BIBLES NET. COM

Matthew Henry’s Commentary – Second Chronicles, Chapter XXV

Matthew Henry’s Complete Commentary

on the Whole Bible

Back to Biblesnet.com Home Page


[Table of Contents]

[Previous]

[Next]

Matthew Henry
Commentary on the Whole Bible (1708)




S E C O N D   C H R O N I C L E S

CHAP. XXV.



     

Amaziah’s reign, recorded in this chapter, was not one of the worse and

yet for from good. Most of the passages in this chapter we had before

more briefly related,

2 Kings xiv.

Here we find Amaziah,

I. A just revenger of his father’s death,

ver. 1-4.

II. An obedient observer of the command of God,

ver. 5-10.

III. A cruel conqueror of the Edomites,

ver. 11-13.

IV. A foolish worshipper of the gods of Edom and impatient of reproof

for it,

ver. 14-16.

V. Rashly challenging the king of Israel, and smarting for his

rashness,

ver. 17-24.

And, lastly, ending his days ingloriously,

ver. 25-28.















Amaziah’s Reign and Victories. B. C. 838.

     

1 Amaziah was twenty and five years old when he began to

reign, and he reigned twenty and nine years in Jerusalem. And his

mother’s name was Jehoaddan of Jerusalem.

  2 And he did that which was right in the sight of the LORD,

but not with a perfect heart.

  3 Now it came to pass, when the kingdom was established to him,

that he slew his servants that had killed the king his father.

  4 But he slew not their children, but did as it is written

in the law in the book of Moses, where the LORD commanded,

saying, The fathers shall not die for the children, neither shall

the children die for the fathers, but every man shall die for his

own sin.

  5 Moreover Amaziah gathered Judah together, and made them

captains over thousands, and captains over hundreds, according to

the houses of their fathers, throughout all Judah and Benjamin:

and he numbered them from twenty years old and above, and found

them three hundred thousand choice men, able to go forth to

war, that could handle spear and shield.

  6 He hired also a hundred thousand mighty men of valour out of

Israel for a hundred talents of silver.

  7 But there came a man of God to him, saying, O king, let not

the army of Israel go with thee; for the LORD is not with

Israel, to wit, with all the children of Ephraim.

  8 But if thou wilt go, do it, be strong for the battle: God

shall make thee fall before the enemy: for God hath power to

help, and to cast down.

  9 And Amaziah said to the man of God, But what shall we do for

the hundred talents which I have given to the army of Israel? And

the man of God answered, The LORD is able to give thee much more

than this.

  10 Then Amaziah separated them, to wit, the army that was

come to him out of Ephraim, to go home again: wherefore their

anger was greatly kindled against Judah, and they returned home

in great anger.

  11 And Amaziah strengthened himself, and led forth his people,

and went to the valley of salt, and smote of the children of Seir

ten thousand.

  12 And other ten thousand left alive did the children of

Judah carry away captive, and brought them unto the top of the

rock, and cast them down from the top of the rock, that they all

were broken in pieces.

  13 But the soldiers of the army which Amaziah sent back, that

they should not go with him to battle, fell upon the cities of

Judah, from Samaria even unto Beth-horon, and smote three thousand

of them, and took much spoil.

     

Here is,

I. The general character of Amaziah: He did that which was right in

the eyes of the Lord, worshipped the true God, kept the temple

service a going, and countenanced religion in his kingdom; but he did

not do it with a perfect heart

(v. 2),

that is, he was not a man of serious piety or devotion himself, nor had

he any zeal for the exercises of religion. He was no enemy to it, but a

cool and indifferent friend. Such is the character of too many in this

Laodicean age: they do that which is good, but not with the heart, not

with a perfect heart.

     

II. A necessary piece of justice which he did upon the traitors that

murdered his father: he put them to death,

v. 3.

Though we should suppose they intended to avenge on their king the

death of the prophet (as was intimated,

ch. xxiv. 25),

yet this would by no means justify their wickedness; for they

were not the avengers, but presumptuously took God’s work out of his

hands: and therefore Amaziah did what became him in calling them to an

account for it, but forbade the putting of the children to death for

the parents’ sin,

v. 4.

     

III. An expedition of his against the Edomites, who, some time ago, had

revolted from under the dominion of Judah, to which he attempted to

reduce them. Observe,

     

1. The great preparation he made for this expedition.

(1.) He mustered his own forces, and marshalled them

(v. 5),

and found Judah and Benjamin in all but 300,000 men that were fit for

war, whereas, in Jehoshaphat’s time, fifty or sixty years before, they

were four times as many. Sin weakens a people, diminishes them,

dispirits them, and lessens their number and figure.

(2.) He hired auxiliary troops out of the kingdom of Israel,

v. 6.

Finding his own kingdom defective in men, he thought to make up the

deficiency with his money, and therefore took into his pay 100,000

Israelites. If he had advised with any of his prophets before he did

this, or had but considered how little any of his ancestors got by

their alliances with Israel, he would not have had this to undo again.

But rashness makes work for repentance.

     

2. The command which God sent him by a prophet to dismiss out of his

service the forces of Israel,

v. 7, 8.

He would not have him call in any assistance at all: it looked like

distrust of God. If he made sure of God’s presence, the army he had of

his own was sufficient. But particularly he must not take in

their assistance: For the Lord is not with the children of

Ephraim, because they are not with him, but worship the calves.

This was a good reason why he should not make use of them, because he

could not depend upon them to do him any service. What good could be

expected from those that had not God with them, nor his blessings upon

their undertakings? It is comfortable to employ those who, we have

reason to hope, have an interest in heaven, and dangerous to associate

with those from whom the Lord has departed. The prophet assured him

that if he persisted in his resolution to take these idolatrous

apostate Israelites with him, in hopes thereby to make himself strong

for the battle, it was at his peril; they would prove a dead weight to

his army, would sink and betray it: “God shall make thee fall before

the enemy, and these Israelites will be the ruin of thy cause; for

God has power to help thee without them, and to cast thee down though

thou hast them with thee.”

     

3. The objection which Amaziah made against this command, and the

satisfactory answer which the prophet gave to that objection,

v. 9.

The king had remitted 100 talents to the men of Israel for

advance-money. “Now,” says he, “if I send them back, I shall lose

that: But what shall we do for the 100 talents?” This is an

objection men often make against their duty: they are afraid of losing

by it. “Regard not that,” says the prophet: “The Lord is able to

give thee much more than this; and, thou mayest depend upon it, he

will not see thee lose by him. What are 100 talents between thee and

him? He has ways enough to make up the loss to thee; it is below thee

to speak of it.” Note, A firm belief of God’s all-sufficiency to bear

us out in our duty, and to make up all the loss and damage we sustain

in his service abundantly to our advantage, will make his yoke very

easy and his burden very light. What is it to trust in God, but to be

willing to venture the loss of any thing for him, in confidence of the

goodness of the security he gives us that we shall not lose by him, but

that whatever we part with for his sake shall be made up to us in kind

or kindness. When we grudge to part with any thing for God and our

religion, this should satisfy us, that God is able to give us much more

than this. He is just, and he is good, and he is solvent. The king lost

100 talents by his obedience; and we find just that sum given to his

grandson Jotham as a present

(ch. xxvii. 5);

then the principal was repaid, and, for interest, 10,000 measures of

wheat and as many of barley.

     

4. His obedience to the command of God, which is upon record to his

honour. He would rather lose his money, disoblige his allies, and

dismiss a fourth part of his army just as they were going to take the

field, than offend God: He separated the army of Ephraim, to go home

again,
v. 10.

And they went home in great anger, taking it as a great affront thus to

be made fools of, and to be cashiered as men not fit to be employed,

and being perhaps disappointed of the advantages they promised

themselves in spoil and plunder by joining with Judah against Edom. Men

are apt to resent that which touches them in their profit or

reputation, though it frees them from trouble.

     

5. His triumphs over the Edomites,

v. 11, 12.

He left dead upon the spot, in the field of battle, 10,000 men; 10,000

more he took prisoners, and barbarously killed them all by throwing

them down some steep and craggy precipice. What provocation he had to

exercise this cruelty towards them we are not told; but it was

certainly very severe.

     

6. The mischief which the disbanded soldiers of Israel did to the

cities of Judah, either in their return or soon after,

v. 13.

They were so enraged at being sent home that, if they might not go to

share with Judah in the spoil of Edom, they would make a prey of Judah.

Several cities that lay upon the borders they plundered, killing 3000

men that made resistance. But why should God suffer this to be done?

Was it not in obedience to him that they were sent home, and yet shall

the country thus suffer by it? Surely God’s way is in the sea! Did not

the prophet say that God was not with the children of Ephraim, and yet

they are suffered to prevail against Judah? Doubtless God intended

hereby to chastise those cities of Judah for their idolatries, which

were found most in those parts that lay next to Israel. The men of

Israel had corrupted them, and now they were made a plague to them.

Satan both tempts and torments.




Amaziah’s Idolatry. B. C. 826.

     

14 Now it came to pass, after that Amaziah was come from the

slaughter of the Edomites, that he brought the gods of the

children of Seir, and set them up to be his gods, and bowed

down himself before them, and burned incense unto them.

  15 Wherefore the anger of the LORD was kindled against Amaziah,

and he sent unto him a prophet, which said unto him, Why hast

thou sought after the gods of the people, which could not deliver

their own people out of thine hand?

  16 And it came to pass, as he talked with him, that the king

said unto him, Art thou made of the king’s counsel? forbear; why

shouldest thou be smitten? Then the prophet forbare, and said, I

know that God hath determined to destroy thee, because thou hast

done this, and hast not hearkened unto my counsel.

     

Here is,

I. The revolt of Amaziah from the God of Israel to the gods of the

Edomites. Egregious folly! Ahaz worshipped the gods of those that had

conquered him, for which he had some little colour,

ch. xxviii. 23.

But to worship the gods of those whom he had conquered, who could not

protect their own worshippers, was the greatest absurdity that could

be. What did he see in the gods of the children of Seir that could

tempt him to set them up for his gods and bow himself down

before them?
v. 14.

If he had cast the idols down from the rock and broken them to pieces,

instead of the prisoners, he would have manifested more of the piety as

well as more of the pity of an Israelite; but perhaps for that

barbarous inhumanity he was given up to this ridiculous idolatry.

     

II. The reproof which God sent to him, by a prophet, for this sin.

The anger of the Lord was kindled against him, and justly; yet,

before he sent to destroy him, he sent to convince and reclaim him, and

so to prevent his destruction. The prophet reasoned with him very

fairly and very mildly: Why hast thou sought the favour of those

gods which could not deliver their own people?
v. 15.

If men would but duly consider the inability of all those things to

help them to which they have recourse when they forsake God, they would

not be such enemies to themselves.

     

III. The check he gave to the reprover,

v. 16.

He could say nothing in excuse of his own folly; the reproof was too

just to be answered. But he fell into a passion with the reprover.

1. He taunted him as saucy and impertinent, and meddling with that

which did not belong to him: Art thou made of the king’s

counsel? Could not a man speak reasonably to him, but he must be

upbraided as usurping the place of a privy-counsellor? But, as a

prophet, he really was made of the king’s counsel by the King of kings,

in duty to whom the king was bound not only to hear, but to ask and

take his counsel.

2. He silenced him, bade him forbear and say not a word more to him. He

said to the seer, See not,
Isa. xxx. 10.

Men would gladly have their prophets thus under their girdles, as we

say, to speak just when and what they would have them speak, and not

otherwise.

3. He threatened him: “Why shouldst thou be smitten? It is at

thy peril if thou sayest a word more of this matter.” He seems to

remind him of Zechariah’s fate in the last reign, who was put to death

for making bold with the king; and bids him take warning by him. Thus

he justifies the killing of that prophet by menacing this, and so, in

effect, makes himself guilty of the blood of both. He had hearkened to

the prophet who ordered him to send back the army of Israel, and was

ruled by him, though he contradicted his politics and lost him 100

talents,

v. 10.

But this prophet, who dissuaded him from worshipping the gods of the

Edomites, he ran upon with an unaccountable rage, which must be

attributed to the witchcraft of idolatry. He was easily persuaded to

part with his talents of silver, but by no means with his gods of

silver.

     

IV. The doom which the prophet passed upon him for this. He had more to

say to him by way of instruction and advice; but, finding him obstinate

in his iniquity, he forbore. He is joined to idols; let him

alone,
Hos. iv. 17.

Miserable is the condition of that man with whom the blessed Spirit, by

ministers and conscience, forbears to strive,
Gen. vi. 3.

And both the reprovers in the gate and that in the bosom, if long

brow-beaten and baffled, will at length forbear. So I gave them up

to their own hearts’ lusts. The secure sinner perhaps values

himself upon it as a noble and happy achievement to have silenced his

reprovers and monitors, and to get clear of them; but what comes of it?

I know that God has determined to destroy thee; it is a plain

indication that thou art marked for ruin that thou hast done this,

and hast not hearkened to my counsel.” Those that are deaf to

reproof are ripening apace for destruction,

Prov. xxix. 1.













The Death of Amaziah. B. C. 825.

     

17 Then Amaziah king of Judah took advice, and sent to Joash,

the son of Jehoahaz, the son of Jehu, king of Israel, saying,

Come, let us see one another in the face.

  18 And Joash king of Israel sent to Amaziah king of Judah,

saying, The thistle that was in Lebanon sent to the cedar that

was in Lebanon, saying, Give thy daughter to my son to wife:

and there passed by a wild beast that was in Lebanon, and trode

down the thistle.

  19 Thou sayest, Lo, thou hast smitten the Edomites; and thine

heart lifteth thee up to boast: abide now at home; why shouldest

thou meddle to thine hurt, that thou shouldest fall, even

thou, and Judah with thee?

  20 But Amaziah would not hear; for it came of God, that he

might deliver them into the hand of their enemies, because they

sought after the gods of Edom.

  21 So Joash the king of Israel went up; and they saw one

another in the face, both he and Amaziah king of Judah, at

Beth-shemesh, which belongeth to Judah.

  22 And Judah was put to the worse before Israel, and they fled

every man to his tent.

  23 And Joash the king of Israel took Amaziah king of Judah, the

son of Joash, the son of Jehoahaz, at Beth-shemesh, and brought

him to Jerusalem, and brake down the wall of Jerusalem from the

gate of Ephraim to the corner gate, four hundred cubits.

  24 And he took all the gold and the silver, and all the

vessels that were found in the house of God with Obed-edom, and

the treasures of the king’s house, the hostages also, and

returned to Samaria.

  25 And Amaziah the son of Joash king of Judah lived after the

death of Joash son of Jehoahaz king of Israel fifteen years.

  26 Now the rest of the acts of Amaziah, first and last, behold,

are they not written in the book of the kings of Judah and

Israel?

  27 Now after the time that Amaziah did turn away from following

the LORD they made a conspiracy against him in Jerusalem; and he

fled to Lachish: but they sent to Lachish after him, and slew him

there.

  28 And they brought him upon horses, and buried him with his

fathers in the city of Judah.

     

We have here this degenerate prince mortified by his neighbour and

murdered by his own subjects.

     

I. Never was proud prince more thoroughly mortified than Amaziah was by

Joash king of Israel.

     

1. This part of the story (which was as fully related

2 Kings xiv. 8,

&c., as it is here)–embracing the foolish challenge which Amaziah sent

to Joash

(v. 17),

his haughty scornful answer to it

(v. 18),

with the friendly advice he gave him to sit still and know when he was

well off,

(v. 19),–

his wilfully persisting in his challenge

(v. 20, 21),

the defeat that was given him

(v. 22),

and the calamity he brought upon himself and his city thereby

(v. 23, 24),–

verifies two of Solomon’s proverbs:–

(1.) That a man’s pride will bring him low,
Prov. xxix. 23.

It goes before his destruction; not only procures it meritoriously, but

is often the immediate occasion of it. He that exalteth himself

shall be abased.

(2.) That he that goes forth hastily to strive will probably not

know what to do in the end thereof, when his neighbour has put him

to shame,
Prov. xxv. 8.

He that is fond of contention may have enough of it sooner than he

thinks of.

     

2. But there are two passages in this story which we had not before in

the Kings.

(1.) That Amaziah took advice before he challenged the king of

Israel,

v. 17.

But of whom? Not of the prophet–he was not made of the king’s

counsel; but of his statesmen that would flatter him and bid him go

up and prosper. It is good to take advice, but then it must be of those

that are fit to advise us. Those that will not take advice from the

word of God, which would guide them aright, will justly be left to the

bad advice of those that will counsel them to their destruction. Let

those be made fools that will not be made wise.

(2.) Amaziah’s imprudence is here made the punishment of his impiety

(v. 20):

It was of the Lord; he left him to himself to act thus

foolishly, that he and his people might be delivered into the hands

of their enemies, because they had forsaken God and sought after

the gods of Edom. Those that will not persuaded to do well for

their souls will justly be given up to their own counsels to do ill for

themselves even in their outward affairs.

     

II. Never was poor prince more violently pursued by his own subjects.

From the time that he departed from the Lord (so it may be read,

v. 27)

the hearts of his subjects departed from him, and they began to form a

design against him in Jerusalem. It is probable they were exasperated

against him more for his rashly engaging in a war against Israel than

for his worshipping the gods of Edom. But at length the ferment grew so

high, and he perceived the plot to be laid so deeply, that he thought

fit to quit his royal city and flee to Lachish, either as a private

place where he might be hid or as a strong place where he might be

guarded; but they sent after him thither, and slew him there. By this

the putting of him to death seems to have been done deliberately, and

to have been the act, not of a disgusted servant or two, but of a

considerable body that durst avow it. How unrighteous soever they were

herein, God was righteous.


[Table of Contents]

[Previous]

[Next]

Matthew Henry
Commentary on the Whole Bible (1708)


Back to Bibles Net . Com – Online Christian Library

Matthew Henry’s Complete Commentary – Free Download

Contact Us


Top