BIBLES NET. COM

Matthew Henry’s Commentary – Acts VIII

Matthew Henry’s Complete Commentary

on the Whole Bible

Back to Biblesnet.com Home Page


[Table of Contents]

[Previous]

[Next]

Matthew Henry
Commentary on the Whole Bible (1721)




A C T S.

CHAP. VIII.



     

In this chapter we have an account of the persecutions of the

Christians, and the propagating of Christianity thereby. It was

strange, but very true, that the disciples of Christ the more they were

afflicted the more they multiplied.

I. Here is the church suffering; upon the occasion of putting Stephen

to death a very sharp storm arose, which forced many from Jerusalem,

ver. 1-3.

II. Here is the church spreading by the ministry of Philip and others

that were dispersed upon that occasion. We have here,

1. The gospel brought to Samaria, preached there

(ver. 4, 5),

embraced there

(ver. 6-8),

even by Simon Magus

(ver. 9-13);

the gift of the Holy Ghost conferred upon some of the believing

Samaritans by the imposition of the hands of Peter and John

(ver. 14-17);

and the severe rebuke given by Peter to Simon Magus for offering money

for a power to bestow that gift,

ver. 18-25.

2. The gospel sent to Ethiopia, by the eunuch, a person of quality of

that country. He is returning home in his chariot from Jerusalem,

ver. 26-28.

Philip is sent to him, and in his chariot preaches Christ to him

(ver. 29-35),

baptizes him upon his profession of the Christian faith

(ver. 36-38),

and the leaves him,

ver. 39, 40.

Thus in different ways and methods the gospel was dispersed among the

nations, and, one way or other, “Have they not all heard?”





Persecution of the Church.

     

1 And Saul was consenting unto his death. And at that time

there was a great persecution against the church which was at

Jerusalem; and they were all scattered abroad throughout the

regions of Judæa and Samaria, except the apostles.

  2 And devout men carried Stephen to his burial, and made

great lamentation over him.

  3 As for Saul, he made havock of the church, entering into

every house, and haling men and women committed them to prison.

     

In these verses we have,

     

I. Something more concerning Stephen and his death; how people stood

affected to it–variously, as generally in such cases, according to

men’s different sentiments of things. Christ had said to his disciples,

when he was parting with them

(John xvi. 20),

You shall weep and lament, but the world shall rejoice.

Accordingly here is,

1. Stephen’s death rejoiced in by one–by many, no doubt, but by one in

particular, and that was Saul, who was afterwards called Paul; he was

consenting to his death, syneudokonhe

consented to it with delight (so the word signifies); he was

pleased with it. He fed his eyes with this bloody spectacle, in hopes

it would put a stop to the growth of Christianity. We have reason to

think that Paul ordered Luke to insert this, for shame to himself, and

glory to free grace. Thus he owns himself guilty of the blood of

Stephen, and aggravates it with this, that he did not do it with regret

and reluctancy, but with delight and a full satisfaction, like those

who not only do such things, but have pleasure in those that do

them.

2. Stephen’s death bewailed by others

(v. 2)–

devout men, which some understand of those that were properly so

called, proselytes, one of whom Stephen himself probably was.

Or, it may be taken more largely; some of the church that were more

devout and zealous than the rest went and gathered up the poor crushed

and broken remains, to which they gave a decent interment, probably in

the field of blood, which was bought some time ago to bury

strangers in. They buried him solemnly, and made great lamentation over

him. Though his death was of great advantage to himself, and great

service to the church, yet they bewailed it as a general loss, so well

qualified was he for the service, and so likely to be useful both as a

deacon and as a disputant. It is a bad symptom if, when such men are

taken away, it is not laid to heart. Those devout men paid these their

last respects to Stephen,

(1.) To show that they were not ashamed of the cause for which he

suffered, nor afraid of the wrath of those that were enemies to it;

for, though they now triumph, the cause is a righteous cause, and will

be at last a victorious one.

(2.) To show the great value and esteem they had for this faithful

servant of Jesus Christ, this first martyr for the gospel, whose memory

shall always be precious to them, notwithstanding the ignominy of his

death. They study to do honour to him upon whom God put honour.

(3.) To testify their belief and hope of the resurrection of the

dead, and the life of the world to come.

     

II. An account of this persecution of the church, which begins upon the

martyrdom of Stephen. When the fury of the Jews ran with such violence,

and to such a height, against Stephen, it could not quickly either stop

itself or spend itself. The bloody are often in scripture called

blood-thirsty; for when they have tasted blood they thirst for

more. One would have thought Stephen’s dying prayers and dying comforts

should have overcome them, and melted them into a better opinion of

Christians and Christianity; but it seems they did not: the persecution

goes on; for they were more exasperated when they saw they could

prevail nothing, and, as if they hoped to be too hard for God himself,

they resolve to follow their blow; and perhaps, because they were none

of them struck dead upon the place for stoning Stephen, their hearts

were the more fully set in them to do evil. Perhaps the disciples were

also the more emboldened to dispute against them as Stephen did, seeing

how triumphantly he finished his course, which would provoke them so

much the more. Observe,

     

1. Against whom this persecution was raised: It was against the

church in Jerusalem, which is no sooner planted than it is

persecuted, as Christ often intimated that tribulation and persecution

would arise because of the word. And Christ had particularly

foretold that Jerusalem would soon be made too hot for his followers,

for that city had been famous for killing the prophets and stoning

those that were sent to it,

Matt. xxiii. 37.

It should seem that in this persecution many were put to death, for

Paul owns that at this time he persecuted this way unto the

death

(ch. xxi. 4),

and

(ch. xxvi. 10)

that when they were put to death he gave his voice against

them.

     

2. Who was an active man in it; none so zealous, so busy, as Saul, a

young Pharisee,

v. 3.

As for Saul (who had been twice mentioned before, and now again for a

notorious persecutor) he made havoc of the church; he did all he

could to lay it waste and ruin it; he cared not what mischief he did to

the disciples of Christ, nor knew when to stop. He aimed at no less

than the cutting off of the gospel Israel, that the name of it should

be no more in remembrance,

Ps. lxxxiii. 4.

He was the fittest tool the chief priests could find out to serve their

purposes; he was informer-general against the disciples, a messenger of

the great council to be employed in searching for meetings, and seizing

all that were suspected to favour that way. Saul was bred a scholar, a

gentleman, and yet did not think it below him to be employed in the

vilest work of that kind.

(1.) He entered into every house, making no difficulty of

breaking open doors, night or day, and having a force attending him for

that purpose. He entered into every house where they used to hold their

meetings, or every house that had any Christians in it, or was thought

to have. No man could be secure in his own house, though it was his

castle.

(2.) He haled, with the utmost contempt and cruelty, both men and

women, dragged them along the streets, without any regard to the

tenderness of the weaker sex; he stooped so low as to take cognizance

of the meanest that were leavened with the gospel, so extremely bigoted

was he.

(3.) He committed them to prison, in order to their being tried and put

to death, unless they would renounce Christ; and some, we find, were

compelled by him to blaspheme,

ch. xxvi. 11.

     

3. What was the effect of this persecution: They were all scattered

abroad

(v. 1),

not all the believers, but all the preachers, who were principally

struck at, and against whom warrants were issued out to take them up.

They, remembering our Master’s rule (when they persecute you in one

city, flee to another), dispersed themselves by agreement

throughout the regions of Judea and of Samaria; not so much for

fear of sufferings (for Judea and Samaria were not so far off from

Jerusalem but that, if they made a public appearance there, as they

determined to do, their persecutors’ power would soon reach them

there), but because they looked upon this as an intimation of

Providence to them to scatter. Their work was pretty well done in

Jerusalem, and now it was time to think of the necessities of other

places; for their Master had told them that they must be his witnesses

in Jerusalem first, and then in all Judea and in Samaria, and

then to the uttermost part of the earth

(ch. i. 8),

and this method they observe. Through persecution may not drive us off

from our work, yet it may send us, as a hint of Providence, to work

elsewhere. The preachers were all scattered except the

apostles, who, probably, were directed by the Spirit to continue at

Jerusalem yet for some time, they being, by the special providence of

God, screened from the storm, and by the special grace of God enabled

to face the storm. They tarried at Jerusalem, that they might be ready

to go where their assistance was most needed by the other preachers

that were sent to break the ice; as Christ ordered his disciples to go

to those places where he himself designed to go,

Luke x. 1.

The apostles continued longer together at Jerusalem than one would have

thought, considering the command and commission given them, to go

into all the world, and to disciple all nations. See

ch. xv. 6; Gal. i. 17.

But what was done by the evangelists whom they sent forth was reckoned

as done by them.











The Spreading of the Gospel; Philip’s Success.

     

4 Therefore they that were scattered abroad went every where

preaching the word.

  5 Then Philip went down to the city of Samaria, and preached

Christ unto them.

  6 And the people with one accord gave heed unto those things

which Philip spake, hearing and seeing the miracles which he did.

  7 For unclean spirits, crying with loud voice, came out of many

that were possessed with them: and many taken with palsies, and

that were lame, were healed.

  8 And there was great joy in that city.

  9 But there was a certain man, called Simon, which beforetime

in the same city used sorcery, and bewitched the people of

Samaria, giving out that himself was some great one:

  10 To whom they all gave heed, from the least to the greatest,

saying, This man is the great power of God.

  11 And to him they had regard, because that of long time he had

bewitched them with sorceries.

  12 But when they believed Philip preaching the things

concerning the kingdom of God, and the name of Jesus Christ, they

were baptized, both men and women.

  13 Then Simon himself believed also: and when he was baptized,

he continued with Philip, and wondered, beholding the miracles

and signs which were done.

     

Samson’s riddle is here again unriddled: Out of the eater comes

forth meat, and out of the strong sweetness. The persecution that

was designed to extirpate the church was by the overruling providence

of God made an occasion of the enlargement of it. Christ had said, I

am come to send fire on the earth; and they thought, by scattering

those who were kindled with that fire, to have put it out, but instead

of this they did but help to spread it.

     

I. Here is a general account of what was done by them all

(v. 4):

They went every where, preaching the word. They did not go to

hide themselves for fear of suffering, no, nor to show themselves as

proud of their sufferings; but they went up and down to scatter the

knowledge of Christ in every place where they were scattered. They went

every where, into the way of the Gentiles, and the cities of the

Samaritans, which before they were forbidden to go into,

Matt. x. 5.

They did not keep together in a body, though this might have been a

strength to them; but they scattered into all parts, not to take their

ease, but to find out work. They went evangelizing the world,

preaching the word of the gospel; it was this which filled them, and

which they endeavoured to fill the country with, those of them that

were preachers in their preaching, and others in their common converse.

They were now in a country where they were no strangers, for Christ and

his disciples had conversed much in the regions of Judea; so that they

had a foundation laid there for them to build upon; and it would be

requisite to let the people there know what that doctrine which Jesus

had preached there some time ago was come to, and that it was not lost

and forgotten, as perhaps they were made to believe.

     

II. A particular account of what was done by Philip. We shall hear of

the progress and success of others of them afterwards

(ch. xi. 19),

but here must attend the motions of Philip, not Philip the apostle, but

Philip the deacon, who was chosen and ordained to serve tables, but

having used the office of a deacon well he purchased to himself a

good degree, and great boldness in the faith,
1 Tim. iii. 13.

Stephen was advanced to the degree of a martyr, Philip to the degree of

an evangelist, which when he entered upon, being obliged by it to

give himself to the word and prayer, he was, no doubt,

discharged from the office of a deacon; for how could he serve tables

at Jerusalem, which by that office he was obliged to do, when he was

preaching in Samaria? And it is probable that two others were chosen in

the room of Stephen and Philip. Now observe,

     

1. What wonderful success Philip had in his preaching, and what

reception he met with.

     

(1.) The place he chose was the city of Samaria, the head city of

Samaria, the metropolis of that country, which stood where the city of

Samaria had formerly stood, of the building of which we read,

1 Kings xvi. 24,

now called Sebaste. Some think it was the same with Sychem or

Sychar, that city of Samaria where Christ was,

John iv. 5.

Many of that city then believed in Christ, though he did no miracle

among them

(v. 39, 41),

and now Philip, three years after, carries on the work then begun. The

Jews would have no dealings with the Samaritans; but Christ sent his

gospel to slay all enmities, and particularly that between the Jews and

the Samaritans, by making them one in his church.

     

(2.) The doctrine he preached was Christ; for he determined to know

nothing else. He preached Christ to them; he proclaimed Christ to

them (so the word signifies), as a king, when he comes to the

crown, is proclaimed throughout his dominions. The Samaritans had an

expectation of the Messiah’s coming, as appears by

John iv. 25.

Now Philip tells them that he is come, and that the Samaritans are

welcome to him. Ministers’ business is to preach Christ–Christ, and

him crucified–Christ, and him glorified.

     

(3.) The proofs he produced for the confirmation of his doctrine were

miracles,

v. 6.

To convince them that he had his commission from heaven (and therefore

not only they might venture upon what he said, but they were bound to

yield to it), he shows them this broad seal of heaven annexed to it,

which the God of truth would never put to a lie. The miracles were

undeniable; they heard and saw the miracles which he did. They heard

the commanding words he spoke, and saw the amazing effects of them

immediately; that he spoke, and it was done. And the nature of the

miracles was such as suited the intention of his commission, and gave

light and lustre to it.

[1.] He was sent to break the power of Satan; and, in token of this,

unclean spirits, being charged in the name of the Lord Jesus to remove,

came out of many that were possessed with them,
v. 7.

As far as the gospel prevails, Satan is forced to quit his hold of men

and his interest in them, and then those are restored to themselves,

and to their right mind again, who, while he kept possession, were

distracted. Wherever the gospel gains the admission and submission it

ought to have, evil spirits are dislodged, and particularly unclean

spirits, all inclinations to the lusts of the flesh, which war

against the soul; for God has called us from uncleanness to holiness,

1 Thess. iv. 7.

This was signified by the casting of these unclean spirits out of the

bodies of people, who, it is here said, came out crying with a loud

voice, which signifies that they came out with great reluctancy,

and sorely against their wills, but were forced to acknowledge

themselves overcome by a superior power,

Mark i. 26; iii. 11; ix. 26.

[2.] He was sent to heal the minds of men, to cure a distempered world,

and to put it in to a good state of health; and, in token of this,

many that were taken with palsies, and that were lame, were

healed. Those distempers are specified that were most difficult to

be cured by the course of nature (that the miraculous cure might be the

more illustrious), and those that were most expressive of the disease

of sin and that moral impotency which the souls of men labour under as

to the service of God. The grace of God in the gospel is designed for

the healing of those that are spiritually lame and paralytic, and

cannot help themselves,

Rom. v. 6.

     

(4.) The acceptance which Philip’s doctrine, thus proved, met with in

Samaria

(v. 6):

The people with one accord gave heed to those things which Philip

spoke, induced thereto by the miracles which served at first to

gain attention, and so by degrees to gain assent. There then begin to

be some hopes of people when they begin to take notice of what is said

to them concerning the things of their souls and eternity–when they

begin to give heed to the word of God, as those that are well pleased

to hear it, desirous to understand and remember it, and that look upon

themselves as concerned in it. The common people gave heed to Philip,

oi ochloia multitude of them, not here and there

one, but with one accord; they were all of a mind, that it was fit the

doctrine of the gospel should be enquired into, and an impartial

hearing given to it.

     

(5.) The satisfaction they had in attending on, and attending to,

Philip’s preaching, and the success it had with many of them

(v. 8):

There was great joy in that city; for

(v. 12)

they believed Philip, and were baptized into the faith of

Christ, the generality of them, both men and women. Observe,

[1.] Philip preached the things concerning the kingdom of God,

the constitution of that kingdom, the laws and ordinances of it, the

liberties and privileges of it, and the obligations we are all under to

be the loyal subjects of that kingdom; and he preached the name of

Jesus Christ, as king of that kingdom–his name, which is above

every name. He preached it up in its commanding power and

influence–all that by which he has made himself known.

[2.] The people not only gave heed to what he said, but at length

believed it, were fully convinced that it was of God and not of men,

and gave up themselves to the direction and government of it. As to

this mountain, on which they had hitherto worshipped God, and placed a

great deal of religion in it, they were now as much weaned from it as

every they had been wedded to it, and become the true worshippers,

who worship the Father in spirit and in truth, and in the name of

Christ, the true temple,

John iv. 20-23.

[3.] When they believed, without scruple (though they were Samaritans)

and without delay they were baptized, openly professed the

Christian faith, promised to adhere to it, and then, by washing them

with water, were solemnly admitted into the communion of the Christian

church, and owned as brethren by the disciples. Men only were

capable of being admitted into the Jewish church by circumcision; but,

to show that in Jesus Christ there is neither male nor female

(Gal. iii. 28),

but both are alike welcome to him, the initiating ordinance is such as

women are capable of, for they are numbered with God’s spiritual

Israel, though not with Israel according to the flesh,

Num. i. 2.

And hence it is easily gathered that women are to be admitted to the

Lord’s supper, though it does not appear that there were any among

those to whom it was first administered.

[4.] This occasioned great joy; each one rejoiced for himself, as he in

the parable who found the treasure hid in the field; and they

all rejoiced for the benefit hereby brought to their city, and that it

came without opposition, which it would scarcely have done if Samaria

had been within the jurisdiction of the chief priests. Note, The

bringing of the gospel to any place is just matter of joy, of great

joy, to that place. Hence the spreading of the gospel in the world is

often prophesied of in the Old Testament as the diffusing of joy among

the nations: Let the nations be glad and sing for joy,
Ps. lxvii. 4; 1 Thess. i. 6.

The gospel of Christ does not make men melancholy, but fills them with

joy, if it be received as it should be; for it is glad tidings of

great joy to all people,
Luke ii. 10.

     

2. What there was in particular at this city of Samaria that made the

success of the gospel there more than ordinarily wonderful.

     

(1.) That Simon Magus had been busy there, and had gained a great

interest among the people, and yet they believed the things that

Philip spoke. To unlearn that which is bad proves many times a

harder task than to learn that which is good. These Samaritans, though

they were not idolaters as the Gentiles, nor prejudiced against the

gospel by traditions received from their fathers, yet had of late been

drawn to follow Simon, a conjurer (For so Magus signifies) who

made a mighty noise among them, and had strangely bewitched

them. We are told,

     

[1.] How strong the delusion of Satan was by which they were brought

into the interests of this great deceiver. He had been for some time,

nay, for a long time, in this city, using sorceries; perhaps he

came there by the instigation of the devil, soon after our Saviour had

been there, to undo what he had been doing there; for it was always

Satan’s way to crush a good work in its bud and infancy,

2 Cor. xi. 3; 1 Thess. iii. 5.

Now,

     

First, Simon assumed to himself that which was considerable:

He gave out that he himself was some great one, and would have

all people to believe so and to pay him respect accordingly; and then,

as to every thing else, they might do as they pleased. He had no design

to reform their lives, nor improve their worship and devotion, only to

make them believe that he was, tis megassome divine

person. Justin Martyr says that he would be worshipped as

proton theonthe chief god. He gave out himself

to be the Son of God, the Messiah, so some think; or to be an

angel, or a prophet. Perhaps he was uncertain within himself what title

of honour to pretend to; but he would be thought some great one.

Pride, ambition, and an affectation of grandeur, have always been the

cause of abundance of mischief both to the world and to the church.

     

Secondly, The people ascribed to him what he pleased.

1. They all gave heed to him, from the least to the greatest,

both young and old, both poor and rich, both governors and governed.

To him they had regard

(v. 10, 11),

and perhaps the more because the time fixed for the coming of the

Messiah had now expired, which had raised a general expectation of the

appearing of some great one about this time. Probably he was a native

of their country, and therefore they embraced him the more cheerfully,

that by giving honour to him they might reflect it upon themselves.

2. They said of him, This man is the great power of God–the power

of God, that great power (so it might be read), that power which

made the world. See how ignorant inconsiderate people mistake that

which is done by the power of Satan, as if it were done by the power of

God. Thus, in the Gentile world, devils pass for deities; and in the

antichristian kingdom all the world wonders after a beast, to

whom the dragon gives his power, and who opens his mouth in

blasphemy against God,
Rev. xiii. 2-5.

3. They were brought to it by his sorceries: He bewitched the people

of Samaria

(v. 9),

bewitched them with sorceries

(v. 11),

that is, either,

(1.) By his magic arts he bewitched the minds of the people, at

least some of them, who drew in others. Satan, by God’s permission,

filled their hearts to follow Simon. O foolish Galatians, saith

Paul, who hath bewitched you?
Gal. iii. 1.

These people are said to be bewitched by Simon, because they were so

strangely infatuated to believe a lie. Or,

(2.) By his magic arts he did many signs and lying wonders,

which seemed to be miracles, but really were not so: like those of the

magicians of Egypt, and those of the man of sin,
2 Thess. ii. 9.

When they knew no better, they were influenced by his sorceries; but,

when they were acquainted with Philip’s real miracles, they saw plainly

that the one was real and the other a sham, and that there was as much

difference as between Aaron’s rod and those of the magicians. What

is the chaff to the wheat?
Jer. xxiii. 28.

     

Thus, notwithstanding the influence Simon Magus had had upon them, and

the unwillingness there generally is in people to own themselves in an

error, and to retract it, yet, when they saw the difference between

Simon and Philip, they quitted Simon, gave heed no longer to him, but

to Philip: and thus you see,

     

[2.] How strong the power of Divine grace is, by which they were

brought to Christ, who is truth itself, and was, as I may say, the

great undeceiver. By that grace working with the word those that had

been led captive by Satan were brought into obedience to Christ.

Where Satan, as a strong man armed, kept possession of the

palace, and thought himself safe, Christ, as a stronger than he,

dispossessed him, and divided the spoil; led captivity captive,

and made those the trophies of his victory whom the devil had triumphed

over. Let us not despair of the worst, when even those whom Simon Magus

had bewitched were brought to believe.

     

(2.) Here is another thing yet more wonderful, that Simon Magus himself

became a convert to the faith of Christ, in show and profession, for a

time. Is Saul also among the prophets? Yes

(v. 13),

Simon himself believed also. He was convinced that Philip

preached a true doctrine, because he saw it confirmed by real miracles,

of which he was the better able to judge because he was conscious to

himself of the trick of his own pretended ones.

[1.] The present conviction went so far that he was baptized,

was admitted, as other believers were, into the church by baptism; and

we have no reason to think that Philip did amiss in baptizing him, no,

nor in baptizing him quickly. Though he had been a very wicked man, a

sorcerer, a pretender to divine honours, yet, upon his solemn

profession of repentance for his sin and faith in Jesus Christ, he was

baptized. For, as great wickedness before conversion keeps not true

penitents from the benefits of God’s grace, so neither should it keep

professing ones from church-fellowship. Prodigals, when they return,

must be joyfully welcomed home, though we cannot be sure but that they

will play the prodigal again. Nay, though he was now but a hypocrite,

and really in the gall of bitterness and bond of iniquity all

this while, and would soon have been found to be so if he had been

tried awhile, yet Philip baptized him; for it is God’s prerogative to

know the heart. The church and its ministers must go by a judgment of

charity, as far as there is room for it. It is a maxim in the law,

Donec contrarium patet, semper præsumitur meliori parti–We

must hope the best as long as we can. And it is a maxim in the

discipline of the church, De secretis non judicat ecclesia–The

secrets of the heart God only judges.

[2.] The present conviction lasted so long that he continued with

Philip. Though afterwards he apostatized from Christianity, yet not

quickly. He courted Philip’s acquaintance, and now he that had given

out himself to be some great one is content to sit at the feet of a

preacher of the gospel. Even bad men, very bad, may sometimes be in a

good frame, very good; and those whose hearts still go after their

covetousness may possibly not only come before God as his people come,

but continue with them.

[3.] The present conviction was wrought and kept up by the miracles; he

wondered to see himself so far outdone in signs and miracles. Many

wonder at the proofs of divine truths who never experience the power of

them.













The Account of Simon Magus.

     

14 Now when the apostles which were at Jerusalem heard that

Samaria had received the word of God, they sent unto them Peter

and John:

  15 Who, when they were come down, prayed for them, that they

might receive the Holy Ghost:

  16 (For as yet he was fallen upon none of them: only they were

baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus.)

  17 Then laid they their hands on them, and they received the

Holy Ghost.

  18 And when Simon saw that through laying on of the apostles’

hands the Holy Ghost was given, he offered them money,

  19 Saying, Give me also this power, that on whomsoever I lay

hands, he may receive the Holy Ghost.

  20 But Peter said unto him, Thy money perish with thee, because

thou hast thought that the gift of God may be purchased with

money.

  21 Thou hast neither part nor lot in this matter: for thy heart

is not right in the sight of God.

  22 Repent therefore of this thy wickedness, and pray God, if

perhaps the thought of thine heart may be forgiven thee.

  23 For I perceive that thou art in the gall of bitterness, and

in the bond of iniquity.

  24 Then answered Simon, and said, Pray ye to the Lord for me,

that none of these things which ye have spoken come upon me.

  25 And they, when they had testified and preached the word of

the Lord, returned to Jerusalem, and preached the gospel in many

villages of the Samaritans.

     

God had wonderfully owned Philip in his work as an evangelist at

Samaria, but he could do no more than an evangelist; there were some

peculiar powers reserved to the apostles, for the keeping up of the

dignity of their office, and here we have an account of what was done

by two of them there–Peter and John. The twelve kept together

at Jerusalem

(v. 1),

and thither these good tidings were brought them that Samaria had

received the word of God

(v. 14),

that a great harvest of souls was gathered, and was likely to be

gathered in to Christ there. The word of God was not only preached to

them, but received by them; they bade it welcome, admitted the light of

it, and submitted to the power of it: When they heard it, they sent

unto them Peter and John. If Peter had been, as some say he was,

the prince of the apostles, he would have sent some of them, or, if he

had seen cause, would have gone himself of his own accord; but he was

so far from this that he submitted to an order of the house, and, as a

servant to the body, went whither they sent him. Two apostles were

sent, the two most eminent, to Samaria,

1. To encourage Philip, to assist him, and strengthen his hands.

Ministers in a higher station, and that excel in gifts and graces,

should contrive how they may be helpful to those in a lower sphere, and

contribute to their comfort and usefulness.

2. To carry on the good work that was begun among the people, and, with

those heavenly graces that had enriched them, to confer upon them

spiritual gifts. Now observe,

     

I. How they advanced and improved those of them that were sincere. It

is said

(v. 16),

The Holy Ghost was as yet fallen upon none of them, in those

extraordinary powers which were conveyed by the descent of the Spirit

upon the day of pentecost. They were none of them endued with the gift

of tongues, which seems then to have been the most usual immediate

effect of the pouring out of the Spirit. See

ch. x. 45, 46.

This was both an eminent sign to those that believed not, and of

excellent service to those that did. This, and other such gifts, they

had not, only they were baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus,

and so engaged in him and interested in him, which was necessary to

salvation, and in this they had joy and satisfaction

(v. 8),

though they could not speak with tongues. Those that are indeed given

up to Christ, and have experienced the sanctifying influences and

operations of the Spirit of grace, have great reason to be thankful,

and no reason to complain, though they have not those gifts that are

for ornament, and would make them bright. But it is intended that they

should go on to the perfection of the present dispensation, for the

greater honour of the gospel. We have reason to think that Philip had

received these gifts of the Holy Ghost himself, but had not a power to

confer them; the apostles must come to do this; and they did it not

upon all that were baptized, but upon some of them, and, it should

seem, such as were designed for some office in the church, or at least

to be eminent active members of it; and upon some of them one gift

of the Holy Ghost, and upon others another. See

1 Cor. xii. 4, 8; xiv. 26.

Now in order to this,

1. The apostles prayed for them,
v. 15.

The Spirit is given, not to ourselves only

(Luke xi. 13),

but to others also, in answer to prayer: I will put my Spirit within

you

(Ezek. xxxvi. 27),

but I will for this be enquired of,
v. 37.

We may take encouragement from this example in praying to God to give

the renewing graces of the Holy Ghost to those whose spiritual welfare

we are concerned for–for our children, for our friends, for our

ministers. We should pray, and pray earnestly, that they may receive

the Holy Ghost; for this includes all blessings.

2. They laid their hands on them, to signify that their prayers were

answered, and that the gift of the Holy Ghost was conferred upon

them; for, upon the use of this sign, they received the Holy

Ghost, and spoke with tongues. The laying on of hands was anciently

used in blessing, by those who blessed with authority. Thus the

apostles blessed these new converts, ordained some to be ministers, and

confirmed others in their Christianity. We cannot now, nor can any,

thus give the Holy Ghost by the laying on of hands; but this may

intimate to us that those whom we pray for we should use our endeavours

with.

     

II. How they discovered and discarded him that was a hypocrite among

them, and this was Simon Magus; for they knew how to separate

between the precious and the vile. Now observe here,

     

1. The wicked proposal that Simon made, by which his hypocrisy was

discovered

(v. 18, 19):

When he saw that through laying on of the apostles’ hands the Holy

Ghost was given (which should have confirmed his faith in the

doctrine of Christ, and increased his veneration for the apostles), it

gave him a notion of Christianity as no other than an exalted piece of

sorcery, in which he thought himself capable of being equal to the

apostles, and therefore offered them money, saying, Give me also

this power. He does not desire them to lay their hands on him, that

he might receive the Holy Ghost himself (for he did not foresee that

any thing was to be got by that), but that they would convey to him a

power to bestow the gift upon others. He was ambitious to have the

honour of an apostle, but not at all solicitous to have the spirit and

disposition of a Christian. He was more desirous to gain honour to

himself than to do good to others. Now, in making this motion,

(1.) He put a great affront upon the apostles, as if they were

mercenary men, would do any thing for money, and loved it as well as he

did; whereas they had left what they had, for Christ, so far were they

from aiming to make it more–

(2.) He put a great affront upon Christianity, as if the miracles that

were wrought for the proof of it were done by magic arts, only of a

different nature from what he himself had practised formerly.

(3.) He showed that, like Balaam, he aimed at the rewards of

divination; for he would not have offered money for this power if he

had not hoped to get money by it.

(4.) He showed that he had a very high conceit of himself, and that he

had never his heart truly humbled. Such a wretch as he had been before

his baptism should have asked, like the prodigal, to be made as one of

the hired servants. But, as soon as he is admitted into the family, no

less a place will serve him than to be one of the stewards of the

household, and to be entrusted with a power which Philip himself had

not, but the apostles only.

     

2. The just rejection of his proposal, and the cutting reproof Peter

gave him for it,

v. 20-23.

     

(1.) Peter shows him his crime

(v. 20):

Thou hast thought that the gift of God may be purchased with

money; and thus,

[1.] He had overvalued the wealth of this world, as if it were an

equivalent for any thing, and as if, because, as Solomon saith, it

answers all things, relating to the life that now is, it would

answer all things relating to the other life, and would purchase the

pardon of sin, the gift of the Holy Ghost, and eternal life.

[2.] He had undervalued the gift of the Holy Ghost and put it upon a

level with the common gifts of nature and providence. He thought the

power of an apostle might as well be had for a good fee as the advice

of a physician or a lawyer, which was the greatest despite that could

be done to the Spirit of grace. All the buying and selling of pardons

and indulgences in the church of Rome is the product of this same

wicked thought, that the gift of God may be purchased with

money, when the offer of divine grace so expressly runs, without

money and without price.

     

(2.) He shows him his character, which is inferred from his crime. From

every thing that a man says or does amiss we cannot infer that he is a

hypocrite in the profession he makes of religion; but this of Simon’s

was such a fundamental error as could by no means consist with a state

of grace; his offering money (and that got by sorcery too) was an

incontestable evidence that he was yet under the power of a worldly and

carnal mind, and was yet that natural man which receiveth not the

things of the Spirit of God, neither can he know them. And

therefore Peter tells him plainly,

[1.] That his heart was not right in the sight of God,
v. 21.

“Though thou professest to believe, and art baptized, yet thou art not

sincere.” We are as our hearts are; if they be not right, we are wrong;

and they are open in the sight of God, who knows them, judges them, and

judges of us by them. Our hearts are that which they are in the sight

of God, who cannot be deceived; and if they be not right in his sight,

whatever our pretensions be, our religion is vain, and will stand us in

no stead: our great concern is to approve ourselves to him in our

integrity, for otherwise we cheat ourselves into our own ruin. Some

refer this particularly to the proposal he made; what he asked is

denied him, because his heart is not right in the sight of God

in asking it. He does not aim at the glory of God nor the honour of

Christ in it, but to make a hand of it for himself; he asks, and has

not, because he asks amiss, that he may consume it upon his lusts,

and be still thought some great one.

[2.] That he is in the gall of bitterness, and in the bond of

iniquity: I perceive that thou art so,

v. 23.

This is plain dealing, and plain dealing is best when we are dealing

about souls and eternity. Simon had got a great name among the people,

and of late a good name too among God’s people, and yet Peter here

gives him a black character. Note, It is possible for a man to continue

under the power of sin, and yet to put on a form of godliness. I

perceive it, saith Peter. It was not so much by the spirit of

discerning, with which Peter was endued, that he perceived this, as by

Simon’s discovery of it in the proposal he made. Note, The disguises of

hypocrites many times are soon seen through; the nature of the wolf

shows itself notwithstanding the cover of the sheep’s clothing. Now the

character here given of Simon is really the character of all wicked

people. First, They are in the gall of

bitterness–odious to God, as that which is bitter as gall is to

us. Sin is an abominable thing, which the Lord hates, and sinners are

by it made abominable to him; they are vicious in their own nature.

Indwelling sin is a root of bitterness, that bears gall and

wormwood,
Deut. xxix. 18.

The faculties are corrupted, and the mind embittered against all good,

Heb. xii. 15.

It intimates likewise the pernicious consequences of sin; the end is

bitter as wormwood. Secondly, They are in the bond of

iniquity–bound over to the judgment of God by the guilt of sin,

and bound under the dominion of Satan by the power of sin; led captive

by him at his will, and it is a sore bondage, like that in Egypt,

making the life bitter.

     

(3.) He reads him his doom in two things–

     

[1.] He shall sink with his worldly wealth, which he overvalued: Thy

money perish with thee. First, Hereby Peter rejects his offer with

the utmost disdain and indignation: “Dost thou think thou canst bribe

us to betray our trust, and to put the power we are entrusted with into

such unworthy hands? Away with thee and thy money too; we will have

nothing to do with either. Get thee behind me, Satan.” When we

are tempted with money to do an evil thing, we should see what a

perishing thing money is, and scorn to be biassed by it–It is the

character of the upright man that he shakes his hands from holding,

from touching bribes,

Isa. xxxiii. 15.

Secondly, He warns him of his danger of utter destruction if he

continued in this mind: “Thy money will perish and thou wilt lose it,

and all that thou canst purchase with it. As meats for the belly and

the belly for meats

(1 Cor. vi. 13),

so goods for money and money for goods, but God shall destroy both

it and them–they perish in the using; but this is not the worst of

it: thou wilt perish with it, and it with thee; and it will be

an aggravation of thy ruin, and a heavy load upon thy perishing soul,

that thou hadst money, which might have been made to turn to a good

account

(Luke xvi. 9),

which might have been laid at the apostles’ feet, as a charity, and

would have been accepted, but was thrust into their hands as a bribe,

and was rejected. Son, remember this.

     

[2.] He shall come short of the spiritual blessings which he

undervalued

(v. 21):

Thou hast neither part nor lot in this matter; thou hast

nothing to do with the gifts of the Holy Ghost, thou dost not

understand them, thou art excluded from them, hast put a bar in thine

own door; thou canst not receive the Holy Ghost thyself, nor power to

confer the Holy Ghost upon others, for thy heart is not right in the

sight of God, if thou thinkest that Christianity is a trade to live

by in this world, and therefore thou hast no part nor lot in the

eternal life in the other world which the gospel offers.” Note,

First, There are many who profess the Christian religion, and

yet have no part nor lot in the matter, no part in Christ

(John xiii. 8),

no lot in the heavenly Canaan. Secondly, They are those whose

hearts are not right in the sight of God, are not animated by a

right spirit, nor guided by a right rule, nor directed to the right

end.

     

(4.) He gives him good counsel, notwithstanding,

v. 22.

Though he was angry with him, yet he did not abandon him; and, though

he would have him see his case to be very bad, yet he would not have

him think it desperate; yet now there is hope in Israel.

Observe,

     

[1.] What it is that he advises him to: He must do his first works.

First, He must repent,–must see his error and retract

it–must change his mind and way–must be humbled and ashamed for what

he has done. His repentance must be particular: “Repent of this, own

thyself guilty in this, and be sorry for it.” He must lay a load upon

himself for it, must not extenuate it, by calling it a mistake, or

misguided zeal, but must aggravate it by calling it wickedness,

his wickedness, the fruit of his own corruption. Those that have said

and done amiss must, as far as they can, unsay it and undo it again by

repentance. Secondly, He must pray to God, must pray that

God would give him repentance, and pardon upon repentance. Penitents

must pray, which implies a desire towards God, and a confidence in

Christ. Simon Magus, as great a man as he thinks himself, shall not be

courted into the apostles’ communion (how much soever some would think

it a reputation to them) upon any other terms than those upon which

other sinners are admitted–repentance and prayer.

     

[2.] What encouragement he gives him to do this: If perhaps the

thought of thy heart, this wicked thought of thine, may be

forgiven thee. Note, First, There may be a great deal of

wickedness in the thought of the heart, its false notions, and corrupt

affections, and wicked projects, which must be repented of, or we are

undone. Secondly, The thought of the heart, though ever so

wicked, shall be forgiven, upon our repentance, and not laid to our

charge. When Peter here puts a perhaps upon it, the doubt is of

the sincerity of his repentance, not of his pardon if his repentance be

sincere. If indeed the thought of thy heart may be forgiven, so

it may be read. Or it intimates that the greatness of his sin might

justly make the pardon doubtful, though the promise of the gospel had

put the matter out of doubt, in case he did truly repent: like that

(Lam. iii. 29),

If so be there may be hope.

     

[3.] Simon’s request to them to pray for him,

v. 24.

He was startled and put into confusion by that which Peter said,

finding that resented thus which he thought would have been embraced

with both arms; and he cries out, Pray you to the Lord for me, that

none of the things which you have spoken come upon me. Here was,

First, Something well–that he was affected with the reproof

given him, and terrified by the character given of him, enough to make

the stoutest heart to tremble; and, this being so, he begged the

prayers of the apostles for him, wishing to have an interest in them,

who, he believed, had a good interest in heaven. Secondly,

Something wanting. He begged of them to pray for him, but did not pray

for himself, as he ought to have done; and, in desiring them to pray

for him, his concern is more that the judgments he had made himself

liable to might be prevented than that his corruptions might be

mortified, and his heart, by divine grace, be made right in the sight

of God; like Pharaoh, who would have Moses entreat the Lord for him,

that he would take away this death only, not that he would take away

this sin, this hardness of heart,

Exod. viii. 8; x. 17.

Some think that Peter had denounced some particular judgments against

him, as against Ananias and Sapphira, which, upon this submission of

his, at the apostle’s intercession, were prevented; or, from what is

related, he might infer that some token of God’s wrath would fall upon

him, which he thus dreaded and deprecated.

     

Lastly, Here is the return of the apostles to Jerusalem, when

they had finished the business they came about; for as yet they were

not to disperse; but, though they came hither to do that work which was

peculiar to them as apostles, yet, opportunity offering itself, they

applied themselves to that which was common to all gospel ministers.

1. There, in the city of Samaria, they were preachers: They

testified the word of the Lord, solemnly attested the truth of the

gospel, and confirmed what the other ministers preached. They did not

pretend to bring them any thing new, though they were apostles, but

bore their testimony to the word of the Lord as they had received it.

2. In their road home they were itinerant preachers; as they passed

through many villages of the Samaritans they preached the gospel.

Though the congregations there were not so considerable as those in the

cities, either for number or figure, yet their souls were as precious,

and the apostles did not think it below them to preach the gospel to

them. God has a regard to the inhabitants of his villages in Israel

(Judg. v. 11),

and so should we.
















Philip and the Ethiopian.

     

26 And the angel of the Lord spake unto Philip, saying, Arise,

and go toward the south unto the way that goeth down from

Jerusalem unto Gaza, which is desert.

  27 And he arose and went: and, behold, a man of Ethiopia, an

eunuch of great authority under Candace queen of the Ethiopians,

who had the charge of all her treasure, and had come to Jerusalem

for to worship,

  28 Was returning, and sitting in his chariot read Esaias the

prophet.

  29 Then the Spirit said unto Philip, Go near, and join thyself

to this chariot.

  30 And Philip ran thither to him, and heard him read the

prophet Esaias, and said, Understandest thou what thou readest?

  31 And he said, How can I, except some man should guide me? And

he desired Philip that he would come up and sit with him.

  32 The place of the scripture which he read was this, He was

led as a sheep to the slaughter; and like a lamb dumb before his

shearer, so opened he not his mouth:

  33 In his humiliation his judgment was taken away: and who

shall declare his generation? for his life is taken from the

earth.

  34 And the eunuch answered Philip, and said, I pray thee, of

whom speaketh the prophet this? of himself, or of some other man?

  35 Then Philip opened his mouth, and began at the same

scripture, and preached unto him Jesus.

  36 And as they went on their way, they came unto a certain

water: and the eunuch said, See, here is water; what doth

hinder me to be baptized?

  37 And Philip said, If thou believest with all thine heart,

thou mayest. And he answered and said, I believe that Jesus

Christ is the Son of God.

  38 And he commanded the chariot to stand still: and they went

down both into the water, both Philip and the eunuch; and he

baptized him.

  39 And when they were come up out of the water, the Spirit of

the Lord caught away Philip, that the eunuch saw him no more: and

he went on his way rejoicing.

  40 But Philip was found at Azotus: and passing through he

preached in all the cities, till he came to Cæsarea.

     

We have here the story of the conversion of an Ethiopian eunuch to the

faith of Christ, by whom, we have reason to think, the knowledge of

Christ was sent into that country where he lived, and that scripture

fulfilled, Ethiopia shall soon stretch out her hands (one of the

first of the nations) unto God,
Ps. lxviii. 31.

     

I. Philip the evangelist is directed into the road where he would meet

with this Ethiopian,

v. 26.

When the churches in Samaria were settled, and had ministers appointed

them, the apostles went back to Jerusalem; but Philip stays, expecting

to be employed in breaking up fresh ground in the country. And here we

have,

1. Direction given him by an angel (probably in a dream or vision of

the night) what course to steer: Arise, and go towards the

south. Though angels were not employed to preach the gospel, they

were often employed in carrying messages to ministers for advice and

encouragement, as

ch. v. 19.

We cannot now expect such guides in our way; but doubtless there is a

special providence of God conversant about the removes and settlements

of ministers, and one way or other he will direct those who sincerely

desire to follow him into that way in which he will own them: he

will guide them with his eye. Philip must go southward, to the

way that leads from Jerusalem to Gaza, through the desert or

wilderness of Judah. He would never have thought of going thither, into

a desert, into a common road through the desert; small probability of

finding work there! Yet thither he is sent, according to our Saviour’s

parable, fore-telling the call of the Gentiles, Go you into the

highways, and the hedges,
Matt. xxii. 9.

Sometimes God opens a door of opportunity to his ministers in places

very unlikely.

2. His obedience to this direction

(v. 27):

He arose and went, without objecting, or so much as asking,

“What business have I there?” Or, “What likelihood is there of doing

good there?” He went out, not knowing whither he went, or whom

he was to meet.

     

II. An account is given of this eunuch

(v. 27),

who and what he was, on whom this distinguishing favour was bestowed.

1. He was a foreigner, a man of Ethiopia. There were two

Ethiopias, one in Arabia, but that lay east from Canaan; it should seem

this was Ethiopia in Africa, which lay south, beyond Egypt, a great way

off from Jerusalem; for in Christ those that were afar off were made

nigh, according to the promise, that the ends of the earth

should see the great salvation. The Ethiopians were looked upon as

the meanest and most despicable of the nations, blackamoors, as if

nature had stigmatized them; yet the gospel is sent to them, and divine

grace looks upon them, though they are black, though the sun has

looked upon them.

2. He was a person of quality, a great man in his own country, a

eunuch, not in body, but in office-lord chamberlain or steward of

the household; and either by the dignity of his place or by his

personal character, which commanded respect, he was of great

authority, and bore a mighty sway under Candace queen of the

Ethiopians, who probably was successor to the queen of Sheba, who

is called the queen of the south, that country being governed by

queens, to whom Candace was a common name, as Pharaoh to

the kings of Egypt. He had the charge of all her treasure; so

great a trust did she repose in him. Not many mighty, not many

noble, are called; but some are.

3. He was a proselyte to the Jewish religion, for he came to

Jerusalem to worship. Some think that he was a proselyte of

righteousness, who was circumcised, and kept the feasts; others that he

was only a proselyte of the gate, a Gentile, but who had renounced

idolatry, and worshipped the God of Israel occasionally in the court of

the Gentiles; but, if so, then Peter was not the first that preached

the gospel to the Gentiles, as he says he was. Some think that there

were remains of the knowledge of the true God in this country, ever

since the queen of Sheba’s time; and probably the ancestor of this

eunuch was one of her attendants, who transmitted to his posterity what

he learned at Jerusalem.

     

III. Philip and the eunuch are brought together into a close

conversation; and now Philip shall know the meaning of his being sent

into a desert, for there he meets with a chariot, that shall serve for

a synagogue, and one man, the conversion of whom shall be in effect,

for aught he knows, the conversion of a whole nation.

     

1. Philip is ordered to fall into company with this traveller that is

going home from Jerusalem towards Gaza, thinking he has done all the

business of his journey, when the great business which the overruling

providence of God designed in it was yet undone. He had been at

Jerusalem, where the apostles were preaching the Christian faith, and

multitudes professing it, and yet there he had taken no notice of it,

and made no enquiries after it–nay, it should seem, had slighted it,

and turned his back upon it; yet the grace of God pursues him,

overtakes him in the desert, and there overcomes him. Thus God is often

found of those that sought him not,
Isa. lxv. 1.

Philip has this order, not by an angel, as before, but by the Spirit

whispering it in his ear

(v. 29):

Go near, and join thyself to this chariot; go so near as that

gentleman may take notice of thee.” We should study to do good to those

we light in company with upon the road: thus the lips of the righteous

may feed many. We should not be so shy of all strangers as some affect

to be. Of those of whom we know nothing else we know this, that they

have souls.

     

2. He finds him reading in his Bible, as he sat in his chariot

(v. 28):

He ran to him, and heard him read; he read out, for the benefit

of those that were with him,

v. 30.

He not only relieved the tediousness of the journey, but redeemed time

by reading, not philosophy, history, nor politics, much less a romance

or a play, but the scriptures, the book of Esaias; that book

Christ read in

(Luke iv. 17)

and the eunuch here, which should recommend it particularly to our

reading. Perhaps the eunuch was now reading over again those portions

of scripture which he had heard read and expounded at Jerusalem, that

he might recollect what he had heard. Note,

(1.) It is the duty of every one of us to converse much with the holy

scriptures.

(2.) Persons of quality should abound more than others in the exercises

of piety, because their example will influence many, and they have

their time more at command.

(3.) It is wisdom for men of business to redeem time for holy duties;

time is precious, and it is the best husbandry in the world to gather

up the fragments of time, that none be lost, to fill up every minute

with something that will turn to a good account.

(4.) When we are returning from public worship we should use means in

private for the keeping up of the good affections there kindled, and

the preserving of the good impressions there made,

1 Chron. xxix. 18.

(5.) Those that are diligent in searching the scriptures are in a fair

way to improve in knowledge; for to him that hath shall be

given.

     

3. He puts a fair question to him: Understandest thou what thou

readest? Not by way of reproach, but with design to offer him his

service. Note, What we read and hear of the word of God it highly

concerns us to understand, especially what we read and hear concerning

Christ; and therefore we should often ask ourselves whether we

understand it or no: Have you understood all these things?
Matt. xiii. 51.

And have you understood them aright? We cannot profit by the

scriptures unless we do in some measure understand them,

1 Cor. xiv. 16, 17.

And, blessed by God, what is necessary to salvation is easy to be

understood.

     

4. The eunuch in a sense of his need of assistance, desires Philip’s

company

(v. 31):

How can I understand, says he, except some one guide me?

Therefore pray come up, and sit with me.”

(1.) He speaks as one that had very low thoughts of himself, and his

own capacity and attainments. He was so far from taking it as an

affront to be asked whether he understood what he read, though Philip

was a stranger, on foot, and probably looked mean (which many a less

man would have done, and have called him an impertinent fellow, and bid

him go about his business, what was it to him?) that he takes the

question kindly, makes a very modest reply, How can I? We have

reason to think he was an intelligent man, and as well acquainted with

the meaning of scripture as most were, and yet he modestly confesses

his weakness. Note, Those that would learn must see their need to be

taught. The prophet must first own that he knows not what these are,

and then the angel will tell him,

Zech. iv. 13.

(2.) He speaks as one very desirous to be taught, to have some one to

guide him. Observe, He read the scripture, though there were many

things in it which he did not understand. Though there are many things

in the scriptures which are dark and hard to be understood, nay,

which are often misunderstood, yet we must not therefore throw them by,

but study them for the sake of those things that are easy, which is the

likeliest way to come by degrees to the understanding of those things

that are difficult: for knowledge and grace grow gradually.

(3.) He invited Philip to come up and sit with him; not as Jehu

took Jonadab into his chariot, to come and see his zeal for the Lord of

hosts

(2 Kings x. 16),

but rather, “Come, see my ignorance, and instruct me.” He will gladly

do Philip the honour to take him into the coach with him, if Philip

will do him the favour to expound a portion of scripture to him. Note,

In order to our right understanding of the scripture, it is requisite

we should have some one to guide us; some good books, and some good

men, but, above all, the Spirit of grace, to lead us into all

truth.

     

IV. The portion of scripture which the eunuch recited, with some hints

of Philip’s discourse upon it. The preachers of the gospel had a very

good handle to take hold of those by who were conversant with the

scriptures of the Old Testament and received them, especially when they

found them actually engaged in the study of them, as the eunuch was

here.

     

1. The chapter he was reading was the fifty-third of Isaiah, two verses

of which are here quoted

(v. 32, 33),

part of the seventh and eighth verses; they are set down according to

the Septuagint version, which in some things differs from the original

Hebrew. Grotius thinks the eunuch read it in the Hebrew, but that Luke

takes the Septuagint translation, as readier to the language in which

he wrote; and he supposes that the eunuch had learned from the many

Jews that were in Ethiopia both their religion and language. But,

considering that the Septuagint version was made in Egypt, which was

the next country adjoining to Ethiopia, and lay between it and

Jerusalem, I rather think that translation was most familiar to him: it

appears by

Isa. xx. 4

that there was much communication between those two nations–Egypt and

Ethiopia. The greatest variation from the Hebrew is that what in the

original is, He was taken from prison and from judgment (hurried

with the utmost violence and precipitation from one judgment-seat to

another; or, From force and from judgment he was taken away;

that is, It was from the fury of the people, and their continual

clamours, and the judgment of Pilate thereupon, that he was taken

away), is here read, In his humiliation his judgment was taken

away. He appeared so mean and despicable in their eyes that they

denied him common justice, and against all the rules of equity, to

the benefit of which every man is entitled, they declared him innocent,

and yet condemned him to die; nothing criminal can be proved upon him,

but he is down, and down with him. Thus in his humiliation his

judgment was taken away; so, the sense is much the same with that

of the Hebrew. So that

(these verses

foretold concerning the Messiah,

(1.) That he should die, should be led to the slaughter, as

sheep that were offered in sacrifice–that his life should be taken

from among men, taken from the earth. With what little reason then was

the death of Christ a stumbling-block to the unbelieving Jews, when it

was so plainly foretold by their own prophets, and was so necessary to

the accomplishment of his undertaking! Then is the offence of the cross

ceased.

(2.) That he should die wrongfully, should die by violence, should be

hurried out of his life, and his judgment shall be taken

away–no justice done to him; for he must be cut off, but not

for himself.

(3.) That he should die patiently. Like a lamb dumb before the

shearer, nay, and before the butcher too, so he opened not his

mouth. Never was there such an example of patience as our Lord

Jesus was in his sufferings; when he was accused, when he was abused,

he was silent, reviled not again, threatened not.

(4.) That yet he should live for ever, to ages which cannot be

numbered; for so I understand those words, Who shall declare his

generation? The Hebrew word properly signifies the duration of

one life,
Eccl. i. 4.

Now who can conceive or express how long he shall continue,

notwithstanding this; for his life is taken only from the

earth; in heaven he shall live to endless and innumerable ages, as

it follows in

Isa. liii. 10,

He shall prolong his days.

     

2. The eunuch’s question upon this is, Of whom speaketh the prophet

this?
v. 34.

He does not desire Philip to give him some critical remarks upon the

words and phrases, and the idioms of the language, but to acquaint him

with the general scope and design of the prophecy, to furnish him with

a key, in the use of which he might, by comparing one thing with

another, be led into the meaning of the particular passage. Prophecies

had usually in them something of obscurity, till they were explained by

the accomplishment of them, as this now was. It is a material question

he asks, and a very sensible one: “Does the prophet speak this of

himself, in expectation of being used, being misused, as the other

prophets were? or does he speak it of some other man, in his own

age, or in some age to come?” Though the modern Jews will not allow it

to be spoken of the Messiah, yet their ancient doctors did so interpret

it; and perhaps the eunuch knew this, and did partly understand it so

himself, only he proposed this question, to draw on discourse with

Philip; for the way to improve in learning is to consult the learned.

As they must enquire the law at the mouth of the priests

(Mal. ii. 7),

so they must enquire the gospel, especially that part of the treasure

which is hid in the field of the Old Testament, at the mouth of the

ministers of Christ. The way to receive good instructions is to ask

good questions.

     

3. Philip takes this fair occasion given him to open to him the great

mystery of the gospel concerning Jesus Christ, and him

crucified. He began at this scripture, took this for his

text (as Christ did another passage of the same prophecy,

Luke iv. 21),

and preached unto him Jesus,
v. 35.

This is all the account given us of Philip’s sermon, because it was the

same in effect with Peter’s sermons, which we have had before. The

business of gospel ministers is to preach Jesus, and this is the

preaching that is likely to do good. It is probable that Philip had now

occasion for his gift of tongues, that he might preach Christ to this

Ethiopian in the language of his own country. And here we have an

instance of speaking of the things of God, and speaking of them to good

purpose, not only as we sit in the house, but as we walk by

the way, according to that rule,

Deut. vi. 7.

     

V. The eunuch is baptized in the name of Christ,

v. 36-38.

It is probable that the eunuch had heard at Jerusalem of the doctrine

of Christ, so that it was not altogether new to him. But, if he had,

what could that do towards this speedy conquest that was made of his

heart for Christ. It was a powerful working of the Spirit with and by

Philip’s preaching that gained the point. Now here we have,

     

1. The modest proposal which the eunuch made of himself for baptism

(v. 36):

As they went on their way, discoursing of Christ, the eunuch

asking more questions and Philip answering them to his satisfaction,

they came unto a certain water, a well, river, or pond, the

sight of which made the eunuch think of being baptized. Thus God, by

hints of providence which seem casual, sometimes puts his people in

mind of their duty, of which otherwise perhaps they would not have

thought. The eunuch knew not how little a while Philip might be with

him, nor where he might afterwards enquire for him. He could not expect

his travelling with him to his next stage, and therefore, if Philip

think fit, he will take the present convenience which offers itself of

being baptized: “See, here is water, which perhaps we may not

meet with a great while again; what doth hinder me to be

baptized? Canst thou show any cause why I should not be admitted a

disciple and follower of Christ by baptism?” Observe,

(1.) He does not demand baptism, does not say, “Here is water and here

I am resolved I will be baptized;” for, if Philip have any thing to

offer to the contrary, he is willing to waive it for the present. If he

think him not fit to be baptized, or if there be any thing in the

institution of the ordinance which will not admit such a speedy

administration of it, he will not insist upon it. The most forward zeal

must submit to order and rule. But,

(2.) He does desire it, and, unless Philip can show cause why not, he

desires it now, and is not willing to defer it. Note, In the solemn

dedicating and devoting of ourselves to God, it is good to make haste,

and not to delay; for the present time is the best time,

Ps. cxix. 60.

Those who have received the thing signified by baptism should not put

off receiving the sign. The eunuch feared lest the good affections now

working in him should cool and abate, and therefore was willing

immediately to bind his soul with the baptismal bonds unto the Lord,

that he might bring the matter to an issue.

     

2. The fair declaration which Philip made him of the terms upon which

he might have the privilege of baptism

(v. 37):

If thou believest with all thy heart, thou mayest; that is, If

thou believest this doctrine which I have preached to thee concerning

Jesus, if thou receivest the record God has given concerning him, and

set to thy seal that it is true.” He must believe with all his heart,

for with the heart man believeth, not with the head only, by an assent

to gospel truths in the understanding; but with the heart, by a consent

of the will to gospel terms. “If thou do indeed believe with all thy

heart, thou art by that united to Christ, and, if thou give proofs and

evidences that thou dost so, thou mayest by baptism be joined to the

church.”

     

3. The confession of faith which the eunuch made in order to his being

baptized. It is very short, but it is comprehensive and much to the

purpose, and what was sufficient: I believe that Jesus Christ is the

Son of God. He was before a worshipper of the true God, so that all

he had to do now was to receive Christ Jesus the Lord.

(1.) He believes that Jesus is the Christ, the true Messiah

promised, the anointed One.

(2.) That Christ is Jesus–a Saviour, the only Saviour of his

people from their sins. And,

(3.) That this Jesus Christ is the Son of God, that he has a

divine nature, as the Son is of the same nature with the Father; and

that, being the Son of God, he is the heir of all things. This

is the principal peculiar doctrine of Christianity, and whosoever

believe this with all their hearts, and confess it, they and their seed

are to be baptized.

     

4. The baptizing of him hereupon. The eunuch ordered his coachman to

stop, commanded the chariot to stand still. It was the best

baiting place he ever met with in any of his journeys. They went

down both into the water, for they had no convenient vessels with

them, being upon a journey, wherewith to take up water, and must

therefore go down into it; not that they stripped off their clothes,

and went naked into the water, but, going barefoot according to the

custom, they went perhaps up to the ankles or mid-leg into the water,

and Philip sprinkled water upon him, according to the prophecy which

this eunuch had probably but just now read, for it was but a few verses

before those which Philip found him upon, and was very apposite to his

case

(Isa. lii. 15):

So shall he sprinkle many nations, kings and great men shall

shut their mouths at him, shall submit to him, and acquiesce in

him, for that which had not before been told them shall they

see, and that which they had not heard shall they consider.

Observe, Though Philip had very lately been deceived in Simon Magus,

and had admitted him to baptism, though he afterwards appeared to be no

true convert, yet he did not therefore scruple to baptize the eunuch

upon his profession of faith immediately, without putting him upon a

longer trial than usual. If some hypocrites crowd into the church, who

afterwards prove a grief and scandal to us, yet we must not therefore

make the door of admission any straiter than Christ has made it; they

shall answer for their apostasy, and not we.

     

VI. Philip and the eunuch are separated presently; and this is as

surprising as the other parts of the story. One would have expected

that the eunuch should either have stayed with Philip, or have taken

him along with him into his own country, and, there being so many

ministers in those parts, he might be spared, and it would be worth

while: but God ordered otherwise. As soon as they had come up out of

the water, before the eunuch went into his chariot again, the

Spirit of the Lord caught away Philip

(v. 39),

and did not give him time to make an exhortation to the eunuch, as

usual after baptism, which it is probable the one intended and the

other expected. But his sudden departure was sufficient to make up the

want of that exhortation, for it seems to have been miraculous, and

that he was caught up in the air in the eunuch’s sight, and so

carried out of his sight; and the working of this miracle upon Philip

was a confirmation of his doctrine, as much as the working of a miracle

by him would have been. He was caught away, and the eunuch saw him

no more, but, having lost his minister, returned to the use of his

Bible again. Now here we are told,

     

1. How the eunuch was disposed: He went on his way rejoicing. He

pursued his journey. Business called him home, and he must hasten to

it; for it was no way inconsistent with his Christianity, which places

no sanctity nor perfection in men’s being hermits or recluses, but is a

religion which men may and ought to carry about with them into the

affairs of this life. But he went on rejoicing; so far was he from

reflecting upon this sudden revolution and change, or advancement

rather, in his religion, with any regret, that his second thoughts

confirmed him abundantly in it, and he went on, rejoicing with joy

unspeakable and full of glory; he was never better pleased in all

his life. He rejoiced,

(1.) That he himself was joined to Christ and had an interest in him.

And,

(2.) That he had these good tidings to bring to his countrymen, and a

prospect of bringing them also, by virtue of his interest among them,

into fellowship with Christ; for he returned, not only a Christian, but

a minister. Some copies read

this verse

thus: And, when they were come up out of the water, the Holy Spirit

fell upon the eunuch (without the ceremony of the apostle’s

imposition of hands), but the angel of the Lord caught away

Philip.

     

2. How Philip was disposed of

(v. 40):

He was found at Azotus or Ashdod, formerly a city of the

Philistines; there the angel or Spirit of the Lord dropped him, which

was about thirty miles from Gaza, whither the eunuch was going, and

where Dr. Lightfoot thinks he took ship, and went by sea into his own

country. But Philip, wherever he was, would not be idle. Passing

through, he preached in all the cities till he came to Cesarea, and

there he settled, and, for aught that appears, had his principal

residence ever after; for at Cesarea we find him in a house of his own,

ch. xxi. 8.

He that had been faithful in working for Christ as an itinerant at

length gains a settlement.


[Table of Contents]

[Previous]

[Next]

Matthew Henry
Commentary on the Whole Bible (1721)


Back to Bibles Net . Com – Online Christian Library

Matthew Henry’s Complete Commentary – Free Download

Contact Us


Top