BIBLES NET. COM
Matthew Henry’s Complete Commentary
on the Whole Bible
Back to Biblesnet.com Home Page
|
[Previous] [Next] |
Matthew Henry |
S E C O N D K I N G S
CHAP. XIV.
This chapter continues the history of the succession in the kingdoms
both of Judah and Israel.
I. In the kingdom of Judah here is,
1. The entire history (as much as is recorded in this book) of
Amaziah’s reign
(1.) His good character,
(2.) The justice he executed on the murderers of his father,
(3.) His victory over the Edomites,
(4.) His war with Joash, and his defeat in that war,
(5.) His fall, as last, by a conspiracy against him,
2. The beginning of the history of Azariah,
II. In the kingdom of Israel, the conclusion of the reign of Joash
(ver. 15, 16),
and the entire history of Jeroboam his son, the second of that name,
How many great men are made to stand in a little compass in God’s
book!
| The Reign of Amaziah. | B. C. 828. |
|
|
|
1 In the second year of Joash son of Jehoahaz king of Israel
reigned Amaziah the son of Joash king of Judah.
2 He was twenty and five years old when he began to reign, and
reigned twenty and nine years in Jerusalem. And his mother’s name
was Jehoaddan of Jerusalem.
3 And he did that which was right in the sight of the LORD,
yet not like David his father: he did according to all things as
Joash his father did.
4 Howbeit the high places were not taken away: as yet the
people did sacrifice and burnt incense on the high places.
5 And it came to pass, as soon as the kingdom was confirmed in
his hand, that he slew his servants which had slain the king his
father.
6 But the children of the murderers he slew not: according unto
that which is written in the book of the law of Moses, wherein
the LORD commanded, saying, The fathers shall not be put to death
for the children, nor the children be put to death for the
fathers; but every man shall be put to death for his own sin.
7 He slew of Edom in the valley of salt ten thousand, and took
Selah by war, and called the name of it Joktheel unto this day.
Amaziah, the son and successor of Joash, is the king whom here we have
an account of. Let us take a view of him,
I. In the temple; and there he acted, in some measure, well, like
Joash, but not like David,
v. 3.
He began well, but did not persevere: He did that which was right in
the sight of the Lord, kept up his attendance on God’s altars and
his attention to God’s word, yet not like David. It is not enough to do
that which our pious predecessors did, merely to keep up the usage, but
we must do it as they did it, from the same principle of faith
and devotion and with the same sincerity and resolution. It is here
taken notice of, as before, that the high places were not taken
away,
v. 4.
It is hard to get clear of those corruptions which, by long usage, have
gained both prescription and a favourable opinion.
II. On the bench; and there we have him doing justice on the traitors
that murdered his father, not as soon as ever he came to the crown,
lest it should occasion some disturbance, but he prudently deferred it
till the kingdom was confirmed in his hand,
v. 5.
To weaken a factious party gradually, when it is not safe to provoke,
often proves the way to ruin it effectually. Justice strikes surely by
striking slowly, and is often executed most prudently when it is not
executed presently. Wisdom here is profitable to direct. Amaziah did
thus,
1. According to the rule of the law, that ancient rule, that he
that sheds man’s blood by man shall his blood be shed. Never let
traitors or murderers expect to come to their graves like other men.
Let them flee to the pit, and let no man stay them.
2. Under the limitation of the law: The children of the murderers he
slew not, because the law of Moses had expressly provided that
the children should not be put to death for the fathers,
v. 6.
It is probable that this is taken notice of because there were those
about him that advised him to that rigour, both in revenge (because the
crime was extraordinary–the murder of a king) and in policy, that the
children might not plot against him, in revenge of their father’s
death. But against these insinuations he opposed the express law of God
which he was to judge by, and which he resolved to adhere to and trust
God with the issue. God visits the iniquity of the fathers upon the
children, because every man is guilty before him and owes him a death;
so that, if he require the life for the father’s sin, he does not
wrong, the sinner having forfeited it already by his own. But he does
not allow earthly princes to do thus: the children, before them, are
innocent, and therefore must not suffer as guilty.
III. In the field; and there we find him triumphing over the Edomites,
v. 7.
Edom had revolted from under the hand of Judah in Joram’s time,
Now he makes war upon them to bring them back to their allegiance,
kills 10,000 and takes the chief city of Arabia the stony (called
Selah—a rock), and gave it a new name. We shall find a
larger account of this expedition,
&c.
8 Then Amaziah sent messengers to Jehoash, the son of Jehoahaz
son of Jehu, king of Israel, saying, Come, let us look one
another in the face.
9 And Jehoash the king of Israel sent to Amaziah king of Judah,
saying, The thistle that was in Lebanon sent to the cedar that
was in Lebanon, saying, Give thy daughter to my son to wife:
and there passed by a wild beast that was in Lebanon, and trode
down the thistle.
10 Thou hast indeed smitten Edom, and thine heart hath lifted
thee up: glory of this, and tarry at home: for why shouldest
thou meddle to thy hurt, that thou shouldest fall, even thou,
and Judah with thee?
11 But Amaziah would not hear. Therefore Jehoash king of Israel
went up; and he and Amaziah king of Judah looked one another in
the face at Beth-shemesh, which belongeth to Judah.
12 And Judah was put to the worse before Israel; and they fled
every man to their tents.
13 And Jehoash king of Israel took Amaziah king of Judah, the
son of Jehoash the son of Ahaziah, at Beth-shemesh, and came to
Jerusalem, and brake down the wall of Jerusalem from the gate of
Ephraim unto the corner gate, four hundred cubits.
14 And he took all the gold and silver, and all the vessels
that were found in the house of the LORD, and in the treasures of
the king’s house, and hostages, and returned to Samaria.
For several successions after the division of the kingdoms that of
Judah suffered much by the enmity of Israel. After Asa’s time,
for several successions, it suffered more by the friendship of
Israel, and by the alliance and affinity made with them. But now we
meet with hostility between them again, which had not been for some
ages before.
I. Amaziah, upon no provocation, and without showing any cause of
quarrel, challenged Joash into the field
(v. 8):
“Come, let us look one another in the face; let us try our
strength in battle.” Had he challenged him to a personal duel only, the
error would have remained with himself, but each must bring all their
forces into the field, and thousands of lives on both sides must be
sacrificed to his capricious humour. Hereby he showed himself proud,
presumptuous, and prodigal of blood. Some think that he intended to
avenge the injury which the dismissed disgusted Israelites had lately
done to his country, in their return
and that he had also the vanity to think of subduing the kingdom of
Israel, and reuniting it to Judah. A fool’s lips thus enter into
contention, and his mouth calleth for strokes. Those that challenge
are chargeable with that beginning of strife, which is as the letting
forth of water. He that is eager either to fight or to go to law may
perhaps have enough of it quickly, and be the first that repents
it.
II. Joash sent him a grave rebuke for his challenge, with advice to
withdraw it,
1. He mortifies his pride, by comparing himself to a cedar, a stately
tree, and Amaziah to a thistle, a sorry weed, telling him he was so far
from fearing him that he despised him, and scorned as much to have any
thing to do with him, or make any alliance with him, as the cedar would
to match his daughter to a thistle. The ancient house of David he
thinks not worthy to be named the same day with the house of Jehu,
though an upstart. How may a humble man smile to hear two proud and
scornful men set their wits on work to vilify and undervalue one
another!
2. He foretels his fall: A wild beast trode down the thistle,
and so put an end to his treaty with the cedar; so easily does Joash
think his forces can crush Amaziah, and so unable does he think him to
make any resistance.
3. He shows him the folly of his challenge: “Thou hast indeed
smitten Edom, a weak, unarmed, undisciplined body of men, and
therefore thinkest thou canst carry all before thee and subdue the
regular forces of Israel with as much ease. Thy heart has lifted
thee up.” See where the root of all sin lies; it is in the heart,
thence it flows, and that must bear the blame. It is not Providence,
the event, the occasion (whatever it is), that makes men proud, or
secure, or discontented, or the like, but it is their own heart that
does it. “Thou art proud of the blow thou hast given to Edom, as if
that had made thee formidable to all mankind.” Those wretchedly deceive
themselves that magnify their own performances, and, because they have
been blessed with some little success and reputation, conclude
themselves fit for any thing and no less sure of it.
4. He counsels him to be content with the honour he has won, and not to
hazard that, by grasping at more that was out of his reach: Why
shouldst thou meddle to thy hurt, as fools often do, that will be
meddling?
Many would have had wealth and honour enough if they had but known when
they had enough. He warns him of the consequence, that it would be
fatal not to himself only, but to his kingdom, which he ought to
protect.
III. Amaziah persisted in his resolution, and the issue was bad; he had
better have tarried at home, for Joash gave him such a look in the face
as put him to confusion. Challengers commonly prove to be on the losing
side.
1. His army was routed and dispersed,
Josephus says, When they were to engage they were struck with such
terror that they did not strike a stroke, but every one made the best
of his way.
2. He himself was taken prisoner by the king of Israel, and then had
enough of looking him in the face. Amaziah’s pedigree comes in
here somewhat abruptly (the son of Joash, the son of Ahaziah),
because perhaps he had gloried in the dignity of his ancestors, or
because he now smarted for their iniquity.
3. The conqueror entered Jerusalem, which tamely opened to him, and yet
he broke down their wall (and, as Josephus says, drove his chariot in
triumph through the breach), in reproach to them, and that he might,
when he pleased, take possession of the royal city.
4. He plundered Jerusalem, took away all that was valuable, and
returned to Samaria, laden with spoils,
It was said of Joash that he did that which was evil in the sight of
the Lord, and of Amaziah that he did that which was right;
and yet Joash triumphs thus over Amaziah, and why so? Because God would
show, in Amaziah’s fate, that he resists the proud, or because,
whatever they were otherwise, Joash had lately been respectful to one
of God’s prophets
(ch. xiii. 14),
but Amaziah had been abusive to another
and God will honour those who honour him in his prophets, but those who
despise them, and him in them, shall be lightly esteemed.
| Reign of Jeroboam, King of Israel. | B. C. 825. |
|
|
|
15 Now the rest of the acts of Jehoash which he did, and his
might, and how he fought with Amaziah king of Judah, are they
not written in the book of the chronicles of the kings of Israel?
16 And Jehoash slept with his fathers, and was buried in
Samaria with the kings of Israel; and Jeroboam his son reigned in
his stead.
17 And Amaziah the son of Joash king of Judah lived after the
death of Jehoash son of Jehoahaz king of Israel fifteen years.
18 And the rest of the acts of Amaziah, are they not written
in the book of the chronicles of the kings of Judah?
19 Now they made a conspiracy against him in Jerusalem: and he
fled to Lachish; but they sent after him to Lachish, and slew him
there.
20 And they brought him on horses: and he was buried at
Jerusalem with his fathers in the city of David.
21 And all the people of Judah took Azariah, which was
sixteen years old, and made him king instead of his father
Amaziah.
22 He built Elath, and restored it to Judah, after that the
king slept with his fathers.
Here are three kings brought to their graves in these few verses:–
1. Joash king of Israel,
We attended his funeral once before,
But, because the historian had occasion to give a further account of
his life and actions, he again mentions his death and burial.
2. Amaziah king of Judah. Fifteen years he survived his conqueror the
king of Israel,
A man may live a great while after he has been shamed, may be
thoroughly mortified (as Amaziah no doubt was) and yet not dead. His
acts are said to be found written in his annals
(v. 18),
but not his might; for his cruelty when he was a conqueror over the
Edomites, and his insolence when he challenged the king of Israel,
showed him void of true courage. He was slain by his own subjects, who
hated him for his maladministration
(v. 19)
and made Jerusalem too hot for him, the ignominious breach made in
their walls being occasioned by his folly and presumption. He fled to
Lachish. How long he continued concealed or sheltered there we are not
told, but, at last, he was there murdered,
No further did the rage of the rebels extend, for they brought him in a
chariot to Jerusalem, and buried him there among his ancestors.
3. Azariah succeeded Amaziah, but not till twelve years after his
father’s death, for Amaziah died in the fifteenth year of Jeroboam (as
appears by comparing
but Azariah did not begin his reign till the twenty-seventh of Jeroboam
(ch. xv. 1),
for he was but four years old at the death of his father, so that, for
twelve years, till he came to be sixteen, the government was in the
hands of protectors. He reigned very long
and yet the account of his reign is here industriously huddled up, and
broken off abruptly
(v. 22):
He built Elath (which had belonged to the Edomites, but, it is
probable, was recovered by his father,
v. 7),
after that the king slept with his fathers, as if that had been
all he did that was worth mentioning, or rather it is meant of king
Amaziah: he built it soon after Amaziah died.
23 In the fifteenth year of Amaziah the son of Joash king of
Judah Jeroboam the son of Joash king of Israel began to reign in
Samaria, and reigned forty and one years.
24 And he did that which was evil in the sight of the LORD:
he departed not from all the sins of Jeroboam the son of Nebat,
who made Israel to sin.
25 He restored the coast of Israel from the entering of Hamath
unto the sea of the plain, according to the word of the LORD God
of Israel, which he spake by the hand of his servant Jonah, the
son of Amittai, the prophet, which was of Gath-hepher.
26 For the LORD saw the affliction of Israel, that it was
very bitter: for there was not any shut up, nor any left, nor
any helper for Israel.
27 And the LORD said not that he would blot out the name of
Israel from under heaven: but he saved them by the hand of
Jeroboam the son of Joash.
28 Now the rest of the acts of Jeroboam, and all that he did,
and his might, how he warred, and how he recovered Damascus, and
Hamath, which belonged to Judah, for Israel, are they not
written in the book of the chronicles of the kings of Israel?
29 And Jeroboam slept with his fathers, even with the kings
of Israel; and Zachariah his son reigned in his stead.
Here is an account of the reign of Jeroboam the second. I doubt it is
an indication of the affection and adherence of the house of Jehu to
the sins of Jeroboam the son of Nebat, who made Israel to sin,
that they called an heir-apparent to the crown by his name, thinking
that an honourable name which in the book of God is infamous and
stigmatized as much as any.
I. His reign was long, the longest of all the reigns of the kings of
Israel: He reigned forty-one years; yet his contemporary
Azariah, the king of Judah, reigned longer, even fifty-two years. This
Jeroboam reigned just as long as Asa had done
yet one did that which was good and the other that which was evil. We
cannot measure men’s characters by the length of their lives or by
their outward prosperity. There is one event to the righteous and to
the wicked.
II. His character was the same with that of the rest of those kings:
He did that which was evil
(v. 24),
for he departed not from the sins of Jeroboam; he kept up the
worship of the calves, and never left that, thinking there was no harm
in it, because it had been the way of all his ancestors and
predecessors. But a sin is never the less evil in God’s sight, whatever
it is in ours, for its being an ancient usage; and a frivolous plea it
will be against doing good, that we have been accustomed to do
evil.
III. Yet he prospered more than most of them, for though, in that one
thing, he did evil in the sight of the Lord, yet it is likely, in other
respects, there was some good found in him and therefore God owned him,
1. By prophecy. He raised up Jonah the son of Amittai, a Galilean (so
much were those mistaken that said, Out of Galilee ariseth no
prophet,
John vii. 52),
and by him intimated the purposes of his favour to Israel,
notwithstanding their provocations, encouraged him and his kingdom to
take up arms for the recovery of their ancient possessions, and (which
would contribute not a little to their success) assured them of
victory. It is a sign that God has not cast off his people if he
continue faithful ministers among them; when Elisha, who strengthened
the hands of Joash, was removed, Jonah was sent to encourage his son.
Happy is the land that has a succession of prophets running parallel
with a succession of princes, that the word of the Lord may endure for
ever. Of this Jonah we read much in that little book of scripture that
bears his name. It is probable that it was when he was a young man, and
fit for such an expedition, that God sent him to Nineveh, and that it
was when he had yet been but a little conversant with the visions of
God that he flew off and fretted as he did; and, if so, this is an
undoubted evidence of the forgiveness of his faults and follies, that
he was afterwards employed as a messenger of mercy to Israel. A
commission amounts to a pardon, and he that had himself found mercy,
notwithstanding his provocations, could the better encourage them with
the hope of mercy notwithstanding theirs. Some that have been foolish
and passionate, and have gone about their work very awkwardly at first,
yet afterwards have proved useful and eminent. Men must not be thrown
away for every fault.
2. By providence. The event was according to the word of the
Lord: his arms were successful; he restored the coast of
Israel, recovered those frontier-towns and countries that lay from
Hamath in the north to the sea of the plain, (that is, the sea of
Sodom) in the south, all which the Syrians had possessed themselves of,
Two reasons are here given why God blessed them with those victories:–
(1.) Because their distress was very great, which made them the objects
of his compassion,
Though he saw not any signs of their repentance and formation, yet
he saw their affliction, that it was very bitter. Those that
lived in those countries which the enemies were masters of were
miserably oppressed and enslaved, and could call nothing their own; the
rest, we may suppose, were much impoverished by the frequent incursions
the enemy made upon them to plunder them, and continually terrified by
their threatenings, so that there was none shut up or left, both
towns and countries were laid waste and stripped of their wealth, and
no helper appeared. To this extremity were they reduced, in many parts
of the country, in the beginning of Jeroboam’s reign, when God, in mere
pity to them, heard the cry of their affliction (for no mention is made
here of the cry of their prayers), and wrought this deliverance for
them by the hand of Jeroboam. Let those whose case is pitiable take
comfort from the divine pity; we read of God’s bowels of mercy
(Isa. lxiii. 15; Jer. xxxi. 20)
and that he is full of compassion,
(2.) Because the decree had not yet gone forth for their utter
destruction; he had not as yet said he would blot out the name of
Israel
(v. 27),
and because he had not said it he would not do it. If this be
understood of the dispersion of the ten tribes, he did say it and do
it, for that name still remains under heaven in the gospel
Israel, and will to the end of time; and because they, at present,
bore that name which was to have this lasting honour, he showed them
this favour, as well as for the sake of the ancient honour of that
name,
IV. Here is the conclusion of Jeroboam’s reign. We read
(v. 28)
of his might, and how he warred, but
(v. 29)
he slept with his fathers; for the mightiest must yield to
death, and there is no discharge in that war. Many prophets there had
been in Israel, a constant succession of them in every age, but none of
the prophets had left any of their prophecies in writing till those of
this age began to do it, and their prophecies are part of the canon of
scripture. It was in the reign of this Jeroboam that Hosea (who
continued very long a prophet) began to prophesy, and he was the first
that wrote his prophecies; therefore the word of the Lord by him is
called the beginning of the word of the Lord,
Hos. i. 2.
Then that part of the word of the Lord began to be written. At
the same time Amos prophesied, and wrote his prophecy, soon
afterwards Micah, and then Isaiah, in the days of Ahaz
and Hezekiah. Thus God never left himself without witness, but, in the
darkest and most degenerate ages of the church, raised up some to be
burning and shining lights in it to their own age by their preaching
and living, and a few by their writings to reflect light upon us on
whom the ends of the world have come.
|
[Previous] [Next] |
Matthew Henry |
|
Back to Bibles Net . Com – Online Christian Library Matthew Henry’s Complete Commentary – Free Download |
Copyright 2008. Bibles Net. Com. All Rights Reserved.