BIBLES NET. COM

Matthew Henry’s Commentary – Leviticus, Chapter XIII

Matthew Henry’s Complete Commentary

on the Whole Bible

Back to Biblesnet.com Home Page


[Table of Contents]

[Previous]

[Next]

Matthew Henry
Commentary on the Whole Bible (1706)




L E V I T C U S

CHAP. XIII.



     

The next ceremonial uncleanness is that of the leprosy, concerning

which the law was very large and particular; we have the discovery of

it in this chapter, and the cleansing of the leper in the next.

Scarcely any one thing in all the levitical law takes up so much room

as this.

I. Rules are here given by which the priest must judge whether the man

had the leprosy or no, according as the symptom was that appeared.

1. If it was a swelling, a scab, or a bright spot,

ver. 1-17.

2. If it was a bile,

ver. 18-23.

3. If it was in inflammation,

ver. 24-28.

4. If it was in the head or beard,

ver. 29-37.

5. If it was a bright spot,

ver. 38, 39.

6. If it was in a bald head,

ver. 40-44.

II. Direction is given how the leper must be disposed of,

ver. 45, 46.

III. Concerning the leprosy in garments,

ver. 47,

&c.



















The Law Concerning Leprosy. B. C. 1490.

     

1 And the LORD spake unto Moses and Aaron, saying,

  2 When a man shall have in the skin of his flesh a rising, a

scab, or bright spot, and it be in the skin of his flesh like

the plague of leprosy; then he shall be brought unto Aaron the

priest, or unto one of his sons the priests:

  3 And the priest shall look on the plague in the skin of the

flesh: and when the hair in the plague is turned white, and the

plague in sight be deeper than the skin of his flesh, it is a

plague of leprosy: and the priest shall look on him, and

pronounce him unclean.

  4 If the bright spot be white in the skin of his flesh, and

in sight be not deeper than the skin, and the hair thereof be

not turned white; then the priest shall shut up him that hath

the plague seven days:

  5 And the priest shall look on him the seventh day: and,

behold, if the plague in his sight be at a stay, and the

plague spread not in the skin; then the priest shall shut him up

seven days more:

  6 And the priest shall look on him again the seventh day: and,

behold, if the plague be somewhat dark, and the plague

spread not in the skin, the priest shall pronounce him clean: it

is but a scab: and he shall wash his clothes, and be clean.

  7 But if the scab spread much abroad in the skin, after that he

hath been seen of the priest for his cleansing, he shall be seen

of the priest again:

  8 And if the priest see that, behold, the scab spreadeth in

the skin, then the priest shall pronounce him unclean: it is a

leprosy.

  9 When the plague of leprosy is in a man, then he shall be

brought unto the priest;

  10 And the priest shall see him: and, behold, if the rising

be white in the skin, and it have turned the hair white, and

there be quick raw flesh in the rising;

  11 It is an old leprosy in the skin of his flesh, and the

priest shall pronounce him unclean, and shall not shut him up:

for he is unclean.

  12 And if a leprosy break out abroad in the skin, and the

leprosy cover all the skin of him that hath the plague from his

head even to his foot, wheresoever the priest looketh;

  13 Then the priest shall consider: and, behold, if the

leprosy have covered all his flesh, he shall pronounce him

clean that hath the plague: it is all turned white: he is

clean.

  14 But when raw flesh appeareth in him, he shall be unclean.

  15 And the priest shall see the raw flesh, and pronounce him to

be unclean: for the raw flesh is unclean: it is a leprosy.

  16 Or if the raw flesh turn again, and be changed unto white,

he shall come unto the priest;

  17 And the priest shall see him: and, behold, if the plague

be turned into white; then the priest shall pronounce him clean

that hath the plague: he is clean.

     

I. Concerning the plague of leprosy we may observe in general,

1. That it was rather an uncleanness than a disease; or, at least, so

the law considered it, and therefore employed not the physicians but

the priests about it. Christ is said to cleanse lepers, not to cure

them. We do not read of any that died of the leprosy, but it rather

buried them alive, by rendering them unfit for conversation with any

but such as were infected like themselves. Yet there is a tradition

that Pharaoh, who sought to kill Moses, was the first that ever was

struck with this disease, and that he died of it. It is said to have

begun first in Egypt, whence it spread into Syria. It was very well

known to Moses, when he put his own hand into his bosom and took it out

leprous.

2. That it was a plague inflicted immediately by the hand of God, and

came not from natural causes, as other diseases; and therefore must be

managed according to a divine law. Miriam’s leprosy, and Gehazi’s, and

king Uzziah’s, were all the punishments of particular sins: and, if

generally it was so, no marvel there was so much care taken to

distinguish it from a common distemper, that none might be looked upon

as lying under this extraordinary token of divine displeasure but those

that really were so.

3. That it is a plague not now known in the world; what is commonly

called the leprosy is of a quite different nature. This seems to have

been reserved as a particular scourge for the sinners of those times

and places. The Jews retained the idolatrous customs they had learnt in

Egypt, and therefore God justly caused this with some others of the

diseases of Egypt to follow them. Yet we read of Naaman the Syrian, who

was a leper,

2 Kings v. 1.

4. That there were other breakings-out in the body which did very much

resemble the leprosy, but were not it, which might make a man sore and

loathsome and yet not ceremonially unclean. Justly are our bodies

called vile bodies, which have in them the seeds of so many diseases,

by which the lives of so many are made bitter to them.

5. That the judgment of it was referred to the priests. Lepers were

looked upon as stigmatized by the justice of God, and therefore it was

left to his servants the priests, who might be presumed to know his

mark best, to pronounce who were lepers and who were not. All the Jews

say, “Any priest, though disabled by a blemish to attend the sanctuary,

might be a judge of the leprosy, provided the blemish were not in his

eye. And he might” (they say) “take a common person to assist him in

the search, but the priest only must pronounce the judgment.”

6. That it was a figure of the moral pollution of men’s minds by sin,

which is the leprosy of the soul, defiling to the conscience, and from

which Christ alone can cleanse us; for herein the power of his grace

infinitely transcends that of the legal priesthood, that the priest

could only convict the leper (for by the law is the knowledge of sin),

but Christ can cure the leper, he can take away sin. Lord, if thou

wilt, thou canst make me clean, which was more than the priests

could do,

Matt. viii. 2.

Some think that the leprosy signified, not so much sin in general as a

state of sin, by which men are separated from God (their spot not being

the spot of God’s children), and scandalous sin, for which men are to

be shut out from the communion of the faithful. It is a work of great

importance, but of great difficulty, to judge of our spiritual state:

we have all cause to suspect ourselves, being conscious to ourselves of

sores and spots, but whether clean or unclean is the question. A man

might have a scab

(v. 6)

and yet be clean: the best have their infirmities; but, as there were

certain marks by which to know that it was a leprosy, so there are

characters of such as are in the gall of bitterness, and the work of

ministers is to declare the judgment of leprosy and to assist those

that suspect themselves in the trial of their spiritual state,

remitting or retaining sin. And hence the keys of the kingdom of heaven

are said to be given to them, because they are to separate between the

precious and the vile, and to judge who are fit as clean to partake of

the holy things and who as unclean must be debarred from them.

     

II. Several rules are here laid down by which the judgment of the

priest must be governed.

1. If the sore was but skin-deep, it was to be hoped it was not

the leprosy,
v. 4.

But, if it was deeper than the skin, the man must be pronounced

unclean,

v. 3.

The infirmities that consist with grace do not sink deep into the soul,

but the mind still serves the law of God, and the

inward man delights in it,
Rom. vii. 22, 25.

But if the matter be really worse than it shows, and the inwards be

infected, the case is dangerous.

2. If the sore be at a stay, and do not spread, it is no

leprosy,

v. 4, 5.

But if it spread much abroad, and continue to do so after

several inspections, the case is bad,

v. 7, 8.

If men do not grow worse, but a stop be put to the course of their sins

and their corruptions be checked, it is to be hoped they will grow

better; but if sin get ground, and they become worse every day, they

are going downhill.

3. If there was proud raw flesh in the rising, the priest needed

not to wait any longer, it was certainly a leprosy,

v. 10, 11.

Nor is there any surer indication of the badness of a man’s spiritual

state than the heart’s rising in self-conceit, confidence in the flesh,

and resistance of the reproofs of the word and strivings of the Spirit.

4. If the eruption, whatever it was, covered all the skin from

head to foot, it was no leprosy

(v. 12, 13);

for it was an evidence that the vitals were sound and strong, and

nature hereby helped itself, throwing out what was burdensome and

pernicious. There is hope in the small-pox when they come out well: so

if men freely confess their sins, and hide them not, there is no danger

comparable to theirs that cover their sins. Some gather this from it,

that there is more hope of the profane than of hypocrites. The

publicans and harlots went into the kingdom of heaven before scribes

and Pharisees. In one respect, the sudden breakings-out of passion,

though bad enough, are not so dangerous as malice concealed. Others

gather this, that, if we judge ourselves, we shall not be judged; if we

see and own that there is no health in us, no soundness in our

flesh, by reason of sin, we shall find grace in the eyes of the

Lord.

5. The priest must take time in making his judgment, and not give it

rashly. If the matter looked suspicious, he must shut up the patient

seven days, and then seven days more, that his judgment might be

according to truth. This teaches all, both ministers and people,

not to be hasty in their censures, nor to judge any thing before the

time. If some men’s sins go before unto judgment, the sins

of others follow after, and so men’s good works; therefore let

nothing be done suddenly,
1 Tim. v. 22, 24, 25.

6. If the person suspected was found to be clean, yet he must wash

his clothes

(v. 6),

because he had been under the suspicion, and there had been in him that

which gave ground for the suspicion. Even the prisoner that is

acquitted must go down on his knees. We have need to be washed in the

blood of Christ from our spots, though they be not leprosy-spots; for

who can say, I am pure from sin? though there are those who

through grace are innocent from the great transgression.




















     

18 The flesh also, in which, even in the skin thereof, was a

boil, and is healed,

  19 And in the place of the boil there be a white rising, or a

bright spot, white, and somewhat reddish, and it be showed to the

priest;

  20 And if, when the priest seeth it, behold, it be in sight

lower than the skin, and the hair thereof be turned white; the

priest shall pronounce him unclean: it is a plague of leprosy

broken out of the boil.

  21 But if the priest look on it, and, behold, there be no

white hairs therein, and if it be not lower than the skin,

but be somewhat dark; then the priest shall shut him up seven

days:

  22 And if it spread much abroad in the skin, then the priest

shall pronounce him unclean: it is a plague.

  23 But if the bright spot stay in his place, and spread not,

it is a burning boil; and the priest shall pronounce him clean.

  24 Or if there be any flesh, in the skin whereof there is a

hot burning, and the quick flesh that burneth have a white

bright spot, somewhat reddish, or white;

  25 Then the priest shall look upon it: and, behold, if the

hair in the bright spot be turned white, and it be in sight

deeper than the skin; it is a leprosy broken out of the

burning: wherefore the priest shall pronounce him unclean: it

is the plague of leprosy.

  26 But if the priest look on it, and, behold, there be no

white hair in the bright spot, and it be no lower than the

other skin, but be somewhat dark; then the priest shall shut

him up seven days:

  27 And the priest shall look upon him the seventh day: and if

it be spread much abroad in the skin, then the priest shall

pronounce him unclean: it is the plague of leprosy.

  28 And if the bright spot stay in his place, and spread not

in the skin, but it be somewhat dark; it is a rising of the

burning, and the priest shall pronounce him clean: for it is an

inflammation of the burning.

  29 If a man or woman have a plague upon the head or the beard;

  30 Then the priest shall see the plague: and, behold, if it

be in sight deeper than the skin; and there be in it a yellow

thin hair; then the priest shall pronounce him unclean: it is a

dry scall, even a leprosy upon the head or beard.

  31 And if the priest look on the plague of the scall, and,

behold, it be not in sight deeper than the skin, and that

there is no black hair in it; then the priest shall shut up him

that hath the plague of the scall seven days:

  32 And in the seventh day the priest shall look on the plague:

and, behold, if the scall spread not, and there be in it no

yellow hair, and the scall be not in sight deeper than the

skin;

  33 He shall be shaven, but the scall shall he not shave; and

the priest shall shut up him that hath the scall seven days

more:

  34 And in the seventh day the priest shall look on the scall:

and, behold, if the scall be not spread in the skin, nor be

in sight deeper than the skin; then the priest shall pronounce

him clean: and he shall wash his clothes, and be clean.

  35 But if the scall spread much in the skin after his

cleansing;

  36 Then the priest shall look on him: and, behold, if the scall

be spread in the skin, the priest shall not seek for yellow hair;

he is unclean.

  37 But if the scall be in his sight at a stay, and that there

is black hair grown up therein; the scall is healed, he is

clean: and the priest shall pronounce him clean.

     

The priest is here instructed what judgment to make if there was any

appearance of a leprosy, either,

1. In an old ulcer, or bile, that has been healed,

v. 18,

&c. When old sores, that seemed to be cured, break out again, it is to

be feared there is a leprosy in them; such is the danger of those who,

having escaped the pollutions of the world, are again entangled

therein and overcome. Or,

2. In a burn by accident, for this seems to be meant,

v. 24,

&c. The burning of strife and contention often proves the occasion of

the rising up and breaking out of that corruption which witnesses to

men’s faces that they are unclean.

3. In a scall-head. And in this commonly the judgment turned upon a

very small matter. If the hair in the scall was black, it was a sign of

soundness; if yellow, it was an indication of a leprosy,

v. 30-37.

The other rules in these cases are the same with those mentioned

before. In reading of these several sorts of ailments, it will be good

for us,

1. To lament the calamitous state of human life, which lies exposed to

so many grievances. What troops of diseases are we beset with on every

side! and they all entered by sin.

2. To give thanks to God if he has never afflicted us with any of these

sores: if the constitution is healthful, and the body lively and easy,

we are bound to glorify God with our bodies.









     

38 If a man also or a woman have in the skin of their flesh

bright spots, even white bright spots;

  39 Then the priest shall look: and, behold, if the bright

spots in the skin of their flesh be darkish white; it is a

freckled spot that groweth in the skin; he is clean.

  40 And the man whose hair is fallen off his head, he is bald;

yet is he clean.

  41 And he that hath his hair fallen off from the part of his

head toward his face, he is forehead bald: yet is he clean.

  42 And if there be in the bald head, or bald forehead, a white

reddish sore; it is a leprosy sprung up in his bald head, or

his bald forehead.

  43 Then the priest shall look upon it: and, behold, if the

rising of the sore be white reddish in his bald head, or in his

bald forehead, as the leprosy appeareth in the skin of the flesh;

  44 He is a leprous man, he is unclean: the priest shall

pronounce him utterly unclean; his plague is in his head.

  45 And the leper in whom the plague is, his clothes shall be

rent, and his head bare, and he shall put a covering upon his

upper lip, and shall cry, Unclean, unclean.

  46 All the days wherein the plague shall be in him he shall

be defiled; he is unclean: he shall dwell alone; without the

camp shall his habitation be.

     

We have here,

     

I. Provisos that neither a freckled skin nor a bald head

should be mistaken for a leprosy,

v. 38-41.

Every deformity must not forthwith be made a ceremonial defilement.

Elisha was jeered for his bald head

(2 Kings ii. 23);

but it was the children of Bethel, that knew not the judgments of their

God, who turned it to his reproach.

     

II. A particular brand set upon the leprosy if at any time it did

appear in a bald head: The plague is in his head, he is utterly

unclean,
v. 44.

If the leprosy of sin have seized the head, if the judgment be

corrupted, and wicked principles which countenance and support wicked

practices, be embraced, it is an utter uncleanness, from which

few are ever cleansed. Soundness in the faith keeps the leprosy from

the head, and saves conscience from being shipwrecked.

     

III. Directions what must be done with the convicted leper. When the

priest, upon mature deliberation, had solemnly pronounced him

unclean,

     

1. He must pronounce himself so,

v. 45.

He must put himself into the posture of a mourner and cry, Unclean,

unclean. The leprosy was not itself a sin, but it was a sad token

of God’s displeasure and a sore affliction to him that was under it.

It was a reproach to his name, put a full stop to his business in the

world, cut him off from conversation with his friends and relations,

condemned him to banishment till he was cleansed, shut him out from the

sanctuary, and was, in effect, the ruin of all the comfort he could

have in this world. Heman, it would seem, either was a leper or alludes

to the melancholy condition of a leper,

Ps. lxxxviii. 8,

&c. He must therefore,

(1.) Humble himself under the mighty hand of God, not insisting upon

his cleanness when the priest had pronounced him unclean, but

justifying God and accepting the punishment of his iniquity. He

must signify this by rending his clothes, uncovering his head,

and covering his upper lip, all tokens of shame and confusion of

face, and very significant of that self-loathing and self-abasement

which should fill the hearts of penitents, the language of which is

self-judging. Thus must we take to ourselves the shame that belongs to

us, and with broken hearts call ourselves by our own name, Unclean,

unclean–heart unclean, life unclean, unclean by original

corruption, unclean by actual transgression–unclean, and therefore

worthy to be for ever excluded from communion with God, and all hope of

happiness in him. We are all as an unclean thing

(Isa. lxiv. 6)–unclean,

and therefore undone, if infinite mercy do not interpose.

(2.) He must give warning to others to take heed of coming near him.

Wherever he went, he must cry to those he saw at a distance, “I am

unclean, unclean, take heed of touching me.” Not that the leprosy

was catching, but by the touch of a leper ceremonial uncleanness was

contracted. Every one therefore was concerned to avoid it; and the

leper himself must give notice of the danger. And this was all that the

law could do, in that it was weak through the flesh; it taught the

leper to cry, Unclean, unclean, but the gospel has put another

cry into the lepers’ mouths,

Luke xvii. 12, 13,

where we find ten lepers crying with a loud voice, Jesus, Master,

have mercy on us. The law only shows us our disease; the gospel

shows us our help in Christ.

     

2. He must then be shut out of the camp, and afterwards, when they came

to Canaan, out of the city, town, or village, where he lived, and

dwell alone

(v. 46),

associating with none but those that were lepers like himself. When

king Uzziah became a leper, he was banished from his palace, and

dwelt in a separate house,
2 Chron. xxvi. 21.

And see

2 Kings vii. 3.

This typified the purity which ought to be preserved in the gospel

church, by the solemn and authoritative exclusion of scandalous

sinners, that hate to be reformed, from the communion of the faithful.

Put away from among yourselves that wicked person,
1 Cor. v. 13.













     

47 The garment also that the plague of leprosy is in, whether

it be a woollen garment, or a linen garment;

  48 Whether it be in the warp, or woof; of linen, or of

woollen; whether in a skin, or in any thing made of skin;

  49 And if the plague be greenish or reddish in the garment, or

in the skin, either in the warp, or in the woof, or in any thing

of skin; it is a plague of leprosy, and shall be showed unto

the priest:

  50 And the priest shall look upon the plague, and shut up it

that hath the plague seven days:

  51 And he shall look on the plague on the seventh day: if the

plague be spread in the garment, either in the warp, or in the

woof, or in a skin, or in any work that is made of skin; the

plague is a fretting leprosy; it is unclean.

  52 He shall therefore burn that garment, whether warp or woof,

in woollen or in linen, or any thing of skin, wherein the plague

is: for it is a fretting leprosy; it shall be burnt in the

fire.

  53 And if the priest shall look, and, behold, the plague be not

spread in the garment, either in the warp, or in the woof, or in

any thing of skin;

  54 Then the priest shall command that they wash the thing

wherein the plague is, and he shall shut it up seven days more:

  55 And the priest shall look on the plague, after that it is

washed: and, behold, if the plague have not changed his colour,

and the plague be not spread; it is unclean; thou shalt burn it

in the fire; it is fret inward, whether it be bare within

or without.

  56 And if the priest look, and, behold, the plague be

somewhat dark after the washing of it; then he shall rend it out

of the garment, or out of the skin, or out of the warp, or out of

the woof:

  57 And if it appear still in the garment, either in the warp,

or in the woof, or in any thing of skin; it is a spreading

plague: thou shalt burn that wherein the plague is with fire.

  58 And the garment, either warp, or woof, or whatsoever thing

of skin it be, which thou shalt wash, if the plague be departed

from them, then it shall be washed the second time, and shall be

clean.

  59 This is the law of the plague of leprosy in a garment of

woollen or linen, either in the warp, or woof, or any thing of

skins, to pronounce it clean, or to pronounce it unclean.

     

This is the law concerning the plague of leprosy in a garment, whether

linen or woollen. A leprosy in a garment, with discernible indications

of it, the colour changed by it, the garment fretted, the nap worn off,

and this in some one particular part of the garment, and increasing

when it was shut up, and not to be got out by washing is a thing which

to us now is altogether unaccountable. The learned confess that it was

a sign and a miracle in Israel, an extraordinary punishment inflicted

by the divine power, as a token of great displeasure against a person

or family.

1. The process was much the same with that concerning a leprous person.

The garment suspected to be tainted was not to be burnt immediately,

though, it may be, there would have been no great loss of it; for in no

case must sentence be given merely upon a surmise, but it must be

shown to the priest. If, upon search, it was found that there

was a leprous spot (the Jews say no bigger than a bean), it must

be burnt, or at least that part of the garment in which the spot

was,

v. 52, 57.

If the cause of the suspicion was gone, it must be washed, and

then might be used,

v. 58.

2. The signification also was much the same, to intimate the great

malignity there is in sin: it not only defiles the sinner’s conscience,

but it brings a stain upon all his employments and enjoyments, all he

has and all he does. To those that are defiled and unbelieving is

nothing pure,
Tit. i. 15.

And we are taught hereby to hate even the garments spotted with the

flesh,
Jude 23.

Those that make their

clothes servants to their pride and lust may see them thereby tainted

with a leprosy, and doomed to the fire,

Isa. iii. 18-24.

But the ornament of the hidden man of the heart is

incorruptible,
1 Pet. iii. 4.

The robes of righteousness never fret nor are moth-eaten.


[Table of Contents]

[Previous]

[Next]

Matthew Henry
Commentary on the Whole Bible (1706)


Back to Bibles Net . Com – Online Christian Library

Matthew Henry’s Complete Commentary – Free Download

Contact Us


Top