BIBLES NET. COM

Matthew Henry’s Commentary – Daniel V

Matthew Henry’s Complete Commentary

on the Whole Bible

Back to Biblesnet.com Home Page


[Table of Contents]

[Previous]

[Next]

Matthew Henry
Commentary on the Whole Bible (1712)




D A N I E L.

CHAP. V.



     

The destruction of the kingdom of Babylon had been long and often

foretold when it was at a distance; in this chapter we have it

accomplished, and a prediction of it the very same night that it was

accomplished. Belshazzar now reigned in Babylon; some compute he had

reigned seventeen years, others but three; we have here the story of

his exit and the period of his kingdom. We must know that about two

years before this Cyrus king of Persia, a growing monarch, came against

Babylon with a great army; Belshazzar met him, fought him, and was

routed by him in a pitched battle. He and his scattered forces retired

into the city, where Cyrus besieged them. They were very secure,

because the river Euphrates was their bulwark, and they had twenty

years; provision in the city; but in the second year of the siege he

took it, as is here related. We have in this chapter,

I. The riotous, idolatrous, sacrilegious feast which Belshazzar made,

in which he filled up the measure of his iniquity,

ver. 1-4.

II. The alarm given him in the midst of his jollity by a hand-writing

on the wall, which none of his wise men could read or tell him the

meaning of,

ver. 5-9.

III. The interpretation of the mystical characters by Daniel, who was

at length brought in to him, and dealt plainly with him, and showed him

his doom written,

ver. 10-28.

IV. The immediate accomplishment of the interpretation in the slaying

of the king and seizing of the kingdom,

ver. 30, 31.











Belshazzar’s Feast; The Hand-writing on the Wall. B. C. 538.

     

1 Belshazzar the king made a great feast to a thousand of his

lords, and drank wine before the thousand.

  2 Belshazzar, whiles he tasted the wine, commanded to bring the

golden and silver vessels which his father Nebuchadnezzar had

taken out of the temple which was in Jerusalem; that the king,

and his princes, his wives, and his concubines, might drink

therein.

  3 Then they brought the golden vessels that were taken out of

the temple of the house of God which was at Jerusalem; and the

king, and his princes, his wives, and his concubines, drank in

them.

  4 They drank wine, and praised the gods of gold, and of silver,

of brass, of iron, of wood, and of stone.

  5 In the same hour came forth fingers of a man’s hand, and

wrote over against the candlestick upon the plaster of the wall

of the king’s palace: and the king saw the part of the hand that

wrote.

  6 Then the king’s countenance was changed, and his thoughts

troubled him, so that the joints of his loins were loosed, and

his knees smote one against another.

  7 The king cried aloud to bring in the astrologers, the

Chaldeans, and the soothsayers. And the king spake, and said to

the wise men of Babylon, Whosoever shall read this writing, and

show me the interpretation thereof, shall be clothed with

scarlet, and have a chain of gold about his neck, and shall be

the third ruler in the kingdom.

  8 Then came in all the king’s wise men: but they could not

read the writing, nor make known to the king the interpretation

thereof.

  9 Then was king Belshazzar greatly troubled, and his

countenance was changed in him, and his lords were astonied.

     

We have here Belshazzar the king very gay, but all of a sudden very

gloomy, and in straits in the fulness of his sufficiency. See how he

affronts God, and God affrights him; and wait what will be the issue of

this contest; and whether he that hardened his heart against God

prospered.

     

I. See how the king affronted God, and put contempt upon him. He

made a great feast, or banquet of wine; probably it was

some anniversary solemnity, in honour off his birth-day or

coronation-day, or in honour of some of their idols. Historians say

that Cyrus, who was now with his army besieging Babylon, knew of this

feast, and presuming that they then would be off their guard, somno

vinoque sepulti–buried in sleep and wine, took that opportunity to

attack the city, and so with the more ease made himself master of it.

Belshazzar upon this occasion invited a thousand of his lords to

come and drink with him. Perhaps they were such as had signalized

themselves in defense of the city against the besiegers; or these were

his great council of war, with whom, when they had well drunk, he would

advise what was further to be done. And they were to look upon it as a

great favour that he drank wine before them, for it was the

pride of those eastern kings to be seldom seen. He drank wine before

them, for he made this feast, as Ahasuerus did, to show the honour

of his majesty. Now in this sumptuous feast,

1. He put an affront upon the providence of God and bade defiance to

his judgments. His city was now besieged; a powerful enemy was at his

gates; his life and kingdom lay at stake. In all this the hand of the

Lord had gone out against him, and by it he called him to weeping,

and mourning, and girding with sackcloth. God’s voice cried in the

city, as Jonah to Nineveh, Yet forty days, or fewer, and

Babylon shall be destroyed. He should therefore, like the king of

Nineveh, have proclaimed a fast; but, as one resolved to walk contrary

to God, he proclaims a feast, and behold joy and gladness, slaying

oxen, killing sheep, eating flesh, and drinking wine, as if he

dared the Almighty to do his worst,

Isa. xxii. 12, 13.

To show how little fear he had of being forced to surrender, for want

of provisions, he spent thus extravagantly. Note, Security and

sensuality are sad presages of approaching ruin. Those that will not be

warned by judgments of God may expect to be wounded by them.

2. He put an affront upon the temple of God, and bade defiance to his

sanctuary,

v. 2.

While he tasted the wine, he commanded to bring the vessels of

the temple, that they might drink in them. When he tasted how rich and

fine the wine was, “O,” said he, “it is a pity but we should have holy

vessels to drink such delicious wine as this in,” which was looked upon

as a piece of wit, and, to carry on the humour, the vessels of the

temple were immediately sent for. Nay, there seems to have been

something more in it than a frolic, and that it was done in a malicious

despite to the God of Israel. The heart of his people was very much

upon these sacred vessels, as appears from

Jer. xxvii. 16, 18.

Their principal care, at their return, was about these,

Ezra i. 7.

Now, we may suppose, they had an expectation of their deliverance

approaching, reckoning the seventy years of their captivity near a

period; and some of them might perhaps have given out some words to

that purport, that shortly they should have the vessels of the

sanctuary restored to them, in defiance of which Belshazzar here

proclaims them to be his own, will keep them in store no longer, but

will make use of them among his own plate. Note, That mirth is sinful

indeed, and fills the measure of men’s iniquity apace, which profanes

sacred things and jests with them. This ripened Babylon for ruin–that

no songs would serve them but the songs of Zion

(Ps. cxxxvii. 3),

no vessels but the vessels of the sanctuary. Let those who thus

sacrilegiously alienate what is dedicated to God and his honour know

that he will not be mocked.

3. He put an affront upon God himself, and bade defiance to his deity;

for they drank wine, and praised the gods of gold and silver,
v. 4.

They gave that glory to images, the work of their own hands and

creatures of their own fancy, which is due to the true and living God

only. They praised them either with sacrifices offered to them or with

songs sung in honour of them. When their heads were giddy, and their

hearts merry, with wine, they were in the fittest frame to praise

the gods of gold and silver, wood and stone; for one would think

that men in their senses, who had the command of a clear and sober

thought, could not be guilty of so gross an absurdity; they must be

intoxicated ere they could be so infatuated. Drunken worshippers, who

are not men, but beasts, are the most proper for the service of

dunghill deities, that are not gods, but devils. They have erred

through wine,
Isa. xxvii. 7.

They drank wine, and praised their idol-gods, as if they had been the

founders of their feast and the givers of all good things to them. Or,

when they were drinking wine, they praised their gods by drinking

healths to them; and the king drank wine before them

(v. 1),

that is, he began the health, first to this god, and then to the other,

till they went through the bead-roll or farrago of them,

those of wood and stone not excepted. Note, Immorality and

impiety, vice and profaneness, strengthen the hands and advance the

interests one of another. Drunken frolics were an introduction to

idolatry, and then idolatrous healths were a shoeing-horn to further

drunkenness.

     

II. See how God affrighted the king, and struck a terror upon him.

Belshazzar and his lords are in the midst of their revels, the cups

going round apace, and all upon the merry pin, drinking confusion, it

may be, to Cyrus and his army, and roaring out huzzas, in confidence of

the speedy raising of the siege; but the hour had come when that must

be fulfilled which had been long ago said of the king of Babylon, when

his city should be besieged by the Persians and Medes,

Isa. xxi. 2-4.

The night of my pleasures has he turned into fear to me. The

mirth of this ball at court must be spoiled, and a damp cast upon their

jollity, though the king himself be master of the revels; immediately,

when God speaks the word, we have him and all his guests in the utmost

confusion, and the end of their mirth is heaviness.

1. There appear the fingers of a man’s hand writing on the plaster

of the wall, before the king’s face

(v. 5),

“the angel Gabriel,” say the rabbin, “directing these fingers and

writing by them.” “That divine hand” (says a rabbi of our own, Dr.

Lightfoot) “that had written the two tables for a law to his people now

writes the doom of Babel and Belshazzar upon the wall.” Here was

nothing sent to frighten them which made a noise, or threatened their

lives, no claps of thunder nor flashes of lightning, no destroying

angel with his sword drawn in his hand, only a pen in the hand, writing

upon the wall, over-against the candlestick, where they might

all see it by the light of their own candle. Note, God’s written word

is sufficient to put the proudest boldest sinners into a fright, when

he is pleased to give it the setting on. The king saw the part of

the hand that wrote, but saw not the person whose hand it was,

which made the thing more frightful. Note, What we see of God, the part

of the hand that writes in the book of the creatures and the book of

the scriptures (Lo, these are parts of his ways,
Job xxvi. 14),

may serve to possess us with awful thoughts concerning that of God

which we do not see. If this be the finger of God, what is his

arm made bare? And what is he?

2. The king is immediately seized with a panic fear

(v. 6):

His countenance was changed (his colour went and came); the

joints of his loins were loosed, so that he had no strength in

them, but was struck with a pain in his back, as is usual in a great

fright; his knees smote one against another, so violently did he

tremble like an aspen leaf. But what was the matter? Why is he in such

a fright? He perceives not what is written, and how does he know but it

may be some happy presage of deliverance to him and to his kingdom? But

the business was his thoughts troubled him; his own guilty

conscience flew in his face, and told him that he had no reason to

expect any good news from Heaven, and that the hand of an angel could

write nothing but terror to him. He that knew himself liable to the

justice of God immediately concluded this to be an arrest in his name,

a summons to appear before him. Note, God can soon awaken the most

secure and make the heart of the stoutest sinner to tremble; and there

needs no more to do it than to let loose his own thoughts upon him;

they will soon play the tyrant, and give him trouble enough.

3. The wise men of Babylon are immediately called in, to see what they

can make of this writing upon the wall,

v. 7.

The king cried aloud, as one in haste, as one in earnest, to

bring the whole college of magicians, to try if they can read this

writing, and show the interpretation of it; for the king and

all his lords cannot pretend to it, it is out of their sphere. The

study of divine revelation (such as they had, or thought they had) and

converse with the world of spirits were by the heathen confined to one

profession, and no other meddled with it; but what is written to us by

the finger of God is legible to all; whoever will may read the mind of

God in the scriptures. To engage these wise men to exert the utmost of

their skill in this matter, and provoke them to an emulation in the

attempt, he promised that whoever would give him a satisfactory account

of this writing should be dignified with the highest honours of the

court. He knew what these pretenders to wisdom aimed at, and what would

please them, and therefore promised them a scarlet robe and a

gold chain, glorious things in the eyes of those that know no

better. Nay, he should be primus par regni–chief minister of

state, the third ruler in the kingdom, next to the king and his

heir apparent.

4. The king is disappointed in his expectations from them; they can

none of them read the writing, much less interpret it

(v. 8),

which increases the king’s confusion,

v. 9.

He likes the thing yet worse and worse, and fears that mischief is

towards him. His lords also, that had been partners with him in

his jollity, are now sharers with him in his terrors; they also were

astonished at their wits’ end; and neither their numbers nor

their refreshment by wine would serve to keep up their spirits. The

reason why the wise men could not read the writing was not because it

was written in any language or characters unknown to them, but God

either cast a mist before their eyes or put such confusion upon their

spirits that they could not read it, that the honour of expounding this

mystical writing might be reserved for Daniel. Note, The terror of an

awakened convinced conscience may justly be increased by the utter

insufficiency of all creatures to give it ease or satisfaction.





















Daniel Brought before Belshazzar. B. C. 538.

     

10 Now the queen, by reason of the words of the king and his

lords, came into the banquet house: and the queen spake and

said, O king, live for ever: let not thy thoughts trouble thee,

nor let thy countenance be changed:

  11 There is a man in thy kingdom, in whom is the spirit of

the holy gods; and in the days of thy father light and

understanding and wisdom, like the wisdom of the gods, was found

in him; whom the king Nebuchadnezzar thy father, the king, I

say, thy father, made master of the magicians, astrologers,

Chaldeans, and soothsayers;

  12 Forasmuch as an excellent spirit, and knowledge, and

understanding, interpreting of dreams, and showing of hard

sentences, and dissolving of doubts, were found in the same

Daniel, whom the king named Belteshazzar: now let Daniel be

called, and he will show the interpretation.

  13 Then was Daniel brought in before the king. And the king

spake and said unto Daniel, Art thou that Daniel, which art

of the children of the captivity of Judah, whom the king my

father brought out of Jewry?

  14 I have even heard of thee, that the spirit of the gods is

in thee, and that light and understanding and excellent wisdom

is found in thee.

  15 And now the wise men, the astrologers, have been brought

in before me, that they should read this writing, and make known

unto me the interpretation thereof: but they could not show the

interpretation of the thing:

  16 And I have heard of thee, that thou canst make

interpretations, and dissolve doubts: now if thou canst read the

writing, and make known to me the interpretation thereof, thou

shalt be clothed with scarlet, and have a chain of gold about

thy neck, and shalt be the third ruler in the kingdom.

  17 Then Daniel answered and said before the king, Let thy gifts

be to thyself, and give thy rewards to another; yet I will read

the writing unto the king, and make known to him the

interpretation.

  18 O thou king, the most high God gave Nebuchadnezzar thy

father a kingdom, and majesty, and glory, and honour:

  19 And for the majesty that he gave him, all people, nations,

and languages, trembled and feared before him: whom he would he

slew; and whom he would he kept alive; and whom he would he set

up; and whom he would he put down.

  20 But when his heart was lifted up, and his mind hardened in

pride, he was deposed from his kingly throne, and they took his

glory from him:

  21 And he was driven from the sons of men; and his heart was

made like the beasts, and his dwelling was with the wild asses:

they fed him with grass like oxen, and his body was wet with the

dew of heaven; till he knew that the most high God ruled in the

kingdom of men, and that he appointeth over it whomsoever he

will.

  22 And thou his son, O Belshazzar, hast not humbled thine

heart, though thou knewest all this;

  23 But hast lifted up thyself against the Lord of heaven; and

they have brought the vessels of his house before thee, and thou,

and thy lords, thy wives, and thy concubines, have drunk wine in

them; and thou hast praised the gods of silver, and gold, of

brass, iron, wood, and stone, which see not, nor hear, nor know:

and the God in whose hand thy breath is, and whose are all

thy ways, hast thou not glorified:

  24 Then was the part of the hand sent from him; and this

writing was written.

  25 And this is the writing that was written, MENE, MENE,

TEKEL, UPHARSIN.

  26 This is the interpretation of the thing: MENE; God hath

numbered thy kingdom, and finished it.

  27 TEKEL; Thou art weighed in the balances, and art found

wanting.

  28 PERES; Thy kingdom is divided, and given to the Medes and

Persians.

  29 Then commanded Belshazzar, and they clothed Daniel with

scarlet, and put a chain of gold about his neck, and made a

proclamation concerning him, that he should be the third ruler in

the kingdom.

     

Here is,

I. The information given to the king, by the queen-mother, concerning

Daniel, how fit he was to be consulted in this difficult case. It is

supposed that this queen was the widow of Evil-Merodach, and was that

famous Nitocris whom Herodotus mentions as a woman of extraordinary

prudence. She was not present at the feast, as the king’s wives and

concubines were

(v. 2);

it was not agreeable to her age and gravity to keep a merry night. But,

tidings of the fright which the king and his lords were put into being

brought to her apartment, she came herself to the banqueting-house, to

recommend to the king a physician for his melancholy. She entreated him

not to be discouraged by the insufficiency of his wise men to solve

this riddle, for that there was a man in his kingdom that had

more than once helped his grandfather at such a dead lift, and, no

doubt, could help him,

v. 11, 12.

She could not undertake to read the writing herself, but directed him

to one that could; let Daniel be called now, who should have

been called first. Now observe,

1. The high character she gives of Daniel: He is a man in whom is

the spirit of the holy gods, who has something in him more than

human, not only the spirit of a man, which, in all, is the

candle of the Lord, but a divine spirit. According to the

language of her country and religion, she could not give a higher

encomium of any man; she speaks honourably of him as a man that had,

(1.) An admirably good head: Light, and understanding, and wisdom,

like the wisdom of the gods, were found in him. Such an insight had

he into things secret, and such a foresight of things to come, that it

was evident he was divinely inspired; he had knowledge and

understanding beyond all the other wise men for interpreting

dreams, explaining enigmas or hard sentences, untying knots, and

resolving doubts. Solomon had a wonderful sagacity of this kind; but it

should seem that in these things Daniel had more of an immediate divine

direction. Behold, a greater than Solomon himself is

here. Yet what was the wisdom of them both compared with the

treasures of wisdom hidden in Christ?

(2.) He had an admirably good heart: An excellent spirit was found

in him, which was a great ornament to his wisdom and knowledge, and

qualified him to receive that gift; for God gives to a man that is

good in his sight wisdom, and knowledge, and joy. He was of a

humble, holy, heavenly spirit, had a devout and gracious spirit, a

spirit of zeal for the glory of God and the good of men. This was

indeed an excellent spirit.

2. The account she gives of the respect that Nebuchadnezzar had for

him; he was much in his favour, and was preferred by him: “The king

thy father” (that is, thy grandfather, but even to many

generations Nebuchadnezzar might well be called the father of that

royal family, for he it was that raised it to such a pitch of

grandeur), “the king, I say, thy father, made him master of

the magicians.” Perhaps Belshazzar had sometimes, in his pride,

spoken slightly of Nebuchadnezzar, and his politics, and the methods of

his government, and the ministers he employed, and thought himself

wiser than he; and therefore his mother harps upon that. “The

king, I say, thy father, to whose good management all thou

hast owing, he pronounced him chief of, and gave him dominion over, all

the wise men of Babylon, and named him Belteshazzar, according

to the name of his god, thinking thereby to put honour upon him;” but

Daniel, by constantly making use of his Jewish name himself (which he

resolved to keep, in token of his faithful adherence to his religion),

had worn out that name; only the queen-dowager remembered it, otherwise

he was generally called Daniel. Note, It is a very good office

to revive the remembrance of the good services of worthy men, who are

themselves modest, and willing that they should be forgotten.

3. The motion she makes concerning him: Let Daniel be called, and he

will show the interpretation. By this it appears that Daniel was

now forgotten at court. Belshazzar was a stranger to him, knew not that

he had such a jewel in his kingdom. With the new king there came in a

new ministry, and the old one was laid aside. Note, There are a great

many valuable men, and such as might be made very useful, that lie long

buried in obscurity, and some that have done eminent services that live

to be overlooked and taken no notice of; but, whatever men are, God is

not unrighteous to forget the services done to his kingdom. Daniel,

being turned out of his place, lived privately, and sought not any

opportunity to come into notice again; yet he lived near the court and

within call, though Babylon was now besieged, that he might be ready,

if there were occasion, to do any good office, by what interest he had

among the great ones, for the children of his people. But Providence so

ordered it that now, just at the fall of that monarchy, he should by

the queen’s means be brought to court again, that he might lie there

ready for preferment in the ensuing government. Thus do the

righteous shine forth out of obscurity, and before honour is

humility.

     

II. The introducing of Daniel to the king, and his request to him to

read and expound the writing. Daniel was brought in before the

king,
v. 13.

He was now nearly ninety years of age, so that his years, and honours,

and former preferments, might have entitled him to a free admission

into the king’s presence; yet he was willing to be conducted in, as a

stranger, by the master of the ceremonies. Note,

1. The king asks, with an air of haughtiness: Art thou that Daniel

who art of the children of the captivity? Being a Jew, and a

captive, he was loth to be beholden to him if he could help it.

2. He tells him what an encomium he had heard of him

(v. 14),

that the spirit of the gods was in him; and he had sent for him

to try whether he deserved so high a character or no.

3. He acknowledges that all the wise men of Babylon were baffled; they

could not read this writing, nor show the interpretation,
v. 16.

But,

4. He promises him the same rewards that he had promised them if he

would do it,

v. 16.

It was strange that the magicians, when now, and in Nebuchadnezzar’s

time, once and again, they were nonplussed, did not attempt something

to save their credit; if they had with a good assurance said, “This is

the meaning of such a dream, such a writing,” who could disprove them?

But God so ordered it that they had nothing at all to say, as, when

Christ was born, the heathen oracles were struck dumb.

     

III. The interpretation which Daniel gave of these mystic characters,

which was so far from easing the king of his fears that we may suppose

it increased them rather. Daniel was now in years, and Belshazzar was

young; and therefore he seems to take a greater liberty of dealing

plainly and roundly with him than he had done upon the like occasions

with Nebuchadnezzar. In reproving any man, especially great men, there

is need of wisdom to consider all circumstances; for they are the

reproofs of instruction that are the way of life. In

Daniel’s discourse here,

     

1. He undertakes to read the writing which gave them this alarm, and to

show them the interpretation of it,

v. 17.

He slights the offer he made him of rewards, is not pleased that it was

mentioned, for he is not one of those that divine for money;

what gratuities Nebuchadnezzar gave him afterwards he gladly accepted,

but he scorned to bargain for them, or to read the writing to the

king for and in consideration of such and such honours promised

him. No: “Let thy gifts be to thyself, for they will not be long

thine, and give thy fee to another, to any of the wise men whom

thou wouldst have most wished to earn it; I value it not.” Daniel sees

his kingdom now at its last gasp, and therefore looks with contempt

upon his gifts and rewards. And thus should we despise all the gifts

and rewards that this world can give did we see, as we may by faith,

its final period hastening on. Let it give its perishing gifts to

another; there are better gifts which we have our eyes and hearts upon;

but let us do our duty in the world, do it all the real service we can,

read God’s writing to it in a profession of religion, and by an

agreeable conversation make known the interpretation of it, and then

trust God for his gifts, his rewards, in comparison with which all the

world can give is mere trash and trifles.

     

2. He largely recounts to the king God’s dealings with his father

Nebuchadnezzar, which were intended for instruction and warning to him,

v. 18, 21.

This is not intended for a flourish or an amusement, but is a necessary

preliminary to the interpretation of the writing. Note, That we may

understand aright what God is doing with us, it is of use to us to

review what he has done with others.

     

(1.) He describes the great dignity and power to which the divine

Providence had advanced Nebuchadnezzar,

v. 18, 19.

He had a kingdom, and majesty, and glory, and honour, for aught

we know, above what any heathen prince ever had before him; he thought

that he got his glory by his own extraordinary conduct and courage, and

ascribed his successes to a projecting active genius of his own; but

Daniel tells him who now enjoyed what he had laboured for that it was

the most high God, the God of gods and Lord of kings (as

Nebuchadnezzar himself had called him), that gave him that

kingdom, that vast dominion, that majesty wherewith he presided in

the affairs of it, and that glory and honour which by his

prosperous management he acquired. Note, Whatever degree of outward

prosperity any arrive at, they must own that it is of God’s giving, not

their own getting. Let it never be said, My might, and the

power of my hand, have gotten me this wealth, this preferment; but

let it always be remembered that it is God that gives men power to

get wealth, and gives success to their endeavours. Now the power

which God gave to Nebuchadnezzar is here described to be very great in

respect both of ability and of authority.

[1.] His ability was so strong that it was irresistible; such was the

majesty that God gave him, so numerous were the forces he had at

command, and such an admirable dexterity he had at commanding them,

that, which way soever his sword turned, it prospered. He could

captivate and subdue nations by threatening them, without striking a

stroke, for all people trembled and feared before him, and would

compound with him for their lives upon any terms. See what force is,

and what the fear of it does. It is that by which the brutal part of

the world, even of the world of mankind, both governs and is governed.

[2.] His authority was so absolute that it was uncontrollable. The

power which was allowed him, which descended upon him, or which, at

least, he assumed, was without contradiction, was absolute and

despotic, none shared with him either in the legislative or in the

executive part of it. In dispensing punishments he condemned or

acquitted at pleasure: Whom he would he slew, and whom he would he

saved alive, though both were equally innocent or equally guilty.

The jus vitæ et necis–the power of life and death was

entirely in his hand. In dispensing rewards he granted or denied

preferment at pleasure: Whom he would he set up, and whom he would

he put down, merely for a humour, and without giving a reason so

much as to himself; but it is all ex mero motu–of his own good

pleasure, and stat pro ratione voluntas–his will stands for a

reason. Such was the constitution of the eastern monarchies, such

the manner of their kings.

     

(2.) He sets before him the sins which Nebuchadnezzar had been guilty

of, whereby he had provoked God against him.

[1.] He behaved insultingly towards those that were under him, and grew

tyrannical and oppressive. The description given of his power intimates

his abuse of his power, and that he was directed in what he did by

humour and passion, not by reason and equity; so that he often

condemned the innocent and acquitted the guilty, both which are an

abomination to the Lord. He deposed men of merit and preferred

unworthy men, to the great detriment of the public, and for this he was

accountable to the most high God, that gave him his power. Note, It is

a very hard and rare thing for men to have an absolute arbitrary power,

and not to make an ill use of it. Camden has a distich of Giraldus,

wherein he speaks of it as a rare instance, concerning our king Henry

II of England, that never any man had so much power and did so little

hurt with it.

Glorior hoc uno, quod nunquam vidimus unum,

Nec potuisse magis, nec nocuisse minus–

Of him I can say, exulting, that with the same power

to do harm no one was ever more inoffensive.

     

But that was not all.

[2.] He behaved insolently towards the God above him, and grew proud

and haughty

(v. 20):

His heart was lifted up, and there his sin and ruin began; his

mind was hardened in pride, hardened against the commands of God

and his judgments; he was willful and obstinate, and neither the word

of God nor his rod made any lasting impression upon him. Note, Pride is

a sin that hardens the heart in all other sin and renders the means of

repentance and reformation ineffectual.

     

(3.) He reminds him of the judgments of God that were brought upon him

for his pride and obstinacy, how he was deprived of his reason, and so

deposed from his kingly throne

(v. 20),

driven from among men, to dwell with the wild asses,
v. 21.

He that would not govern his subjects by rules of reason had not reason

sufficient for the government himself. Note, Justly does God deprive

men of their reason when they become unreasonable and will not use it,

and of their power when they become oppressive and use it ill. He

continued like a brute till he knew and embraced that first

principle of religion, That the most high God rules. And it is

rather by religion than reason that man is distinguished from, and

dignified above, the beasts; and it is more his honour to be a subject

to the supreme Creator than to be lord of the inferior creatures. Note,

Kings must know, or shall be made to know, that the most high God rules

in their kingdoms (that is an imperium in imperio–an empire within

an empire, not to be excepted against), and that he appoints over

them whomsoever he will. As he makes heirs, so he makes princes.

     

3. In God’s name, he exhibits articles of impeachment against

Belshazzar. Before he reads him his doom, from the hand-writing on the

wall, he shows him his crime, that God may be justified when he

speaks, and clear when he judges. Now that which he lays to his

charge is,

(1.) That he had not taken warning by the judgments of God upon his

father

(v. 22):

Thou his son, O Belshazzar! hast not humbled thy heart, though thou

knewest all this. Note, It is a great offence to God if our hearts

be not humbled before him to comply both with his precepts and with his

providences, humbled by repentance, obedience, and patience; nay, he

expects from the greatest of men that their hearts should be humbled

before him, by an acknowledgment that, great as they are, to him they

are accountable. And it is a great aggravation of the unhumbledness of

our hearts when we know enough to humble them but do not consider and

improve it, particularly when we know how others have been broken that

would not bend, how others have fallen that would not stoop, and yet we

continue stiff and inflexible. It makes the sin of children the more

heinous if they tread in the steps of their parents’ wickedness, though

they have seen how dearly it has cost them, and how pernicious the

consequences of it have been. Do we know this, do we know all this, and

yet are we not humbled?

(2.) That he had affronted God more impudently than Nebuchadnezzar

himself had done, witness the revels of this very night, in the midst

of which he was seized with this horror

(v. 23):

Thou hast lifted up thyself against the Lord of heaven, hast

swelled with rage against him, and taken up arms against his crown and

dignity, in this particular instance, that thou hast profaned the

vessels of his house, and made the utensils of his sanctuary

instruments of thy iniquity, and, in an actual designed contempt of

him, hast praised the gods of silver and gold, which see not, nor

hear, nor know anything, as if they were to be preferred before the

God that sees, and hears, and knows every thing.” Sinners that are

resolved to go on in sin are well enough pleased with gods that

neither see, nor hear, nor know, for then they may sin securely;

but they will find, to their confusion, that though those are the gods

they choose those are not the gods they must be judged by, but one to

whom all things are naked and open.

(3.) That he had not answered the end of his creation and maintenance:

The God in whose hand thy breath is, and whose are all thy ways,

hast thou not glorified. This is a general charge, which stands

good against us all; let us consider how we shall answer it. Observe,

[1.] Our dependence upon God as our creator, preserver, benefactor,

owner, and ruler; not only from his hand our breath was at first, but

in his hand our breath is still; it is he that holds our

souls in life, and, if he take away our breath, we die. Our

times being in his hand, so is our breath, by which our times

are measured. In him we live, and move, and have our being; we

live by him, live upon him, and cannot live without him. The way of

man is not in himself, not at his own command, at his own disposal,

but his are all our ways; for our hearts are in his hand, and so

are the hearts of all men, even of kings, who seem to act most as

free-agents.

[2.] Our duty to God, in consideration of this dependence; we ought to

glorify him, to devote ourselves to his honour and employ ourselves in

his service, to make it our care to please him and our business to

praise him.

[3.] Our default in this duty, notwithstanding that dependence; we have

not done it; for we have all sinned, and come short of the glory of

God. This is the indictment against Belshazzar; there needs no

proof, it is made good by the notorious evidence of the fact, and his

own conscience cannot but plead guilty to it. And therefore,

     

4. He now proceeds to read the sentence, as he found it written upon

the wall: “Then” (says Daniel) “when thou hast come to such a

height of impiety as thus to trample upon the most sacred things,

then when thou wast in the midst of thy sacrilegious idolatrous

feast, then was the part of the hand, the writing fingers, sent

from him, from that God whom thou didst so daringly affront, and

who had borne so long with thee, but would bear no longer; he sent

them, and this writing, thou now seest, was written,
v. 24.

It is he that now writes bitter things against thee, and

makes thee to possess thy iniquities,

Job xiii. 26.

Note, As the sin of sinners is written in the book of God’s

omniscience, so the doom of sinners is written in the book of God’s

law; and the day is coming when those books shall be opened, and

they shall be judged by them. Now the writing was, Mene, Mene,

Tekel, Upharsin,
v. 25.

It is well that we have an authentic exposition of these words annexed,

else we could make little of them, so concise are they; the

signification of them is, He has numbered, he has weighed, and they

divide. The Chaldean wise men, because they knew not that there is

but one God only, could not understand who this He should be,

and for that reason (some think) the writing puzzled them.

(1.) Mene; that is repeated, for the thing is certain–Mene,

mene; that signifies, both in Hebrew and Chaldee, He has

numbered and finished, which Daniel explains thus

(v. 26):

God has numbered thy kingdom, the years and days of the

continuance of it; these were numbered in the counsel of God, and now

they are finished; the term has expired for and during which thou wast

to hold it, and now it must be surrendered. Here is an end of thy

kingdom.”

(2.) Tekel; that signifies, in Chaldee, Thou art weighed,

and, in Hebrew, Thou art too light. So Dr. Lightfoot. For this

king and his actions are weighed in the just and unerring balances of

divine equity. God does as perfectly know his true character as the

goldsmith knows the weight of that which he has weighed in the nicest

scales. God does not give judgment against him till he has first

pondered his actions, and considered the merits of his case. “But thou

art found wanting, unworthy to have such a trust lodged in thee,

a vain, light, empty man, a man of no weight or consideration.”

(3.) Upharsin, which should be rendered, and Pharsin, or

Peres. Parsin, in Hebrew, signifies the Persians;

Paresin, in Chaldee, signifies dividing; Daniel puts both

together

(v. 28):

Thy kingdom is divided, is rent from thee, and given to the

Medes and Persians, as a prey to be divided among them.” Now this

may, without any force, be applied to the doom of sinners. Mene,

Tekel, Peres, may easily be made to signify death, judgment,

and hell. At death, the sinner’s days are numbered and

finished; after death the judgment, when he will be weighed

in the balance and found wanting; and after judgment the sinner

will be cut asunder, and given as a prey to the devil and his

angels. Daniel does not here give Belshazzar such advice and

encouragement to repent as he had given Nebuchadnezzar, because he saw

the decree had gone forth and he would not be allowed any space to

repent.

     

One would have thought that Belshazzar would be exasperated against

Daniel, and, seeing his own case desperate, would be in a rage against

him. But he was so far convicted by his own conscience of the

reasonableness of all he said that he objected nothing against it; but,

on the contrary, gave Daniel the reward he promised him, put on him the

scarlet gown and the gold chain, and proclaimed him the

third ruler in the kingdom

(v. 29),

because he would be as good as his word, and because it was not

Daniel’s fault if the exposition of the hand-writing was not such as he

desired. Note, Many show great respect to God’s prophets who yet have

no regard to his word. Daniel did not value these titles and ensigns of

honour, yet would not refuse them, because they were tokens of his

prince’s good-will: but we have reason to think that he received them

with a smile, foreseeing how soon they would all wither with him that

bestowed them. They were like Jonah’s gourd, which came up in a night

and perished in a night, and therefore it was folly for him to be

exceedingly glad of them.



Daniel Deals Plainly with Belshazzar; Interpreting of the Writing on the Wall. B. C. 538.

     

30 In that night was Belshazzar the king of the Chaldeans

slain.

  31 And Darius the Median took the kingdom, being about

threescore and two years old.

     

Here is,

1. The death of the king. Reason enough he had to tremble, for he was

just falling into the hands of the king of terrors,
v. 30.

In that night, when his heart was merry with wine, the besiegers

broke into the city, aimed at the palace; there they found the king,

and gave him his death’s wound. He could not find any place so secret

as to conceal him, or so strong as to protect him. Heathen writers

speak of Cyrus’s taking Babylon by surprise, with the assistance of two

deserters that showed him the best way into the city. And it was

foretold what a consternation it would be to the court,

Jer. li. 11, 39.

Note, Death comes as a snare upon those whose hearts are overcharged

with surfeiting and drunkenness.

2. The transferring of the kingdom into other hands. From the head of

gold we now descend to the breast and arms of silver. Darius the

Mede took the kingdom in partnership with, and by the consent of,

Cyrus, who had conquered it,

v. 31.

They were partners in war and conquest, and so they were in dominion,

ch. vi. 28.

Notice is taken of his age, that he was now sixty-two years old, for

which reason Cyrus, who was his nephew, gave him the precedency. Some

observe that being now sixty-two years old, in the last year of the

captivity, he was born in the eighth year of it, and that was the year

when Jeconiah was carried captive and all the nobles, &c. See

2 Kings xxiv. 13-15.

Just at that time when the most fatal stroke was given was a prince

born that in process of time should avenge Jerusalem upon Babylon, and

heal the wound that was now given. Thus deep are the counsels of God

concerning his people, thus kind are his designs towards them.


[Table of Contents]

[Previous]

[Next]

Matthew Henry
Commentary on the Whole Bible (1712)


Back to Bibles Net . Com – Online Christian Library

Matthew Henry’s Complete Commentary – Free Download

Contact Us


Top