BIBLES NET. COM

Matthew Henry’s Commentary – First Kings, Chapter XV

Matthew Henry’s Complete Commentary

on the Whole Bible

Back to Biblesnet.com Home Page


[Table of Contents]

[Previous]

[Next]

Matthew Henry
Commentary on the Whole Bible (1708)




F I R S T   K I N G S

CHAP. XV.



     

In this chapter we have an abstract of the history,

I. Of two of the kings of Judah, Abijam, the days of whose reign were

few and evil

(ver. 1-8),

and Asa, who reigned well and long,

ver. 9-24.

II. Of two of the kings of Israel, Nadab the son of Jeroboam, and

Baasha the destroyer of Jeroboam’s house,

ver. 25-34.










Abijam’s Reign. B. C. 958.

     

1 Now in the eighteenth year of king Jeroboam the son of Nebat

reigned Abijam over Judah.

  2 Three years reigned he in Jerusalem. And his mother’s name

was Maachah, the daughter of Abishalom.

  3 And he walked in all the sins of his father, which he had

done before him: and his heart was not perfect with the LORD his

God, as the heart of David his father.

  4 Nevertheless for David’s sake did the LORD his God give him a

lamp in Jerusalem, to set up his son after him, and to establish

Jerusalem:

  5 Because David did that which was right in the eyes of the

LORD, and turned not aside from any thing that he commanded him

all the days of his life, save only in the matter of Uriah the

Hittite.

  6 And there was war between Rehoboam and Jeroboam all the days

of his life.

  7 Now the rest of the acts of Abijam, and all that he did,

are they not written in the book of the chronicles of the kings

of Judah? And there was war between Abijam and Jeroboam.

  8 And Abijam slept with his fathers; and they buried him in the

city of David: and Asa his son reigned in his stead.

     

We have here a short account of the short reign of Abijam the son of

Rehoboam king of Judah. He makes a better figure,

2 Chron. xiii.,

where we have an account of his war with Jeroboam, the speech which he

made before the armies engaged, and the wonderful victory he obtained

by the help of God. There he is called Abijah–My father is the

Lord, because no wickedness is there laid to his charge. But here,

where we are told of his faults, Jah, the name of God, is, in

disgrace to him, taken away from his name, and he is called

Abijam. See

Jer. xxii. 24.

     

I. Few particulars are related concerning him.

1. Here began his reign in the beginning of Jeroboam’s eighteenth year;

for Rehoboam reigned but seventeen,

ch. xiv. 21.

Jeroboam indeed survived Rehoboam, but Rehoboam’s Abijah lived to

succeed him and to be a terror to Jeroboam, while Jeroboam’s Abijah

(whom we read of

ch. xiv. 1)

died before him.

2. He reigned scarcely three years, for he died before the end of

Jeroboam’s twentieth year,

v. 9.

Being made proud and secure by his great victory over Jeroboam

(2 Chron. xiii. 21),

God cut him off, to make way for his son Asa, who would be a better

man.

3. His mother’s name was Maachah, the daughter of Abishalom,

that is, Absalom, David’s son, as I am the rather inclined to think

because two other of Rehoboam’s wives were his near relations

(2 Chron. xi. 18),

one the daughter of Jerimoth, David’s son, and another the daughter of

Eliab, David’s brother. He took warning by his father not to marry

strangers; yet thought it below him to marry his subjects, except they

were of the royal family.

4. He carried on his father’s wars with Jeroboam. As there was

continual war between Rehoboam and Jeroboam, not set battles (these

were forbidden,

ch. xii. 24),

but frequent encounters, especially upon the borders, one making

incursions and reprisals on the other, so there was between Abijam and

Jeroboam

(v. 7),

till Jeroboam, with a great army, invaded him, and then Abijam, not

being forbidden to act in his own defence, routed him, and weakened

him, so that he compelled him to be quiet during the rest of his reign,

2 Chron. xiii. 20.

     

II. But, in general, we are told,

1. That he was not like David, had no hearty affection for the

ordinances of God, though, to serve his purpose against Jeroboam, he

pleaded his possession of the temple and priesthood, as that upon which

he valued himself,

2 Chron. xiii. 10-12.

Many boast of their profession of godliness who are strangers to the

power of it, and plead the truth of their religion who yet are not true

to it. His heart was not perfect with the Lord his God. He

seemed to have zeal, but he wanted sincerity; he began pretty well, but

he fell off, and walked in all the sins of his father, followed

his bad example, though he had seen the bad consequences of it. He that

was all his days in war ought to have been so wise as to make and keep

his peace with God, and not to make him his enemy, especially having

found him so good a friend in his war with Jeroboam,

2 Chron. xiii. 18.

Let favour be shown to the wicked, yet will he not learn

righteousness,
Isa. xxvi. 10.

2. That yet it was for David’s sake that he was advanced, and continued

upon the throne; it was for his sake

(v. 4, 5)

that God thus set up his son after him; not for his own sake,

nor for the sake of his father, in whose steps he trod, but for the

sake of David, whose example he would not follow. Note, It

aggravates the sin of a degenerate seed that they fare the better for

the piety of their ancestors and owe their blessings to it, and yet

will not imitate it. They stand upon that ground, and yet despise it,

and trample upon it, and unreasonably ridicule and oppose that which

they enjoy the benefit of. The kingdom of Judah was supported,

(1.) That David might have a lamp, pursuant to the divine ordination of

a lamp for his anointed,
Ps. cxxxii. 17.

(2.) That Jerusalem might be established, not only that the honours put

upon it in David’s and Solomon’s time might be preserved to it, but

that it might be reserved to the honours designed for it in

after-times. The character here given of David is very great–that

he did that which was right in the eyes of the Lord; but the

exception is very remarkable–save only in the matter of Uriah,

including both his murder and the debauching of his wife. That was a

bad matter; it was a remaining blot upon his name, a bar in his

escutcheon, and the reproach of it was not wiped away, though the guilt

was. David was guilty of other faults, but they were nothing in

comparison of that; yet even that being repented of, though it be

mentioned for warning to others, did not prevail to throw him out of

the covenant, nor to cut off the entail of the promise upon his

seed.

















Asa’s Reign. B. C. 914.

     

9 And in the twentieth year of Jeroboam king of Israel reigned

Asa over Judah.

  10 And forty and one years reigned he in Jerusalem. And his

mother’s name was Maachah, the daughter of Abishalom.

  11 And Asa did that which was right in the eyes of the LORD,

as did David his father.

  12 And he took away the sodomites out of the land, and removed

all the idols that his fathers had made.

  13 And also Maachah his mother, even her he removed from

being queen, because she had made an idol in a grove; and Asa

destroyed her idol, and burnt it by the brook Kidron.

  14 But the high places were not removed: nevertheless Asa’s

heart was perfect with the LORD all his days.

  15 And he brought in the things which his father had dedicated,

and the things which himself had dedicated, into the house of the

LORD, silver, and gold, and vessels.

  16 And there was war between Asa and Baasha king of Israel all

their days.

  17 And Baasha king of Israel went up against Judah, and built

Ramah, that he might not suffer any to go out or come in to Asa

king of Judah.

  18 Then Asa took all the silver and the gold that were left

in the treasures of the house of the LORD, and the treasures of

the king’s house, and delivered them into the hand of his

servants: and king Asa sent them to Benhadad, the son of

Tabrimon, the son of Hezion, king of Syria, that dwelt at

Damascus, saying,

  19 There is a league between me and thee, and between my

father and thy father: behold, I have sent unto thee a present of

silver and gold; come and break thy league with Baasha king of

Israel, that he may depart from me.

  20 So Benhadad hearkened unto king Asa, and sent the captains

of the hosts which he had against the cities of Israel, and smote

Ijon, and Dan, and Abel-beth-maachah, and all Cinneroth, with all

the land of Naphtali.

  21 And it came to pass, when Baasha heard thereof, that he

left off building of Ramah, and dwelt in Tirzah.

  22 Then king Asa made a proclamation throughout all Judah; none

was exempted: and they took away the stones of Ramah, and the

timber thereof, wherewith Baasha had builded; and king Asa built

with them Geba of Benjamin, and Mizpah.

  23 The rest of all the acts of Asa, and all his might, and all

that he did, and the cities which he built, are they not

written in the book of the chronicles of the kings of Judah?

Nevertheless in the time of his old age he was diseased in his

feet.

  24 And Asa slept with his fathers, and was buried with his

fathers in the city of David his father: and Jehoshaphat his son

reigned in his stead.

     

We have here a short account of the reign of Asa; we shall find a more

copious history of it

2 Chron. xiv., xv., and xvi.

Here is,

     

I. The length of it: He reigned forty-one years in Jerusalem,
v. 10.

In the account we have of the kings of Judah we find the number of the

good kings and the bad ones nearly equal; but then we may observe, to

our comfort, that the reign of the good kings was generally long, but

that of the bad kings short, the consideration of which will make the

state of God’s church not altogether so bad within that period as it

appears at first sight. Length of days is in Wisdom’s right hand.

Honour thy father, much more thy heavenly Father, that thy

days may be long.

     

II. The general good character of it

(v. 11):

Asa did that which was right in the eyes of the Lord, and that

is right indeed which is so in God’s eyes; those are approved whom he

commends. He did as did David his father, kept close to God, and

to his instituted worship, was hearty and zealous for that, which gave

him this honourable character, that he was like David, though he was

not a prophet, or psalmist, as David was. If we come up to the graces

of those that have gone before us it will be our praise with God,

though we come short of their gifts. Asa was like David, though he was

neither such a conqueror nor such an author; for his heart was

perfect with the Lord all his days

(v. 14),

that is, he was both cordial and constant in his religion. What he did

for God he was sincere in, steady and uniform, and did it from a good

principle, with a single eye to the glory of God.

     

III. The particular instances of Asa’s piety. His times were times of

reformation. For,

     

1. He removed that which was evil. There reformation begins; and a

great deal of work of that kind his hand found to do. For, though it

was but twenty years after the death of Solomon that he began to reign,

yet very gross corruption had spread far and taken deep root.

Immorality he first struck at: He took away the sodomites out of the

land, suppressed the brothels; for how can either prince or people

prosper while those cages of unclean and filthy birds, more dangerous

than pest-houses, are suffered to remain? Then he proceeded against

idolatry: He removed all the idols, even those that his

father had made,
v. 12.

His father having made them, he was the more concerned to remove them,

that he might cut off the entail of the curse, and prevent the visiting

of that iniquity upon him and his. Nay (which redounds much to his

honour, and shows his heart was perfect with God), when he found

idolatry in the court, he rooted it out thence,

v. 13.

When it appeared that Maachah his mother, or rather his grandmother

(but called his mother because she had the educating of him in

his childhood), had an idol in a grove, though she was his mother, his

grandmother,–though, it is likely, she had a particular fondness for

it,–though, being old, she could not live long to patronise

it,–though she kept it for her own use only, yet he would by no means

connive at her idolatry. Reformation must begin at home. Bad practices

will never be suppressed in the country while they are supported in the

court. Asa, in every thing else, will honour and respect his mother; he

loves her well, but he loves God better, and (like the Levite,

Deut. xxxiii. 9)

readily forgets the relation when it comes in competition with his

duty. If she be an idolater,

(1.) Her idol shall be destroyed, publicly exposed to contempt,

defaced, and burnt to ashes by the brook Kidron, on which, it is

probable, he strewed the ashes, in imitation of Moses

(Exod. xxxii. 20)

and in token of his detestation of idolatry and his indignation at it

wherever he found it. Let no remains of a court-idol appear.

(2.) She shall be deposed, He removed her from being queen, or from the

queen, that is, from conversing with his wife; he banished her from the

court, and confined her to an obscure and private life. Those that have

power are happy when thus they have hearts to use it well.

     

2. He re-established that which was good

(v. 15):

He brought into the house of God the dedicated things which he

himself had vowed out of the spoils of the Ethiopians he had conquered,

and which his father had vowed, but lived not to bring in pursuant to

his vow. We must not only cease to do evil, but learn to do well, not

only cast away the idols of our iniquity, but dedicate ourselves and

our all to God’s honour and glory. When those who, in their infancy,

were by baptism devoted to God, make it their own act and deed to join

themselves to him and vigorously employ themselves in his service, this

is bringing in the dedicated things which they and their fathers have

dedicated: it is necessary justice–rendering to God the things that

are his.

     

VI. The policy of his reign. He built cities himself, to encourage the

increase of his people

(v. 23)

and to invite others to him by the conveniences of habitation; and he

was very zealous to hinder Baasha from building Ramah, because he

designed it for the cutting off of communication between his people and

Jerusalem and to hinder those who in obedience to God would come to

worship there. An enemy must by no means be suffered to fortify a

frontier town.

     

V. The faults of his reign. In both the things for which he was praised

he was found defective. The fairest characters are not without some

but or other in them.

1. Did he take away the idols? That was well; but the high places

were not removed

(v. 14);

therein his reformation fell short. He removed all images which were

rivals with the true God or false representations of him; but the

altars which were set up in high places, and to which those sacrifices

were brought which should have been offered on the altar in the temple,

those he suffered to stand, thinking there was no great harm in them,

they having been used by good men before the temple was built, and

being loth to disoblige the people, who had a kindness to them and were

wedded to them both by custom and convenience; whereas in Judah and

Benjamin, the only tribes under Asa’s government which lay so near

Jerusalem and the altars there, there was less pretence for them than

in those tribes which lay more remote. They were against the law, which

obliged them to worship at one place,
Deut. xii. 11.

They lessened men’s esteem of the temple and the altars there, and were

an open gap for idolatry to enter in at, while the people were so much

addicted to it. It was not well that Asa, when his hand was in, did not

remove these. Nevertheless his heart was perfect with the Lord.

This affords us a comfortable note, That those may be found honest and

upright with God, and be accepted of him, who yet, in some instances,

come short of doing the good they might and should do. The perfection

which is made the indispensable condition of the new covenant is not to

be understood of sinlessness (then we were all undone), but sincerity.

2. Did he bring in the dedicated things? That was well; but he

afterwards alienated the dedicated things, when he took the gold and

silver out of the house of God and sent them as a bribe to Benhadad, to

hire him to break his league with Baasha, and, by making an inroad upon

his country, to give him a diversion from the building of Ramah,

v. 18, 19.

Here he sinned,

(1.) In tempting Benhadad to break his league, and so to violate the

public faith. If he did wrong in doing it, as certainly he did, Asa did

wrong in persuading him to do it.

(2.) In that he could not trust God, who had done so much for him, to

free him out of this strait, without using such indirect means to help

himself.

(3.) In taking the gold out of the treasury of the temple, which was

not to be made use of but on extraordinary occasions. The project

succeeded. Benhadad made a descent upon the land of Israel, which

obliged Baasha to retire with his whole force from Ramah

(v. 20, 21),

which gave Asa a fair opportunity to demolish his works there, and the

timber and stones served him for the building of some cities of his

own,

v. 22.

But, though the design prospered, we find it was displeasing to God;

and though Asa valued himself upon the policy of it, and promised

himself that it would effectually secure his peace, he was told by the

prophet that he had done foolishly, and that thenceforth he should

have wars; see

2 Chron. xvi. 7-9.

     

VI. The troubles of his reign. For the most part he prospered; but,

1. Baasha king of Israel was a very troublesome neighbour to him. He

reigned twenty-four years, and all his days had war, more or less, with

Asa,

v. 16.

This was the effect of the division of the kingdoms, that they were

continually vexing one another, and so weakened one another, which made

them both an easier prey to the common enemy.

2. In his old age he was himself afflicted with the gout: He was

diseased in his feet, which made him less fit for business and

peevish towards those about him.

     

VII. The conclusion of his reign. The acts of it were more largely

recorded in the common history (to which reference is here had,

v. 23)

than in this sacred one. He reigned long, but finished at last with

honour, and left his throne to a successor no way inferior to him.











The Reign of Nadab and Baasha. B. C. 954.

     

25 And Nadab the son of Jeroboam began to reign over Israel in

the second year of Asa king of Judah, and reigned over Israel two

years.

  26 And he did evil in the sight of the LORD, and walked in the

way of his father, and in his sin wherewith he made Israel to

sin.

  27 And Baasha the son of Ahijah, of the house of Issachar,

conspired against him; and Baasha smote him at Gibbethon, which

belonged to the Philistines; for Nadab and all Israel laid

siege to Gibbethon.

  28 Even in the third year of Asa king of Judah did Baasha slay

him, and reigned in his stead.

  29 And it came to pass, when he reigned, that he smote all

the house of Jeroboam; he left not to Jeroboam any that breathed,

until he had destroyed him, according unto the saying of the

LORD, which he spake by his servant Ahijah the Shilonite:

  30 Because of the sins of Jeroboam which he sinned, and which

he made Israel sin, by his provocation wherewith he provoked the

LORD God of Israel to anger.

  31 Now the rest of the acts of Nadab, and all that he did,

are they not written in the book of the chronicles of the kings

of Israel?

  32 And there was war between Asa and Baasha king of Israel all

their days.

  33 In the third year of Asa king of Judah began Baasha the son

of Ahijah to reign over all Israel in Tirzah, twenty and four

years.

  34 And he did evil in the sight of the LORD, and walked in the

way of Jeroboam, and in his sin wherewith he made Israel to sin.

     

We are now to take a view of the miserable state of Israel, while the

kingdom of Judah was happy under Asa’s good government. It was

threatened that they should be as a reed shaken in the water

(ch. xiv. 15),

and so they were, when, during the single reign of Asa, the government

of their kingdom was in six or seven different hands, as we find in

this and the following chapter. Jeroboam was upon the throne in the

beginning of his reign and Ahab at the end of it, and between them were

Nadab, Baasha, Elah, Zimri, Tibni, and Omri, undermining and destroying

one another. This they got by deserting the house both of God and of

David. Here we have,

1. The ruin and extirpation of the family of Jeroboam, according to the

word of the Lord by Ahijah. His son Nadab succeeded him. If the death

of his brother Abijah had had a due influence upon him to make him

religious, and the honour done him at his death had engaged him to

follow his good example, his reign might have been long and glorious;

but he walked in the way of his father

(v. 26),

kept up the worship of his calves, and forbade his subjects to go up to

Jerusalem to worship, sinned and made Israel to sin, and

therefore God brought ruin upon him quickly, in the second year of his

reign. He was besieging Gibbethon, a city which the Philistines had

taken from the Danites, and was endeavouring to re-take it; and there,

in the midst of his army, did Baasha, with others, conspire against him

and kill him,

(v. 27),

and so little interest had he in the affections of his people that his

army did not only not avenge his death, but chose his murderer for his

successor. Whether Baasha did it upon a personal pique against Nadab,

or to be avenged on the house of Jeroboam for some affront received

from them, or whether under pretence of freeing his country from the

tyranny of a bad prince, or whether merely from a principle of

ambition, to make way for himself to the throne, does not appear; but

he slew him and reigned in his stead,
v. 28.

And the first thing he did when he came to the crown was to cut off

all the house of Jeroboam, that he might the better secure himself

and his own usurped government. He thought it not enough to imprison or

banish them, but he destroyed them, left not only no males (as was

foretold,

ch. xiv. 10),

but none that breathed. Herein he was barbarous, but God was righteous.

Jeroboam’s sin was punished

(v. 30);

for those that provoke God do it to their own confusion; see

Jer. vii. 19.

Ahijah’s prophecy was accomplished

(v. 29);

for no word of God shall fall to the ground. Divine threatenings are

not bugbears.

2. The elevation of Baasha. He shall be tried awhile, as Jeroboam was.

Twenty-four years he reigned

(v. 33),

but showed that it was not from any dislike to Jeroboam’s sin that he

destroyed his family, but from malice and ambition; for, when he had

rooted out the sinner, he himself clave to the sin, and walked in

the way of Jeroboam

(v. 34),

though he had seen the end of that way; so strangely was his heart

hardened with the deceitfulness of sin.


[Table of Contents]

[Previous]

[Next]

Matthew Henry
Commentary on the Whole Bible (1708)


Back to Bibles Net . Com – Online Christian Library

Matthew Henry’s Complete Commentary – Free Download

Contact Us


Top