BIBLES NET. COM

Matthew Henry’s Commentary – Mark II

Matthew Henry’s Complete Commentary

on the Whole Bible

Back to Biblesnet.com Home Page


[Table of Contents]

[Previous]

[Next]

Matthew Henry
Commentary on the Whole Bible (1721)




M A R K.

CHAP. II.



     

In this chapter, we have,

I. Christ’s healing a man that was sick of a palsy,

ver. 1-12.

II. His calling of Matthew from the receipt of custom, and his eating,

upon that occasion, with publicans and sinners, and justifying himself

in so doing,

ver. 13-17.

III. His justifying his disciples in not fasting so much as those

plucking the ears of corn on the sabbath day,

ver. 23-28.

All which passages we had before,

Matt. ix. and xii.














The Healing of a Paralytic.

     

1 And again he entered into Capernaum after some days; and it

was noised that he was in the house.

  2 And straightway many were gathered together, insomuch that

there was no room to receive them, no, not so much as about the

door: and he preached the word unto them.

  3 And they come unto him, bringing one sick of the palsy, which

was borne of four.

  4 And when they could not come nigh unto him for the press,

they uncovered the roof where he was: and when they had broken

it up, they let down the bed wherein the sick of the palsy lay.

  5 When Jesus saw their faith, he said unto the sick of the

palsy, Son, thy sins be forgiven thee.

  6 But there were certain of the scribes sitting there, and

reasoning in their hearts,

  7 Why doth this man thus speak blasphemies? who can forgive

sins but God only?

  8 And immediately when Jesus perceived in his spirit that they

so reasoned within themselves, he said unto them, Why reason ye

these things in your hearts?

  9 Whether is it easier to say to the sick of the palsy, Thy

sins be forgiven thee; or to say, Arise, and take up thy bed, and

walk?

  10 But that ye may know that the Son of man hath power on earth

to forgive sins, (he saith to the sick of the palsy,)

  11 I say unto thee, Arise, and take up thy bed, and go thy way

into thine house.

  12 And immediately he arose, took up the bed, and went forth

before them all; insomuch that they were all amazed, and

glorified God, saying, We never saw it on this fashion.

     

Christ, having been for some time preaching about in the country, here

returns to Capernaum his head-quarters, and makes his appearance there,

in hopes that by this time the talk and crowd would be somewhat abated.

Now observe,

     

I. The great resort there was to him. Though he was in the

house, wither Peter’s house, or some lodgings of his own which he

had taken, yet people came to him as soon as it was noised that

he was in town; they did not stay till he appeared in the synagogue,

which they might be sure he would do on the sabbath day, but

straightway many were gathered together to him. Where the king

is, there is the court; where Shiloh is, there shall the gathering

of the people be. In improving opportunities for our souls, we must

take care not to lose time. One invited another (Come, let us go

see Jesus), so that his house could not contain his visitants. There

was no room to receive them, they were so numerous, no not so

much as about the door. A blessed sight, to see people thus flying

like a cloud to Christ’s house, though it was but a poor one, and as

the doves to their windows!

     

II. The good entertainment Christ gave them, the best his house would

afford, and better than any other could; he preached the word unto

them,
v. 2.

Many of them perhaps came only for cures, and many perhaps only for

curiosity, to get a sight of him; but when he had them together he

preached to them. Though the synagogue-door was open to him at

proper times, he thought it not at all amiss to preach in a house, on a

week day; though some might reckon it both an improper place and an

improper time. Blessed are ye that sow beside all waters,
Isa. xxxii. 20.

     

III. The presenting of a poor cripple to him, to be helped by him. The

patient was one sick of the palsy, it should seem not as that,

Matt. viii. 6,

grievously tormented, but perfectly disabled, so that he was

borne of four, was carried upon a bed, as if he had been

upon a bier, by four persons. It was his misery, that he needed

to be so carried, and bespeaks the calamitous state of human life; it

was their charity, who did so carry him, and bespeaks the compassion

that it is justly expected should be in the children of men toward

their fellow-creatures in distress, because we know not how soon the

distress may be our own. These kind relations or neighbours

thought, if they could but carry this poor man once to Christ, they

should not need to carry him any more; and therefore made hard shift to

get him to him; and when they could not otherwise get to him, they

uncovered the roof where he was,
v. 4.

I see no necessity to conclude that Christ was preaching in an upper

room, though in such the Jews that had stately houses, had their

oratories; for then to what purpose should the crowd stand before

the door, as wisdom’s clients used to do?

Prov. viii. 34.

But I rather conjecture that the house he was in, was so little and

mean (agreeable to his present state), that it had no upper

room, but the ground-floor was open to the roof: and these

petitioners for the poor paralytic, resolving not to be disappointed,

when they could not get through the crowd at the door, got their friend

by some means or other to the roof of the house, took off some of the

tiles, and so let him down upon his bed with cords into the house where

Christ was preaching. This bespoke both their faith and their

fervency in this address to Christ. Hereby it appeared that

they were in earnest, and would not go away, nor let Christ go

without a blessing.
Gen. xxxii. 26.

     

IV. The kind word Christ said to this poor patient; He saw their

faith; perhaps not so much his, for his distemper hindered him from

the exercise of faith, but theirs that brought him. In curing

the centurion’s servant, Christ took notice of it as an instance of

his faith, that he did not bring him to Christ, but believed he

could cure him at a distance; here he commended their faith,

because they did bring their friend through so much difficulty. Note,

True faith and strong faith may work variously, conquering sometimes

the objections of reason, sometimes those of sense; but, however

manifested, it shall be accepted and approved by Jesus Christ. Christ

said, Son, thy sins be forgiven thee. The compellation is

very tender-Son; intimating a fatherly care of him and

concern for him. Christ owns true believers as his sons: a

son, and yet sick of the palsy. Herein God deals with you as

with sons. The cordial is very rich; Thy sins are

forgiven thee. Note,

1. Sin is the procuring cause of all our pains and sicknesses. The word

of Christ was to take his thoughts off from the disease, which was the

effect, and to lead them to the sin, the cause, that he might be more

concerned about that, to get that pardoned.

2. God doth then graciously take away the sting and malignity of

sickness, when he forgives sin; recovery from sickness is then a

mercy indeed, when way is made for it by the pardon of sin. See

Isa. xxxviii. 17; Ps. ciii. 3.

The way to remove the effect, is, to take away the cause. Pardon of sin

strikes at the root of all diseases, and either cures them, or alters

their property.

     

V. The cavil of the scribes at that which Christ said, and a

demonstration of the unreasonableness of their cavil. They were

expositors of the law, and their doctrine was true–that it is

blasphemy for any creature to undertake the pardon of sin, and that it

is God’s prerogative,

Isa. xliii. 25.

But, as is usual with such teachers, their application was

false, and was the effect of their ignorance and enmity to

Christ. It is true, None can forgive sins but God only; but it

is false that therefore Christ cannot, who had abundantly proved

himself to have a divine power. But Christ perceived in his spirit

that they so reasoned within themselves; this proves him to be God,

and therefore confirmed what was to be proved, that he had authority to

forgive sins; for he searched the heart, and knew what

was in man,
Rev. ii. 23.

God’s royalties are inseparable, and he that could know

thoughts, could forgive sins. This magnifies the grace of

Christ, in pardoning sin, that he knew men’s thoughts, and

therefore knows more than any other can know, both of the sinfulness of

their sins and the particulars of them, and yet is ready to pardon. Now

he proves his power to forgive sin, by demonstrating his power

to cure the man sick of the palsy,
v. 9-11.

He would not have pretended to do the one, if he could not have

done the other; that ye may know that the Son of man, the

Messiah, has power on earth to forgive sin, that I have that

power, Thou that art sick of the palsy, arise, take up thy

bed. Now,

1. This was a suitable argument in itself. He could not have

cured the disease, which was the effect, if he could not have taken

away the sin, which was the cause. And besides, his curing diseases was

a figure of his pardoning sin, for sin is the disease of the soul; when

it is pardoned, it is healed. He that could by a word accomplish the

sign, could doubtless perform the thing signified,

2. It was suited to them. These carnal scribes would be more affected

with such a suitable effect of a pardon as the cure of the disease, and

be sooner convinced by it, than by any other more spiritual

consequences; therefore it was proper enough to appeal, whether it is

easier to say, Thy sins are forgiven thee, or to say, Arise,

and walk? The removing of the punishment as such, was the remitting

of the sin; he that could go so far in the cure, no doubt could perfect

it. See

Isa. xxxiii. 24.

     

VI. The cure of the sick man, and the impression it made upon the

people,

v. 12.

He not only arise out of his bed, perfectly well, but, to show

that he had perfect strength restored to him, he took up his

bed, because it lay in the way, and went forth before them

all; and they were all amazed, as well they might, and

glorified God, as indeed they ought; saying, “We never saw it

on this fashion; never were such wonders as these done before in

our time.” Note, Christ’s works were without precedent. When we see

what he does in healing souls, we must own that we never saw the

like.






Christ among Publicans and Sinners.

     

13 And he went forth again by the sea side; and all the

multitude resorted unto him, and he taught them.

  14 And as he passed by, he saw Levi the son of Alphæus

sitting at the receipt of custom, and said unto him, Follow me.

And he arose and followed him.

  15 And it came to pass, that, as Jesus sat at meat in his

house, many publicans and sinners sat also together with Jesus

and his disciples: for there were many, and they followed him.

  16 And when the scribes and Pharisees saw him eat with

publicans and sinners, they said unto his disciples, How is it

that he eateth and drinketh with publicans and sinners?

  17 When Jesus heard it, he saith unto them, They that are

whole have no need of the physician, but they that are sick: I

came not to call the righteous, but sinners to repentance.

     

Here is,

     

I. Christ preaching by the sea-side

(v. 13),

whither he went for room, because he found, upon second trial,

no house or street large enough to contain his auditory; but upon the

strand there might come as many as would. It should seem by this, that

our Lord Jesus had a strong voice, and could and did speak loud; for

wisdom crieth without in the places of concourse.

Wherever he goes, though it be to the sea-side, multitudes resort to

him. Wherever the doctrine of Christ is faithfully preached, though

it be driven into corners or into deserts, we must follow it.

     

II. His calling Levi; the same with Matthew, who had a place in the

custom-house at Capernaum, from which he was denominated a

publican; his place fixed him by the water-side, and thither

Christ went to meet with him, and to give him an effectual call. This

Levi is here said to be the son of Alpheus or Cleophas,

husband to that Mary who was sister or near kinswoman to the virgin

Mary and if so, he was own brother to James the less, and Jude, and

Simon the Canaanite, so that there were four brothers of them apostles,

It is probable that Matthew was but a loose extravagant young man, or

else, being a Jew, he would never have been a publican. However, Christ

called him to follow him. Paul, though a Pharisee, had been one

of the chief of sinners, and yet was called to be an apostle. With God,

through Christ, there is mercy to pardon the greatest sins, and grace

to sanctify the greatest sinners. Matthew, that had been a publican,

became an evangelist, the first that put pen to paper, and the

fullest in writing the life of Christ. Great sin and scandal

before conversion, are no bar to great gifts, graces, and advancements,

after; nay, God may be the more glorified. Christ prevented him with

this call; in bodily cures, ordinarily, he was sought unto, but

in these spiritual cures, he was found of them that sought him

not. For this is the great evil and peril of the disease of sin,

that those who are under it, desire not to be made whole.

     

III. His familiar converse with publicans and sinners,
v. 15.

We are here told,

1. That Christ sat at meat in Levi’s house, who invited him

and his disciples to the farewell-feast he made to his friends,

when he left all to attend on Christ: such a feast he made, as Elisha

did

(1 Kings xix. 21),

to show, not only with what cheerfulness in himself, but with what

thankfulness to God, he quitted all, in compliance with Christ’s call.

Fitly did he make the day of his espousals to Christ a festival

day. This was also to testify his respect to Christ, and the grateful

sense he had of his kindness, in snatching him from the receipt of

custom as a brand out of the burning.

2. That many publicans and sinners sat with Christ in Levi’s

house (for there were many belonging to that custom-house); and

they followed him. They followed Levi; so some understand it,

supposing that, like Zaccheus, he was chief among the publicans,

and was rich; and for that reason, the inferior sort of them

attended him for what they could get. I rather take it, that they

followed Jesus because of the report they had heard of him. They

did not for conscience-sake leave all to follow him, but for

curiosity-sake they came to Levi’s feast, to see him; whatever

brought them thither, they were sitting with Jesus and his

disciples. The publicans are here and elsewhere ranked with

sinners, the worst of sinners.

(1.) Because commonly they were such; so general were the

corruptions in the execution of that office, oppressing, exacting, and

taking bribes or fees to extortion, and accusing falsely,
Luke iii. 13, 14.

A faithful fair-dealing publican was so rare, even at Rome, that one

Sabinus, who kept a clean reputation in that office, was, after his

death, honoured with this inscription, Kalos

telonesantiHere lies an honest publican.

(2.) Because the Jews had a particular antipathy to them and their

office, as an affront to the liberty of their nation and a badge of

their slavery, and therefore put them into an ill name, and thought it

scandalous to be seen in their company. Such as these our blessed Lord

was pleased to converse with, when he appeared in the likeness of

sinful flesh.

     

IV. The offence which the scribes and Pharisees took at this,

v. 16.

They would not come to hear him preach, which they might have been

convinced the edified by; but they would come themselves to see

him sit with publicans and sinners, which they would be provoked

by. They endeavoured to put the disciples out of conceit with their

Master, as a man not of such sanctity and severe morals as became his

character; and therefore put the question to them. How is it, that

he eateth and drinketh with publicans and sinners? Note, It is no

new thing for that which is both well-done, and

well-designed, to be misrepresented, and turned to the reproach

of the wisest and best of men.

     

V. Christ’s justification of himself in it,

v. 17.

He stood to what he did, and would not withdraw, though the Pharisees

were offended, as Peter afterwards did,

Gal. ii. 12.

Note, Those are too tender of their own good name, who, to

preserve it with some nice people, will decline a good work.

Christ would not do so. They thought the publicans were to be

hated. “No,” saith Christ, “they are to be pitied, they

are sick and need a physician; they are sinners, and need

a Saviour.” They thought Christ’s character should separate him from

them; “No,” saith Christ, “my commission directs me to them; I came

not to call the righteous, but sinners to repentance. If the world

had been righteous, there had been no occasion for my coming,

either to preach repentance, or to purchase remission. It

is to a sinful world that I am sent, and therefore my business

lies most with those that are the greatest sinners in it.” Or thus;

I am not come to call the righteous, the proud Pharisees that

think themselves righteous, that ask, Wherein shall we return?

(Mal. iii. 7),

Of what shall we repent? But poor publicans, that own themselves to be

sinners, and are glad to be invited and encouraged to repent.” It is

good dealing with those that there is hope of; now there is more

hope of a fool than of one that is wise in his own conceit,
Prov. xxvi. 12.












The Hypocritical Rigour of the Pharisees.

     

18 And the disciples of John and of the Pharisees used to fast:

and they come and say unto him, Why do the disciples of John and

of the Pharisees fast, but thy disciples fast not?

  19 And Jesus said unto them, Can the children of the

bridechamber fast, while the bridegroom is with them? as long as

they have the bridegroom with them, they cannot fast.

  20 But the days will come, when the bridegroom shall be taken

away from them, and then shall they fast in those days.

  21 No man also seweth a piece of new cloth on an old garment:

else the new piece that filled it up taketh away from the old,

and the rent is made worse.

  22 And no man putteth new wine into old bottles: else the new

wine doth burst the bottles, and the wine is spilled, and the

bottles will be marred: but new wine must be put into new

bottles.

  23 And it came to pass, that he went through the corn fields on

the sabbath day; and his disciples began, as they went, to pluck

the ears of corn.

  24 And the Pharisees said unto him, Behold, why do they on the

sabbath day that which is not lawful?

  25 And he said unto them, Have ye never read what David did,

when he had need, and was an hungred, he, and they that were with

him?

  26 How he went into the house of God in the days of Abiathar

the high priest, and did eat the showbread, which is not lawful

to eat but for the priests, and gave also to them which were with

him?

  27 And he said unto them, The sabbath was made for man, and not

man for the sabbath:

  28 Therefore the Son of man is Lord also of the sabbath.

     

Christ had been put to justify himself in conversing with

publicans and sinners: here he is put to justify his disciples;

and in what they do according to his will he will justify them, and

bear them out.

     

I. He justifies them in their not fasting, which was turned to

their reproach by the Pharisees. Why do the Pharisees and the disciples

of John fast? They used to fast, the Pharisees fasted twice

in the week

(Luke xviii. 12),

and probably the disciples of John did so too; and, it should seem,

this very day, when Christ and his disciples were feasting in Levi’s

house, was their fast-day, for the word is

nesteuousithey do fast, or are fasting,

which aggravated the offence. Thus apt are strict professors to make

their own practice a standard, and to censure and condemn all that do

not fully come up to it. They invidiously suggest that if Christ went

among sinners to do them good, as he had pleaded, yet the

disciples went to indulge their appetites, for they never knew what it

was to fast, or to deny themselves. Note, Ill-will always suspects the

worst.

     

Two things Christ pleads in excuse of his disciples not

fasting.

     

1. That these were easy days with them, and fasting was not so

seasonable now as it would be hereafter,

v. 19, 20.

There is a time for all things. Those that enter into the married

state, must expect care and trouble in the flesh, and yet,

during the nuptial solemnity, they are merry, and think it becomes them

to be so; it was very absurd for Samson’s bride to weep before

him, during the days that the feast lasted,
Judg. xiv. 17.

Christ and his disciples were but newly married, the bridegroom was

yet with them, the nuptials were yet in the celebrating

(Matthew’s particularly); when the bridegroom should be removed from

them to the far country, about his business, then would be a proper

time to sit as a widow, in solitude and fasting.

     

2. That these were early days with them, and they were not so

able for the severe exercises of religion as hereafter they would be.

The Pharisees had long accustomed themselves to such austerities; and

John Baptist himself came neither eating nor drinking. His disciples

from the first inured themselves to hardships, and thus found it easier

to bear strict and frequent fasting, but it was not so with Christ’s

disciples; their Master came eating and drinking, and had not

bred them up to the difficult services of religion as yet, for it was

all in good time. To put them upon such frequent fasting at first,

would be a discouragement to them, and perhaps drive them off from

following Christ; it would be of as ill consequence as putting new

wine into old casks, or sewing new cloth to that which is

worn thin and threadbare,

v. 21, 22.

Note, God graciously considers the frame of young Christians,

that are weak and tender, and so must we; nor must we

expect more than the work of the day in its day, and that day

according to the strength, because it is not in our hands to give

strength according to the day. Many contract an antipathy to some kind

of food, otherwise good, by being surfeited with it when they are

young; so, many entertain prejudices against the exercises of devotion

by being burthened with them, and made to serve with an

offering, at their setting out. Weak Christians must take heed of

over-tasking themselves, and of making the yoke of Christ

otherwise than as it is, easy, and sweet, and pleasant.

     

II. He justifies them in plucking the ears of corn on the sabbath

day, which, I will warrant you, a disciples of the Pharisees would

not dare to have done; for it was contrary to an express tradition of

their elders. In this instance, as in that before, they reflect upon

the discipline of Christ’s school, as if it were not so strict as that

of theirs: so common it is for those who deny the power of

godliness, to be jealous for the form, and censorious of

those who affect not their form.

     

Observe,

1. What a poor breakfast Christ’s disciples had on a sabbath-day

morning, when they were going to church

(v. 23);

they plucked the ears of corn, and that was the best they had.

They were so intent upon spiritual dainties, that they forgot even

their necessary food; and the word of Christ was to them instead

of that; and their zeal for it even ate them up. The Jews made

it a piece of religion, to eat dainty food on sabbath days, but the

disciples were content with any thing.

     

2. How even this was grudged them by the Pharisees, upon

supposition that it was not lawful to pluck the ears of corn on

the sabbath day, that that was as much a servile work as reaping

(v. 24);

Why do they on the sabbath day that which is not lawful? Note,

If Christ’s disciples do that which is unlawful, Christ will be

reflected upon, and upbraided with it, as he was here, and dishonour

will redound to his name. It is observable, that when the Pharisees

thought Christ did amiss, they told the disciples

(v. 16);

and now when they thought the disciples did amiss, they spoke to

Christ, as make-bates, that did what they could to sow discord between

Christ and his disciples, and make a breach in the family.

     

3. How Christ defended them in what they did.

     

(1.) By example. They had a good precedent for it in David’s eating the

show-bread, when he was hungry, and there was no other bread to

be had

(v. 25, 26);

Have ye never read? Note, Many of our mistakes would be

rectified, and our unjust censures of others corrected, if we would but

recollect what we have read in the scripture; appeals to that

are most convincing. “You have read that David, the man after God’s own

heart, when he was hungry, made no difficulty of eating the

show-bread, which by the law none might eat of but the priests and

their families.” Note, Ritual observances must give way to moral

obligations; and that may be done in a case of necessity, which

otherwise may not be done. This, it is said, David did in the days of

Abiathar the High-Priest; or just before the days of

Abiathar, who immediately succeeded Abimelech his father in the

pontificate, and, it is probable, was at that time his father’s deputy,

or assistant, in the office; and he it was that escaped the massacre,

and brought the ephod to David.

     

(2.) By argument. To reconcile them to the disciples’ plucking the

ears of corn, let them consider,

     

[1.] Whom the sabbath was made for

(v. 27);

it was made for man, and not man for the sabbath. This we had

not in Matthew. The sabbath is a sacred and divine institution; but we

must receive and embrace it as a privilege and a benefit, not as a task

and a drudgery. First, God never designed it to be an

imposition upon us, and therefore we must not make it so to

ourselves. Man was not made for the sabbath, for he was made a

day before the sabbath was instituted. Man was made for God, and

for his honour and service, and he just rather die than deny him; but

he was not made for the sabbath, so as to be tied up by the law

of it, from that which is necessary to the support of his life.

Secondly, God did design it to be an advantage to us, and

so we must make it, and improve it. He made if for man.

1. He had some regard to our bodies in the institution,

that they might rest, and not be tired out with the constant business

of this world

(Deut. v. 14);

that thy man-servant and thy maid-servant may rest. Now he that

intended the sabbath-rest for the repose of our bodies,

certainly never intended it should restrain us, in a case of necessity,

from fetching in the necessary supports of the body; it must be

construed so as not to contradict itself–for edification, and

not for destruction.

2. He had much more regard to our souls. The

sabbath was made a day of rest, only in order to its being a day

of holy work, a day of communion with God, a day of praise and

thanksgiving; and the rest from worldly business is therefore

necessary, that we may closely apply ourselves to this work, and spend

the whole time in it, in public and in private; but then time is

allowed us for that which is necessary to the fitting of our bodies for

the service of our souls in God’s service, and the enabling of them to

keep pace with them in that work. See here,

(1.) What a good Master we serve, all whose institutions are for

our own benefit, and if we be so wise as to observe them, we are

wise for ourselves; it is not he, but we, that are gainers by

our service.

(2.) What we should aim at in our sabbath work, even the good of

our own souls. If the sabbath was made for man, we should then ask

ourselves at night, “What am I the better for this sabbath day?”

(3.) What care we ought to take not to make those exercises of religion

burthens to ourselves or others, which God ordained to be blessings;

neither adding to the command by unreasonable strictness, nor indulging

those corruptions which are adverse to the command, for thereby we make

those devout exercises a penance to ourselves, which otherwise would be

a pleasure.

     

[2.] Whom the sabbath was made by

(v. 28);

The Son of man is Lord also of the sabbath; and therefore he

will not see the kind intentions of the institution of it frustrated by

your impositions.” Note, The sabbath days are days of the Son of

man; he is the Lord of the day, and to his honour it must be

observed; by him God made the worlds, and so it was by him that the

sabbath was first instituted; by him God gave the law at mount Sinai,

and so the fourth commandment was his law; and that

little alteration that was shortly to be made, by the shifting of it

one day forward to the first day of the week, was to be in remembrance

of his resurrection, and therefore the Christian sabbath was to

be called the Lord’s day

(Rev. i. 10),

the Lord Christ’s day; and the Son of man, Christ, as Mediator,

is always to be looked upon as Lord of the sabbath. This argument he

largely insists upon in his own justification, when he was charged with

having broken the sabbath,

John v. 16.


[Table of Contents]

[Previous]

[Next]

Matthew Henry
Commentary on the Whole Bible (1721)


Back to Bibles Net . Com – Online Christian Library

Matthew Henry’s Complete Commentary – Free Download

Contact Us


Top