BIBLES NET. COM

Matthew Henry’s Commentary – Luke XXII

Matthew Henry’s Complete Commentary

on the Whole Bible

Back to Biblesnet.com Home Page


[Table of Contents]

[Previous]

[Next]

Matthew Henry
Commentary on the Whole Bible (1721)




L U K E.

CHAP. XXII.



     

All the evangelists, whatever they omit, give us a particular account

of the death and resurrection of Christ, because he died for our sins

and rose for our justification, this evangelist as fully as any, and

with many circumstances and passages added which we had not before. In

this chapter we have,

I. The plot to take Jesus, and Judas’s coming into it,

ver. 1-6.

II. Christ’s eating the passover with his disciples,

ver. 7-18.

III. The instituting of the Lord’s supper,

ver. 19, 20.

IV. Christ’s discourse with his disciples after supper, upon several

heads,

ver. 21-38.

V. His agony in the garden,

ver. 39-46.

VI. The apprehending of him, by the assistance of Judas,

ver. 47-53.

VII. Peter’s denying him,

ver. 54-62.

VIII. The indignities done to Christ by those that had him in custody,

and his trial and condemnation in the ecclesiastical court,

ver. 63-71.








The Treachery of Judas.

     

1 Now the feast of unleavened bread drew nigh, which is called

the Passover.

  2 And the chief priests and scribes sought how they might kill

him; for they feared the people.

  3 Then entered Satan into Judas surnamed Iscariot, being of the

number of the twelve.

  4 And he went his way, and communed with the chief priests and

captains, how he might betray him unto them.

  5 And they were glad, and covenanted to give him money.

  6 And he promised, and sought opportunity to betray him unto

them in the absence of the multitude.

     

The year of the redeemed is now come, which had been from

eternity fixed in the divine counsels, and long looked for by them that

waited for the consolation of Israel. After the revolutions of many

ages, it is at length come,
Isa. lxiii. 4.

And, it is observable, it is in the very first month of that

year that the redemption is wrought out, so much in haste was the

Redeemer to perform his undertaking, so was he straitened till

it was accomplished. It was in the same month, and at the same

time of the month (in the beginning of months,
Exod. xii. 2),

that God by Moses brought Israel out of Egypt, that the Antitype might

answer the type. Christ is here delivered up, when the feast of

unleavened bread drew nigh,
v. 1.

About as long before that feast as they began to make preparation for

it, here was preparation making for our Passover’s being offered for

us. Here we have,

     

I. His sworn enemies contriving it

(v. 2),

the chief priests, men of sanctity, and the scribes, men of

learning, seeking how they might kill him, either by force of

fraud. Could they have had their will, it had been soon done, but they

feared the people, and the more for what they now saw of their

diligent attendance upon his preaching.

     

II. A treacherous disciple joining in with them, and coming to their

assistance, Judas surnamed Iscariot. He is here said to be of

the number of the twelve, that dignified distinguished number. One

would wonder that Christ, who knew all men, should take a

traitor into that number, and that one of that number,

who could not but know Christ, should be so base as to betray

him; but Christ had wise and holy ends in taking Judas to be a

disciple, and how he who knew Christ so well yet came to betray him we

are here told: Satan entered into Judas,
v. 3.

It was the devil’s work, who thought hereby to ruin Christ’s

undertaking, to have broken his head; but it proved only the bruising

of his heel. Whoever betrays Christ, or his truths or ways, it is Satan

that puts them upon it. Judas knew how desirous the chief priests were

to get Christ into their hands, and that they could not do it safely

without the assistance of some that knew his retirements, as he did.

He therefore went himself, and made the motion to them,

v. 4.

Note, It is hard to say whether more mischief is done to Christ’s

kingdom by the power and policy of its open enemies, or by the

treachery and self-seeking of its pretended friends: nay, without the

latter its enemies could not gain their point as they do. When you see

Judas communing with the chief priests, be sure some mischief is

hatching; it is for no good that they are laying their heads

together.

     

III. The issue of the treaty between them.

1. Judas must betray Christ to them, must bring them to a place

where they might seize him without danger of tumult, and this they

would be glad of.

2. They must give him a sum of money for doing it, and this he would

be glad of

(v. 5):

They covenanted to give him money. When the bargain was made,

Judas sought opportunity to betray him. Probably, he slyly

enquired of Peter and John, who were more intimate with their Master

than he was, where he would be at such a time, and whither he would

retire after the passover, and they were not sharp enough to suspect

him. Somehow or other, in a little time he gained the advantage he

sought, and fixed the time and place where it might be done, in the

absence of the multitude, and without tumult.















The Keeping of the Passover.

     

7 Then came the day of unleavened bread, when the passover must

be killed.

  8 And he sent Peter and John, saying, Go and prepare us the

passover, that we may eat.

  9 And they said unto him, Where wilt thou that we prepare?

  10 And he said unto them, Behold, when ye are entered into the

city, there shall a man meet you, bearing a pitcher of water;

follow him into the house where he entereth in.

  11 And ye shall say unto the goodman of the house, The Master

saith unto thee, Where is the guestchamber, where I shall eat the

passover with my disciples?

  12 And he shall show you a large upper room furnished: there

make ready.

  13 And they went, and found as he had said unto them: and they

made ready the passover.

  14 And when the hour was come, he sat down, and the twelve

apostles with him.

  15 And he said unto them, With desire I have desired to eat

this passover with you before I suffer:

  16 For I say unto you, I will not any more eat thereof, until

it be fulfilled in the kingdom of God.

  17 And he took the cup, and gave thanks, and said, Take this,

and divide it among yourselves:

  18 For I say unto you, I will not drink of the fruit of the

vine, until the kingdom of God shall come.

  19 And he took bread, and gave thanks, and brake it, and gave

unto them, saying, This is my body which is given for you: this

do in remembrance of me.

  20 Likewise also the cup after supper, saying, This cup is

the new testament in my blood, which is shed for you.

     

What a hopeful prospect had we of Christ’s doing a great deal of good

by his preaching in the temple during the feast of unleavened bread,

which continued seven days, when the people were every morning,

and early in the morning, so attentive to hear him! But here is

a stop put to it. He must enter upon work of another kind; in this,

however, he shall do more good than in the other, for neither Christ’s

nor his church’s suffering days are their idle empty days. Now here we

have,

     

I. The preparation that was made for Christ’s eating the passover with

his disciples, upon the very day of unleavened bread, when the

passover must be killed according to the law,

v. 7.

Christ was made under the law, and observed the ordinances of it,

particularly that of the passover, to teach us in like manner to

observe his gospel institutions, particularly that of the Lord’s

supper, and not to neglect them. It is probable that he went to the

temple to preach in the morning, when he sent Peter and John another

way into the city to prepare the passover. Those who have

attendants about them, to do their secular business for them in a great

measure, must not think that this allows them to be idle;

it engages them to employ themselves more in spiritual

business, or service to the public. He directed those whom he

employed whither they should go

(v. 9, 10):

they must follow a man bearing a pitcher of water, and he must

be their guide to the house. Christ could have described the house to

them; probably it was a house they knew, and he might have said no more

than, Go to such a one’s house, or to a house in such a street, with

such a sign, &c. But he directed them thus, to teach them to depend

upon the conduct of Providence, and to follow that, step by

step. They went, not knowing whither they went, nor whom

they followed. Being come to the house, they must desire the master

of the house to show them a room

(v. 11),

and he will readily do it,

v. 12.

Whether it was a friend’s house or a public house does not appear; but

the disciples found their guide, and the house, and the room, just as

he had said to them

(v. 13);

for they need not fear a disappointment who go upon Christ’s

word; according to the orders given them, they got every thing in

readiness for the passover,
v. 11.

     

II. The solemnizing of the passover, according to the law. When the

hour was come that they should go to supper he sat down,

probably at the head-end of the table, and the twelve apostles with

him, Judas not excepted; for it is possible that those whose hearts

are filled with Satan, and all manner of wickedness, may yet continue a

plausible profession of religion, and be found in the performance of

its external services; and while it is in the heart, and does not break

out into anything scandalous, such cannot be denied the external

privileges of their external profession. Though Judas has already been

guilty of an overt act of treason, yet, it not being publicly

known, Christ admits him to sit down with the rest at the passover. Now

observe,

     

1. How Christ bids this passover welcome, to teach us in like

manner to welcome his passover, the Lord’s supper, and to come to it

with an appetite

(v. 15):

With desire I have desired, I have most earnestly desired, to

eat this passover with you before I suffer.” He knew it was to

be the prologue to his sufferings, and therefore he desired it,

because it was in order to his Father’s glory and man’s redemption. He

delighted to do even this part of the will of God

concerning him as Mediator. Shall we be backward to any service

for him who was so forward in the work of our salvation? See the

love he had to his disciples; he desired to eat it with them,

that he and they might have a little time together, themselves, and

none besides, for private conversation, which they could not have in

Jerusalem but upon this occasion. He was now about to leave them, but

was very desirous to eat this passover with them before he

suffered, as if the comfort of that would carry him the more

cheerfully through his sufferings, and make them the easier to him.

Note, Our gospel passover, eaten by faith with Jesus Christ, will be an

excellent preparation for sufferings, and trials, and death itself.

     

2. How Christ in it takes his leave of all passovers, thereby

signifying his abrogating all the ordinances of the ceremonial law, of

which that of the passover was one of the earliest and one of

the most eminent

(v. 16):

I will not any more eat thereof, nor shall it by any more

celebrated by my disciples, until it be fulfilled in the kingdom of

God.

(1.) It was fulfilled when Christ our Passover was sacrificed for

us,
1 Cor. v. 7.

And therefore that type and shadow was laid aside, because now

in the kingdom of God the substance was come, which superseded

it.

(2.) It was fulfilled in the Lord’s supper, an ordinance of the

gospel kingdom, in which the passover had its accomplishment, and which

the disciples, after the pouring out of the Spirit, did frequently

celebrate, as we find

Acts ii. 42, 46.

They ate of it, and Christ might be said to eat with them, because of

the spiritual communion they had with him in that ordinance. He is

said to sup with them and they with him,
Rev. iii. 20.

But,

(3.) The complete accomplishment of that commemoration of liberty will

be in the kingdom of glory, when all God’s spiritual Israel shall be

released from the bondage of death and sin, and be put in possession of

the land of promise. What he had said of his eating of the paschal

lamb, he repeats concerning his drinking of the passover wine,

the cup of blessing, or of thanksgiving, in which all the

company pledged the Master of the feast, at the close of the passover

supper. This cup he took, according to the custom, and gave

thanks for the deliverance of Israel out of Egypt, and the

preservation of their first-born, and then said, Take this, and

divide it among yourselves,
v. 17.

This is not said afterwards of the sacramental cup, which being

probably of much more weight and value, being the New Testament in

his blood, he might give into every one’s hand, to teach them to

make a particular application of it to their own souls; but, as for the

paschal cup which is to be abolished, it is enough to say, “Take

it, and divide it among yourselves, do what you will with it,

for we shall have no more occasion for it,

v. 18.

I will not drink of the fruit of the vine any more, I will not

have it any more drank of, till the kingdom of God shall come,

till the Spirit be poured out, and then you shall in the Lord’s

supper commemorate a much more glorious redemption, of which both

the deliverance out of Egypt and the passover commemoration of it were

types and figures. The kingdom of God is now so near being set up that

you will not need to eat or drink any more till it comes.” Christ dying

next day opened it. As Christ with a great deal of pleasure took leave

of all the legal feasts (which fell of course with the passover) for

the evangelical ones, both spiritual and sacramental; so may good

Christians, when they are called to remove from the church militant to

that which is triumphant, cheerfully exchange even their spiritual

repasts, much more their sacramental ones, for the eternal feast.

     

III. The institution of the Lord’s supper,

v. 19, 20.

The passover and the deliverance out of Egypt were

typical and prophetic signs of a Christ to come, who

should by dying deliver us from sin and death, and the tyranny of

Satan; but they shall no more say, The Lord liveth, that brought us

up out of the land of Egypt; a much greater deliverance shall

eclipse the lustre of that, and therefore the Lord’s supper is

instituted to be a commemorative sign or memorial of a Christ already

come, that has by dying delivered us; and it is his death that

is in a special manner set before us in that ordinance.

     

1. The breaking of Christ’s body as a sacrifice for us is

here commemorated by the breaking of bread; and the sacrifices

under the law were called the bread of our God

(Lev. xxi. 6, 8, 17):

This is my body which is given for you. And there is a feast

upon that sacrifice instituted, in which we are to apply it to

ourselves, and to take the benefit and comfort of it. This bread that

was given for us is given to us to be food for our souls, for

nothing can be more nourishing and satisfying to our

souls than the doctrine of Christ’s making atonement for sin, and the

assurance of our interest in that atonement; this bread that was

broken and given for us, to satisfy for the guilt of our

sins, is broken and given to us, to satisfy the desire of

our souls. And this we do in remembrance of what he did for us,

when he died for us, and for a memorial of what we do, in

making ourselves partakers of him, and joining ourselves to him

in an everlasting covenant; like the stone Joshua set up for a

witness,
Josh. xxiv. 27.

     

2. The shedding of Christ’s blood, by which the atonement

was made (for the blood made atonement for the soul,
Lev. xvii. 11),

as represented by the wine in the cup; and that cup of wine is a sign

and token of the New Testament, or new covenant, made with us. It

commemorates the purchase of the covenant by the blood of

Christ, and confirms the promises of the covenant, which are all

Yea and Amen in him. This will be reviving and refreshing

to our souls, as wine that makes glad the heart. In all our

commemorations of the shedding of Christ’s blood, we must have an eye

to it as shed for us; we needed it, we take hold of it, we hope to have

benefit by it; who loved me, and gave himself for me. And in all

our regards to the New Testament we must have an eye to the blood of

Christ, which gave life and being to it, and seals to us all the

promises of it. Had it not been for the blood of Christ, we had never

had the New Testament; and, had it not been for the New Testament, we

had never know the meaning of Christ’s blood shed.



















The Disciples Admonished; Peter’s Frailty Predicted.

     

21 But, behold, the hand of him that betrayeth me is with me

on the table.

  22 And truly the Son of man goeth, as it was determined: but

woe unto that man by whom he is betrayed!

  23 And they began to enquire among themselves, which of them it

was that should do this thing.

  24 And there was also a strife among them, which of them should

be accounted the greatest.

  25 And he said unto them, The kings of the Gentiles exercise

lordship over them; and they that exercise authority upon them

are called benefactors.

  26 But ye shall not be so: but he that is greatest among

you, let him be as the younger; and he that is chief, as he that

doth serve.

  27 For whether is greater, he that sitteth at meat, or he

that serveth? is not he that sitteth at meat? but I am among

you as he that serveth.

  28 Ye are they which have continued with me in my temptations.

  29 And I appoint unto you a kingdom, as my Father hath

appointed unto me;

  30 That ye may eat and drink at my table in my kingdom, and sit

on thrones judging the twelve tribes of Israel.

  31 And the Lord said, Simon, Simon, behold, Satan hath desired

to have you, that he may sift you as wheat:

  32 But I have prayed for thee, that thy faith fail not: and

when thou art converted, strengthen thy brethren.

  33 And he said unto him, Lord, I am ready to go with thee, both

into prison, and to death.

  34 And he said, I tell thee, Peter, the cock shall not crow

this day, before that thou shalt thrice deny that thou knowest

me.

  35 And he said unto them, When I sent you without purse, and

scrip, and shoes, lacked ye any thing? And they said, Nothing.

  36 Then said he unto them, But now, he that hath a purse, let

him take it, and likewise his scrip: and he that hath no

sword, let him sell his garment, and buy one.

  37 For I say unto you, that this that is written must yet be

accomplished in me, And he was reckoned among the transgressors:

for the things concerning me have an end.

  38 And they said, Lord, behold, here are two swords. And he

said unto them, It is enough.

     

We have here Christ’s discourse with his disciples after supper, much

of which is new here; and in St. John’s gospel we shall find other

additions. We should take example from him to entertain and edify our

family and friends with such discourse at table as is good and to the

use of edifying, which may minister grace to the hearers; but

especially after we have been at the Lord’s table, by Christian

conference to keep one another in a suitable frame. The matters Christ

here discoursed of were of weight, and to the present purpose.

     

I. He discoursed with them concerning him that should betray him, who

was now present.

1. He signifies to them that the traitor was now among them, and one of

them,

v. 21.

By placing this after the institution of the Lord’s supper, though in

Matthew and Mark it is placed before it, it seems plain that Judas did

receive the Lord’s supper, did eat of that bread and drink of

that cup; for, after the solemnity was over, Christ said,

Behold, the hand of him that betrayeth me is with me on the

table. There have been those that have eaten bread with Christ and

yet have betrayed him.

2. He foretels that the treason would take effect

(v. 22):

Truly the Son of man goes as it was determined, goes to the

place where he will be betrayed; for he is delivered up by the counsel

and foreknowledge of God, else Judas could not have delivered him up.

Christ was not driven to his sufferings, but cheerfully went to

them. He said, Lo, I come.

3. He threatens the traitor: Woe to that man by whom he is

betrayed. Note, Neither the patience of the saints under their

sufferings, nor the counsel of God concerning their sufferings, will be

any excuse for those that have any hand in their sufferings, or that

persecute them. Though God has determined that Christ shall be

betrayed and he himself has cheerfully submitted to it, yet Judas’s sin

or punishment is not at all the less.

4. He frightens the rest of the disciples into a suspicion of

themselves, by saying that it was one of them, and not naming which

(v. 23):

They began to enquire among themselves, to interrogate

themselves, to put the question to themselves, who it was that

should do this thing, that could be so base to so good a Master.

The enquiry was not, Is it you? or, Is it such a one?

but, Is it I?

     

II. Concerning the strife that was among them for precedency or

supremacy.

     

1. See what the dispute was: Which of them should be accounted the

greatest. Such and so many contests among the disciples for dignity

and dominion, before the Spirit was poured upon them, were a sad

presage of the like strifes for, and affections of, supremacy in the

churches, after the Spirit should be provoked to depart from them. How

inconsistent is this with that in the

verse before!

There they were enquiring which would be the traitor, and here which

should be the prince. Could such an instance of humility, and such an

instance of pride and vanity, be found in the same men, so near

together? This is like sweet waters and bitter proceeding

at the same time out of the same fountain. What a self-contradiction is

the deceitful heart of man!

     

2. See what Christ said to this dispute. He was not sharp upon them, as

might have been expected (he having so often reproved them for this

very thing), but mildly showed them the sin and folly of it.

     

(1.) This was to make themselves like the kings of the Gentiles,

who affect worldly pomp, and worldly power,

v. 25.

They exercise lordship over their subjects, and are ever and

anon striving to exercise lordship too over the princes that are

about them, though as good as themselves, if they think them not

so strong as themselves. Note, The exercising of lordship

better becomes the kings of the Gentiles than the ministers of

Christ. But observe, They that exercise authority, and take upon

themselves to bear sway, and give law, they are called

BenefactorsEuergetas, they call themselves so,

and so their flatterers call them, and those that set themselves to

serve their interests. It is pretended that they have been

benefactors, and upon that account they should be admitted to

have rule; nay, that in exercising authority they are

benefactors. However they may really serve themselves, they would be

thought to serve their country. One of the Ptolemies was

surnamed Euergetes–The Benefactor. Now our Saviour, by taking

notice of this, intimates,

[1.] That to do good is much more honourable than to look

great; for these princes that were the terror of the mighty

would not be called so, but rather the benefactors of the needy;

so that, by their own confession, a benefactor to his country is much

more valued than a ruler of his country.

[2.] That to do good is the surest way to be great, else they

that aimed to be rulers would not have been so solicitous to be

called Benefactors. This therefore he would have his disciples

believe, that their greatest honour would be to do all the good they

could in the world. They would indeed be benefactors to the

world, by bringing the gospel to it. Let them value themselves upon

that title, which they would indeed be entitled to, and then

they need not strive which should be the greatest, for they would all

be greater- treater blessings to mankind than the kings of the

earth, that exercise lordship over them. If they have that which is

confessedly the greater honour, of being benefactors, let them

despise the less, of being rulers.

     

(2.) It was to make themselves unlike the disciples of Christ, and

unlike Christ himself: “You shall not be so,

v. 26, 27.

“It was never intended that you should rule any otherwise than

by the power of truth and grace, but that you should serve.

When church-rulers affect external pomp and power, and bear up

themselves by secular interests and influences, they debase their

office, and it is an instance of degeneracy like that of Israel when

they would have a king like the nations that were round about them,

whereas the Lord was their King. See here,

[1.] What is the rule Christ gave to his disciples: He that is

greater among you, that is senior, to whom precedency is

due upon the account of his age, let him be as the younger, both

in point of lowness of place (let him condescend to sit with the

younger, and be free and familiar with them) and in point of

labour and work. We say, Juniores ad labores, seniores

ad honores–Let the young work, and the aged receive their honours.

But let the elder take pains as well as the younger; their age and

honour, instead of warranting them to take their ease, bind them to

double work. And he that is chief, ho

hegoumenosthe president of the college or assembly,

let him be as he that serves, hos ho

diakononas the deacon; let him stoop to the meanest

and most toilsome services for the public good, if there be occasion.

[2.] What was the example which he himself gave to this rule:

Whether is greater, he that sitteth at meat or he that serveth?

he that attendeth or he that is attended on? Now Christ was among his

disciples just like one that waited at table. He was so far from

taking state, or taking his ease, by commanding their

attendance upon him, that he was ready to do any office of kindness and

service for them; witness his washing their feet. Shall those

take upon them the form of princes who call themselves followers of him

that took upon him the form of a servant?

     

(3.) They ought not to strive for worldly honour and grandeur, because

he had better honours in reserve for them, of another nature, a

kingdom, a feast, a throne, for each of them,

wherein they should all share alike, and should have no occasion to

strive for precedency,

v. 28-30.

Where observe,

     

[1.] Christ’s commendation of his disciples for their faithfulness to

him; and this was honour enough for them, they needed not to strive for

any greater. It is spoken with an air of encomium and applause: “You

are they who have continued with me in my temptations, you are they

who have stood by me and stuck to me when others have deserted me and

turned their backs upon me.” Christ had his temptations; he was

despised and rejected of men, reproached and reviled, and endured

the contradiction of sinners. But his disciples continued with him,

and were afflicted in all his afflictions. It was but little help that

they could give him, or service that they could do him; nevertheless,

he took it kindly that they continued with him, and he here owns

their kindness, though it was by the assistance of his own grace that

they did continue. Christ’s disciples had been very defective in their

duty. We find them guilty of many mistakes and weaknesses: they were

very dull and very forgetful, and often blundered, yet their Master

passes all by and forgets it; he does not upbraid them with their

infirmities, but gives them this memorable testimonial, You are they

who have continued with me. Thus does he praise at parting, to show

how willing he is to make the best of those whose hearts he knows to be

upright with him.

     

[2.] The recompence he designed them for their fidelity: I

appoint, diatithemai, I bequeath, unto you a

kingdom. Or thus, I appoint to you, as my Father has appointed a

kingdom to me, that you may eat and drink at my table. Understand

it, First, Of what should be done for them in this world. God

gave his Son a kingdom among men, the gospel church, of which he

is the living, quickening, ruling, Head. This kingdom he

appointed to his apostles and their successors in the ministry

of the gospel, that they should enjoy the comforts and privileges of

the gospel, help to communicate them to others by gospel ordinances,

sit on thrones as officers of the church, not only declaratively, but

exhortatively judging the tribes of Israel that persist in their

infidelity, and denouncing the wrath of God against them, and ruling

the gospel Israel, the spiritual Israel, by the instituted discipline

of the church, administered with gentleness and love. This is the

honour reserved for you. Or, Secondly, Of what should be done

for them in the other world, which I take to be chiefly meant. Let them

go on in their services in this world; their preferments shall be in

the other world. God will give them the kingdom, in which they

shall be sure to have,

1. The richest dainties; for they shall eat and drink at

Christ’s table in his kingdom, of which he had spoken,

v. 16, 18.

They shall partake of those joys and pleasures which were the

recompence of his services and sufferings. They shall have a full

satisfaction of soul in the vision and fruition of God; and herein they

shall have the best society, as at a feast, in the perfection of love.

2. The highest dignities: “You shall not only be provided for at

the royal table, as Mephibosheth at David’s, but you shall be preferred

to the royal throne; shall sit down with me on my throne,
Rev. iii. 21.

In the great day you shall sit on thrones, as assessors with

Christ, to approve of and applaud his judgment of the twelve tribes

of Israel.” If the saints shall judge the world

(1 Cor. vi. 2),

much more the church.

     

III. Concerning Peter’s denying him. And in this part of the discourse

we may observe,

     

1. The general notice Christ gives to Peter of the devil’s design upon

him and the rest of the apostles

(v. 31):

The Lord said, Simon, Simon, observe what I say; Satan hath

desired to have you, to have you all in his hands, that he may

sift you as wheat. Peter, who used to be the mouth of the

rest in speaking to Christ, is here made the ear of the rest;

and what is designed for warning to them all (all you shall be

offended, because of me) is directed to Peter, because he was

principally concerned, being in particular manner struck at by the

tempter: Satan has desired to have you. Probably Satan had

accused the disciples to God as mercenary in following Christ,

and aiming at nothing else therein but enriching and advancing

themselves in this world, as he accused Job. “No,” saith God, “they are

honest men, and men of integrity.” “Give me leave to try them,” saith

Satan, “and Peter particularly.” He desired to have them, that he

might sift them, that he might show them to be chaff, and not

wheat. The troubles that were now coming upon them were sifting,

would try what there was in them: but this was not all; Satan desired

to sift them by his temptations, and endeavoured by those troubles to

draw them into sin, to put them into a loss and hurry, as corn when it

is sifted to bring the chaff uppermost, or rather to shake out the

wheat and leave nothing but the chaff. Observe, Satan could not sift

them unless God gave him leave: He desired to have them, as he

begged of God a permission to try and tempt Job.

Exetesato–“He has challenged you, has undertaken

to prove you a company of hypocrites, and Peter especially, the

forwardest of you.” Some suggest that Satan demanded leave to sift them

as their punishment for striving who should be greatest, in which

contest Peter perhaps was very warm: “Leave them to me, to sift them

for it.”

     

2. The particular encouragement he gave to Peter, in reference to this

trial: “I have prayed for thee, because, though he desires to

have them all, he is permitted to make his strongest onset upon thee

only: thou wilt be most violently assaulted, but I have prayed for

thee, that thy faith fail not, that it may not totally and finally

fail.” Note,

(1.) If faith be kept up in an hour of temptation, though we may fall,

yet we shall not be utterly cast down. Faith will quench Satan’s fiery

darts.

(2.) Though there may be many failings in the faith of true believers,

yet there shall not be a total and final failure of their faith. It is

their seed, their root, remaining in them.

(3.) It is owing to the mediation and intercession of Jesus Christ that

the faith of his disciples, though sometimes sadly shaken, yet is not

sunk. If they were left to themselves, they would fail; but they are

kept by the power of God and the prayer of Christ. The

intercession of Christ is not only general, for all that believe, but

for particular believers (I have prayed for thee), which

is an encouragement for us to pray for ourselves, and an engagement

upon us to pray for others too.

     

3. The charge he gives to Peter to help others as he should himself be

helped of God: “When thou art converted, strengthen thy

brethren; when thou art recovered by the grace of God, and brought

to repentance, do what thou canst to recover others; when thou hast

found they faith kept from failing, labour to confirm the faith of

others, and to establish them; when thou hast found mercy with God

thyself, encourage others to hope that they also shall find mercy.”

Note,

(1.) Those that have fallen into sin must be converted from it;

those that have turned aside must return; those that have left

their first love must do their first works.

(2.) Those that through grace are converted from sin must do what they

can to strengthen their brethren that stand, and to prevent their

falling; see

Ps. li. 11-13; 1 Tim. i. 13.

     

4. Peter’s declared resolution to cleave to Christ, whatever it cost

him

(v. 33):

Lord, I am ready to go with thee, both into prison and to death.

This was a great word, and yet I believe no more than he meant at this

time, and thought he should make good too. Judas never protested

thus against denying Christ, though often warned of it; for his heart

was as fully set in him to the evil as Peter’s was against it. Note,

All the true disciples of Christ sincerely desire and design to

follow him, whithersoever he goes, and whithersoever he leads

them, though into a prison, though out of the world.

     

5. Christ’s express prediction of his denying him thrice

(v. 34):

I tell thee, Peter (thou dost not know thine own heart, but

must be left to thyself a little, that thou mayest know it, and mayest

never trust to it again), the cock shall not crow this day before

thou even deny that thou knowest me.” Note, Christ knows us better

than we know ourselves, and knows the evil that is in us, and will be

done by us, which we ourselves do not suspect. It is well for us that

Christ knows where we are weak better than we do, and therefore where

to come in with grace sufficient; that he knows how far a temptation

will prevail, and therefore when to say, Hitherto shall it come, and

no further.

     

IV. Concerning the condition of all the disciples.

     

1. He appeals to them concerning what had been,

v. 35.

He had owned that they had been faithful servants to him,

v. 28.

Now he expects, at parting, that they should acknowledge that he had

been a kind and careful Master to them ever since they left all to

follow him: When I sent you without purse, lacked you any thing?

(1.) He owns that he had sent them out in a very poor and bare

condition, barefoot, and with no money in their purses, because they

were not to go far, nor be out long; and he would thus teach them to

depend upon the providence of God, and, under that, upon the kindness

of their friends. If God thus send us out into the world, let us

remember that better than we have thus begun low.

(2.) Yet ye will have them own that, notwithstanding this, they had

lacked nothing; they then lived as plentifully and comfortably

as ever; and they readily acknowledged it: “Nothing, Lord; I

have all, and abound.” Note,

[1.] It is good for us often to review the providences of God that have

been concerning us all our days, and to observe how we have got through

the straits and difficulties we have met with.

[2.] Christ is a good Master, and his service a good service; for

though his servants may sometimes be brought low, yet he will help

them; and though he try them, yet will he not leave them.

Jehovah-jireh.

[3.] We must reckon ourselves well done by, and must not complain, but

be thankful, if we have had the necessary supports of life, though we

have had neither dainties nor superfluities, though we have lived from

hand to mouth, and lived upon the kindness of our friends. The

disciples lived upon contribution, and yet did not complain that their

maintenance was precarious, but owned, to their Master’s honour, that

it was sufficient; they had wanted nothing.

     

2. He gives them notice of a very great change of their circumstances

now approaching. For,

(1.) He that was their Master was now entering upon his sufferings,

which he had often foretold

(v. 37):

“Now that which is written must be fulfilled in me, and this

among the rest, He was numbered among the transgressors– he

must suffer and die as a malefactor, and in company with some of the

vilest of malefactors. This is that which is yet to be

accomplished, after all the rest, and then the things concerning

me, the things written concerning me, will have an end; then I

shall say, It is finished.” Note, It may be the comfort of

suffering Christians, as it was of a suffering Christ, that their

sufferings were foretold, and determined in the counsels of

heaven, and will shortly determine in the joys of heaven. They

were written concerning them, and they will have an end,

and will end well, everlastingly well.

(2.) They must therefore expect troubles, and must not think now to

have such an easy and comfortable life as they had had; no, the scene

will alter. They must now in some degree suffer with their

Master; and, when he is gone, they must expect to suffer like

him. The servant is not better than his Lord.

[1.] They must not now expect that their friends would be so kind and

generous to them as they had been; and therefore, He that has a

purse, let him take it, for he may have occasion for it, and for

all the good husbandry he can use.

[2.] They must now expect that their enemies would be more fierce upon

them than they had been, and they would need magazines as well as

stores: He that has no sword wherewith to defend himself against

robbers and assassins

(2 Cor. xi. 26)

will find a great want of it, and will be ready to wish, some time or

other, that he had sold his garment and bought one. This is intended

only to show that the times would be very perilous, so that no man

would think himself safe if he had not a sword by his side. But the

sword of the Spirit is the sword which the disciples of Christ

must furnish themselves with. Christ having suffered for us, we

must arm ourselves with the same mind

(1 Peter iv. 1),

arm ourselves with an expectation of trouble, that it may not be a

surprise to us, and with a holy resignation to the will of God in it,

that there may be no opposition in us to it: and then we are better

prepared than if we had sold a coat to buy a sword. The disciples

hereupon enquire what strength they had, and find they had among them

two swords

(v. 38),

of which one was Peter’s. The Galileans generally travelled with

swords. Christ wore none himself, but he was not against his disciples’

wearing them. But he intimates how little he would have them depend

upon this when he saith, It is enough, which some think is

spoken ironically: “Two swords among twelve men! you are bravely armed

indeed when our enemies are now coming out against us in great

multitudes, and every one with a sword!” Yet two swords are sufficient

for those who need none, having God himself to be the shield of

their help and the sword of their excellency,
Deut. xxxiii. 29.









The Agony in the Garden.

     

39 And he came out, and went, as he was wont, to the mount of

Olives; and his disciples also followed him.

  40 And when he was at the place, he said unto them, Pray that

ye enter not into temptation.

  41 And he was withdrawn from them about a stone’s cast, and

kneeled down, and prayed,

  42 Saying, Father, if thou be willing, remove this cup from me:

nevertheless not my will, but thine, be done.

  43 And there appeared an angel unto him from heaven,

strengthening him.

  44 And being in an agony he prayed more earnestly: and his

sweat was as it were great drops of blood falling down to the

ground.

  45 And when he rose up from prayer, and was come to his

disciples, he found them sleeping for sorrow,

  46 And said unto them, Why sleep ye? rise and pray, lest ye

enter into temptation.

     

We have here the awful story of Christ’s agony in the garden,

just before he was betrayed, which was largely related by the other

evangelists. In it Christ accommodated himself to that part of

his undertaking which he was now entering upon–the making of his

soul an offering for sin. He afflicted his own soul with grief for

the sin he was to satisfy for, and an apprehension of the wrath of God

to which man had by sin made himself obnoxious, which he was pleased as

a sacrifice to admit the impressions of, the consuming of a sacrifice

with fire from heaven being the surest token of its acceptance. In it

Christ entered the lists with the powers of darkness, gave them all the

advantages they could desire, and yet conquered them.

     

I. What we have in this passage which we had before is,

1. That when Christ went out, though it was in the night, and a long

walk, his disciples (eleven of them, for Judas had given them

the slip) followed him. Having continued with him hitherto in

his temptations, they would not leave him now.

2. That he went to the place where he was wont to be private,

which intimates that Christ accustomed himself to retirement, was often

alone, to teach us to be so, for freedom of converse with God and our

own hearts. Though Christ had no conveniency for retirement but a

garden, yet he retired. This should particularly be our practice after

we have been at the Lord’s table; we have then work to do which

requires us to be private.

3. That he exhorted his disciples to pray that, though the

approaching trial could not be avoided, yet they might not in it

enter into temptation to sin; that, when they were in the

greatest fright and danger, yet they might not have any inclination to

desert Christ, nor take a step towards it: “Pray that you may be

kept from sin.

4. That he withdrew from them, and prayed himself; they had their

errands at the throne of grace, and he had his, and therefore it was

fit that they should pray separately, as sometimes, when they had joint

errands, they prayed together. He withdrew about a stone’s cast

further into the garden, which some reckon about fifty of sixty paces,

and there he kneeled down (so it is here) upon the bare ground;

but the other evangelists say that afterwards he fell on his

face, and there prayed that, if it were the will of God,

this cup of suffering, this bitter cup, might be removed from

him. This was the language of that innocent dread of suffering

which, being really and truly man, he could not but have in his nature.

5. That he, knowing it to be his Father’s will that he should suffer

and die, and that, as the matter was now settled, it was necessary for

our redemption and salvation, presently withdrew that petition, did not

insist upon it, but resigned himself to his heavenly Father’s will:

Nevertheless not my will be done, not the will of my human

nature, but the will of God as it is written concerning me in the

volume of the book, which I delight to do, let that be done,”

Ps. xl. 7, 8.

6. That his disciples were asleep when he was at prayer, and

when they should have been themselves praying,

v. 45.

When he rose from prayer, he found them sleeping,

unconcerned in his sorrows; but see what a favourable construction is

here put upon it, which we had not in the other evangelists–they were

sleeping for sorrow. The great sorrow they were in upon the

mournful farewells their Master had been this evening giving them had

exhausted their spirits, and made them very dull and heavy, which (it

being now late) disposed them to sleep. This teaches us to make the

best of our brethren’s infirmities, and, if there be one cause better

than another, charitably impute them to that.

7. That when he awoke them, then he exhorted them to pray

(v. 46):

Why sleep ye? Why do you allow yourselves to sleep? Rise

and pray. Shake off your drowsiness, that you may be fit to

pray, and pray for grace, that you may be able to shake

off your drowsiness.” This was like the ship-master’s call to Jonah

in a storm

(Jon. i. 6):

Arise, call upon thy God. When we find ourselves either by our

outward circumstances or our inward dispositions entering into

temptation, it concerns us to rise and pray, Lord, help me in

this time of need. But,

     

II. There are three things in this passage which we had not in the

other evangelists:–

     

1. That, when Christ was in his agony, there appeared to him

an angel from heaven, strengthening him,
v. 43.

(1.) It was an instance of the deep humiliation of our Lord Jesus that

he needed the assistance of an angel, and would admit it.

The influence of the divine nature withdrew for the present, and then,

as to his human nature, he was for a little while lower than the

angels, and was capable of receiving help from them.

(2.) When he was not delivered from his sufferings, yet he was

strengthened and supported under them, and that was

equivalent. If God proportion the shoulders to the burden, we

shall have no reason to complain, whatever he is pleased to lay upon

us. David owns this a sufficient answer to his prayer, in the

day of trouble, that God strengthened him with strength in his

soul, and so does the son of David,

Ps. cxxxviii. 3.

(3.) The angels ministered to the Lord Jesus in his sufferings. He

could have had legions of them to rescue him; nay, this one could have

done it, could have chased and conquered the whole band of men that

came to take him; but he made use of his ministration only to

strengthen him; and the very visit which this angel made him now

in his grief, when his enemies were awake and his friends asleep, was

such a seasonable token of the divine favour as would be a very great

strengthening to him. Yet this was not all: he probably said

something to him to strengthen him; put him in mind that his

sufferings were in order to his Father’s glory, to his own glory, and

to the salvation of those that were given him, represented to him the

joy set before him, the seed he should see; with these and the like

suggestions he encouraged him to go on cheerfully; and what is

comforting is strengthening. Perhaps he did something to

strengthen him, wiped away his sweat and tears, perhaps ministered some

cordial to him, as after his temptation, or, it may be, took him by the

arm, and helped him off the ground, or bore him up when he was ready to

faint away; and in these services of the angel the Holy Spirit was

enischyon autonputting strength into him; for so

the word signifies. It pleased the Lord to bruise him indeed;

yet did he plead against him with his great power? No, but he

put strength in him

(Job xxiii. 6),

as he had promised,

Ps. lxxxix. 21;

Isa. xlix. 8; l. 7.

     

2. That, being in an agony, he prayed more earnestly,
v. 44.

As his sorrow and trouble grew upon him, he grew more importunate in

prayer; not that there was before any coldness or indifferency in his

prayers, but there was now a greater vehemency in them, which was

expressed in his voice and gesture. Note, Prayer, though never out of

season, is in a special manner seasonable when we are in an agony; and

the stronger our agonies are the more lively and frequent our prayers

should be. Now it was that Christ offered up prayers and

supplications with strong crying and tears, and was heard in that he

feared

(Heb. v. 7),

and in his fear wrestled, as Jacob with the angel.

     

3. That, in this agony, his sweat was as it were great drops of

blood falling down to the ground. Sweat came in with sin, and was a

branch of the curse,

Gen. iii. 19.

And therefore, when Christ was made sin and a curse for us, he

underwent a grievous sweat, that in the sweat of his face we

might eat bread, and that he might sanctify and sweeten all our trials

to us. There is some dispute among the critics whether this

sweat is only compared to drops of blood, being

much thicker than drops of sweat commonly are, the pores of the

body being more than ordinarily opened, or whether real blood

out of the capillary veins mingled with it, so that it was in colour

like blood, and might truly be called a bloody sweat; the matter

is not great. Some reckon this one of the times when Christ shed his

blood for us, for without the shedding of blood there is no

remission. Every pore was as it were a bleeding wound, and his

blood stained all his raiment. This showed the travail of his

soul. He was now abroad in the open air, in a cool season, upon the

cold ground, far in the night, which, one would think, had been enough

to strike in a sweat; yet now he breaks out into a sweat, which

bespeaks the extremity of the agony he was in.








The Treachery of Judas.

     

47 And while he yet spake, behold a multitude, and he that was

called Judas, one of the twelve, went before them, and drew near

unto Jesus to kiss him.

  48 But Jesus said unto him, Judas, betrayest thou the Son of

man with a kiss?

  49 When they which were about him saw what would follow, they

said unto him, Lord, shall we smite with the sword?

  50 And one of them smote the servant of the high priest, and

cut off his right ear.

  51 And Jesus answered and said, Suffer ye thus far. And he

touched his ear, and healed him.

  52 Then Jesus said unto the chief priests, and captains of the

temple, and the elders, which were come to him, Be ye come out,

as against a thief, with swords and staves?

  53 When I was daily with you in the temple, ye stretched forth

no hands against me: but this is your hour, and the power of

darkness.

     

Satan, finding himself baffled in his attempts to terrify our Lord

Jesus, and so to put him out of the possession of his own soul, betakes

himself (according to his usual method) to force and arms, and brings a

party into the field to seize him, and Satan was in them. Here

is,

     

I. The marking of him by Judas. Here a numerous party appears, and

Judas at the head of them, for he was guide to them that took

Jesus; they knew not where to find him, but he brought them

to the place: when they were there, they knew not which was he, but

Judas told them that whomsoever he should kiss, that same was he; so he

drew near to him to kiss him, according to the wonted freedom

and familiarity to which our Lord Jesus admitted his disciples. Luke

takes notice of the question Christ asked him, which we have not in the

other evangelists: Judas, betrayest thou the Son of man with a

kiss? What! Is this the signal?

v. 48.

Must the Son of man be betrayed, as if any thing could be

concealed from him, and a plot carried on against him unknown to him?

Must one of his own disciples betray him, as if he had been a hard

Master to them, or deserved ill at their hands? Must he be betrayed

with a kiss? Must the badge of friendship be the instrument of

treachery? Was ever a love-token so desecrated and abused? Note,

Nothing can be a greater affront or grief to the Lord Jesus than to be

betrayed, and betrayed with a kiss, by those that profess relation to

him and an affection for him. Those do so who, under pretence of zeal

for his honour, persecute his servants, who, under the cloak of a

seeming affection for the honour of free grace, give a blow to the root

of holiness and strictness of conversation. Many instances there are of

Christ’s being betrayed with a kiss, by those who, under the form of

godliness, fight against the power of it. It were well if their own

consciences would put this question to them, which Christ here puts to

Judas, Betrayest thou the Son of man with a kiss? And will he

not resent it? Will he not revenge it?

     

II. The effort which his disciples made for his protection

(v. 49):

When they saw what would follow, that those armed men were come

to seize him, they said, “Lord, shall we smite with the sword?

Thou didst allow us to have two swords, shall we now make use of

them? Never was there more occasion; and to what purpose should we have

them if we do not use them?” They asked the question as if they would

not have drawn the sword without commission from their Master, but they

were in too much haste and too much heat to stay for an

answer. But Peter, aiming at the head of one of the servants of the

high priest, missed his blow, and cut off his right ear.

As Christ, by throwing them to the ground that came to take him, showed

what he could have done, so Peter, by this exploit, showed what he

could have done too in so good a cause if he had had leave. The other

evangelists tell us what was the check Christ gave to Peter for it.

Luke here tells us,

1. How Christ excused the blow: Suffer ye thus far,
v. 51.

Dr. Whitby thinks he said this to his enemies who came to take him, to

pacify them, that they might not be provoked by it to fall upon the

disciples, whom he had undertaken the preservation of: “Pass by

this injury and affront; it was without warrant from me, and there

shall not be another blow struck.” Though Christ had power to have

struck them down, and struck them dead, yet he speaks them fair,

and, as it were, begs their pardon for an assault made upon them

by one of his followers, to teach us to give good words even to our

enemies.

2. How he cured the wound, which was more than amends sufficient for

the injury: He touched his ear, and healed him; fastened his ear

on again, that he might not so much as go away stigmatized,

though he well deserved it. Christ hereby gave them a proof,

(1.) Of his power. He that could heal could destroy if he

pleased, which should have obliged them in interest to submit to him.

Had they returned the blow upon Peter, he would immediately have healed

him; and what could not a small regiment do that had such a surgeon to

it, immediately to help the sick and wounded?

(2.) Of his mercy and goodness. Christ here gave an illustrious example

to his own rule of doing good to them that hate us, as

afterwards he did of praying for them that despitefully use us.

Those who render good for evil do as Christ did. One would have thought

that this generous piece of kindness should have overcome them, that

such coals, heaped on their heads, should have melted them, that

they could not have bound him as a malefactor who had approved himself

such a benefactor; but their hearts were hardened.

     

III. Christ’s expostulation with the officers of the detachment that

came to apprehend him, to show what an absurd thing it was for them to

make all this rout and noise,

v. 52, 53.

Matthew relates it as said to the multitude. Luke tells us that

it was said to the chief priests and captains of the temple the

latter commanded the several orders of the priests, and therefore are

here put between the chief priests and the elders, so

that they were all ecclesiastics, retainers to the temple, who were

employed in this odious piece of service; and some of the first rank

too disparaged themselves so far as to be seen in it. Now see here,

     

1. How Christ reasons with them concerning their proceedings.

What occasion was there for them to come out in the dead of the night,

and with swords and staves?

(1.) They knew that he was one that would not resist, nor raise

the mob against them; he never had done any thing like this. Why then

are ye come out as against a thief?

(2.) They knew he was one that would not abscond, for he was

daily with them in the temple, in the midst of them, and never sought

to conceal himself, nor did they offer to lay hands on him. Before his

hour was come, it was folly for them to think to take him; and when his

hour was come it was folly for them to make all this ado to take

him.

     

2. How he reconciles himself to their proceedings; and this we had not

before: “But this is your hour, and the power of darkness. How

hard soever it may seem that I should be thus exposed, I submit, for so

it is determined. This is the hour allowed you to have your will

against me. There is an hour appointed me to reckon for it. Now

the power of darkness, Satan, the ruler of the darkness of

this world, is permitted to do his worst, to bruise the heel of the

seed of the woman, and I resolve to acquiesce; let him do his worst.

The Lord shall laugh at him, for he sees that his day, his hour,

is coming.

Ps. xxxvii. 13.

Let this quiet us under the prevalency of the church’s enemies; let it

quiet us in a dying hour, that,

(1.) It is but an hour that is permitted for the triumph of our

adversary, a short time, a limited time.

(2.) It is their hour, which is appointed them, and in which

they are permitted to try their strength, that omnipotence may be the

more glorified in their fall.

(3.) It is the power of darkness that rides master, and

darkness must give way to light, and the power of darkness be made to

truckle to the prince of light. Christ was willing to wait for his

triumphs till his warfare was accomplished, and we must be so too.










The Fall of Peter.

     

54 Then took they him, and led him, and brought him into the

high priest’s house. And Peter followed afar off.

  55 And when they had kindled a fire in the midst of the hall,

and were set down together, Peter sat down among them.

  56 But a certain maid beheld him as he sat by the fire, and

earnestly looked upon him, and said, This man was also with him.

  57 And he denied him, saying, Woman, I know him not.

  58 And after a little while another saw him, and said, Thou art

also of them. And Peter said, Man, I am not.

  59 And about the space of one hour after another confidently

affirmed, saying, Of a truth this fellow also was with him: for

he is a Galilæan.

  60 And Peter said, Man, I know not what thou sayest. And

immediately, while he yet spake, the cock crew.

  61 And the Lord turned, and looked upon Peter. And Peter

remembered the word of the Lord, how he had said unto him, Before

the cock crow, thou shalt deny me thrice.

  62 And Peter went out, and wept bitterly.

     

We have here the melancholy story of Peter’s denying his Master, at the

time when he was arraigned before the high priest, and those that were

of the cabal, that were ready to receive the prey, and to

prepare the evidence for his arraignment, as soon as it was day,

before the great sanhedrim,

v. 66.

But notice is not taken here, as was in the other evangelists, of

Christ’s being now upon his examination before the high priest, only of

his being brought into the high priest’s house,
v. 54.

But the manner of expression is observable. They took him, and led

him, and brought him, which methinks is like that concerning Saul

(1 Sam. xv. 12):

He is gone about, and passed on, and gone down; and intimates

that, even when they had seized their prey, they were in confusion,

and, for fear of the people, or rather struck with inward terror upon

what they had seen and heard, they took him the furthest way about, or,

rather, knew not which way they hurried him, such a hurry were they in

in their own bosoms. Now observe,

     

I. Peter’s falling.

1. It began in sneaking. He followed Christ when he was

had away prisoner; this was well, and showed a concern for his Master.

But he followed afar off, that he might be out of danger. He

thought to trim the matter, to follow Christ, and so to satisfy

his conscience, but to follow afar off, and so to save his

reputation, and sleep in a whole skin.

2. It proceeded in keeping his distance still, and associating himself

with the high priest’s servants, when he should have been at his

master’s elbow. The servants kindled a fire in the midst of the

hall and sat down together, to talk over their

night-expedition. Probably Malchus was among them, and Peter sat

down among them, as if he had been one of them, at least would be

thought to be so. His fall itself was disclaiming all acquaintance with

Christ, and relation to him, disowning him because he was now in

distress and danger. He was charged by a sorry simple maid, that

belonged to the house, with being a retainer to this Jesus,

about whom there was now so much noise. She looked wistfully

upon him as he at by the fire, only because he was a stranger,

and one whom she had not seen before; and concluding that at this time

of night there were no neuters there, and knowing him not to be any of

the retinue of the high priest, she concludes him to be one of the

retinue of this Jesus, or perhaps she had been some time or other

looking about her in the temple, and had seen Jesus there and Peter

with him, officious about him, and remembered him; and this man was

with him, saith she. And Peter, as he had not the courage to

own the charge, so he had not the wit and presence of mind to

turn it off, as he might have done many ways, and therefore

flatly and plainly denies it: Woman, I know him not.

4. His fall was repeated a second time

(v. 58):

After a little while, before he had time to recollect himself,

another saw him, and said, “Even thou art one of them, as

slyly as thou sittest here among the high priest’s servants.” Not

I, saith Peter; Man, I am not. And a third time,

about the space of an hour after (for, saith the tempter, “When

he is down, down with him; let us follow the blow, till we get him past

recovery”), another confidently affirms, strenuously

asserts it, “Of a truth this fellow also was with him, let him

deny it if he can, for you may all perceive he is a Galilean.

But he that has once told a lie is strongly tempted to persist in it;

the beginning of that sin is as the letting forth of

water. Peter now not only denies that he is a disciple of Christ,

but that he knows any thing of him

(v. 60):

Man, I know not what thou sayest; I never heard of this

Jesus.”

     

II. Peter’s getting up again. See how happily he recovered

himself, or, rather, the grace of God recovered him. See how it was

brought about:–

     

1. The cock crew just as he was the third time denying that he

knew Christ, and this startled him and put him upon thinking. Note,

Small accidents may involve great consequences.

     

2. The Lord turned and looked upon him. This circumstance we had

not in the other evangelists, but it is a very remarkable one. Christ

is here called the Lord, for there was much of divine knowledge,

power, and grace, appearing in this. Observe, Though Christ had now

his back upon Peter, and was upon his trial (when, one would think, he

had something else to mind), yet he knew all that Peter said. Note,

Christ takes more notice of what we say and do than we think he does.

When Peter disowned Christ, yet Christ did not disown him, though he

might justly have cast him off, and never looked upon him more, but

have denied him before his Father. It is well for us that Christ does

not deal with us as we deal with him. Christ looked upon Peter,

not doubting but that Peter would soon be aware of it; for he knew

that, though he had denied him with his lips, yet his eye would still

be towards him. Observe, Though Peter had now been guilty of a very

great offence, and which was very provoking, yet Christ would not

call to him, lest he should shame him or expose

him; he only gave him a look which none but Peter would

understand the meaning of, and it had a great deal in it.

(1.) It was a convincing look. Peter said that he did not

know Christ. Christ turned, and looked upon him, as if he

should say, “Dost thou not know me, Peter? Look me in the face, and

tell me so.”

(2.) It was a chiding look. We may suppose that he looked upon

him and frowned, or some way signified his displeasure. Let us

think with what an angry countenance Christ justly looks upon us when

we have sinned.

(3.) It was an expostulating upbraiding look: “What, Peter, art

thou he that disownest me now, when thou shouldest come and witness for

me? What thou a disciple? Thou that wast the most forward to confess me

to be the Son of God, and didst solemnly promise thou wouldest never

disown me?”

(4.) It was a compassionate look; he looked upon him with

tenderness. “Poor Peter, how weak is thine heart! How art thou fallen

and undone if I do not help thee!”

(5.) It was a directing look. Christ guided him with his

eye, gave him a wink to go out from that sorry company, to

retire, and bethink himself a little, and then he would soon see

what he had to do.

(6.) It was a significant look: it signified the conveying of

grace to Peter’s heart, to enable him to repent; the crowing of the

cock would not have brought him to repentance without this look, nor

will the external means without special efficacious grace. Power went

along with this look, to change the heart of Peter, and to bring him to

himself, to his right mind.

     

3. Peter remembered the words of the Lord. Note, The grace of

God works in and by the word of God, brings that to mind,

and sets that home upon the conscience, and so gives the soul a happy

turn. Tolle et lege–Take it up, and read.

     

4. Then Peter went out, and wept bitterly. One look from Christ

melted him into tears of godly sorrow for sin. The candle was newly put

out, and then a little thing lighted it again. Christ looked upon the

chief priests, and made no impression upon them as he did on Peter, who

had the divine seed remaining in him to work upon. It was not the look

from Christ, but the grace of God with it, that recovered Peter, and

brought him to-rights.










Christ Abused and Insulted.

     

63 And the men that held Jesus mocked him, and smote him.

  64 And when they had blindfolded him, they struck him on the

face, and asked him, saying, Prophesy, who is it that smote thee?

  65 And many other things blasphemously spake they against him.

  66 And as soon as it was day, the elders of the people and the

chief priests and the scribes came together, and led him into

their council, saying,

  67 Art thou the Christ? tell us. And he said unto them, If I

tell you, ye will not believe:

  68 And if I also ask you, ye will not answer me, nor let me

go.

  69 Hereafter shall the Son of man sit on the right hand of the

power of God.

  70 Then said they all, Art thou then the Son of God? And he

said unto them, Ye say that I am.

  71 And they said, What need we any further witness? for we

ourselves have heard of his own mouth.

     

We are here told, as before in the other gospels,

     

I. How our Lord Jesus was abused by the servants of the high

priest. The abjects, the rude and barbarous servants,

gathered themselves together against him. They that held

Jesus, that had him in custody till the court sat, they mocked

him, and smote him

(v. 63),

they would not allow him to repose himself one minute, though he

had had no sleep all night, nor to compose himself, though he

was hurried to his trial, and no time given him to prepare for it. They

made sport with him: this sorrowful night to him shall be a merry night

to them; and the blessed Jesus, like Samson, is made the fool in the

play. They hood-winked him, and then, according to the common

play that young people have among them, they struck him on the

face, and continued to do so till he named the person that smote

him

(v. 64),

intending hereby an affront to his prophetical office, and that

knowledge of secret things which he was said to have. We are not told

that he said any thing, but bore every thing; hell was

let loose, and he suffered it to do its worst. A greater indignity

could not be done to the blessed Jesus, yet this was but one instance

of many; for many other things blasphemously spoke they against

him,
v. 65.

They that condemned him for a blasphemer were themselves the vilest

blasphemers that ever were.

     

II. How he was accused and condemned by the great sanhedrim, consisting

of the elders of the people, the chief priests, and the scribes,

who were all up betimes, and got together as soon as it was day,

about five of the clock in the morning, to prosecute this matter. They

were working this evil upon their beds, and, as soon as ever the

morning was light, practised it,

Mic. ii. 1.

They would not have been up so early for any good work. It is but a

short account that we have here of his trial in the ecclesiastical

court.

     

1. They ask him, Art thou the Christ? He was generally believed

by his followers to be the Christ, but they could not prove it upon him

that he had ever said so totidem verbis–in so many words, and

therefore urge him to own it to them,

v. 67.

If they had asked him this question with a willingness to admit that he

was the Christ, and to receive him accordingly if he could give

sufficient proof of his being so, it had been well, and might

have been for ever well with them; but they asked it with a

resolution not to believe him, but a design to ensnare him.

     

2. He justly complained of their unfair and unjust usage of him,

v. 67, 68.

They all, as Jews, professed to expect the Messiah, and to expect him

at this time. No other appeared, or had appeared, that pretended

to be the Messiah. He had no competitor, nor was he likely to have any.

He had given amazing proofs of a divine power going along with him,

which made his claims very well worthy of a free and impartial enquiry.

It had been but just for these leaders of the people to have taken him

into their council, and examined him there as a candidate for

the messiahship, not at the bar as a criminal. “But,” saith he,

(1.) “If I tell you that I am the Christ, and give you ever such

convincing proofs of it, you are resolved that you will not

believe. Why should the cause be brought on before you who have

already prejudged it, and are resolved, right or wrong, to run it down,

and to condemn it?”

(2.) “If I ask you what you have to object against the proofs I

produce, you will not answer me.” Here he refers to their

silence when he put a question to them, which would have led them to

own his authority,

ch. xx. 5-7.

They were neither fair judges, nor fair disputants; but, when they were

pinched with an argument, would rather be silent than own their

conviction: “You will neither answer me nor let me go; if I be

not the Christ, you ought to answer the arguments with

which I prove that I am; if I be, you ought to let me go; but

you will do neither.”

     

3. He referred them to his second coming, for the full proof of his

being the Christ, to their confusion, since they would not now admit

the proof of it, to their conviction

(v. 69):

Hereafter shall the Son of man sit, and be seen to sit, on

the right hand of the power of God, and then you will not need to

ask whether he be the Christ or no.”

     

4. Hence they inferred that he set up himself as the Son of God, and

asked him whether he were so or no

(v. 70):

Art thou then the Son of God? He called himself the Son of

man, referring to Daniel’s vision of the Son of man that

came near before the Ancient of days,
Dan. vii. 13, 14.

But they understood so much as to know that if he was that Son

of man, he was also the Son of God. And art thou so? By this it

appears to have been the faith of the Jewish church that the Messiah

should be both Son of man and Son of God.

     

5. He owns himself to be the Son of God: Ye say that I am; that

is, “I am, as ye say.” Compare

Mark xiv. 62.

Jesus said, I am. This confirms Christ’s testimony concerning

himself, that he was the Son of God, that he stood to it, when he knew

he should suffer for standing to it.

     

6. Upon this they ground his condemnation

(v. 71):

What need we any further witness? It was true, they needed not

any further witness to prove that he said he was the Son of God,

they had it from his own mouth; but did they not need proof that

he was not so, before they condemned him as a blasphemer for saying

that he was so? Had they no apprehension that it was possible he might

be so, and then what horrid guilt they should bring upon themselves in

putting him to death? No, they know not, neither will they

understand. They cannot think it possible that he should be the

Messiah, though ever so evidently clothed with divine power and grace,

if he appear not, as they expect, in worldly pomp and grandeur. Their

eyes being blinded with the admiration of that, they rush on in this

dangerous prosecution, as the horse into the battle.


[Table of Contents]

[Previous]

[Next]

Matthew Henry
Commentary on the Whole Bible (1721)


Back to Bibles Net . Com – Online Christian Library

Matthew Henry’s Complete Commentary – Free Download

Contact Us


Top