BIBLES NET. COM

Matthew Henry’s Commentary – First Samuel, Chapter XXIV

Matthew Henry’s Complete Commentary

on the Whole Bible

Back to Biblesnet.com Home Page


[Table of Contents]

[Previous]

[Next]

Matthew Henry
Commentary on the Whole Bible (1708)




F I R S T   S A M U E L

CHAP. XXIV.



     

We have hitherto had Saul seeking an opportunity to destroy David, and,

to his shame, he could never find it. In this chapter David had a fair

opportunity to destroy Saul, and, to his honour, he did not make use of

it; and his sparing Saul’s life was as great an instance of God’s grace

in him as the preserving of his own life was of God’s providence over

him. Observe,

I. How maliciously Saul sought David’s life,

ver. 1, 2.

II. How generously David saved Saul’s life (when he had him at an

advantage) and only cut off the skirt of his robe,

ver. 3-8.

III. How pathetically he reasoned with Saul, upon this to bring him to

a better temper towards him,

ver. 9-15.

IV. The good impression this made upon Saul for the present,

ver. 16-22.










David Spares Saul in the Cave. B. C. 1057.

     

1 And it came to pass, when Saul was returned from following

the Philistines, that it was told him, saying, Behold, David is

in the wilderness of Engedi.

  2 Then Saul took three thousand chosen men out of all Israel,

and went to seek David and his men upon the rocks of the wild

goats.

  3 And he came to the sheepcotes by the way, where was a cave;

and Saul went in to cover his feet: and David and his men

remained in the sides of the cave.

  4 And the men of David said unto him, Behold the day of which

the LORD said unto thee, Behold, I will deliver thine enemy into

thine hand, that thou mayest do to him as it shall seem good unto

thee. Then David arose, and cut off the skirt of Saul’s robe

privily.

  5 And it came to pass afterward, that David’s heart smote him,

because he had cut off Saul’s skirt.

  6 And he said unto his men, The LORD forbid that I should do

this thing unto my master, the LORD‘s anointed, to stretch forth

mine hand against him, seeing he is the anointed of the LORD.

  7 So David stayed his servants with these words, and suffered

them not to rise against Saul. But Saul rose up out of the cave,

and went on his way.

  8 David also arose afterward, and went out of the cave, and

cried after Saul, saying, My lord the king. And when Saul looked

behind him, David stooped with his face to the earth, and bowed

himself.

     

Here,

I. Saul renews his pursuit of David,

v. 1, 2.

No sooner had he come home safely from chasing the Philistines, in

which it should seem he had good success, than he enquired after David

to do him a mischief, and resolved to have another thrust at him, as

if he had been delivered to do all these abominations,
Jer. vii. 10.

By the frequent incursions of the Philistines, he might have seen how

necessary it was to recall David from his banishment and restore him to

his place in the army again; but so far is he from doing this that now

more than ever he is exasperated against him, and, hearing that he is

in the wilderness of En-gedi, he draws out 3000 choice men, and

goes with them at his feet in pursuit of him upon the rocks of the

wild goats, where, one would think, David should not have been

envied a habitation nor Saul desirous of disturbing him; for what harm

could he fear from one who was no better accommodated? But it is not

enough for Saul that David is thus cooped up; he cannot be easy while

he is alive.

     

II. Providence brings Saul alone into the same cave wherein David and

his men had hidden themselves,

v. 3.

In those countries there were very large caves in the sides of the

rocks or mountains, partly natural, but probably much enlarged by art

for the sheltering of sheep from the heat of the sun; hence we read of

places where the flocks did rest at noon

(Cant. i. 7),

and this cave seems to be spoken of as one of the sheep-cotes. In the

sides of this cave David and his men remained, perhaps not all his men,

the whole 600, but only some few of his particular friends, the rest

being disposed of in similar retirements. Saul, passing by, turned in

himself alone, not in search of David (for, supposing him to be an

aspiring ambitious man, he thought to find him rather climbing with the

wild goats upon the rocks than retiring with the sheep into a cave),

but thither he turned aside to cover his feet, that is, to sleep

awhile, it being a cool and quiet place, and very refreshing in the

heat of the day; probably he ordered his attendants to march before,

reserving only a very few to wait for him at the mouth of the cave.

Some by the covering of the feet understand the easing of nature, and

think that this was Saul’s errand into the cave: but the former

interpretation is more probable.

     

III. David’s servants stir him up to kill Saul now that he has so fair

an opportunity to do it,

v. 4.

They reminded him that this was the day which he had long looked for,

and of which God had spoken to him in general when he was anointed to

the kingdom, which should put a period to his troubles and open the

passage to his advancement. Saul now lay at his mercy, and it was easy

to imagine how little mercy he would find with Saul and therefore what

little reason he had to show mercy to him. “By all means” (say his

servants) “give him the fatal blow now.” See how apt we are to

misunderstand,

1. The promises of God. God had assured David that he would deliver him

from Saul, and his men interpret this as a warrant to destroy Saul.

2. The providences of God. Because it was now in his power to kill

him, they concluded he might lawfully do it.

     

IV. David cut off the skirt of his robe, but soon repented that

he had done this: His heart smote him for it

(v. 5);

though it did Saul no real hurt, and served David for a proof that it

was in his power to have killed him

(v. 11),

yet, because it was an affront to Saul’s royal dignity, he wished he

had not done it. Note, It is a good thing to have a heart within us

smiting us for sins that seem little; it is a sign that conscience is

awake and tender, and will be the means of preventing greater sins.

     

V. He reasons strongly both with himself and with his servants against

doing Saul any hurt.

1. He reasons with himself

(v. 6):

The Lord forbid that I should do this thing. Note, Sin is a

thing which it becomes us to startle at, and to resist the temptations

to, not only with resolution, but with a holy indignation. He

considered Saul now, not as his enemy, and the only person that stood

in the way of his preferment (for then he would be induced to hearken

to the temptation), but as God’s anointed (that is, the person whom God

had appointed to reign as long as he lived, and who, as such, was under

the particular protection of the divine law), and as his master, to

whom he was obliged to be faithful. Let servants and subjects learn

hence to be dutiful and loyal, whatever hardships are put upon them,

1 Pet. ii. 18.

2. He reasons with his servants: He suffered them not to rise

against Saul,
v. 7.

He would not only not do this evil thing himself, but he would not

suffer those about him to do it. Thus did he render good for evil to

him from whom he had received evil for good, and was herein both a type

of Christ, who saved his persecutors, and an example to all Christians

not to be overcome of evil, but to overcome evil with good.

     

VI. He followed Saul out of the cave, and, though he would not take the

opportunity to slay him, yet he wisely took the opportunity, if

possible, to slay his enmity, by convincing him that he was not such a

man as he took him for.

1. Even in showing his head now he testified that he had an honourable

opinion of Saul. He had too much reason to believe that, let him say

what he would, Saul would immediately be the death of him as soon as he

saw him, and yet he bravely lays aside that jealousy, and thinks Saul

so much a man of sense as to hear his reasoning when he had so much to

say in his own vindication and such fresh and sensible proofs to give

of his own integrity.

2. His behaviour was very respectful: He stooped with his face to

the earth, and bowed himself, giving honour to whom honour was due,

and teaching us to order ourselves lowly and reverently to all our

superiors, even to those that have been most injurious to us.








David Expostulates with Saul. B. C. 1057.

     

9 And David said to Saul, Wherefore hearest thou men’s words,

saying, Behold, David seeketh thy hurt?

  10 Behold, this day thine eyes have seen how that the LORD had

delivered thee to day into mine hand in the cave: and some bade

me kill thee: but mine eye spared thee; and I said, I will

not put forth mine hand against my lord; for he is the LORD‘s

anointed.

  11 Moreover, my father, see, yea, see the skirt of thy robe in

my hand: for in that I cut off the skirt of thy robe, and killed

thee not, know thou and see that there is neither evil nor

transgression in mine hand, and I have not sinned against thee;

yet thou huntest my soul to take it.

  12 The LORD judge between me and thee, and the LORD avenge me

of thee: but mine hand shall not be upon thee.

  13 As saith the proverb of the ancients, Wickedness proceedeth

from the wicked: but mine hand shall not be upon thee.

  14 After whom is the king of Israel come out? after whom dost

thou pursue? after a dead dog, after a flea.

  15 The LORD therefore be judge, and judge between me and thee,

and see, and plead my cause, and deliver me out of thine hand.

     

We have here David’s warm and pathetic speech to Saul, wherein he

endeavours to convince him that he did him a great deal of wrong in

persecuting him thus and to persuade him therefore to be

reconciled.

     

I. He calls him father

(v. 11),

for he was not only, as king, the father of his country, but he was, in

particular, his father-in-law. From a father one may expect compassion

and a favourable opinion. For a prince to seek the ruin of any of his

good subjects is as unnatural as for a father to seek the ruin of his

own children.

     

II. He lays the blame of his rage against him upon his evil

counsellors: Wherefore hearest thou men’s words?
v. 9.

It is a piece of respect due to crowned heads, if they do amiss, to

charge it upon those about them, who either advised them to it or

should have advised them against it. David had reason enough to think

that Saul persecuted him purely from his own envy and malice, yet he

courteously supposes that others put him on to do it, and made him

believe that David was his enemy and sought his hurt. Satan, the great

accuser of the brethren, has his agents in all places, and particularly

in the courts of those princes that encourage them and give ear to

them, who make it their business to represent the people of God as

enemies to Caesar and hurtful to kings and provinces, that, being thus

dressed up in bear-skins, they may “be baited.”

     

III. He solemnly protests his own innocence, and that he is far from

designing any hurt or mischief to Saul: “There is neither evil nor

transgression in my hand,
v. 11.

I am not chargeable with any crime, nor conscious of any guilt, and,

had I a window in my breast, thou mightest through it see the sincerity

of my heart in this protestation: I have not sinned against thee

(however I have sinned against God), yet thou huntest my soul,

that is, “my life.” Perhaps it was about this time that David penned

the seventh psalm, concerning the affair of Cush the Benjamite (that

is, Saul, as some think), wherein he thus appeals to God

(v. 3-5):

If there be iniquity in my hands, then let the enemy persecute my

soul and take it, putting in a parenthesis, with reference to the

story of this chapter, Yea, I have delivered him that without cause

is my enemy.

     

IV. He produces undeniable evidence to prove the falsehood of the

suggestion upon which Saul’s malice against him was grounded. David was

charged with seeking Saul’s hurt: “See,” says he, “yea, see

the skirt of thy robe,
v. 11.

Let this be a witness for me, and an unexceptionable witness it is; had

that been true of which I am accused, I should now have had thy head in

my hand and not the skirt of thy robe, for I could as easily have cut

off that as this.” To corroborate this evidence he shows him,

1. That God’s providence had given him opportunity to do it: The

lord delivered thee, very surprisingly, to day into my hand,

whence many a one would have gathered an intimation that it was the

will of God he should now give the determining blow to him whose neck

lay so fair for it. When Saul had but a very small advantage against

David he cried out, God has delivered him into my hand

(ch. xxiii. 7),

and resolved to make the best of that advantage; but David did not so.

2. That his counsellors and those about him had earnestly besought him

to do it: Some bade me kill thee. He had blamed Saul for

hearkening to men’s words and justly; “for,” says he, “if I had done

so, thou wouldest not have been alive now.”

3. That it was upon a good principle that he refused to do it; not

because Saul’s attendants were at hand, who, it may be, would have

avenged his death; no, it was not by the fear of them, but by the fear

of God, that he was restrained from it. “He is my lord, and the Lord’s

anointed, whom I ought to protect, and to whom I owe faith and

allegiance, and therefore I said, I will not touch a hair of his head.”

Such a happy command he had of himself that his nature, in the midst of

the greatest provocation, was not suffered to rebel against his

principles.

     

V. He declares it to be his fixed resolution never to be his own

avenger: “The Lord avenge me of thee, that is, deliver me out of

thy hand; but, whatever comes of it, my hand shall not be upon

thee

(v. 12),

and again

(v. 13),

for saith the proverb of the ancients, Wickedness proceedeth from

the wicked. The wisdom of the ancients is transmitted to posterity

by their proverbial sayings. Many such we receive by tradition from our

fathers; and the counsels of common persons are very much directed by

this, “As the old saying is.” Here is one that was in use in David’s

time: Wickedness proceedeth from the wicked, that is,

1. Men’s own iniquity will ruin them at last, so some understand it.

Forward furious men will cut their own throats with their own knives.

Give them rope enough, and they will hang themselves. In this sense it

comes in very fitly as a reason why his hand should not be upon

him.

2. Bad men will do bad things; according as men’s principles and

dispositions are, so will their actions be. This also agrees very well

with the connexion. If David had been a wicked man, as he was

represented, he would have done this wicked thing; but he durst not,

because of the fear of God. Or thus: Whatever injuries bad men do us

(which we are not to wonder at; he that lies among thorns must expect

to be scratched), yet we must not return them; never render railing for

railing. Though wickedness proceed from the wicked, yet let it

not therefore proceed from us by way of retaliation. Though the dog

bark at the sheep, the sheep does not bark at the dog. See

Isa. xxxii. 6-8.

     

VI. He endeavours to convince Saul that as it was a bad thing, so it

was a mean thing, for him to give chase to such an inconsiderable

person as he was

(v. 14):

Whom does the king of Israel pursue with all this care and

force? A dead dog; a flea; one flea, so it is in the Hebrew. It

is below so great a king to enter the lists with one that is so unequal

a match for him, one of his own servants, bred a poor shepherd, now an

exile, neither able nor willing to make any resistance. To conquer him

would not be to his honour, to attempt it was his disparagement. If

Saul would consult his own reputation, he would slight such an enemy

(supposing he were really his enemy) and would think himself in no

danger from him. David was so far from aspiring that he was, in his own

account, as a dead dog. Mephibosheth thus calls himself,

2 Sam. ix. 8.

This humble language would have wrought upon Saul if he had had any

spark of generosity in him. Satis est prostrasse leoni–Enough for

the lion that he has laid his victim low. What credit would it be

to Saul to trample upon a dead dog? What pleasure could it be to him

to hunt a flea, a single flea, which (as some have observed), if it be

sought, is not easily found, if it be found, is not easily caught, and,

if it be caught, is a poor prize, especially for a prince. Aquila

non captat muscas–The eagle does not dart upon flies. David thinks

Saul had no more reason to fear him than to fear a flea-bite.

     

VII. He once and again appeals to God as the righteous Judge

(v. 12 and v. 15):

The Lord judge between me and thee. Note, The justice of God is

the refuge and comfort of oppressed innocence. If men wrong us, God

will right us, at furthest, in the judgment of the great day. With him

David leaves his cause, and so rests satisfied, waiting his time to

appear for him.








Saul Relents at David’s Reproof. B. C. 1057.

     

16 And it came to pass, when David had made an end of speaking

these words unto Saul, that Saul said, Is this thy voice, my

son David? And Saul lifted up his voice, and wept.

  17 And he said to David, Thou art more righteous than I: for

thou hast rewarded me good, whereas I have rewarded thee evil.

  18 And thou hast shewed this day how that thou hast dealt well

with me: forasmuch as when the LORD had delivered me into thine

hand, thou killedst me not.

  19 For if a man find his enemy, will he let him go well away?

wherefore the LORD reward thee good for that thou hast done unto

me this day.

  20 And now, behold, I know well that thou shalt surely be king,

and that the kingdom of Israel shall be established in thine

hand.

  21 Swear now therefore unto me by the LORD, that thou wilt not

cut off my seed after me, and that thou wilt not destroy my name

out of my father’s house.

  22 And David sware unto Saul. And Saul went home; but David and

his men gat them up unto the hold.

     

Here we have,

     

I. Saul’s penitent reply to David’s speech. It was strange that he had

patience to hear him out, considering how outrageous he was against

him, and how cutting David’s discourse was. But God restrained him and

his men; and we may suppose Saul struck with amazement at the

singularity of the event, and much more when he found how much he had

lain at David’s mercy. His heart must have been harder than a stone if

this had not affected him.

1. He melted into tears, and we will not suppose them to have been

counterfeit but real expressions of his present concern at the sight of

his own iniquity, so plainly proved upon him. He speaks as one quite

overcome with David’s kindness: Is this thy voice, my son David?

And, as one that relented at the thought of his own folly and

ingratitude, he lifted up his voice and wept,
v. 16.

Many mourn for their sins that do not truly repent of them, weep

bitterly for them, and yet continue in love and league with them.

2. He ingenuously acknowledges David’s integrity and his own iniquity

(v. 17):

Thou art more righteous than I. Now God made good to David that

word on which he had caused him to hope, that he would bring forth

his righteousness as the light,
Ps. xxxvii. 6.

Those who take care to keep a good conscience may leave it to God to

secure them the credit of it. This fair confession was enough to prove

David innocent (even his enemy himself being judge), but not enough to

prove Saul himself a true penitent. He should have said, Thou are

righteous, but I am wicked; but the utmost he will own is this:

Thou art more righteous than I. Bad men will commonly go no

further than this in their confessions; they will own they are not so

good as some others are; there are those that are better than they, and

more righteous. He now owns himself under a mistake concerning David

(v. 18):

Thou hast shown this day that thou art so far from seeking my

hurt that thou hast dealt well with me.” We are too apt to

suspect others to be worse affected towards us then really they are,

and than perhaps they are proved to be; and when, afterwards, our

mistake is discovered, we should be forward to recall our suspicions,

as Saul does here.

3. He prays God to recompense David for this his generous kindness to

him. He owns that David’s sparing him, when he had him in his power,

was an uncommon and unparalleled instance of tenderness to an enemy; no

man would have done the like; and therefore, either because he thought

himself not able to give him a full recompence for so great a favour,

or because he found himself not inclined to give him any recompence at

all, he turns him over to God for his pay: The Lord reward thee

good,
v. 19.

Poor beggars can do no less than pray for their benefactors, and Saul

did no more.

4. He prophesies his advancement to the throne

(v. 20):

I know well that thou shalt surely be king. He knew it before,

by the promise Samuel had made him of it compared with the excellent

spirit that appeared in David, which highly aggravated his sin and

folly in persecuting him as he did; he had as much reason to say

concerning David as David concerning him, How can I put forth my

hand against the Lord’s anointed? But now he knew it by the

interest he found David had in the people, the special providence of

God in protecting him, and the generous kingly spirit he had now given

a proof of in sparing his enemy. Now he knew it, that is, now that he

was in a good temper he was willing to own that he knew it and to

submit to the conviction of it. Note, Sooner or later, God will force

even those that are of the synagogue of Satan to know and own those

that he has loved, and to worship before their feet; for so is the

promise,

Rev. iii. 9.

This acknowledgement which Saul made of David’s incontestable title to

the crown was a great encouragement to David himself and a support to

his faith and hope.

5. He binds David with an oath hereafter to show the same tenderness of

his seed and of his name as he had now shown of his person,

v. 21.

David had more reason to oblige Saul by an oath that he would not

destroy him, yet he insists not on that (if the laws of justice and

honour would not bind him, an oath would not), but Saul knew David to

be a conscientious man, and would think his interests safe if he could

get them secured by his oath. Saul by his disobedience had ruined his

own soul, and never took care by repentance to prevent that ruin, and

yet is very solicitous that his name might not be destroyed nor his

seed cut off. However, David swore unto him,
v. 22.

Though he might be tempted, not only in revenge, but in prudence, to

extirpate Saul’s family, yet he binds himself not to do it, knowing

that God could and would establish the kingdom to him and his, without

the use of such bloody methods. This oath he afterwards religiously

observed; he supported Mephibosheth, and executed those as traitors

that slew Ishbosheth. The hanging up of seven of Saul’s posterity, to

atone for the destruction of the Gibeonites, was God’s appointment, not

David’s act, and therefore not the violation of this oath.

     

II. Their parting in peace.

1. Saul, for the present, desisted from the persecution. He went home

convinced, but not converted; ashamed of his envy of David, yet

retaining in his breast that root of bitterness; vexed that, when at

last he had found David, he could not at that time find in his heart to

destroy him, as he had designed. God has many ways to tie the hands of

persecutors, when he does not turn their hearts.

2. David continued to shift for his own safety. He knew Saul too well

to trust him, and therefore got him up into the hold. It is

dangerous venturing upon the mercy of a reconciled enemy. We read of

those who believed in Christ, and yet he did not commit himself to

them because he knew all men. Those that like David are innocent as

doves must thus like him be wise as serpents.


[Table of Contents]

[Previous]

[Next]

Matthew Henry
Commentary on the Whole Bible (1708)


Back to Bibles Net . Com – Online Christian Library

Matthew Henry’s Complete Commentary – Free Download

Contact Us


Top