.

Miracles were for signs to those that believed not,

1 Cor. xiv. 22.

     

2. His hand itself is next made the subject of a miracle. He puts it

once into his bosom, and takes it out leprous; he puts it again into

the same place, and takes it out well,

v. 6, 7.

This signified,

(1.) That Moses, by the power of God, should bring sore diseases upon

Egypt, and that, at his prayer, they should be removed.

(2.) That whereas the Israelites in Egypt had become leprous, polluted

by sin, and almost consumed by oppression (a leper is as one

dead,
Num. xii. 12),

by being taken into the bosom of Moses they should be cleansed and

cured, and have all their grievances redressed.

(3.) That Moses was not to work miracles by his own power, nor for his

own praise, but by the power of God and for his glory; the leprous hand

of Moses does forever exclude boasting. Now it was supposed that, if

the former sign did not convince, this latter would. Note, God is

willing more abundantly to show the truth of his word, and is not

sparing in his proofs; the multitude and variety of the miracles

corroborate the evidence.

     

3. He is directed, when he shall come to Egypt, to turn some of the

water of the river into blood,

v. 9.

This was done, at first, as a sign, but, not gaining due credit with

Pharaoh, the whole river was afterwards turned into blood, and then it

became a plague. He is ordered to work this miracle in case they would

not be convinced by the other two. Note, Unbelief shall be left

inexcusable, and convicted of a wilful obstinacy. As to the people of

Israel, God had said

(ch. iii. 18),

They shall hearken; yet he appoints these miracles to be wrought

for their conviction, for he that has ordained the end has ordained the

means.








     

10 And Moses said unto the LORD, O my Lord, I am not

eloquent, neither heretofore, nor since thou hast spoken unto thy

servant: but I am slow of speech, and of a slow tongue.

  11 And the LORD said unto him, Who hath made man’s mouth? or

who maketh the dumb, or deaf, or the seeing, or the blind? have

not I the LORD?

  12 Now therefore go, and I will be with thy mouth, and teach

thee what thou shalt say.

  13 And he said, O my Lord, send, I pray thee, by the hand of

him whom thou wilt send.

  14 And the anger of the LORD was kindled against Moses, and he

said, Is not Aaron the Levite thy brother? I know that he can

speak well. And also, behold, he cometh forth to meet thee: and

when he seeth thee, he will be glad in his heart.

  15 And thou shalt speak unto him, and put words in his mouth:

and I will be with thy mouth, and with his mouth, and will teach

you what ye shall do.

  16 And he shall be thy spokesman unto the people: and he shall

be, even he shall be to thee instead of a mouth, and thou shalt

be to him instead of God.

  17 And thou shalt take this rod in thine hand, wherewith thou

shalt do signs.

     

Moses still continues backward to the service for which God had

designed him, even to a fault; for now we can no longer impute it to

his humility and modesty, but must own that here was too much of

cowardice, slothfulness, and unbelief in it. Observe here,

     

I. How Moses endeavours to excuse himself from the work.

     

1. He pleads that he was no good spokesman: O my Lord! I am not

eloquent,
v. 10.

He was a great philosopher, statesman, and divine, and yet no orator; a

man of a clear head, great thought, and solid judgment, but had not a

voluble tongue, or ready utterance, and therefore he thought himself

unfit to speak before great men about great affairs, and in danger of

being run down by the Egyptians. Observe,

(1.) We must not judge of men by the readiness and fluency of their

discourse. Moses was mighty in word

(Acts vii. 22),

and yet not eloquent: what he said was strong and nervous, and to the

purpose, and distilled as the dew

(Deut. xxxii. 2),

though he did not deliver himself with that readiness, ease, and

elegance, that some do, who have not the tenth part of his sense. St.

Paul’s speech was contemptible,

2 Cor. x. 10.

A great deal of wisdom and true worth is concealed by a slow

tongue.

(2.) God is pleased sometimes to make choice of those as his messengers

who have fewest of the advantages of art or nature, that his grace in

them may appear the more glorious. Christ’s disciples were no orators,

till the Spirit made them such.

     

2. When this plea was overruled, and all his excuses were answered, he

begged that God would send somebody else on this errand and leave him

to keep sheep in Midian

(v. 13):

“Send by any hand but mine; thou canst certainly find one much more

fit.” Note, An unwilling mind will take up with a sorry excuse rather

than none, and is willing to devolve those services upon others that

have any thing of difficulty or danger in them.

     

II. How God condescends to answer all his excuses. Though the anger

of the Lord was kindled against him

(v. 14),

yet he continued to reason with him, till he had overcome him. Note,

Even self-diffidence, when it grows into an extreme–when it either

hinders us from duty or clogs us in duty, or when it discourages our

dependence upon the grace of God–is very displeasing to him. God

justly resents our backwardness to serve him, and has reason to take it

ill; for he is such a benefactor as is before-hand with us, and such a

rewarder as will not be behind-hand with us. Note further, God is

justly displeased with those whom yet he does not reject: he vouchsafes

to reason the case even with his froward children, and overcomes them,

as he did Moses here, with grace and kindness.

     

1. To balance the weakness of Moses, he here reminds him of his own

power,

v. 11.

(1.) His power in that concerning which Moses made the objection:

Who has made man’s mouth? Have not I the Lord? Moses knew that

God made man, but he must be reminded now that God made man’s mouth. An

eye to God as Creator would help us over a great many of the

difficulties which lie in the way of our duty,

Ps. cxxiv. 8.

God, as the author of nature, has given us the power and faculty of

speaking; and from him, as the fountain of gifts and graces, comes the

faculty of speaking well, the mouth and wisdom

(Luke xxi. 15),

the tongue of the learned

(Isa. l. 4);

he pours grace into the lips,
Ps. xlv. 2.

(2.) His power in general over the other faculties. Who but God

makes the dumb and the deaf, the seeing and the blind?

[1.] The perfections of our faculties are his work, he makes the

seeing; he formed the eye

(Ps. xciv. 9);

he opens the understanding, the eye of the mind,

Luke xxiv. 45.

[2.] Their imperfections are from him too; he make the dumb, and

deaf, and blind. Is there any evil of this kind, and the

Lord has not done it? No doubt he has, and always in wisdom and

righteousness, and for his own glory,

John ix. 3.

Pharaoh and the Egyptians were made deaf and blind spiritually, as

Isa. vi. 9, 10.

But God knew how to manage them, and get himself honour upon them.

     

2. To encourage him in this great undertaking, he repeats the promise

of his presence, not only in general, I will be with thee

(ch. iii. 12),

but in particular, “I will be with thy mouth, so that the

imperfection in thy speech shall be no prejudice to thy message.” It

does not appear that God did immediately remove the infirmity, whatever

it was; but he did that which was equivalent, he taught him what to

say, and then let the matter recommend itself: if others spoke more

gracefully, none spoke more powerfully. Note, Those whom God employs to

speak for him ought to depend upon him for instructions, and it

shall be given them what they shall speak,
Matt. x. 19.

     

3. He joins Aaron in commission with him. He promises that Aaron shall

meet him opportunely, and that he will be glad to see him, they having

not seen one another (it is likely) for many years,

v. 14.

He directs him to make use of Aaron as his spokesman,

v. 16.

God might have laid Moses wholly aside, for his backwardness to be

employed; but he considered his frame, and ordered him an assistant.

Observe,

(1.) Two are better than one,

Eccl. iv. 9.

God will have his two witnesses

(Rev. xi. 3),

that out of their mouths every word may be established.

(2.) Aaron was the brother of Moses, divine wisdom so ordering it, that

their natural affection one to another might strengthen their union in

the joint execution of their commission. Christ sent his disciples two

and two, and some of the couples were brothers.

(3.) Aaron was the elder brother, and yet he was willing to be employed

under Moses in this affair, because God would have it so.

(4.) Aaron could speak well, and yet was far inferior to Moses in

wisdom. God dispenses his gifts variously to the children of men, that

we may see our need one of another, and each may contribute something

to the good of the body,

1 Cor. xii. 21.

The tongue of Aaron, with the head and heart of Moses, would make one

completely fit for this embassy.

(5.) God promises, I will be with thy mouth, and with his mouth.

Even Aaron, that could speak well, yet could not speak to purpose

unless God was with his mouth; without the constant aids of divine

grace the best gifts will fail.

     

4. He bids him take the rod with him in his hand

(v. 17),

to intimate that he must bring about his undertaking rather by acting

than by speaking; the signs he should work with this rod might

abundantly supply the want of eloquence; one miracle would do him

better service than all the rhetoric in the world. Take this

rod, the rod he carried as a shepherd, that he might not be ashamed

of that mean condition out of which God called him. This rod must be

his staff of authority, and must be to him in stead both of sword and

sceptre.







Moses Returns in Egypt. B. C. 1491.

     

18 And Moses went and returned to Jethro his father in law, and

said unto him, Let me go, I pray thee, and return unto my

brethren which are in Egypt, and see whether they be yet alive.

And Jethro said to Moses, Go in peace.

  19 And the LORD said unto Moses in Midian, Go, return into

Egypt: for all the men are dead which sought thy life.

  20 And Moses took his wife and his sons, and set them upon an

ass, and he returned to the land of Egypt: and Moses took the rod

of God in his hand.

  21 And the LORD said unto Moses, When thou goest to return into

Egypt, see that thou do all those wonders before Pharaoh, which I

have put in thine hand: but I will harden his heart, that he

shall not let the people go.

  22 And thou shalt say unto Pharaoh, Thus saith the LORD, Israel

is my son, even my firstborn:

  23 And I say unto thee, Let my son go, that he may serve me:

and if thou refuse to let him go, behold, I will slay thy son,

even thy firstborn.

     

Here,

I. Moses obtains leave of his father-in-law to return into Egypt,

v. 18.

His father-in-law had been kind to him when he was a stranger, and

therefore he would not be so uncivil as to leave his family, nor so

unjust as to leave his service, without giving him notice. Note, The

honour of being admitted into communion with God, and of being employed

for him, does not exempt us from the duties of our relations and

callings in this world. Moses said nothing to his father-in-law (for

aught that appears) of the glorious manifestation of God to him; such

favours we are to be thankful for to God, but not to boast of before

men.

     

II. He receives from God further encouragements and directions in his

work. After God had appeared to him in the bush to settle a

correspondence, it should seem, he often spoke to him, as there was

occasion, with less overwhelming solemnity. And,

1. He assures Moses that the coasts were clear. Whatever new enemies

he might make by his undertaking, his old enemies were all dead, all

that sought his life,
v. 19.

Perhaps some secret fear of falling into their hands was at the bottom

of Moses’s backwardness to go to Egypt, though he was not willing to

own it, but pleaded unworthiness, insufficiency, want of elocution, &c.

Note, God knows all the temptations his people lie under, and how to

arm them against their secret fears,

Ps. cxlii. 3.

2. He orders him to do the miracles, not only before the elders of

Israel, but before Pharaoh,

v. 21.

There were some alive perhaps in the court of Pharaoh who remembered

Moses when he was the son of Pharaoh’s daughter, and had many a time

called him a fool for deserting the honours of that relation; but he is

now sent back to court, clad with greater powers than Pharaoh’s

daughter could have advanced him to, so that it might appear he was no

loser by his choice: this wonder-working rod did more adorn the hand of

Moses than the sceptre of Egypt could have done. Note, Those that look

with contempt upon worldly honours shall be recompensed with the honour

that cometh from God, which is the true honour.

3. That Pharaoh’s obstinacy might be no surprise nor discouragement to

him, God tells him before that he would harden his heart.

Pharaoh had hardened his own heart against the groans and cries of the

oppressed Israelites, and shut up the bowels of his compassion from

them; and now God, in a way of righteous judgment, hardens his heart

against the conviction of the miracles, and the terror of the plagues.

Note, Ministers must expect with many to labour in vain: we must not

think it strange if we meet with those who will not be wrought upon by

the strongest arguments and fairest reasonings; yet our judgment is

with the Lord.

4. Words are put into his mouth with which to address Pharaoh,

v. 22, 23.

God had promised him

(v. 12),

I will teach thee what thou shalt say; and here he does teach

him.

(1.) He must deliver his message in the name of the great Jehovah:

Thus saith the Lord; this is the first time that preface

is used by any man which afterwards is used so frequently by all the

prophets: whether Pharaoh will hear, or whether he will forbear, Moses

must tell him, Thus saith the Lord.

(2.) He must let Pharaoh know Israel’s relation to God, and God’s

concern for Israel. Is Israel a servant? is he a home-born

slave?
Jer. ii. 14.

“No, Israel is my son, my firstborn, precious in my sight,

honourable, and dear to me, not to be thus insulted and abused.”

(3.) He must demand a discharge for them: “Let my son go; not

only my servant whom thou hast no right to detain, but my son whose

liberty and honour I am very jealous for. It is my son, my son that

serves me, and therefore must be spared, must be pleaded for,”

Mal. iii. 17.

(4.) He must threaten Pharaoh with the death of the first-born of

Egypt, in case of a refusal: I will slay thy son, even thy

firstborn. As men deal with God’s people, let them expect to be

themselves dealt with; with the froward he will wrestle.

     

III. Moses addresses himself to this expedition. When God had assured

him

(v. 19)

that the men were dead who sought his life, immediately it follows

(v. 20),

he took his wife, and his sons, and set out for Egypt. Note,

Though corruption may object much against the services God calls us to,

yet grace will get the upper hand, and will be obedient to the heavenly

vision.









The Circumcision of the Son of Moses. B. C. 1491.

     

24 And it came to pass by the way in the inn, that the LORD met

him, and sought to kill him.

  25 Then Zipporah took a sharp stone, and cut off the foreskin

of her son, and cast it at his feet, and said, Surely a bloody

husband art thou to me.

  26 So he let him go: then she said, A bloody husband thou

art, because of the circumcision.

  27 And the LORD said to Aaron, Go into the wilderness to meet

Moses. And he went, and met him in the mount of God, and kissed

him.

  28 And Moses told Aaron all the words of the LORD who had sent

him, and all the signs which he had commanded him.

  29 And Moses and Aaron went and gathered together all the

elders of the children of Israel:

  30 And Aaron spake all the words which the LORD had spoken unto

Moses, and did the signs in the sight of the people.

  31 And the people believed: and when they heard that the LORD

had visited the children of Israel, and that he had looked upon

their affliction, then they bowed their heads and worshipped.

     

Moses is here going to Egypt, and we are told,

     

I. How God met him in anger,

v. 24-26.

This is a very difficult passage of story; much has been written, and

excellently written, to make it intelligible; we will try to make it

improving. Here is,

     

1. The sin of Moses, which was neglecting to circumcise his son. This

was probably the effect of his being unequally yoked with a Midianite,

who was too indulgent of her child, while Moses was too indulgent of

her. Note,

(1.) We have need to watch carefully over our own hearts, lest fondness

for any relation prevail above our love to God, and take us off from

our duty to him. It is charged upon Eli that he honoured his sons

more than God

(1 Sam. ii. 29);

and see

Matt. x. 37.

(2.) Even good men are apt to cool in their zeal for God and duty when

they have long been deprived of the society of the faithful: solitude

has its advantages, but they seldom counterbalance the loss of

Christian communion.

     

2. God’s displeasure against him. He met him, and, probably by a sword

in an angel’s hand, sought to kill him. This was a great change; very

lately God was conversing with him, and lodging a trust in him, as a

friend; and now he is coming forth against him as an enemy. Note,

(1.) Omissions are sins, and must come into judgment, and particularly

the contempt and neglect of the seals of the covenant; for it is a sign

that we undervalue the promises of the covenant, and are displeased

with the conditions of it. He that has made a bargain, and is not

willing to seal and ratify it, one may justly suspect, neither likes it

nor designs to stand to it.

(2.) God takes notice of, and is much displeased with, the sins of his

own people. If they neglect their duty, let them expect to hear of it

by their consciences, and perhaps to feel from it by cross providences:

for this cause many are sick and weak, as some think Moses was

here.

     

3. The speedy performance of the duty for the neglect of which God had

now a controversy with him. His son must be circumcised; Moses is

unable to circumcise him; therefore, in this case of necessity,

Zipporah does it, whether with passionate words (expressing her dislike

of the ordinance itself, or at least the administration of it to so

young a child, and in a journey), as to me it seems, or with proper

words–solemnly expressing the espousal of the child to God by the

covenant of circumcision (as some read it) or her thankfulness to God

for sparing her husband, giving him a new life, and thereby giving her,

as it were, a new marriage to him, upon her circumcising her son (as

others read it)–I cannot determine: but we learn,

(1.) That when God discovers to us what is amiss in our lives we must

give all diligence to amend it speedily, and particularly return to the

duties we have neglected.

(2.) The putting away of our sins is indispensably necessary to the

removal of God’s judgements. This is the voice of every rod, it calls

to us to return to him that smites us.

     

4. The release of Moses thereupon: So he let him go; the

distemper went off, the destroying angel withdrew, and all was well:

only Zipporah cannot forget the fright she was in, but will

unreasonably call Moses a bloody husband, because he obliged her

to circumcise the child; and, upon this occasion (it is probable), he

sent them back to his father-in-law, that they might not create him any

further uneasiness. Note,

(1.) When we return to God in a way of duty he will return to us in a

way of mercy; take away the cause, and the effect will cease.

(2.) We must resolve to bear it patiently, if our zeal for God and his

institutions be misinterpreted and discouraged by some that should

understand themselves, and us, and their duty, better, as David’s zeal

was misinterpreted by Michal; but if this be to be vile, if this be to

be bloody, we must be yet more so.

(3.) When we have any special service to do for God we should remove as

far from us as we can that which is likely to be our hindrance. Let

the dead bury their dead, but follow thou me.

     

II. How Aaron met him in love,

v. 27, 28.

1. God sent Aaron to meet him, and directed him where to find him, in

the wilderness that lay towards Midian. Note, The providence of God is

to be acknowledged in the comfortable meeting of relations and friends.

2. Aaron made so much haste, in obedience to his God, and in love to

his brother, that he met him in the mount of God, the place

where God had met with him.

3. They embraced one another with mutual endearments. The more they saw

of God’s immediate direction in bringing them together the more

pleasant their interview was: they kissed, not only in token of

brotherly affection, and in remembrance of ancient acquaintance, but as

a pledge of their hearty concurrence in the work to which they were

jointly called.

4. Moses informed his brother of the commission he had received, with

all the instructions and credentials affixed to it,

v. 28.

Note, What we know of God we should communicate for the benefit of

others; and those that are fellow-servants to God in the same work

should use a mutual freedom, and endeavour rightly and fully to

understand one another.

     

III. How the elders of Israel met him in faith and obedience. When

Moses and Aaron first opened their commission in Egypt, said what they

were ordered to say, and, to confirm it, did what they were ordered to

do, they met with a better reception than they promised themselves,

v. 29-31.

1. The Israelites gave credit to them: The people believed, as

God had foretold

(ch. iii. 18),

knowing that no man could do those works that they did, unless God were

with him. They gave glory to God: They bowed their heads and

worshipped, therein expressing not only their humble thankfulness

to God, who had raised them up and sent them a deliverer, but also

their cheerful readiness to observe orders, and pursue the methods of

their deliverance.


[Table of Contents]

[Previous]

[Next]

Matthew Henry
Commentary on the Whole Bible (1706)


Back to Bibles Net . Com – Online Christian Library

Matthew Henry’s Complete Commentary – Free Download

Contact Us


Top