BIBLES NET. COM

Matthew Henry’s Commentary – Deuteronomy, Chapter XXIII

Matthew Henry’s Complete Commentary

on the Whole Bible

Back to Biblesnet.com Home Page


[Table of Contents]

[Previous]

[Next]

Matthew Henry
Commentary on the Whole Bible (1706)




D E U T E R O N O M Y

CHAP. XXIII.



     

The laws of this chapter provide,

I. For the preserving of the purity and honour of the families of

Israel, by excluding such as would be a disgrace to them,

ver. 1-8.

II. For the preserving of the purity and honour of the camp of Israel

when it was abroad,

ver. 9-14.

III. For the encouraging and entertaining of slaves who fled to them,

ver. 15, 16.

IV. Against whoredom,

ver. 17, 18.

V. Against usury,

ver. 19, 20.

IV. Against the breach of vows,

ver. 21-23.

VII. What liberty a man might take in his neighbour’s field and

vineyard, and what not,

ver. 23, 25.










Laws of Separation. B. C. 1451.

     

1 He that is wounded in the stones, or hath his privy member

cut off, shall not enter into the congregation of the LORD.

  2 A bastard shall not enter into the congregation of the LORD;

even to his tenth generation shall he not enter into the

congregation of the LORD.

  3 An Ammonite or Moabite shall not enter into the congregation

of the LORD; even to their tenth generation shall they not enter

into the congregation of the LORD for ever:

  4 Because they met you not with bread and with water in the

way, when ye came forth out of Egypt; and because they hired

against thee Balaam the son of Beor of Pethor of Mesopotamia, to

curse thee.

  5 Nevertheless the LORD thy God would not hearken unto Balaam;

but the LORD thy God turned the curse into a blessing unto thee,

because the LORD thy God loved thee.

  6 Thou shalt not seek their peace nor their prosperity all thy

days for ever.

  7 Thou shalt not abhor an Edomite; for he is thy brother:

thou shalt not abhor an Egyptian; because thou wast a stranger in

his land.

  8 The children that are begotten of them shall enter into the

congregation of the LORD in their third generation.

     

Interpreters are not agreed what is here meant by entering into the

congregation of the Lord, which is here forbidden to eunuchs and to

bastards, Ammonites and Moabites, for ever, but to Edomites and

Egyptians only till the third generation.

1. Some think they are hereby excluded from communicating with the

people of God in their religious services. Though eunuchs and bastards

were owned as members of the church, and the Ammonites and Moabites

might be circumcised and proselyted to the Jewish religion, yet they

and their families must lie for some time under marks of disgrace,

remembering the rock whence they were hewn, and must not come so near

the sanctuary as others might, nor have so free a communion with

Israelites.

2. Others think they are hereby excluded from bearing office in the

congregation: none of these must be elders or judges, lest the honour

of the magistracy should thereby be stained.

3. Others think they are excluded only from marrying with Israelites.

Thus the learned bishop Patrick inclines to understand it; yet we find

that when this law was put in execution after the captivity they

separated from Israel, not only the strange wives, but all the mixed

multitude, see

Neh. xiii. 1-2.

With the daughters of these nations (though out of the nations of

Canaan), it should seem, the men of Israel might marry, if they were

completely proselyted to the Jewish religion; but with the men of these

nations the daughters of Israel might not marry, nor could the men be

naturalized otherwise than as here provided.

     

It is plain, in general, that disgrace is here put,

     

I. Upon bastards and eunuchs,

v. 1, 2.

By bastards here the Jewish writers understand, not all that were born

of fornication, or out of marriage, but all the issue of those

incestuous mixtures which are forbidden,

Lev. xviii.

And, though it was not the fault of the issue, yet, to deter people

from those unlawful marriages and unlawful lusts, it was very

convenient that their posterity should thus be made infamous. By this

rule Jephthah, though the son of a harlot, a strange woman

(Judg. xi. 1, 2),

yet was not a bastard in the sense of this law. And as for the eunuchs,

though by this law they seemed to be cast out of the vineyard as dry

trees, which they complain of

(Isa. lvi. 3),

yet it is here promised

(v. 5)

that if they took care of their duty to God, as far as they were

admitted, by keeping his sabbaths and choosing the things that pleased

him, the want of this privilege should be made up to them with such

spiritual blessings as would entitle them to an everlasting name.

     

II. Upon Ammonites and Moabites, the posterity of Lot, who, for his

outward convenience, had separated himself from Abraham,

Gen. xiii. 11.

And we do not find that he or his ever joined themselves again to the

children of the covenant. They are here cut off to the tenth

generation, that is, (as some think it is explained), for ever.

Compare

Neh. xiii. 1.

The reason of this quarrel which Israel must have with them, so as not

to seek their peace

(v. 6),

is because of the unkindness they had now lately done to the camp of

Israel, notwithstanding the orders God had given not to distress or vex

them,

ch. ii. 9, 19.

1. It was bad enough that they did not meet them with bread and

water in the way

(v. 4),

that they did not as allies, or at least as neutral states, bring

victuals into their camp, which they should have been duly paid for. It

was well that God’s Israel did not need their kindness, God himself

following them with bread and water. However this omission of the

Ammonites should be remembered against their nation in future ages.

Note, God will certainly reckon, not only with those that oppose his

people, but with those that do not help and further them, when it is in

the power of their hand to do it. The charge at the great day is for an

omission: I was hungry, and you gave me no meat.

2. The Moabites had done worse, they hired Balaam to curse Israel,

v. 4.

It is true God turned the curse into a blessing

(v. 5),

not only changing the word in Balaam’s mouth, but making that really

turn to the honour and advantage of Israel which was designed for their

ruin. But though the design was defeated, and overruled for good, the

Moabites’ wickedness was not the less provoking. God will deal with

sinners, but according to their endeavours,

Ps. xxviii. 4.

     

III. The Edomites and Egyptians had not so deep a mark of displeasure

put upon them as the Moabites and Ammonites had. If an Edomite or

Egyptian turned proselyte, his grand-children should be looked upon as

members of the congregation of the Lord to all intents and purposes,

v. 7, 8.

We should think that the Edomites had been more injurious to the

Israelites than the Ammonites, and deserved as little favour from them

(Num. xx. 20),

and yet “Thou shalt not abhor an Edomite, as thou must an

Ammonite, for he is thy brother.” Note, The unkindness of near

relations, though by many worst taken, yet should with us, for that

reason, because of the relation, be first forgiven. And then, as to the

Egyptians, here is a strange reason given why they must not be

abhorred: “Thou wast a stranger in their land, and therefore,

though hardly used there, be civil to them, for old acquaintance’

sake.” They must not remember their bondage in Egypt for the keeping up

of any ill will to the Egyptians, but only for the magnifying of Gods

power and goodness in their deliverance.







Moral and Ceremonial Purity Enjoined. B. C. 1451.

     

9 When the host goeth forth against thine enemies, then keep

thee from every wicked thing.

  10 If there be among you any man, that is not clean by reason

of uncleanness that chanceth him by night, then shall he go

abroad out of the camp, he shall not come within the camp:

  11 But it shall be, when evening cometh on, he shall wash

himself with water: and when the sun is down, he shall come

into the camp again.

  12 Thou shalt have a place also without the camp, whither thou

shalt go forth abroad:

  13 And thou shalt have a paddle upon thy weapon; and it shall

be, when thou wilt ease thyself abroad, thou shalt dig therewith,

and shalt turn back and cover that which cometh from thee:

  14 For the LORD thy God walketh in the midst of thy camp, to

deliver thee, and to give up thine enemies before thee; therefore

shall thy camp be holy: that he see no unclean thing in thee, and

turn away from thee.

     

Israel was now encamped, and this vast army was just entering upon

action, which was likely to keep them together for a long time, and

therefore it was fit to give them particular directions for the good

ordering of their camp. And the charge is in one word to be

clean. They must take care to keep their camp pure from moral,

ceremonial, and natural pollution.

     

I. From moral pollution

(v. 9):

When the host goes forth against thy enemy then look upon

thyself as in a special manner engaged to keep thyself from every

evil thing.

1. The soldiers themselves must take heed of sin, for sin takes off the

edge of valour; guilt makes men cowards. Those that put their lives in

their hands are concerned to make and keep their peace with God, and

preserve a conscience void of offence; then may they look death in the

face without terror. Soldiers, in executing their commission, must keep

themselves from gratifying the lusts of malice, covetousness, or

uncleanness, for these are wicked things–must keep themselves from the

idols, or accursed things, they found in the camps they plundered.

2. Even those that tarried at home, the body of the people, and every

particular person, must at that time especially keep from every wicked

thing, lest by sin they provoke God to withdraw his presence from the

host, and give victory to the enemy for the correcting of his own

people. Times of war should be times of reformation, else how can we

expect God should hear and answer our prayers for success?

Ps. lxvi. 18.

See

1 Sam. vii. 3.

     

II. From ceremonial pollution, which might befal a person when

unconscious of it, for which he was bound to wash his flesh in water,

and look upon himself as unclean until the evening,
Lev. xv. 16.

A soldier, notwithstanding the constant service and duty he had to do

in the camp, must be so far from looking upon himself as discharged

from the observance of this ceremony that more was required from him

than at another time; had he been at his own house, he needed only to

wash his flesh, but, being in the army, he must go abroad out of the

camp, as one concerned to keep it pure and ashamed of his own impurity,

and not return till after sunset,

v. 10, 11.

By this trouble and reproach, which even involuntary pollutions exposed

men to, they were taught to keep up a very great dread of all fleshly

lusts. It were well if military men would consider this.

     

III. From natural pollution; the camp of the Lord must have nothing

offensive in it,

v. 12-14.

It is strange that the divine law, or at least the solemn order and

direction of Moses, should extend to a thing of this nature; but the

design of it was to teach them,

1. Modesty and decorum; nature itself teaches them thus to distinguish

themselves from beasts that know no shame.

2. Cleanliness, and, though not niceness, yet neatness, even in their

camp. Filthiness is offensive to the senses God has endued us with,

prejudicial to the health, a wrong to the comfort of human life, and an

evidence of a careless slothful temper of mind.

3. Purity from the pollutions of sin; if there must be this care taken

to preserve the body clean and sweet, much more should we be solicitous

to keep the mind so.

4. A reverence of the divine majesty. This is the reason here given:

For the Lord thy God walketh by his ark, the special token of

his presence, in the midst of thy camp; with respect to that

external symbol this external purity is required, which (though not

insisted on in the letter when that reason ceases) teaches us to

preserve inward purity of soul, in consideration of the eye of God,

which is always upon us. By this expression of respect to the presence

of God among them, they were taught both to fortify themselves against

sin and to encourage themselves against their enemies with the

consideration of that presence.

5. A regard one to another. The filthiness of one is noisome to many;

this law of cleanliness therefore teaches us not to do that which will

be justly offensive to our brethren and grieve them. It is a law

against nuisances.












Protection of Fugitives; The Law Concerning Usury. B. C. 1451.

     

15 Thou shalt not deliver unto his master the servant which is

escaped from his master unto thee:

  16 He shall dwell with thee, even among you, in that place

which he shall choose in one of thy gates, where it liketh him

best: thou shalt not oppress him.

  17 There shall be no whore of the daughters of Israel, nor a

sodomite of the sons of Israel.

  18 Thou shalt not bring the hire of a whore, or the price of a

dog, into the house of the LORD thy God for any vow: for even

both these are abomination unto the LORD thy God.

  19 Thou shalt not lend upon usury to thy brother; usury of

money, usury of victuals, usury of any thing that is lent upon

usury:

  20 Unto a stranger thou mayest lend upon usury; but unto thy

brother thou shalt not lend upon usury: that the LORD thy God may

bless thee in all that thou settest thine hand to in the land

whither thou goest to possess it.

  21 When thou shalt vow a vow unto the LORD thy God, thou shalt

not slack to pay it: for the LORD thy God will surely require it

of thee; and it would be sin in thee.

  22 But if thou shalt forbear to vow, it shall be no sin in

thee.

  23 That which is gone out of thy lips thou shalt keep and

perform; even a freewill offering, according as thou hast vowed

unto the LORD thy God, which thou hast promised with thy mouth.

  24 When thou comest into thy neighbour’s vineyard, then thou

mayest eat grapes thy fill at thine own pleasure; but thou shalt

not put any in thy vessel.

  25 When thou comest into the standing corn of thy neighbour,

then thou mayest pluck the ears with thine hand; but thou shalt

not move a sickle unto thy neighbour’s standing corn.

     

Orders are here given about five several things which have no relation

one to another:–

     

I. The land of Israel is here made a sanctuary, or city of refuge, for

servants that were wronged and abused by their masters, and fled

thither for shelter from the neighbouring countries,

v. 15, 16.

We cannot suppose that they were hereby obliged to give entertainment

to all the unprincipled men that ran from service; Israel needed not

(as Rome at first did) to be thus peopled. But,

1. They must not deliver up the trembling servant to his enraged

master, till upon trial it appeared that the servant has wronged his

master and was justly liable to punishment. Note, It is an honourable

thing to shelter and protect the weak, provided they be not wicked. God

allows his people to patronise the oppressed. The angel bid Hagar

return to her mistress, and Paul sent Onesimus back to his master

Philemon, because they had neither of them any cause to go away, nor

was either of them exposed to any danger in returning. But the servant

here is supposed to escape, that is, to run for his life, to the people

of Israel, of whom he had heard (as Benhadad of the kings of Israel,

1 Kings xx. 31)

that they were a merciful people, to save himself from the fury of a

tyrant; and in that case to deliver him up is to throw a lamb into the

mouth of a lion.

2. If it appeared that the servant was abused, they must not only

protect him, but, supposing him willing to embrace their religion, they

must give him all the encouragement that might be to settle among them.

Care is taken both that he should not be imposed up on in the place of

his settlement–let it be that which he shall choose and

where it liketh him best, and that he should not exchange one

hard master for many–thou shalt not oppress him. Thus would he

soon find a comfortable difference between the land of Israel and other

lands, and would choose it to be his rest for ever. Note, Proselytes

and converts to the truth should be treated with particular tenderness,

that they may have no temptation to return.

     

II. The land of Israel must be no shelter for the unclean; no whore, no

Sodomite, must be suffered to live among them

(v. 17, 18),

neither a whore nor a whoremonger. No houses of uncleanness must be

kept either by men or women. Here is,

1. A good reason intimated why there should be no such wickedness

tolerated among them: they were Israelites. This seems to have an

emphasis laid upon it. For a daughter of Israel to be a whore, or a son

of Israel a whoremaster, is to reproach the stock they are come of, the

people they belong to, and the God they worship. It is bad in any, but

worst in Israelites, a holy nation,

2 Sam. xiii. 12.

2. A just mark of displeasure put upon this wickedness, that the hire

of a whore, that is, the money she gets by her whoring, and the price

of a dog, that is, of the Sodomite, pimp, or whoremaster (so I incline

to understand it, for such are called dogs,
Rev. xxii. 15),

the money he gets by his lewd and villainous practices, no part of it

shall be brought into the house of the Lord (as the hire of

prostitutes among the Gentiles was into their temples) for any

vow. This intimates,

(1.) That God would not accept of any offering at all from such wicked

people; they had nothing to bring an offering of but what they got by

their wickedness, and therefore their sacrifice could not but be an

abomination to the Lord,
Prov. xv. 8.

(2.) That they should not think, by making and paying vows, and

bringing offerings to the Lord, to obtain leave to go on in this sin,

as (it should seem) some that followed that trade suggested to

themselves, when their offerings were admitted.

Prov. vii. 14, 15,

This day have I paid my vows, therefore came I forth to meet

thee. Nothing should be accepted in commutation of penance.

(3.) That we cannot honour God with our substance unless it be honestly

and honourably come by. It must not only be considered what we give,

but how we got it; God hates robbery for burnt-offerings, and

uncleanness too.

     

III. The matter of usury is here settled,

v. 19, 20.

(1.) They must not lend upon usury to an Israelite. They had and held

their estates immediately from and under God, who, while he

distinguished them from all other people, might have ordered, had he so

pleased, that they should have all things in common among themselves;

but instead of that, and in token of their joint interest in the good

land he had given them, he only appointed them, as there was occasion,

to lend to one another without interest, which among them would be

little or no loss to the lender, because their land was so divided,

their estates were so settled, and there was so little of merchandise

among them, that it was seldom or never that they had occasion to

borrow any great sums, only what was necessary for the subsistence of

their families when the fruits of their ground had met with any

disaster, or the like; and, in such a case, for a small matter to

insist upon usury would have been very barbarous. Where the borrower

gets, or hopes to get, it is just that the lender should share in the

gain; but to him that borrows for his necessary food pity must be

shown, and we must lend, hoping for nothing again, if we have

wherewithal to do it,

Luke vi. 35.

(2.) They might lend upon usury to a stranger, who was supposed to live

by trade, and (as we say) by turning the penny, and therefore got by

what he borrowed, and came among them in hopes to do so. By this it

appears that usury is not in itself oppressive; for they must not

oppress a stranger, and yet might exact usury from him.

     

IV. The performance of the vows wherewith we have bound our souls is

here required; and it is a branch of the law of nature,

v. 21-23.

(1.) We are here left at our liberty whether we will make vows or no:

If thou shalt forbear to vow (some particular sacrifice and

offering, more than was commanded by the law), it shall be no sin to

thee. God had already signified his readiness to accept a free-will

offering thus vowed, though it were but a little fine flour

(Lev. ii. 4,

&c.),

which was encouragement enough to those who were so inclined. But lest

the priests, who had the largest share of those vows and voluntary

offerings, should sponge upon the people, by pressing it upon them as

their duty to make such vows, beyond their ability and inclination,

they are here expressly told that it should not be reckoned a sin in

them if they did not make any such vows, as it would be if they omitted

any of the sacrifices that God had particularly required. For (as

bishop Patrick well expresses it) God would have men to be easy in his

service, and all their offerings to be free and cheerful.

(2.) We are here laid under the highest obligations, when we have made

a vow, to perform it, and to perform it speedily: “Thou shalt not be

slack to pay it, lest if it be delayed beyond the first opportunity

the zeal abate, the vow be forgotten, or something happen to disable

thee for the performance of it. That which has gone out of thy

lips as a solemn and deliberate vow must not be recalled, but

thou shalt keep and perform it, punctually and fully.” The rule

of the gospel goes somewhat further than this.

2 Cor. ix. 7,

Every one, according as he purposeth in his heart, though it

have not gone out of his lips, so let him give. Here is a good

reason why we should pay our vows, that if we do not God will

require it of us, will surely and severely reckon with us, not only

for lying, but for going about to mock him, who cannot be mocked. See

Eccl. v. 4.

     

V. Allowance is here given, when they passed through a cornfield or

vineyard, to pluck and eat of the corn or grapes that grew by the

road-side, whether it was done for necessity or delight, only they must

carry none away with them,

v. 24, 25.

Therefore the disciples were not censured for plucking the ears of corn

(it was well enough known that the law allowed it), but for doing it on

the sabbath day, which the tradition of the elders had forbidden. Now,

1. This law intimated to them what great plenty of corn and wine they

should have in Canaan, so much that a little would not be missed out of

their fruits: they should have enough for themselves and all their

friends.

2. It provided for the support of poor travellers, to relieve the

fatigue of their journey, and teaches us to be kind to such. The Jews

say, “This law was chiefly intended in favour of labourers, who were

employed in gathering in their harvest and vintage; their mouths must

not be muzzled any more than that of the ox when he treads out the

corn.”

3. It teaches us not to insist upon property in a small matter, of

which it is easy to say, What is that between me and thee? It

was true the grapes which the passenger ate were none of his own, nor

did the proprietor give them to him; but the thing was of so small

value that he had reason to think were he present, he would not deny

them to him, anymore than he himself would grudge the like courtesy,

and therefore it was no theft to take them.

4. It used them to hospitality, and teaches us to be ready to

distribute, willing to communicate, and not to think every thing lost

that is given away. Yet,

5. It forbids us to abuse the kindness of our friends, and to take the

advantage of fair concessions to make unreasonable encroachments: we

must not draw an ell from those that give but an inch. They may eat of

their neighbour’s grapes; but it does not therefore follow that they

may carry away.


[Table of Contents]

[Previous]

[Next]

Matthew Henry
Commentary on the Whole Bible (1706)


Back to Bibles Net . Com – Online Christian Library

Matthew Henry’s Complete Commentary – Free Download

Contact Us


Top