BIBLES NET. COM

Matthew Henry’s Commentary – First Chronicles, Chapter IV

Matthew Henry’s Complete Commentary

on the Whole Bible

Back to Biblesnet.com Home Page


[Table of Contents]

[Previous]

[Next]

Matthew Henry
Commentary on the Whole Bible (1708)




F I R S T   C H R O N I C L E S

CHAP. IV.



     

In this chapter we have,

I. A further account of the genealogies of the tribe of Judah, the most

numerous and most famous of all the tribes. The posterity of Shobal

the son of Hur

(ver. 1-4),

of Ashur the posthumous son of Hezron (who was mentioned,

ii. 24),

with something particular concerning Jabez

(ver. 5-10),

of Chelub and others

(ver. 11-20),

of Shelah,

ver. 21-23.

II. An account of the posterity and cities of Simeon, their conquest of

Gedon, and of the Amalekites in Mount Seir,

ver. 24-43.












The Sons of Judah; The Prayer of Jabez. B. C. 1720.

     

1 The sons of Judah; Pharez, Hezron, and Carmi, and Hur, and

Shobal.

  2 And Reaiah the son of Shobal begat Jahath; and Jahath begat

Ahumai, and Lahad. These are the families of the Zorathites.

  3 And these were of the father of Etam; Jezreel, and Ishma,

and Idbash: and the name of their sister was Hazelel-poni:

  4 And Penuel the father of Gedor, and Ezer the father of

Hushah. These are the sons of Hur, the firstborn of Ephratah,

the father of Bethlehem.

  5 And Ashur the father of Tekoa had two wives, Helah and

Naarah.

  6 And Naarah bare him Ahuzam, and Hepher, and Temeni, and

Haahashtari. These were the sons of Naarah.

  7 And the sons of Helah were, Zereth, and Jezoar, and Ethnan.

  8 And Coz begat Anub, and Zobebah, and the families of Aharhel

the son of Harum.

  9 And Jabez was more honourable than his brethren: and his

mother called his name Jabez, saying, Because I bare him with

sorrow.

  10 And Jabez called on the God of Israel, saying, Oh that thou

wouldest bless me indeed, and enlarge my coast, and that thine

hand might be with me, and that thou wouldest keep me from

evil, that it may not grieve me! And God granted him that which

he requested.

     

One reason, no doubt, why Ezra is here most particular in the register

of the tribe of Judah is because it was that tribe which, with its

appendages, Simeon, Benjamin, and Levi, made up the kingdom of Judah,

which not only long survived the other tribes in Canaan, but in process

of time, now when this was written, returned out of captivity, when the

generality of the other tribes were lost in the kingdom of Assyria. The

most remarkable person in this paragraph is Jabez. It is not said whose

son he was, nor does it appear in what age he lived; but, it should

seem, he was the founder of one of the families of Aharhel, mentioned

v. 8.

Here is,

     

I. The reason of his name: his mother gave him the name with this

reason, Because I bore him with sorrow,
v. 9.

All children are borne with sorrow (for the sentence upon the woman is,

In sorrow shalt thou bring forth children), but some with much

more sorrow than others. Usually the sorrow in bearing is afterwards

forgotten for joy that the child is born; but here it seems it

was so extraordinary that it was remembered when the child came to be

circumcised, and care was taken to perpetuate the remembrance of it

while he lived. Perhaps the mother called Habez, as Rachel called her

son Benoni, when she was dying of the sorrow. Or, if she recovered it,

yet thus she recorded it,

1. That it might be a continual memorandum to herself, to be thankful

to God as long as she lived for supporting her under and bringing her

through that sorrow. It may be of use to be often reminded of our

sorrows, that we may always have such thoughts of things as we had in

the day of our affliction, and may learn to rejoice with trembling.

2. That it might likewise be a memorandum to him what this world is

into which she bore him, a vale of tears, in which he must expect

few days and full of trouble. The sorrow he carried in his name

might help to put a seriousness upon his spirit. It might also remind

him to love and honour his mother, and labour, in every thing, to be a

comfort to her who brought him into the world with so much sorrow. It

is piety in children thus to requite their parents,

1 Tim. v. 4.

     

II. The eminence of his character: He was more honourable than his

brethren, qualified above them by the divine grace and dignified

above them by the divine providence; they did virtuously, but he

excelled them all. Now the sorrow with which his mother bore him was

abundantly recompensed. That son which of all her children cost her

most dear she was most happy in, and was made glad in proportion to the

affliction,

Ps. xc. 15.

We are not told upon what account he was more honourable than his

brethren, whether because he raised a greater estate, or was

preferred to the magistracy, or signalized himself in war; we have most

reason to think it was upon the account of his learning and piety, not

only because these, above any thing, put honour upon a man, but because

we have reason to think that in these Jabez was eminent.

1. In learning, because we find that the families of the scribes

dwelt at Jabez

(ch. ii. 55),

a city which, it is likely, took its name from him. The Jews say that

he was a famous doctor of the law and left many disciples behind him.

And it should seem, by the mentioning of him so abruptly here, that his

name was well known when Ezra wrote this.

2. In piety, because we find here that he was a praying man. His

inclination to devotion made him truly honourable, and by prayer he

obtained those blessings from God which added much to his honour. The

way to be truly great is to be truly good and to pray much.

     

III. The prayer he made, probably like Solomon’s prayer for wisdom,

just when he was setting out in the world. He set himself to

acknowledge God in all his ways, put himself under the divine blessing

and protection, and prospered accordingly. Perhaps these were the heads

on which he enlarged in his daily prayers; for this purpose it was his

constant practice to pray alone, and with his family, as Daniel. Some

think that it was upon some particular occasion, when he was straitened

and threatened by his enemies, that he prayed this prayer.

Observe,

     

1. To whom he prayed, not to any of the gods of the Gentiles; no, he

called on the God of Israel, the living and true God, who alone

can hear and answer prayer, and in prayer had an eye to him as the God

of Israel, a God in covenant with his people, the God with whom Jacob

wrestled and prevailed and was thence called Israel.

     

2. What was the nature of his prayer.

(1.) As the margin reads it, it was a solemn vow–If thou

wilt bless me indeed, &c. and then the sense is imperfect, but may

easily be filled up from Jacob’s vow, or some such like–then thou

shalt be my God. He did not express his promise, but left it to be

understood, either because he was afraid to promise in his own strength

or because he resolved to devote himself entirely to God. He does, as

it were, give God a blank paper, let him write what he pleases: “Lord,

if thou wilt bless me and keep me, do what thou wilt with me, I will be

at thy command and disposal for ever.”

(2.) As the text reads it, it was the language of a most ardent

and affectionate desire: O that thou wouldst bless me!

     

3. What was the matter of his prayer. Four things he prayed for:–

(1.) That God would bless him indeed: “That, blessing, thou wilt

bless me, bless me greatly with manifold and abundant blessings.”

Perhaps he had an eye to the promise God made to Abraham

(Gen. xxii. 17),

In blessing, I will bless thee. “Let that blessing of Abraham

come upon me.” Spiritual blessings are the best blessings, and those

are blessed indeed who are blessed with them. God’s blessings are real

things and produce real effects. We can but wish a blessing: he

commands it. Those whom he blesses are blessed indeed.

(2.) That he would enlarge his coast, that he would prosper his

endeavours for the increase of what fell to his lot either by work or

war. That God would enlarge our hearts, and so enlarge our portion in

himself and in the heavenly Canaan, ought to be our desire and prayer.

(3.) That God’s hand might be with him. The prayer of Moses for this

tribe of Judah was, That his own hands might be sufficient for

him,
Deut. xxxiii. 7;

but Jabez expects not that this can be the case, unless he have

God’s hand with him and the presence of his power. God’s hand

with us, to lead us, protect us, strengthen us, and to work all our

works in us and for us, is indeed a hand sufficient for us,

all-sufficient.

(4.) That he would keep him from evil, the evil of sin, the evil of

trouble, all the evil designs of his enemies, that they might not hurt

him, nor grieve him, nor make him a Jabez indeed, a man of

sorrow: in the original there is an allusion to his name. Father

in heaven, deliver me from evil.

     

4. What was the success of his prayer: God granted him that which he

requested, prospered him remarkably, and gave him success in his

undertakings, in his studies, in his worldly business, in his conflicts

with the Canaanites, and so he became more honourable than his

brethren. God was of old always ready to hear prayer, and his

ear is not yet heavy.














Genealogies. B. C. 1420.

     

11 And Chelub the brother of Shuah begat Mehir, which was the

father of Eshton.

  12 And Eshton begat Beth-rapha, and Paseah, and Tehinnah the

father of Irnahash. These are the men of Rechah.

  13 And the sons of Kenaz; Othniel, and Seraiah: and the sons of

Othniel; Hathath.

  14 And Meonothai begat Ophrah: and Seraiah begat Joab, the

father of the valley of Charashim; for they were craftsmen.

  15 And the sons of Caleb the son of Jephunneh; Iru, Elah, and

Naam: and the sons of Elah, even Kenaz.

  16 And the sons of Jehaleleel; Ziph, and Ziphah, Tiria, and

Asareel.

  17 And the sons of Ezra were, Jether, and Mered, and Epher,

and Jalon: and she bare Miriam, and Shammai, and Ishbah the

father of Eshtemoa.

  18 And his wife Jehudijah bare Jered the father of Gedor, and

Heber the father of Socho, and Jekuthiel the father of Zanoah.

And these are the sons of Bithiah the daughter of Pharaoh,

which Mered took.

  19 And the sons of his wife Hodiah the sister of Naham, the

father of Keilah the Garmite, and Eshtemoa the Maachathite.

  20 And the sons of Shimon were, Amnon, and Rinnah, Benhanan,

and Tilon. And the sons of Ishi were, Zoheth, and Benzoheth.

  21 The sons of Shelah the son of Judah were, Er the father of

Lecah, and Laadah the father of Mareshah, and the families of the

house of them that wrought fine linen, of the house of Ashbea,

  22 And Jokim, and the men of Chozeba, and Joash, and Saraph,

who had the dominion in Moab, and Jashubilehem. And these are

ancient things.

  23 These were the potters, and those that dwelt among plants

and hedges: there they dwelt with the king for his work.

     

We may observe in these verses,

1. That here is a whole family of craftsmen, handicraft tradesmen, that

applied themselves to all sorts of manufactures, in which they were

ingenious and industrious above their neighbours,

v. 14.

There was a valley where they lived which was, from them, called the

valley of craftsmen. Those that are craftsmen are not therefore to

be looked upon as mean men. These craftsmen, though two of a trade

often disagree, yet chose to live together, for the improving of arts

by comparing notes, and that they might support one another’s

reputation.

2. That one of these married the daughter of Pharaoh

(v. 18),

which was the common name of the kings of Egypt. If an Israelite in

Egypt before the bondage began, while Joseph’s merits were yet fresh in

mind, was preferred to be the king’s son-in-law, it is not to be

thought strange: few Israelites could, like Moses, refuse an alliance

with the court.

3. That another is said to be the father of the house of those that

wrought fine linen,
v. 21.

It is inserted in their genealogy as their honour that they were the

best weavers in the kingdom, and they brought up their children, from

one generation to another, to the same business, not aiming to make

them gentlemen. This Laadah is said to be the father of those that

wrought fine linen, as before the flood Jubal is said to be the

father of musicians and Jabal of shepherds, &c. His

posterity inhabited the city of Mareshah, the manufacture or staple

commodity of which place was linen-cloth, with which their kings and

priests were clothed.

4. That another family had had dominion in Moab, but were now in

servitude in Babylon,
v. 22, 23.

(1.) It was found among the ancient things that they had the

dominion in Moab. Probably in David’s time, when that country

was conquered, they transplanted themselves thither, and were put in

places of power there, which they held for several generations; but

this was a great while ago, time out of mind.

(2.) Their posterity were now potters and gardeners, as is supposed in

Babylon, where they dwelt with the king for his work, got a good

livelihood by their industry, and therefore cared not for returning

with their brethren to their own land, after the years of captivity had

expired. Those that now have dominion know not what their posterity may

be reduced to, nor what mean employments they may be glad to take up

with. But those were unworthy the name of Israelites that would

dwell among plants and hedges rather than be at the pains to

return to Canaan.





















Genealogies. B. C. 715.

     

24 The sons of Simeon were, Nemuel, and Jamin, Jarib, Zerah,

and Shaul:

  25 Shallum his son, Mibsam his son, Mishma his son.

  26 And the sons of Mishma; Hamuel his son, Zacchur his son,

Shimei his son.

  27 And Shimei had sixteen sons and six daughters; but his

brethren had not many children, neither did all their family

multiply, like to the children of Judah.

  28 And they dwelt at Beer-sheba, and Moladah, and Hazar-shual,

  29 And at Bilhah, and at Ezem, and at Tolad,

  30 And at Bethuel, and at Hormah, and at Ziklag,

  31 And at Beth-marcaboth, and Hazar-susim, and at Beth-birei, and

at Shaaraim. These were their cities unto the reign of David.

  32 And their villages were, Etam, and Ain, Rimmon, and

Tochen, and Ashan, five cities:

  33 And all their villages that were round about the same

cities, unto Baal. These were their habitations, and their

genealogy.

  34 And Meshobab, and Jamlech, and Joshah the son of Amaziah,

  35 And Joel, and Jehu the son of Josibiah, the son of Seraiah,

the son of Asiel,

  36 And Elioenai, and Jaakobah, and Jeshohaiah, and Asaiah, and

Adiel, and Jesimiel, and Benaiah,

  37 And Ziza the son of Shiphi, the son of Allon, the son of

Jedaiah, the son of Shimri, the son of Shemaiah;

  38 These mentioned by their names were princes in their

families: and the house of their fathers increased greatly.

  39 And they went to the entrance of Gedor, even unto the east

side of the valley, to seek pasture for their flocks.

  40 And they found fat pasture and good, and the land was

wide, and quiet, and peaceable; for they of Ham had dwelt there

of old.

  41 And these written by name came in the days of Hezekiah king

of Judah, and smote their tents, and the habitations that were

found there, and destroyed them utterly unto this day, and dwelt

in their rooms: because there was pasture there for their

flocks.

  42 And some of them, even of the sons of Simeon, five

hundred men, went to mount Seir, having for their captains

Pelatiah, and Neariah, and Rephaiah, and Uzziel, the sons of

Ishi.

  43 And they smote the rest of the Amalekites that were escaped,

and dwelt there unto this day.

     

We have here some of the genealogies of the tribe of Simeon (though it

was not a tribe of great note), especially the princes of that tribe,

v. 38.

Of this tribe it is said that they increased greatly, but not

like the children of Judah,
v. 27.

Those whom God increases ought to be thankful, though they see others

that are more increased. Here observe,

1. The cities allotted them

(v. 28),

of which see

Joshua xix. 1,

&c. When it is said that they were theirs unto the reign of

David

(v. 31)

intimation is given that when the ten tribes revolted from the house of

David many of the Simeonites quitted these cities, because they lay

within Judah, and seated themselves elsewhere.

2. The ground they got elsewhere. When those of this tribe that

revolted from the house of David were carried captive with the rest

into Assyria those that adhered to Judah were remarkably owned of God

and prospered in their endeavours to enlarge their coasts. It was in

the days of Hezekiah that a generation of Simeonites, whose tribe had

long crouched and truckled, was animated to make these bold efforts.

(1.) Some of them attacked a place in Arabia, as it should seem, called

the entrance of Gedor, inhabited by the posterity of accursed

Ham

(v. 40),

made themselves masters of it, and dwelt there. This adds to the glory

of Hezekiah’s pious reign, that, as his kingdom in general prospered,

so did particular families. It is said that they found fat pastures,

and yet the land was quiet; even when the kings of Assyria were

giving disturbance to all their neighbours this land escaped their

alarms. The inhabitants being shepherds, who molested none, were not

themselves molested, till the Simeonites came and drove them out and

succeeded them, not only in the plenty, but in the peace, of their

land. Those who dwell (as we do) in a fruitful country, and whose land

is wide, and quiet, and peaceable, have reason to own themselves

indebted to that God who appoints the bounds of our habitation.

(2.) Others of them, to the number of 500, under the command of four

brethren here named, made a descent upon Mount Seir, and smote the

remainder of the devoted Amalekites, and took possession of their

country,

v. 42, 43.

Now the curses on Ham and Amalek had a further accomplishment, when

they seemed dormant, if not dead; as had also the curse on Simeon, that

he should be divided and scattered

(Gen. xlix. 7):

yet to him it was turned into a blessing, for the families of Simeon,

which thus transplanted themselves into those distant countries, are

said to dwell there unto this day

(v. 43),

by which it should seem they escaped the calamities of the captivity.

Providence sometimes sends those out of trouble that are designed for

preservation.


[Table of Contents]

[Previous]

[Next]

Matthew Henry
Commentary on the Whole Bible (1708)


Back to Bibles Net . Com – Online Christian Library

Matthew Henry’s Complete Commentary – Free Download

Contact Us


Top