BIBLES NET. COM

Matthew Henry’s Commentary – Deuteronomy, Chapter XVII

Matthew Henry’s Complete Commentary

on the Whole Bible

Back to Biblesnet.com Home Page


[Table of Contents]

[Previous]

[Next]

Matthew Henry
Commentary on the Whole Bible (1706)




D E U T E R O N O M Y

CHAP. XVII.



     

The charge of this chapter is,

I. Concerning the purity and perfection of all those animals that were

offered in sacrifice,

ver. 1.

II. Concerning the punishment of those that worshipped idols,

ver. 2-7.

III. Concerning appeals from the inferior courts to the great

sanhedrim,

ver. 8-13.

IV. Concerning the choice and duty of a king,

ver. 14,

&c.









The Punishment of Idolatry. B. C. 1451.

     

1 Thou shalt not sacrifice unto the LORD thy God any bullock,

or sheep, wherein is blemish, or any evilfavouredness: for that

is an abomination unto the LORD thy God.

  2 If there be found among you, within any of thy gates which

the LORD thy God giveth thee, man or woman, that hath wrought

wickedness in the sight of the LORD thy God, in transgressing his

covenant,

  3 And hath gone and served other gods, and worshipped them,

either the sun, or moon, or any of the host of heaven, which I

have not commanded;

  4 And it be told thee, and thou hast heard of it, and

enquired diligently, and, behold, it be true, and the thing

certain, that such abomination is wrought in Israel:

  5 Then shalt thou bring forth that man or that woman, which

have committed that wicked thing, unto thy gates, even that man

or that woman, and shalt stone them with stones, till they die.

  6 At the mouth of two witnesses, or three witnesses, shall he

that is worthy of death be put to death; but at the mouth of

one witness he shall not be put to death.

  7 The hands of the witnesses shall be first upon him to put him

to death, and afterward the hands of all the people. So thou

shalt put the evil away from among you.

     

Here is,

I. A law for preserving the honour of God’s worship, by providing that

no creature that had any blemish should be offered in sacrifice to him,

v. 1.

This caveat we have often met with: Thou shalt not sacrifice that

which has any blemish, which renders it unsightly, or any evil

matter or thing (as the following word night better be rendered),

any sickness or weakness, though not discernible at first view; it is

an abomination to God. God is the best of beings, and therefore

whatsoever he is served with ought to be the best in its kind. And the

Old-Testament sacrifices in a special manner must be so, because they

were types of Christ, who is a Lamb without blemish or spot

(1 Pet. i. 19),

perfectly pure from all sin and all appearance of it. In the latter

times of the Jewish church, when by the captivity in Babylon they were

cured of idolatry, yet they were charged with profaneness in the breach

of this law, with offering the blind, and the lame, and the sick for

sacrifice,
Mal. i. 8.

     

II. A law for the punishing of those that worshipped false gods. It was

made a capital crime to seduce others to idolatry

(ch. xiii.),

here it is made no less to be seduced. If the blind thus mislead the

blind, both must fall into the ditch. Thus God would possess them

with a dread of that sin, which they must conclude exceedingly sinful

when so many sanguinary laws were made against it, and would deter

those from it that would not otherwise be persuaded against it; and yet

the law, which works death, proved ineffectual. See here,

     

1. What the crime was against which this law was levelled, serving or

worshipping other gods,

v. 3.

That which was the most ancient and plausible idolatry is specified,

worshipping the sun, moon, and stars; and, if that was so detestable a

thing, much more was it so to worship stocks and stones, or the

representations of mean and contemptible animals. Of this it is said,

(1.) That it is what God had not commanded. He had again and again

forbidden it; but it is thus expressed to intimate that, if there had

been no more against it, this had been enough (for in the worship of

God his institution and appointment must be our rule and warrant), and

that God never commanded his worshippers to debase themselves so far as

to do homage to their fellow-creatures: had God commanded them to do

it, they might justly have complained of it as a reproach and

disparagement to them; yet, when he has forbidden it, they will, from a

spirit of contradiction, put this indignity upon themselves.

(2.) That it is wickedness in the sight of God,
v. 2.

Be it ever so industriously concealed, he sees it, and, be it ever so

ingeniously palliated, he hates it: it is a sin in itself exceedingly

heinous, and the highest affront that can be offered to Almighty God.

(3.) That it is a transgression of the covenant. It was on this

condition that God took them to be his peculiar people, that they

should serve and worship him only as their God, so that if they gave to

any other the honour which was due to him alone that covenant was void,

and all the benefit of it forfeited. Other sins were transgressions of

the command, but this was a transgression of the covenant. It was

spiritual adultery, which breaks them marriage bond.

(4.) That it is abomination in Israel,

v. 4.

Idolatry was bad enough in any, but it was particularly abominable in

Israel, a people so blessed with peculiar discoveries of the will and

favour of the only true and living God.

     

2. How it must be tried. Upon information given of it, or any ground of

suspicion that any person whatsoever, man or woman, had served other

gods,

(1.) Enquiry must be made,

v. 4.

Though it appears not certain at first, it may afterwards upon search

appear so; and, if it can possibly be discovered, it must not be

unpunished; if not, yet the very enquiry concerning it would possess

the country with a dread of it.

(2.) Evidence must be given in,

v. 6.

How heinous and dangerous soever the crime is, yet they must not punish

any for it, unless there were good proof against them, by two witnesses

at least. They must not, under pretence of honouring God, wrong an

innocent man. This law, which requires two witnesses in case of life,

we had before,

Num. xxxv. 30;

it is quoted,

Matt. xviii. 16.

     

3. What sentence must be passed and executed. So great a punishment as

death, so great a death as stoning, must be inflicted on the idolater,

whether man or woman, for the infirmity of the weaker sex would be no

excuse,

v. 5.

The place of execution must be the gate of the city, that the shame

might be the greater to the criminal and the warning the more public to

all others. The hands of the witnesses, in this as in other cases, must

be first upon him, that is, they must cast the first stone at him,

thereby avowing their testimony, and solemnly imprecating the guilt of

his blood upon themselves if their evidence were false. This custom

might be of use to deter men from false-witness bearing. The witnesses

are really, and therefore it was required that they should be actually,

the death of the malefactor. But they must be followed, and the

execution completed, by the hands of all the people, who were thus to

testify their detestation of the crime and to put the evil away from

among them, as before,

ch. xiii. 9.







The Authority of the Judges. B. C. 1451.

     

8 If there arise a matter too hard for thee in judgment,

between blood and blood, between plea and plea, and between

stroke and stroke, being matters of controversy within thy

gates: then shalt thou arise, and get thee up into the place

which the LORD thy God shall choose;

  9 And thou shalt come unto the priests the Levites, and unto

the judge that shall be in those days, and enquire; and they

shall show thee the sentence of judgment:

  10 And thou shalt do according to the sentence, which they of

that place which the LORD shall choose shall show thee; and thou

shalt observe to do according to all that they inform thee:

  11 According to the sentence of the law which they shall teach

thee, and according to the judgment which they shall tell thee,

thou shalt do: thou shalt not decline from the sentence which

they shall show thee, to the right hand, nor to the left.

  12 And the man that will do presumptuously, and will not

hearken unto the priest that standeth to minister there before

the LORD thy God, or unto the judge, even that man shall die: and

thou shalt put away the evil from Israel.

  13 And all the people shall hear, and fear, and do no more

presumptuously.

     

Courts of judgment were ordered to be erected in every city

(ch. xvi. 18),

and they were empowered to hear and determine causes according to law,

both those which we call pleas of the crown and those between party and

party; and we may suppose that ordinarily they ended the matters that

were brought before them, and their sentence was definitive; but,

1. It is here taken for granted that sometimes a case might come into

their court too difficult for those inferior judges to determine, who

could not be thought to be so learned in the laws as those that

presided in the higher courts; so that (to speak in the language of our

law) they must find a special verdict, and take time to advise before

the giving of judgment

(v. 8):

If there arise a matter too hard for thee in judgment, which it

would be no dishonour to the judges to own the difficulty of,–suppose

it between blood and blood, the blood of a person which cried

and the blood of him that was charged with the murder which was

demanded, when it was doubtful upon the evidence whether it was wilful

or casual,–or between plea and plea, the plea (that is, the

bill or declaration) of the plaintiff and the plea of the

defendant,–or between stroke and stroke, in actions of assault

and battery; in these and similar cases, thought the evidence were

plain, yet doubts might arise about the sense and meaning of the law

and the application of it to the particular case.

2. These difficult cases, which hitherto had been brought to Moses,

according to Jethro’s advice, were, after his death, to be brought to

the supreme power, wherever it was lodged, whether in a judge (when

there was such an extraordinary person raised up and qualified for that

great service, as Othniel, Deborah, Gideon, &c.) or in the high-priest

(when he was by the eminency of his gifts called of God to preside in

public affairs, as Eli), or, if no single person were marked by heaven

for this honour, then in the priests and Levites (or in the priests,

who were Levites of course), who not only attended the sanctuary, but

met in council to receive appeals from the inferior courts, who might

reasonably be supposed, not only to be best qualified by their learning

and experience, but to have the best assistance of the divine Spirit

for the deciding of doubts,

v. 9, 11, 12.

They are not appointed to consult the urim and thummim, for it is

supposed that these were to be consulted only in cases relating to the

public, either the body of the people or the prince; but in ordinary

cases the wisdom and integrity of those that sat at the stern must be

relied on, their judgment had not the divine authority of an oracle,

yet besides the moral certainty it had, as the judgment of knowing,

prudent, and experienced men, it had the advantage of a divine promise,

implied in those words

(v. 9),

They shall show thee the sentence of judgment; it had also the

support of a divine institution, by which they were made the supreme

judicature of the nation.

3. The definitive sentence given by the judge, priest, or great

council, must be obeyed by the parties concerned, upon pain of death:

Thou shalt do according to their sentence

(v. 10);

thou shalt observe to do it, thou shalt not decline from it

(v. 11),

to the right hand nor to the left. Note, It is for the honour of

God and the welfare of a people that the authority of the higher power

be supported and the due order of government observed, that those be

obeyed who are appointed to rule, and that every soul be subject to

them in all those things that fall within their commission. Though the

party thought himself injured by the sentence (as every man is apt to

be partial in is own cause), yet he must needs be subject, must stand

to the award, how unpleasing soever, and bear, or lose, or pay,

according to it, not only for wrath, but also for conscience’ sake. But

if an inferior judge contradict the sentence of the higher court and

will not execute the orders of it, or a private person refuse to

conform to their sentence, the contumacy must be punished with death,

though the matter were ever so small in which the opposition was made:

That man shall die, and all the people shall hear and fear,
v. 12, 13.

See here,

(1.) The evil of disobedience. Rebellion and stubbornness, from a

spirit of contradiction and opposition of God, or those in authority

under him, from a principle of contempt and self-willedness, are as

witchcraft and idolatry. To differ in opinion from weakness and

infirmity may be excused and must be borne with; but to do so

presumptuously, in pride and wickedness (as the ancient translations

explain it), this is to take up arms against the government, and is an

affront to him by whom the powers that be are ordained.

(2.) The design of punishment: that others may hear and fear, and not

do the like. Some would be so considerate as to infer the heinousness

of the offence from the grievousness of the penalty, and therefore

would detest it; and others would so far consult their own safety as to

cross their humours by conforming to the sentence rather than to sin

against their own heads, and forfeit their lives by going contrary to

it. From this law the apostle infers the greatness of the punishment of

which those will be thought worthy that trample on the authority of the

Son of God,

Heb. x. 28, 29.








The Choice of a King. B. C. 1451.

     

14 When thou art come unto the land which the LORD thy God

giveth thee, and shalt possess it, and shalt dwell therein, and

shalt say, I will set a king over me, like as all the nations

that are about me;

  15 Thou shalt in any wise set him king over thee, whom the

LORD thy God shall choose: one from among thy brethren shalt

thou set king over thee: thou mayest not set a stranger over

thee, which is not thy brother.

  16 But he shall not multiply horses to himself, nor cause the

people to return to Egypt, to the end that he should multiply

horses: forasmuch as the LORD hath said unto you, Ye shall

henceforth return no more that way.

  17 Neither shall he multiply wives to himself, that his heart

turn not away: neither shall he greatly multiply to himself

silver and gold.

  18 And it shall be, when he sitteth upon the throne of his

kingdom, that he shall write him a copy of this law in a book out

of that which is before the priests the Levites:

  19 And it shall be with him, and he shall read therein all the

days of his life: that he may learn to fear the LORD his God, to

keep all the words of this law and these statutes, to do them:

  20 That his heart be not lifted up above his brethren, and that

he turn not aside from the commandment, to the right hand, or

to the left: to the end that he may prolong his days in his

kingdom, he, and his children, in the midst of Israel.

     

After the laws which concerned subjects fitly followed the laws which

concern kings; for those that rule others must themselves remember that

they are under command. Here are laws given,

     

I. To the electors of the empire, what rules they must go by in making

their choice,

v. 14, 15.

1. It is here supposed that the people would, in process of time, be

desirous of a king, whose royal pomp and power would be thought to make

their nation look great among their neighbours. Their having a king is

neither promised as a mercy nor commanded as a duty (nothing could be

better for them than the divine regimen they were under), but it is

permitted them if they desired it. If they would but take care to have

the ends of government answered, and God’s laws duly observed and put

in execution, they should not be tied to any one form of government,

but should be welcome to have a king. Though something irregular is

supposed to be the principle of the desire, that they might be like the

nations (whereas God in many ways distinguished them from the nations),

yet God would indulge them in it, because he intended to serve his own

purposes by it, in making the regal government typical of the kingdom

of the Messiah.

2. They are directed in their choice. If they will have a king over

them, as God foresaw they would (though it does not appear that ever

the motion was made till almost 400 years after), then they must,

(1.) Ask counsel at God’s mouth, and make him king whom God shall

choose; and happy it was for them that they had an oracle to consult in

so weighty an affair, and a God to choose for them who knows infallibly

what every man is and will be. Kings are God’s vicegerents, and

therefore it is fit that he should have the choosing of them: God had

himself been in a particular manner Israel’s King, and if they set

another over them, under him, it was necessary that he should nominate

the person. Accordingly, when the people desired a king, they applied

to Samuel a prophet of the Lord; and afterwards David, Solomon,

Jeroboam, Jehu, and others, were chosen by the prophets; and the people

are reproved for not observing this law,

Hos. viii. 4:

They have set up kings but not by me. In all cases God’s choice,

if we can but know it, should direct, determine, and overrule ours.

(2.) They must not choose a foreigner under pretence of strengthening

their alliances, or of the extraordinary fitness of the person, lest a

strange king should introduce strange customs of usages, contrary to

those that were established by the divine law; but he must be one

from among thy brethren, that he may be a type of Christ, who is

bone of our bone,

Heb. ii. 14.

     

II. Laws are here given to the prince that should be elected for the

due administration of the government.

     

1. He must carefully avoid every thing that would divert him from God

and religion. Riches, honours, and pleasures are the three great

hindrances of godliness (the lusts of the flesh, the lusts of the

eye, and the pride of life), especially to those in high stations:

against these therefore the king is here warned.

(1.) He must not gratify the love of honour by multiplying horses,

v. 16.

He that rode upon a horse (a stately creature) in a country where asses

and mules were generally used looked very great; and therefore though

he might have horses for his own saddle, and chariots, yet he must not

set servants on horseback

(Eccl. x. 7)

nor have many horses for his officers and guards (when God was their

King, his judges rode on asses,

Judg. v. 10; xii. 14),

nor must he multiply horses for war, lest he should trust too much to

them,

Ps. xx. 7; xxxiii. 17; Hos. xiv. 3.

The reason here given against his multiplying horses is because it

would produce a greater correspondence with Egypt (which furnished

Canaan with horses,

1 Kings x. 28, 29)

than it was fit the Israel of God should have, who were brought thence

with such a high hand: You shall return no more that way, for

fear of being infected with the idolatries of Egypt

(Lev. xviii. 3),

to which they were very prone. Note, We should take heed of that

commerce or conversation by which we are in danger of being drawn into

sin. If Israel must not return to Egypt, they must not trade with

Egypt; Solomon got no good by it.

(2.) He must not gratify the love of pleasure by multiplying wives

(v. 17),

as Solomon did to his undoing

(1 Kings xi. 1),

that his heart, being set upon them, turn not away from business, and

every thing that is serious, and especially from the exercise of piety

and devotion, to which nothing is a greater enemy than the indulgence

of the flesh.

(3.) He must not gratify the love of riches by greatly multiplying

silver and gold. A competent treasure is allowed him, and he is not

forbidden to be good husband of it, but,

[1.] He must not greatly multiply money, so as to oppress his people by

raising it (as Solomon seems to have done,

1 Kings xii. 4),

nor so as to deceive himself, by trusting to it, and setting his heart

upon it,

Ps. lxii. 10.

[2.] He must not multiply it to himself. David multiplied silver and

gold, but it was for the service of God

(1 Chron. xxix. 4),

not for himself; for his people, not for his own family.

     

2. He must carefully apply himself to the law of God, and make that his

rule. This must be to him better than all riches, honours, and

pleasures, than many horses or many wives, better than thousands of

gold and silver.

     

(1.) He must write himself a copy of the law out of the original, which

was in the custody of the priests that attended the sanctuary,

v. 18.

Some think that he was to write only this book of Deuteronomy, which is

an abstract of the law, and the precepts of which, being mostly moral

and judicial, concerned the king more than the laws in Leviticus and

Numbers, which, being ceremonial, concerned chiefly the priests. Others

think that he was to transcribe all the five books of Moses, which are

called the law, and which were preserved together as the

foundation of their religion. Now,

[1.] Though the king might be presumed to have very fair copies by him

from his ancestors, yet, besides those, he must have one of his own: it

might be presumed that theirs were worn with constant use; he must have

a fresh one to begin the world with.

[2.] Though he had secretaries about him whom he might employ to write

this copy, and who perhaps could write a better hand than he, yet he

must do it himself, with his own hand, for the honour of the law, and

that he might think no act of religion below him, to inure himself to

labour and study, and especially that he might thereby be obliged to

take particular notice of every part of the law and by writing it might

imprint it in his mind. Note, It is of great use for each of us to

write down what we observe as most affecting and edifying to us, out of

the scriptures and good books, and out of the sermons we hear. A

prudent pen may go far towards making up the deficiencies of the

memory, and the furnishing of the treasures of the good householder

with things new and old.

[3.] He must do this even when he sits upon the throne of his kingdom,

provided that he had not done it before. When he begins to apply

himself to business, he must apply himself to this in the first place.

He that sits upon the throne of a kingdom cannot but have his hands

full. The affairs of his kingdom both at home and abroad call for a

large share of his time and thoughts, and yet he must write himself a

copy of the law. Let not those who call themselves men of business

think that this will excuse them from making religion their business;

nor let great men think it any disparagement to them to write for

themselves those great things of God’s law which he hath written to

them,
Hos. viii. 12.

     

(2.) Having a Bible by him of his own writing, he must not think it

enough to keep it in his cabinet, but he must read therein all the

days of his life,
v. 19.

It is not enough to have Bibles, but we must use them, use them daily,

as the duty and necessity of everyday require: our souls must have

their constant meals of that manna; and, if well digested, it will be

true nourishment and strength to them. As the body is receiving benefit

by its food continually, and not only when it is eating, so is the

soul, by the word of God, if it meditate therein day and night,
Ps. i. 2.

And we must persevere in the use of the written word of God as long as

we live. Christ’s scholars never learn above their Bibles, but will

have a constant occasion for them till they come to that world where

knowledge and love will both be made perfect.

     

(3.) His writing and reading were all nothing if he did not reduce to

practice what he wrote and read,

v. 19, 20.

The word of God is not designed merely to be and entertaining subject

of speculation, but to be a commanding rule of conversation. Let him

know,

[1.] What dominion his religion must have over him, and what influence

it must have upon him. First, It must possess him with a very

reverent and awful regard to the divine majesty and authority. He must

learn (and thus the most learned must by ever learning) to fear the

Lord his God; and, as high as he is, he must remember that God is

above him, and, whatever fear his subjects owe to him, that, and much

more, he owes to God as his King. Secondly, It must engage him

to a constant observance of the law of God, and a conscientious

obedience to it, as the effect of that fear. He must keep all the

words of this law (he is custos utriusque tabulae–the keeper of

both tables), not only take care that others do them, but do them

himself as a humble servant to the God of heaven and a good example to

his inferiors. Thirdly, It must keep him humble. How much

soever he is advanced, let him keep his spirit low, and let the fear

of his God prevent the contempt of his brethren; and let not his

heart be lifted up above them, so as to carry himself haughtily

or disdainfully towards them, and to trample upon them. Let him not

conceit himself better than they because he is greater and makes a

fairer show; but let him remember that he is the minister of God to

them for good (major singulis, but minor

universisgreater than any one, but less than the

whole). It must prevent his errors, either on he right hand or

on the left (for there are errors on both hands), and keep him

right, in all instances, to his God and to his duty.

[2.] What advantage his religion would be of to him. Those that fear

God and keep his commandments will certainly fare the better for it in

this world. The greatest monarch in the world may receive more benefit

by religion than by all the wealth and power of his monarchy. It will

be of advantage, First, To his person: He shall prolong his

days in his kingdom. We find in the history of the kings of Judah

that, generally, the best reigns were the longest, except when God

shortened them for the punishment of the people, as Josiah’s.

Secondly, To his family: his children shall also prosper. Entail

religion upon posterity, and God will entail a blessing upon it.


[Table of Contents]

[Previous]

[Next]

Matthew Henry
Commentary on the Whole Bible (1706)


Back to Bibles Net . Com – Online Christian Library

Matthew Henry’s Complete Commentary – Free Download

Contact Us


Top