BIBLES NET. COM

Matthew Henry’s Commentary – Amos VII

Matthew Henry’s Complete Commentary

on the Whole Bible

Back to Biblesnet.com Home Page


[Table of Contents]

[Previous]

[Next]

Matthew Henry
Commentary on the Whole Bible (1712)




A M O S.

CHAP. VII.



     

In this chapter we have,

I. God contending with Israel, by the judgments, but are reprieved, and

the judgments turned away at the prayer of Amos,

ver. 1-6.

2. God’s patience is at length worn out by their obstinacy, and they

are rejected, and sentenced to utter ruin,

ver. 7-9.

II. Israel contending with God, by the opposition given to his prophet.

1. Amaziah informs against Amos

(ver. 10, 11)

and does what he can to rid the country of him as a public nuisance,

ver. 12, 13.

2. Amos justifies himself in what he did as a prophet

(ver. 14, 15)

and denounces the judgments of God against Amaziah his prosecutor

(ver. 16, 17);

for, when the contest is between God and man, it is easy to foresee, it

is very easy to foretel, who will come off with the worst of it.











Intercession for Israel; Ruin of Israel Foretold. B. C. 785.

     

1 Thus hath the Lord GOD shewed unto me; and, behold, he formed

grasshoppers in the beginning of the shooting up of the latter

growth; and, lo, it was the latter growth after the king’s

mowings.

  2 And it came to pass, that when they had made an end of

eating the grass of the land, then I said, O Lord GOD, forgive, I

beseech thee: by whom shall Jacob arise? for he is small.

  3 The LORD repented for this: It shall not be, saith the LORD.

  4 Thus hath the Lord GOD shewed unto me: and, behold, the Lord

GOD called to contend by fire, and it devoured the great deep,

and did eat up a part.

  5 Then said I, O Lord GOD, cease, I beseech thee: by whom shall

Jacob arise? for he is small.

  6 The LORD repented for this: This also shall not be, saith the

Lord GOD.

  7 Thus he shewed me: and, behold, the Lord stood upon a wall

made by a plumb-line, with a plumb-line in his hand.

  8 And the LORD said unto me, Amos, what seest thou? And I said,

A plumb-line. Then said the Lord, Behold, I will set a plumb-line

in the midst of my people Israel: I will not again pass by them

any more:

  9 And the high places of Isaac shall be desolate, and the

sanctuaries of Israel shall be laid waste; and I will rise

against the house of Jeroboam with the sword.

     

We here see that God bears long, but that he will not bear always, with

a provoking people, both these God here showed the prophet: Thus

hath the Lord God showed me,
v. 1, 4, 7.

He showed him what was present, foreshowed him what was to come, gave

him the knowledge both of what he did and of what he designed; for the

Lord God reveals his secret unto his servants the prophets,
ch. iii. 7.

     

I. We have here two instances of God’s sparing mercy, remembered in the

midst of judgment, the narratives of which are so much like one another

that they will be best considered together, and very considerable they

are.

     

1. God is here coming forth against this sinful nation, first by one

judgment and then by another.

(1.) He begins with the judgment of famine. The prophet saw this in

vision. He saw God forming grasshoppers, or locusts, and

bringing them up upon the land, to eat up the fruits of it, and so to

strip it of its beauty and starve its inhabitants,

v. 1.

God formed these grasshoppers, not only as they were his creatures (and

much of the wisdom and power of God appears in the formation of minute

animals, as much in the structure of an ant as of an elephant), but as

they were instruments of his wrath. God is said to frame evil

against a sinful people,

Jer. xviii. 11.

These grasshoppers were framed on purpose to eat up the grass of the

land; and vast numbers of them were prepared accordingly. They were

sent in the beginning of the shooting up of the latter growth, after

the king’s mowings. See here how the judgment was mitigated by the

mercy that went before it. God could have sent these insects to eat up

the grass at the beginning of the first growth, in the spring, when the

grass was most needed, was most plentiful, and was the best in its

kind; but God suffered that to grow, and suffered them to gather it in;

the king’s mowings were safely housed, for the king himself is

served from the field

(Eccl. v. 9),

and could as ill be without his mowings as without any other branch of

his revenues. Uzziah, who was now king of Judah, loved

husbandry,
2 Chron. xxvi. 10.

But the grasshoppers were commissioned to eat up only the latter

growth (the edgrew we call it in the country), the after-grass,

which is of little value in comparison with the former. The mercies

which God give us, and continues to us, are more numerous and more

valuable than those he removes from us, which is a good reason why we

should be thankful and not complain. The remembrance of the mercies of

the former growth should make us submissive to the will of God when we

meet with disappointments in the latter growth. The prophet, in vision,

saw this judgment prevailing far. These grasshoppers ate up the

grass of the land, which should have been for the cattle, which the

owners must of course suffer by. Some understand this figuratively of a

wasting destroying army brought upon them. In the days of Jeroboam the

kingdom of Israel began to recover itself from the desolations it had

been under in the former reigns

(2 Kings xiv. 25);

the latter growth shot up, after the mowings of the kings of Syria,

which we read of

2 Kings xiii. 3.

And then God commissioned the king of Assyria with an army of

caterpillars to come upon them and lay them waste, that nation spoken

of

ch. vi. 14,

which afflicted them from the entering of Hamath to the river of the

wilderness, which seems to refer to

2 Kings xiv. 25,

where Jeroboam is said to have restored their coast from the

entering of Hamath to the sea of the plain. God can bring all to

ruin when we think all is in some good measure repaired.

(2.) He proceeds to the judgment of fire, to show that he has many

arrows in his quiver, many ways of humbling a sinful nation

(v. 4):

The Lord God called to contend by fire. He contended, for God’s

judgment upon a people are his controversies with them; in them he

prosecutes his action against them; and his controversies are neither

causeless nor groundless. He called to contend; he did by his

prophets give them notice of his controversy, and drew up a

declaration, setting forth the meaning of it. Or he called for his

angels, or other ministers of his justice, that were to be employed in

it. A fire was kindled among them, by which perhaps is meant a great

drought (the heat of the sun, which should have warmed the earth,

scorched it, and burnt up the roots of the grass which the locusts had

eaten the spires of), or a raging fever, which was as a fire in their

bones, which devoured and ate up multitudes, or lightning, fire from

heaven, which consumed their houses, as Sodom and Gomorrah were

consumed

(ch. iv. 11),

or it was the burning of their cities, either by accident or by the

hand of the enemy, for fire and sword used to go together; thus were

the towns wasted, as the country was by the grasshoppers. This fire,

which God called for, did terrible execution; it devoured the great

deep, as the fire that fell from heaven on Elijah’s altar licked up

the water that was in the trench. Though the water designed for the

stopping and quenching of this fire was as the water of the great deep,

yet it devoured it; for who, or what, can stand before a fire kindled

by the wrath of God! It did eat up a part, a great part, of the

cities where it was sent; or it was as the fire at Taberah, which

consumed the outermost parts of the camp

(Num. xi. 1);

when some were overthrown others were as brands plucked out of the

fire. All deserved to be devoured, but it ate up only a part, for

God does not stir up all his wrath.

     

2. The prophet goes forth to meet him in the way of his judgments, and

by prayer seeks to turn away his wrath,

v. 2.

When he saw, in vision, what dreadful work these caterpillars made,

that they had eaten up in a manner all the grass of the land (he

foresaw they would do so, if suffered to go on), then he said, O

Lord God! forgive, I beseech thee

(v. 2);

cease, I beseech thee,
v. 5.

He that foretold the judgment in his preaching to the people, yet

deprecated it in his intercessions for them. He is a prophet, and he

shall pray for thee. It was the business of prophets to pray for

those to whom they prophesied, and so to make it appear that though

they denounced they did not desire the woeful day. Therefore,

God showed his prophets the evils coming, that they might befriend the

people, not only by warning them, but by praying for them, and

standing in the gap, to turn away God’s wrath, as Moses, that

great prophet, often did. Now observe here,

     

(1.) The prophet’s prayer: O Lord God!

[1.] Forgive, I beseech thee, and take away the sin,

v. 2.

He sees sin at the bottom of the trouble, and therefore concludes that

the pardon of sin must be at the bottom of deliverance, and prays for

that in the first place. Note, Whatever calamity we are under, personal

or public, the forgiveness of sin is that which we should be most

earnest with God for.

[2.] Cease, I beseech thee, and take away the judgment; cease

the fire, cease the controversy; cause they anger towards us to

cease. This follows upon the forgiveness of sin. Take away the

cause and effect will cease. Note, Those whom God contends with will

soon find what need they have to cry for a cessation of arms; and there

are hopes that though God has begun, and proceeded far, in his

controversy, yet it may be obtained.

     

(2.) The prophet’s plea to enforce this prayer: By whom shall Jacob

arise, for he is small?
v. 2.

And it is repeated

(v. 5)

and yet no vain repetition. Christ, in his agony, prayed

earnestly, saying the same words, again and again.

[1.] It is Jacob that he is interceding for, the professing people of

God, called by his name, calling on his name, the seed of Jacob, his

chosen, and in covenant with him. It it Jacob’s case that is in this

prayer spread before the God of Jacob.

[2.] Jacob is small, very small already, weakened and brought

low by former judgments; and therefore, it these come, he will be quite

ruined and brought to nothing. The people are few; the dust of

Jacob, which was once innumerable, is now soon counted. Those few

are feeble (it is the worm Jacob,
Isa. xli. 14);

they are unable to help themselves or one another. Sin will soon make a

great people small, will diminish the numerous, impoverish the

plenteous, and weaken the courageous.

[3.] By whom shall he arise? He has fallen, and cannot help

himself up, and he has no friend to help him, none to raise him, unless

the hand of God do it; what will become of him, then, if the hand that

should raise him to stretched out against him? Note, When the state of

God’s church is very low and very helpless it is proper to be

recommended by our prayers to God’s pity.

     

3. God graciously lets fall his controversy, in answer to the prophet’s

prayer, once and again

(v. 3):

The Lord repented for this. He did not change his mind, for he

is one mind and who can turn him? But he changed is way, took another

course, and determined to deal in mercy and not in wrath. He said,

It shall not be. And again

(v. 6),

This also shall not be. The caterpillars were countermanded,

were remanded; a stop was put to the progress of the fire, and thus a

reprieve was granted. See the power of prayer, of effectual

fervent prayer, and how much it avails, what great things it

prevails for. A stop has many a time been put to a judgment by making

supplication to the Judge. This was not the first time that

Israel’s life was begged, and so saved. See what a blessing praying

people, praying prophets, are to a land, and therefore how highly they

ought to be valued. Ruin would many a time have broken in if they had

not stood in the breach, and made good the pass. See how ready, how

swift, God is to show mercy, how he waits to be gracious. Amos

moves for a reprieve, and obtains it, because God inclines to grant it

and looks about to see if there be any that will intercede for it,

Isa. lix. 16.

Nor are former reprieves objected against further instances of mercy,

but are rather encouragements to pray and hope for them. This also

shall not be, any more than that. It is the glory of God that he

multiplies to pardon, that he spares, and forgives, to more than

seventy times seven times.

     

II. We have here the rejection of those at last who had been often

reprieved and yet never reclaimed, reduced to straits and yet never

reduced to their God and their duty. This is represented to the prophet

by a vision

(v. 7, 8)

and an express prediction of utter ruin,

v. 9.

     

1. The vision is of a plumb-line, a line with a plummet at the

end of it, such as masons and bricklayers use to run up a wall by, that

they may work it straight and true, and by rule.

(1.) Israel was a wall, a strong wall, which God himself had reared, as

a bulwark, or wall of defence, to his sanctuary, which he set up among

them. The Jewish church says of herself

(Cant. viii. 10),

I am a wall, and my breasts are like towers. This wall was

made by a plumb-line, very exact and firm. So happy was its

constitution, so well compacted, and every thing so well ordered

according to the model; it had long stood fast as a wall of brass. But,

(2.) God now stands upon this wall, not to hold it up, but to

tread it down, or, rather, to consider what he should do with it. He

stands upon it with a plumb-line in his hand, to take measure of

it, that it may appear to be a bowing, bulging wall. Recti est index

sui et oblique–This plumb-line would discover where it was

crooked. Thus God would bring the people of Israel to the trial,

would discover their wickedness, and show wherein they erred; and he

would likewise bring his judgments upon them according to equity, would

set a plumb-line in the midst of them, to mark how far their

wall must be pulled down, as David measured the Moabites with a

line

(2 Sam. viii. 2)

to put them to death. And, when God is coming to the ruin of a

people, he is said to lay judgment to the line and righteousness to

the plummet; for when he punishes it is with exactness. It is now

determined: “I will not again pass by them any more; they shall

not be spared and reprieved as they have been; their punishment shall

not be turned away,

ch. i. 3.

Note, God’s patience, which has long been sinned against, will at

length be sinned away; and the time will come when those that have been

spared often shall be no longer spared. My spirit shall not always

strive. After frequent reprieves, yet a day of execution will

come.

     

2. The prediction is of utter ruin,

v. 9.

(1.) The body of the people shall be destroyed, with all those things

that were their ornament and defence. They are here called Isaac

as well as Israel, the house of Isaac

(v. 16),

some think in allusion to the signification of Isaac’s name; it is

laughter; they shall become a jest among all their neighbours;

their neighbours shall laugh at them. The desolation shall

fasten upon their high places and their sanctuaries, either

their castles or their temples, both built on high

places. Their castles they thought safe, and their temples sacred as

sanctuaries. These shall be laid waste, to punish them for their

idolatry and to make them ashamed of their carnal confidences, which

were the two things for which God had a controversy with them. When

these were made desolate they might read their sin and folly in their

punishment.

(2.) The royal family shall sink first, as an earnest of the ruin of

the whole kingdom: I will rise against the house of Jeroboam,

Jeroboam the second, who was now king of the ten tribes; his family was

extirpated in his son Zecharias, who was slain with the sword before

the people, by Shallum who conspired against him,
2 Kings xv. 10.

How unrighteous soever the instruments were, God was righteous, and in

them God rose up against that idolatrous family. Even king’s houses

will be no shelter against the sword of God’s wrath.









Amaziah’s Charge against Amos; Amaziah’s Doom. B. C. 785.

     

10 Then Amaziah the priest of Bethel sent to Jeroboam king of

Israel, saying, Amos hath conspired against thee in the midst of

the house of Israel: the land is not able to bear all his words.

  11 For thus Amos saith, Jeroboam shall die by the sword, and

Israel shall surely be led away captive out of their own land.

  12 Also Amaziah said unto Amos, O thou seer, go, flee thee away

into the land of Judah, and there eat bread, and prophesy there:

  13 But prophesy not again any more at Bethel: for it is the

king’s chapel, and it is the king’s court.

  14 Then answered Amos, and said to Amaziah, I was no prophet,

neither was I a prophet’s son; but I was a herdman, and a

gatherer of sycamore fruit:

  15 And the LORD took me as I followed the flock, and the LORD

said unto me, Go, prophesy unto my people Israel.

  16 Now therefore hear thou the word of the LORD: Thou sayest,

Prophesy not against Israel, and drop not thy word against the

house of Isaac.

  17 Therefore thus saith the LORD; Thy wife shall be a harlot

in the city, and thy sons and thy daughters shall fall by the

sword, and thy land shall be divided by line; and thou shalt die

in a polluted land: and Israel shall surely go into captivity

forth of his land.

     

One would have expected,

1. That what we met with in the former part of the chapter would awaken

the people to repentance, when they saw that they were reprieved in

order that they might have space to repent and that they could

not obtain a pardon unless the did repent.

2. That it would endear the prophet Amos to them, who had not only

shown his good-will to them in praying against the judgments that

invaded them, but had prevailed to turn away those judgments, which, if

they had had any sense of gratitude, would have gained him an interest

in their affections. But it fell out quite contrary; they continue

impenitent, and the next news we hear of Amos is that he is persecuted.

Note, As it is the praise of great saints that they pray for those that

are enemies to them, so it is the shame of many great sinners that they

are enemies to those who pray for them,

Ps. xxxv. 13, 15; cix. 4.

We have here,

     

I. The malicious information brought to the king against the prophet

Amos,

v. 10, 11.

The informer was Amaziah the priest of Bethel, the chief of the

priests that ministered to the golden calf there, the president of

Bethel (so some read it), that had the principal hand in civil

affairs there. He complained against Amos, not only because he

prophesied without license from him, but because he prophesied against

his altars, which would soon be deserted and demolished if Amos’s

preaching could but gain credit. Thus the shrine-makers at Ephesus

hated Paul, because his preaching tended to spoil their trade. Note,

Great pretenders to sanctity are commonly the worst enemies to those

who are really sanctified. Priests have been the most bitter

persecutors. Amaziah brings an information to Jeroboam against Amos.

Observe,

1. The crime he is charged with is no less than treason: “Amos has

conspired against thee, to depose and murder thee; he aims at

succeeding thee, and therefore is taking the most effectual way to

weaken thee. He sows the seeds of sedition in the hearts of the good

subjects of the king, and makes them disaffected to him and his

government, that he may draw them by degrees from their allegiance;

upon this account the land is not able to bear his words.” It is

slyly insinuated to the king that the country was exasperated against

him, and it is given in as their sense that his preaching was

intolerable, and such as nobody could be reconciled to, such as the

times would by no means bear, that is, the men of the times would not.

Both the impudence of his supposed treason, and the bad influence it

would have upon the country, are intimated in that part of the charge,

that he conspired against the king in the midst of the house of Israel.

Note, It is no new thing for the accusers of the brethren to

misrepresent them as enemies to the king and kingdom, as traitors to

their prince and troublers of the land, when really they are the best

friends to both. And it is common for designing men to assert that as

the sense of the country which is far from being so. And yet here, I

doubt, it was too true, that the people could not bear plain dealing

any more than the priests.

2. The words laid in the indictment for the support of this charge

(v. 11):

Amos says (and they have witnesses ready to prove it)

Jeroboam shall die by the sword, and Israel shall be led away

captive; and hence they infer that he is an enemy to his king and

country, and not to be tolerated. See the malice of Amaziah; he does

not tell the king how Amos had interceded for Israel, and by his

intercession had turned away first one judgment and then another, and

did not let fall his intercession till he saw the decree had gone

forth; he does not tell him that these threatenings were conditional,

and that he had often assured them that if they would repent and reform

the ruin should be prevented. Nay, it was not true that he said,

Jeroboam shall die by the sword, nor did he so die

(2 Kings xiv. 28),

but that God would rise against the house of Jeroboam with the

sword,
v. 9.

God’s prophets and ministers have often had occasion to make David’s

complaint

(Ps. lvi. 5),

Every day they wrest my words. But shall it be made the

watchman’s crime, when he sees the sword coming, to give warning to the

people, that they may get themselves secured? or the physician’s crime

to tell his patient of the danger of his disease, that he may use means

for the cure of it? What enemies are foolish men to themselves, to

their own peace, to their best friends! It does not appear that

Jeroboam took any notice of this information; perhaps he reverenced a

prophet, and stood more in awe of the divine authority than Amaziah his

priest did.

     

II. The method he used to persuade Amos to withdraw and quit the

country

(v. 12, 13);

when he could not gain his point with the king to have Amos imprisoned,

banished, or put to death, or at least to have him frightened into

silence or flight, he tried what he could do by fair means to get rid

of him; he insinuated himself into his acquaintance, and with all the

arts of wheedling endeavored to persuade him to go and prophesy in the

land of Judah, and not at Bethel. He owns him to be a seer, and

does not pretend to enjoin him silence, but suggests to him,

     

1. That Bethel was not a proper place for him to exercise his ministry

in, for it was the king’s chapel, or sanctuary, where he

had his idols and their altars and priests; and it was the king’s

court, or the house of the kingdom, where the royal family

resided and where were set the thrones of judgment; and therefore

prophesy not any more here. And why not?

(1.) Because Amos is too plain and blunt a preacher for the court and

the king’s chapel. Those that wear silk and fine clothing, and

speak silken soft words, are fit for king’s palaces.

(2.) Because the worship that is in the king’s chapel will be a

continual vexation and trouble to Amos; let him therefore get far

enough from it, and what the eye sees not the heart grieves not for.

(3.) Because it was not fit that the king and his house should be

affronted in their own court and chapel by the reproofs and

threatenings which Amos was continually teazing them with in the name

of the Lord; as if it were the prerogative of the prince, and the

privilege of the peers, when they are running headlong upon a

precipice, not to be told of their danger.

(4.) Because he could not expect any countenance or encouragement

there, but, on the contrary, to be bantered and ridiculed by some and

to be threatened and brow-beaten by others; however, he could not think

to make any converts there, or to persuade any from that idolatry which

was supported by the authority and example of the king. To preach his

doctrine there was but (as we say) to run his head against a post; and

therefore prophesy no more there. But,

     

2. He persuades him that the land of Judah was the fittest place for

him to set up in: Flee thee away thither with all speed, and

there eat bread, and prophesy there. There thou wilt be

safe; there thou wilt be welcome; the king’s court and chapel there are

on thy side; the prophets there will second thee; the priests and

princes there will take notice of thee, and allow thee an honourable

maintenance. See here,

(1.) How willing wicked men are to get clear of their faithful

reprovers, and how ready to say to the seers, See not, or See

not for us; the two witnesses were a torment to those that dwelt on the

earth

(Rev. xi. 10),

and it were indeed a pity that men should be tormented before the

time, but that it is in order to the preventing of eternal torment.

(2.) How apt worldly men are to measure others by themselves. Amaziah,

as a priest, aimed at nothing but the profits of his place, and he

thought Amos, as a prophet, had the same views, and therefore advised

him to prophesy were he might eat bread, where he might be sure

to have as much as he chose; whereas Amos was to prophesy where God

appointed him, and where there was most need of him, not where he would

get most money. Note, Those that make gain their godliness, and are

governed by the hopes of wealth and preferment themselves, are ready to

think these the most powerful inducements with others also.

     

III. The reply which Amos made to these suggestions of Amaziah’s. He

did not consult with flesh and blood, nor was it his care to

enrich himself, but to make full proof of his ministry, and to

be found faithful in the discharge of it, not to sleep in a whole skin,

but to keep a good conscience; and therefore he resolved to abide by

his post, and, in answer to Amaziah,

     

1. He justified himself in his constant adherence to his work and to

his place

(v. 14, 15);

and that which he was sure would not only bear him out, but bind him to

it, was that he had a divine warrant and commission for it: “I was

no prophet, nor prophet’s son, neither born nor bred to the office,

not originally designed for a prophet, as Samuel and Jeremiah, not

educated in the schools of the prophets, as many others were; but I

was a herdsman, a keeper of cattle, and a gatherer of

sycamore-fruit.” Our sycamores bear no fruit, but, it seems, theirs

did, which Amos gathered either for his cattle or for himself and his

family, or to sell. He was a plain country-man, bred up and employed in

country work and used to country fare. He followed the flocks as

well as the herds, and thence God took him, and bade him

go and prophesy to his people Israel, deliver to them

such messages as he should from time to time receive from the

Lord. God made him a prophet, and a prophet to them, appointed him

his work and appointed him his post. Therefore he ought not to be

silenced, for,

(1.) He could produce a divine commission for what he did. He did not

run before he was sent, but pleads, as Paul, that he was called to

be an apostle; and men will find it is at their peril if they

contradict and oppose any that come in God’s name, if they say to his

seers, See not, or silence those whom he has bidden to speak;

such fight against God. An affront done to an ambassador is an

affront to the prince that sends him. Those that have a warrant from

God ought not to fear the face of man.

(2.) The mean character he wore before he received that commission

strengthened his warrant, so far was it from weakening it.

[1.] He had no thoughts at all of ever being a prophet, and therefore

his prophesying could not be imputed to a raised expectation or a

heated imagination, but purely to a divine impulse.

[2.] He was not educated nor instructed in the art or mystery of

prophesying, and therefore he must have his abilities for it

immediately from God, which is an undeniable proof that he had his

mission from him. The apostles, being originally unlearned and ignorant

men, evidenced that they owed their knowledge to their having been

with Jesus,
Acts iv. 13.

When the treasure is put into such earthen vessels, it is thereby made

to appear that the excellency of the power is of God, and not of

man,
2 Cor. iv. 7.

[3.] He had an honest calling, by which he could comfortably maintain

himself and his family; and therefore did not need to prophesy for

bread, as Amaziah suggested

(v. 12),

did not take it up as a trade to live by, but as a trust to honour God

and do good with.

[4.] He had all his days been accustomed to a plain homely way of

living among poor husbandmen, and never affected either gaieties or

dainties, and therefore would not have thrust himself so near the

king’s court and chapel if the business God had called him to had not

called him thither.

[5.] Having been so meanly bred, he could not have the courage to speak

to kings and great men, especially to speak such bold and provoking

things to them, if he had not been animated by a greater spirit than

his own. If God, that sent him, had not strengthened him, he could not

thus have set his face as a flint,
Isa. l. 7.

Note, God often chooses the weak and foolish things of the world

to confound the wise and mighty; and a herdman of Tekoa puts to shame a

priest of Bethel, when he receives from God authority and ability to

act for him.

     

2. He condemns Amaziah for the opposition he gave them, and denounces

the judgments of God against him, not from any private resentment or

revenge, but in the name of the Lord and by authority from him,

v. 16, 17.

Amaziah would not suffer Amos to preach at all, and therefore he is

particularly ordered to preach against him: Now therefore hear thou

the word of the Lord, hear it and tremble. Those that cannot bear

general woes may expect woes of their own. The sin he is charged with

is forbidding Amos to prophesy; we do not find that he beat him, or put

him in the stocks, only he enjoined him silence: Prophesy not

against Israel, and drop not thy word against the house of Isaac;

he must not only thunder against them, but he must not so much as drop

a word against them; he cannot bear, no, not the most gentle distilling

of that rain, that small rain. Let him therefore hear his doom.

     

(1.) For the opposition he gave to Amos God will bring ruin upon

himself and his family. This was the sin that filled the measure of his

iniquity.

[1.] He shall have no comfort in any of his relations, but be afflicted

in those that were nearest to him: His wife shall be a harlot;

either she shall be forcibly abused by the soldiers, as the Levite’s

concubine by the men of Gibeah (they ravish the women of Zion,
Lam. v. 11),

or she shall herself wickedly play the harlot, which, though her sin,

her great sin, would be his affliction, his great affliction and

reproach, and a just punishment upon him for promoting spiritual

whoredom. Sometimes the sins of our relations are to be looked upon as

judgments of God upon us. His children, though they keep honest, yet

shall not keep alive: His sons and his daughters shall fall by the

sword of war, and he himself shall live to see it. He has trained

them up in iniquity, and therefore God will cut them off in it.

[2.] He shall be stripped of all his estate; it shall fall into the

hand of the enemy, and be divided by line, by lot, among the

soldiers. What is ill begotten will not be long kept.

[3.] He shall himself perish in a strange country, not in the land

of Israel, which had been holiness to the Lord, but in a

polluted land, in a heathen country, the fittest place for such

a heathen to end his days in, that hated and silenced God’s prophets

and contributed so much to the polluting of his own land with

idolatry.

     

(2.) Notwithstanding the opposition he gave to Amos, God will bring

ruin upon the land and nation. He was accused for saying, Israel

shall be led away captive

(v. 11),

but he stands to it, and repeats it; for the unbelief of man shall not

make the word of God of no effect. The burden of the word of the

Lord may be striven with, but it cannot be shaken off. Let Amaziah

rage, and fret, and say what he will to the contrary, Israel shall

surely go into captivity forth of his land. Note, it is to no

purpose to contend with the judgments of God; for when God judges he

will overcome. Stopping the mouths of God’s ministers will not stop the

progress of God’s word, for it shall not return void.


[Table of Contents]

[Previous]

[Next]

Matthew Henry
Commentary on the Whole Bible (1712)


Back to Bibles Net . Com – Online Christian Library

Matthew Henry’s Complete Commentary – Free Download

Contact Us


Top