BIBLES NET. COM

Matthew Henry’s Commentary – Romans I

Matthew Henry’s Complete Commentary

on the Whole Bible

Back to Biblesnet.com Home Page


[Table of Contents]

[Previous]

[Next]

Matthew Henry
Commentary on the Whole Bible (1721)




R O M A N S.

CHAP. I.



     

In this chapter we may observe,

I. The preface and introduction to the whole epistle, to

ver. 16.

II. A description of the deplorable condition of the Gentile world,

which begins the proof of the doctrine of justification by faith, here

laid down at

ver. 17.

The first is according to the then usual formality of a letter, but

intermixed with very excellent and savoury expressions.









The Apostle’s Commission. A. D. 58.

     

1 Paul, a servant of Jesus Christ, called to be an apostle,

separated unto the gospel of God,

  2 (Which he had promised afore by his prophets in the holy

scriptures,)

  3 Concerning his Son Jesus Christ our Lord, which was made of

the seed of David according to the flesh;

  4 And declared to be the Son of God with power, according to

the spirit of holiness, by the resurrection from the dead:

  5 By whom we have received grace and apostleship, for obedience

to the faith among all nations, for his name:

  6 Among whom are ye also the called of Jesus Christ:

  7 To all that be in Rome, beloved of God, called to be

saints: Grace to you and peace from God our Father, and the Lord

Jesus Christ.

     

In this paragraph we have,

     

I. The person who writes the epistle described

(v. 1):

Paul, a servant of Jesus Christ; this is his title of honour,

which he glories in, not as the Jewish teachers, Rabbi, Rabbi;

but a servant, a more immediate attendant, a steward in the house.

Called to be an apostle. Some think he alludes to his old name

Saul, which signifies one called for, or enquired after:

Christ sought him to make an apostle of him,

Acts ix. 15.

He here builds his authority upon his call; he did not run without

sending, as the false apostles did; kletos

apostoloscalled an apostle, as if this were the name

he would be called by, though he acknowledged himself not meet to be

called so,

1 Cor. xv. 9.

Separated to the gospel of God. The Pharisees had their name

from separation, because they separated themselves to the study of

the law, and might be called aphorismenoi eis ton

nomon; such a one Paul had formerly been; but now he had

changed his studies, was aphorismenos eis to Euangelion,

a gospel Pharisee, separated by the counsel of God

(Gal. i. 15),

separated from his mother’s womb, by an immediate direction of

the Spirit, and a regular ordination according to that direction

(Acts xiii. 2, 3),

by a dedication of himself to this work. He was an entire devotee to

the gospel of God, the gospel which has God for its author, the origin

and extraction of it divine and heavenly.

     

II. Having mentioned the gospel of God, he digresses, to give us an

encomium of it.

     

1. The antiquity of it. It was promised before

(v. 2);

it was no novel upstart doctrine, but of ancient standing in the

promises and prophecies of the old Testament, which did all unanimously

point at the gospel, the morning-beams that ushered in the sun of

righteousness; this not by word of mouth only, but in the

scriptures.

     

2. The subject-matter of it: it is concerning Christ,

v. 3, 4.

The prophets and apostles all bear witness to him; he is the true

treasure hid in the field of the scriptures. Observe, When Paul

mentions Christ, how he heaps up his names and titles, his Son Jesus

Christ our Lord, as one that took a pleasure in speaking of him;

and, having mentioned him, he cannot go on in his discourse without

some expression of love and honour, as here, where in one person he

shows us his two distinct natures.

(1.) His human nature: Made of the seed of David

(v. 3),

that is, born of the virgin Mary, who was of the house of David

(Luke i. 27),

as was Joseph his supposed father,

Luke ii. 4.

David is here mentioned, because of the special promises made to him

concerning the Messiah, especially his kingly office;

2 Sam. vii. 12;

Ps. cxxxii. 11, compared with Luke i. 32, 33.

(2.) His divine nature: Declared to be the Son of God

(v. 4),

the Son of God by eternal generation, or, as it is here explained,

according to the Spirit of holiness. According to the flesh,

that is, his human nature, he was of the seed of David; but,

according to the Spirit of holiness, that is, the divine nature

(as he is said to be quickened by the Spirit,
1 Pet. iii. 18,

compared with 2 Cor. xiii. 4),

he is the Son of God. The great proof or demonstration of this is

his resurrection from the dead, which proved it effectually and

undeniably. The sign of the prophet Jonas, Christ’s resurrection, was

intended for the last conviction,

Matt. xii. 39, 40.

Those that would not be convinced by that would be convinced by

nothing. So that we have here a summary of the gospel doctrine

concerning Christ’s two natures in one person.

     

3. The fruit of it

(v. 5);

By whom, that is, by Christ manifested and made known in the

gospel, we (Paul and the rest of the ministers) have received

grace and apostleship, that is, the favour to be made apostles,

Eph. iii. 8.

The apostles were made a spectacle to the world, led a life of toil,

and trouble, and hazard, were killed all the day long, and yet

Paul reckons the apostleship a favour: we may justly reckon it a great

favour to be employed in any work or service for God, whatever

difficulties or dangers we may meet with in it. This apostleship was

received for obedience to the faith, that is, to bring people to

that obedience; as Christ, so his ministers, received that they might

give. Paul’s was for this obedience among all nations, for he

was the apostle of the Gentiles,
ch. xi. 13.

Observe the description here given of the Christian profession: it is

obedience to the faith. It does not consist in a notional

knowledge or a naked assent, much less does it consist in perverse

disputings, but in obedience. This obedience to the faith answers the

law of faith, mentioned

ch. iii. 27.

The act of faith is the obedience of the understanding to God

revealing, and the product of that is the obedience of the will to God

commanding. To anticipate the ill use which might be made of the

doctrine of justification by faith without the works of the law, which

he was to explain in the following epistle, he here speaks of

Christianity as an obedience. Christ has a yoke. “Among whom are

you,
v. 6.

You Romans in this stand upon the same level with other Gentile nations

of less fame and wealth; you are all one in Christ.” The gospel

salvation is a common salvation,

Jude 3.

No respect of persons with God. The called of Jesus Christ; all

those, and those only, are brought to an obedience of the faith that

are effectually called of Jesus Christ.

     

III. The persons to whom it is written

(v. 7):

To all that are in Rome, beloved of God, called to be saints;

that is, to all the professing Christians that were in Rome, whether

Jews or Gentiles originally, whether high or low, bond or free, learned

or unlearned. Rich and poor meet together in Christ Jesus. Here is,

1. The privilege of Christians: They are beloved of God, they

are members of that body which is beloved, which is God’s

Hephzibah, in which his delight is. We speak of God’s love by

his bounty and beneficence, and so he hath a common love to all mankind

and a peculiar love for true believers; and between these there is a

love he hath for all the body of visible Christians.

2. The duty of Christians; and that is to be holy, for hereunto are

they called, called to be saints, called to salvation through

sanctification. Saints, and only saints, are beloved of God with a

special and peculiar love. Kletois hagioiscalled

saints, saints in profession; it were well if all that are called

saints were saints indeed. Those that are called saints should labour

to answer to the name; otherwise, though it is an honour and a

privilege, yet it will be of little avail at the great day to have been

called saints, if we be not really so.

     

IV. The apostolical benediction

(v. 7):

Grace to you and peace. This is one of the tokens in every

epistle; and it hath not only the affection of a good wish, but the

authority of a blessing. The priests under the law were to bless the

people, and so are gospel ministers, in the name of the Lord. In this

usual benediction observe,

1. The favours desired: Grace and peace. The Old-Testament

salutation was, Peace be to you; but now grace is

prefixed–grace, that is, the favour of God towards us or the

work of God in us; both are previously requisite to true peace. All

gospel blessings are included in these two: grace and peace.

Peace, that is all good; peace with God, peace in your own

consciences, peace with all that are about you; all these founded in

grace.

2. The fountain of those favours, from God our Father, and the Lord

Jesus Christ. All good comes,

(1.) From God as a Father; he hath put himself into that relation to

engage and encourage our desires and expectations; we are taught, when

we come for grace and peace, to call him our Father.

(2.) From the Lord Jesus Christ, as Mediator, and the great

feoffee in trust for the conveying and securing of these benefits. We

have them from his fulness, peace from the fulness of his merit, grace

from the fulness of his Spirit.









Paul’s Love to the Roman Christians. A. D. 58.

     

8 First, I thank my God through Jesus Christ for you all, that

your faith is spoken of throughout the whole world.

  9 For God is my witness, whom I serve with my spirit in the

gospel of his Son, that without ceasing I make mention of you

always in my prayers;

  10 Making request, if by any means now at length I might have a

prosperous journey by the will of God to come unto you.

  11 For I long to see you, that I may impart unto you some

spiritual gift, to the end ye may be established;

  12 That is, that I may be comforted together with you by the

mutual faith both of you and me.

  13 Now I would not have you ignorant, brethren, that oftentimes

I purposed to come unto you, (but was let hitherto,) that I might

have some fruit among you also, even as among other Gentiles.

  14 I am debtor both to the Greeks, and to the Barbarians; both

to the wise, and to the unwise.

  15 So, as much as in me is, I am ready to preach the gospel to

you that are at Rome also.

     

We may here observe,

     

I. His thanksgivings for them

(v. 8):

First, I thank my God. It is good to begin every thing with

blessing God, to make that the alpha and omega of every song,

in every thing to give thanks.My God. He speaks this

with delight and triumph. In all our thanksgivings, it is good for us

to eye God as our God; this makes every mercy sweet, when we can say of

God, “He is mine in covenant.”–Through Jesus Christ. All our

duties and performances are pleasing to God only through Jesus Christ,

praises as well as prayers.–For you all. We must express our

love to our friends, not only by praying for them, but by praising God

for them. God must have the glory of all the comfort we have in our

friends; for every creature is that to us, and no more, which God makes

it to be. Many of these Romans Paul had no personal acquaintance with,

and yet he could heartily rejoice in their gifts and graces. When some

of the Roman Christians met him

(Acts xxviii. 15),

he thanked God for them, and took courage; but here his true catholic

love extends itself further, and he thanks God for them all; not

only for those among them that were his helpers in Christ, and that

bestowed much labour upon him (of whom he speaks

ch. xvi. 3, 6),

but for them all.–That your faith is spoken of. Paul travelled

up and down from place to place, and, wherever he came, he heard great

commendations of the Christians at Rome, which he mentions, not to make

them proud, but to quicken them to answer the general character people

gave of them, and the general expectation people had from them. The

greater reputation a man hath for religion, the more careful he should

be to preserve it, because a little folly spoils him that is in

reputation,
Eccl. x. 1.–Throughout

the whole world, that is, the Roman empire, into which the Roman

Christians, upon Claudius’s edict to banish all the Jews from Rome,

were scattered abroad, but had now returned, and, it seems, left a very

good report behind them, wherever they had been, in all the churches.

There was this good effect of their sufferings: if they had not been

persecuted, they had not been famous. This was indeed a good name, a

name for good things with God and good people. As the elders of old, so

these Romans, obtained a good report through faith,
Heb. xi. 2.

It is a desirable thing to be famous for faith. The faith of the Roman

Christians came to be thus talked of, not only because it was excelling

in itself, but because it was eminent and observable in its

circumstances. Rome was a city upon a hill, every one took notice of

what was done there. Thus those who have many eyes upon them have need

to walk circumspectly, for what they do, good or bad, will be spoken

of. The church of Rome was then a flourishing church; but since that

time how is the gold become dim! How is the most fine gold changed!

Rome is not what it was. She was then espoused a chaste virgin to

Christ, and excelled in beauty; but she has since degenerated,

dealt treacherously, and embraced the bosom of a stranger; so that

(as that good old book, the Practice of Piety, makes appear in

no less than twenty-six instances) even the epistle to the

Romans is now an epistle against the Romans; little reason

has she therefore to boast of her former credit.

     

II. His prayer for them,

v. 9.

Though a famous flourishing church, yet they had need to be prayed for;

they had not yet attained. Paul mentions this as an instance of

his love to them. One of the greatest kindnesses we can do our friends,

and sometimes the only kindness that is in the power of our hands, is,

by prayer to recommend them to the loving-kindness of God. From Paul’s

example here we may learn,

1. Constancy in prayer: Always without ceasing. He did himself

observe the same rules he gave to others,

Eph. vi. 18; 1 Thess. v. 17.

Not that Paul did nothing else but pray, but he kept up stated times

for the solemn performance of that duty, and those very frequent, and

observed without fail.

2. Charity in prayer: I make mention of you. Though he had not

particular acquaintance with them, nor interest in them, yet he prayed

for them; not only for all saints in general, but he made express

mention of them. It is not unfit sometimes to be express in our prayers

for particular churches and places; not to inform God, but to affect

ourselves. We are likely to have the most comfort in those friends that

we pray most for. Concerning this he makes a solemn appeal to the

searcher of hearts: For God is my witness. It was in a weighty

matter, and in a thing known only to God and his own heart, that he

used this asseveration. It is very comfortable to be able to call God

to witness to our sincerity and constancy in the discharge of a duty.

God is particularly a witness to our secret prayers, the matter of

them, the manner of the performance; then our Father sees in secret,

Matt. vi. 6.

God, whom I serve with my spirit. Those that serve God with

their spirits may, with a humble confidence, appeal to him; hypocrites

who rest in bodily exercise cannot. His particular prayer, among many

other petitions he put up for them, was that he might have an

opportunity of paying them a visit

(v. 10):

Making request, if by any means, &c. Whatever comfort we desire

to find in any creature, we must have recourse to God for it by prayer;

for our times are in his hand, and all our ways at his disposal.

The expressions here used intimate that he was very desirous of such an

opportunity: if by any means; that he had long and often been

disappointed: now at length; and yet that he submitted it to the

divine Providence: a prosperous journey by the will of God. As

in our purposes, so in our desires, we must still remember to insert

this, if the Lord will,
James iv. 15.

Our journeys are prosperous or otherwise according to the will of God,

comfortable or not as he pleases.

     

III. His great desire to see them, with the reasons of it,

v. 11-15.

He had heard so much of them that he had a great desire to be better

acquainted with them. Fruitful Christians are as much the joy as barren

professors are the grief of faithful ministers. Accordingly, he

often purposed to come, but was let hitherto

(v. 13),

for man purposeth, but God disposeth. He was hindered by other business

that took him off, by his care of other churches, whose affairs were

pressing; and Paul was for doing that first, not which was most

pleasant (then he would have gone to Rome), but which was most

needful–a good example to ministers, who must not consult their own

inclinations so much as the necessity of their people’s souls. Paul

desired to visit these Romans,

     

1. That they might be edified

(v. 11):

That I may impart unto you. He received, that he might

communicate. Never were full breasts so desirous to be drawn out to the

sucking infant as Paul’s head and heart were to be imparting spiritual

gifts, that is, preaching to them. A good sermon is a good gift, so

much the better for being a spiritual gift.–To the end you may be

established. Having commended their flourishing he here expresses

his desire of their establishment, that as they grew upward in the

branches they might grow downward in the root. The best saints, while

they are in such a shaking world as this, have need to be more and more

established; and spiritual gifts are of special use for our

establishment.

     

2. That he might be comforted,

v. 12.

What he heard of their flourishing in grace was so much a joy to him

that it must needs be much more so to behold it. Paul could take

comfort in the fruit of the labours of other ministers.–By the

mutual faith both of you and me, that is, our mutual faithfulness

and fidelity. It is very comfortable when there is a mutual confidence

between minister and people, they confiding in him as a faithful

minister, and he in them as a faithful people. Or, the mutual work of

faith, which is love; they rejoiced in the expressions of one another’s

love, or communicating their faith one to another. It is very

refreshing to Christians to compare notes about their spiritual

concerns; thus are they sharpened, as iron sharpens iron.–That I

might have some fruit,
v. 13.

Their edification would be his advantage, it would be fruit abounding

to a good account. Paul minded his work, as one that believed the more

good he did the greater would his reward be.

     

3. That he might discharge his trust as the apostle of the Gentiles

(v. 14):

I am a debtor.

(1.) His receivings made him a debtor; for they were talents he was

entrusted with to trade for his Master’s honour. We should think of

this when we covet great things, that all our receivings put us in

debt; we are but stewards of our Lord’s goods.

(2.) His office made him a debtor. He was a debtor as he was an

apostle; he was called and sent to work, and had engaged to mind it.

Paul had improved his talent, and laboured in his work, and done as

much good as ever any man did, and yet, in reflection upon it, he still

writes himself debtor; for, when we have done all, we are but

unprofitable servants.–Debtor to the Greeks, and to the

barbarians, that is, as the following words explain it, to the

wise and to the unwise. The Greeks fancied themselves to have the

monopoly of wisdom, and looked upon all the rest of the world as

barbarians, comparatively so; not cultivated with learning and arts as

they were. Now Paul was a debtor to both, looked upon himself as

obliged to do all the good he could both to the one and to the other.

Accordingly, we find him paying his debt, both in his preaching and in

his writing, doing good both to Greeks and barbarians, and

suiting his discourse to the capacity of each. You may observe a

difference between his sermon at Lystra among the plain Lycaonians

(Acts xiv. 15,

&c.) and his sermon at Athens among the polite philosophers,

Acts xvii. 22,

&c. He delivered both as debtor to each, giving to each their portion.

Though a plain preacher, yet, as debtor to the wise, he speaks wisdom

among those that are perfect,

1 Cor. ii. 6.

For these reasons he was ready, if he had an opportunity, to preach

the gospel at Rome,
v. 15.

Though a public place, though a perilous place, where Christianity met

with a great deal of opposition, yet Paul was ready to run the risk at

Rome, if called to it: I am readyprothymon. It

denotes a great readiness of mind, and that he was very forward to it.

What he did was not for filthy lucre, but of a ready mind. It is an

excellent thing to be ready to meet every opportunity of doing or

getting good.




Paul’s Discourse on Justification. A. D. 58.

     

16 For I am not ashamed of the gospel of Christ: for it is the

power of God unto salvation to every one that believeth; to the

Jew first, and also to the Greek.

  17 For therein is the righteousness of God revealed from faith

to faith: as it is written, The just shall live by faith.

  18 For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all

ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who hold the truth in

unrighteousness;

     

Paul here enters upon a large discourse of justification, in the latter

part of this chapter laying down his thesis, and, in order to the proof

of it, describing the deplorable condition of the Gentile world. His

transition is very handsome, and like an orator: he was ready to preach

the gospel at Rome, though a place where the gospel was run down by

those that called themselves the wits; for, saith he, I am

not ashamed of it,
v. 16.

There is a great deal in the gospel which such a man as Paul might be

tempted to be ashamed of, especially that he whose gospel it is was a

man hanged upon a tree, that the doctrine of it was plain, had little

in it to set it off among scholars, the professors of it were mean and

despised, and every where spoken against; yet Paul was not ashamed to

own it. I reckon him a Christian indeed that is neither ashamed of the

gospel nor a shame to it. The reason of this bold profession, taken

from the nature and excellency of the gospel, introduces his

dissertation.

     

I. The proposition,

v. 16, 17.

The excellency of the gospel lies in this, that it reveals to us,

     

1. The salvation of believers as the end: It is the power of God

unto salvation. Paul is not ashamed of the gospel, how mean and

contemptible soever it may appear to a carnal eye; for the power of

God works by it the salvation of all that believe; it shows us

the way of salvation

(Acts xvi. 17),

and is the great charter by which salvation is conveyed and made over

to us. But,

(1.) It is through the power of God; without that power the

gospel is but a dead letter; the revelation of the gospel is the

revelation of the arm of the Lord

(Isa. liii. 1),

as power went along with the word of Christ to heal diseases.

(2.) It is to those, and those only, that believe. Believing interests

us in the gospel salvation; to others it is hidden. The medicine

prepared will not cure the patient if it be not taken.–To the Jew

first. The lost sheep of the house of Israel had the first offer

made them, both by Christ and his apostles. You first

(Acts iii. 26),

but upon their refusal the apostles turned to the Gentiles,

Acts xiii. 46.

Jews and Gentiles now stand upon the same level, both equally miserable

without a Saviour, and both equally welcome to the Saviour,

Col. iii. 11.

Such doctrine as this was surprising to the Jews, who had hitherto been

the peculiar people, and had looked with scorn upon the Gentile world;

but the long-expected Messiah proves a light to enlighten the

Gentiles, as well as the glory of his people Israel.

     

2. The justification of believers as the way

(v. 17):

For therein, that is, in this gospel, which Paul so much

triumphs in, is the righteousness of God revealed. Our misery

and ruin being the product and consequent of our iniquity, that which

will show us the way of salvation must needs show us the way of

justification, and this the gospel does. The gospel makes known a

righteousness. While God is a just and holy God, and we are guilty

sinners, it is necessary we should have a righteousness wherein to

appear before him; and, blessed be God, there is such a righteousness

brought in by Messiah the prince

(Dan. ix. 24)

and revealed in the gospel; a righteousness, that is, a

gracious method of reconciliation and acceptance, notwithstanding the

guilt of our sins. This evangelical righteousness,

(1.) Is called the righteousness of God; it is of God’s

appointing, of God’s approving and accepting. It is so called to cut

off all pretensions to a righteousness resulting from the merit of our

own works. It is the righteousness of Christ, who is God, resulting

from a satisfaction of infinite value.

(2.) It is said to be from faith to faith, from the faithfulness

of God revealing to the faith of man receiving (so some); from the

faith of dependence upon God, and dealing with him immediately, as Adam

before the fall, to the faith of dependence upon a Mediator, and so

dealing with God (so others); from the first faith, by which we are put

into a justified state, to after faith, by which we live, and are

continued in that state: and the faith that justifies us is no less

than our taking Christ for our Saviour, and becoming true Christians,

according to the tenour of the baptismal covenant; from faith

engrafting us into Christ, to faith deriving virtue from him as our

root: both implied in the next words, The just shall live by faith.

Just by faith, there is faith justifying us; live by faith,

there is faith maintaining us; and so there is a righteousness from

faith to faith. Faith is all in all, both in the beginning and

progress of a Christian life. It is not from faith to works, as if

faith put us into a justified state, and then works preserved and

maintained us in it, but it is all along from faith to faith, as

2 Cor. iii. 18,

from glory to glory; it is increasing, continuing, persevering

faith, faith pressing forward, and getting ground of unbelief. To show

that this is no novel upstart doctrine, he quotes for it that famous

scripture in the Old Testament, so often mentioned in the New

(Hab. ii. 4):

The just shall live by faith. Being justified by faith he shall

live by it both the life of grace and of glory. The prophet there had

placed himself upon the watch-tower, expecting some extraordinary

discoveries

(v. 1),

and the discovery was of the certainty of the appearance of the

promised Messiah in the fulness of time, not withstanding seeming

delays. This is there called the vision, by way of eminence, as

elsewhere the promise; and while that time is coming, as well as

when it has come, the just shall live by faith. Thus is the

evangelical righteousness from faith to faith–from Old-Testament faith

in a Christ to come to New-Testament faith in a Christ already

come.

     

II. The proof of this proposition, that both Jews and Gentiles stand in

need of a righteousness wherein to appear before God, and that neither

the one nor the other have nay of their own to plead. Justification

must be either by faith or works. It cannot be by works, which he

proves at large by describing the works both of Jews and Gentiles; and

therefore he concludes it must be by faith,

ch. iii. 20, 28.

The apostle, like a skilful surgeon, before he applies the plaster,

searches the wound–endeavours first to convince of guilt and wrath,

and then to show the way of salvation. This makes the gospel the more

welcome. We must first see the righteousness of God condemning, and

then the righteousness of God justifying will appear worthy of all

acceptation. In general

(v. 18),

the wrath of God is revealed. The light of nature and the light

of the law reveal the wrath of God from sin to sin. It is well for us

that the gospel reveals the justifying righteousness of God from faith

to faith. The antithesis is observable. Here is,

     

1. The sinfulness of man described; he reduceth it to two heads,

ungodliness and unrighteousness; ungodliness against the laws of

the first table, unrighteousness against those of the second.

     

2. The cause of that sinfulness, and that is, holding the truth in

unrighteousness. Some communes notitæ, some ideas they had

of the being of God, and of the difference of good and evil; but they

held them in unrighteousness, that is, they knew and professed them in

a consistency with their wicked courses. They held the truth as a

captive or prisoner, that it should not influence them, as otherwise it

would. An unrighteous wicked heart is the dungeon in which many a good

truth is detained and buried. Holding fast the form of sound words

in faith and love is the root of all religion

(2 Tim. i. 13),

but holding it fast in unrighteousness is the root of all sin.

     

3. The displeasure of God against it: The wrath of God is revealed

from heaven; not only in the written word, which is given by

inspiration of God (the Gentiles had not that), but in the

providences of God, his judgments executed upon sinners, which do not

spring out of the dust, or fall out by chance, nor are they to be

ascribed to second causes, but they are a revelation from heaven. Or

wrath from heaven is revealed; it is not the wrath of a man like

ourselves, but wrath from heaven, therefore the more terrible

and the more unavoidable.















The Excellency of the Gospel. A. D. 58.

     

19 Because that which may be known of God is manifest in them;

for God hath showed it unto them.

  20 For the invisible things of him from the creation of the

world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are

made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are

without excuse:

  21 Because that, when they knew God, they glorified him not

as God, neither were thankful; but became vain in their

imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened.

  22 Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools,

  23 And changed the glory of the uncorruptible God into an image

made like to corruptible man, and to birds, and four footed

beasts, and creeping things.

  24 Wherefore God also gave them up to uncleanness through the

lusts of their own hearts, to dishonour their own bodies between

themselves:

  25 Who changed the truth of God into a lie, and worshipped and

served the creature more than the Creator, who is blessed for

ever. Amen.

  26 For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for

even their women did change the natural use into that which is

against nature:

  27 And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the

woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men

working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that

recompence of their error which was meet.

  28 And even as they did not like to retain God in their

knowledge, God gave them over to a reprobate mind, to do those

things which are not convenient;

  29 Being filled with all unrighteousness, fornication,

wickedness, covetousness, maliciousness; full of envy, murder,

debate, deceit, malignity; whisperers,

  30 Backbiters, haters of God, despiteful, proud, boasters,

inventors of evil things, disobedient to parents,

  31 Without understanding, covenant-breakers, without natural

affection, implacable, unmerciful:

  32 Who knowing the judgment of God, that they which commit such

things are worthy of death, not only do the same, but have

pleasure in them that do them.

     

In this last part of the chapter the apostle applies what he had said

particularly to the Gentile world, in which we may observe,

     

I. The means and helps they had to come to the knowledge of God. Though

they had not such a knowledge of his law as Jacob and Israel had

(Ps. cxlvii. 20),

yet among them he left not himself without witness

(Acts xiv. 17):

For that which may be known, &c.,

v. 19, 20.

Observe,

     

1. What discoveries they had: That which may be known of God is

manifest, en autoisamong them; that is, there

were some even among them that had the knowledge of God, were convinced

of the existence of one supreme Numen. The philosophy of

Pythagoras, Plato, and the Stoics, discovered a great deal of the

knowledge of God, as appears by abundance of testimonies. That which

may be known, which implies that there is a great deal which may

not be known. The being of God may be apprehended, but cannot be

comprehended. We cannot by searching find him out,

Job xi. 7-9.

Finite understandings cannot perfectly know an infinite being; but,

blessed be God, there is that which may be known, enough to lead us to

our chief end, the glorifying and enjoying of him; and these things

revealed belong to us and to our children, while secret things are not

to be pried into,

Deut. xxix. 29.

     

2. Whence they had these discoveries: God hath shown it to them.

Those common natural notions which they had of God were imprinted upon

their hearts by the God of nature himself, who is the Father of

lights. This sense of a Deity, and a regard to that Deity, are so

connate with the human nature that some think we are to distinguish men

from brutes by these rather than by reason.

     

3. By what way and means these discoveries and notices which they had

were confirmed and improved, namely, by the work of creation

(v. 20);

For the invisible things of God, &c.

     

(1.) Observe what they knew: The invisible things of him, even his

eternal power and Godhead. Though God be not the object of sense,

yet he hath discovered and made known himself by those things that are

sensible. The power and Godhead of God are invisible things, and yet

are clearly seen in their products. He works in secret

(Job xxiii. 8, 9; Ps. cxxxix. 15;

Eccl. xi. 5),

but manifests what he has wrought, and therein makes known his power

and Godhead, and others of his attributes which natural light

apprehends in the idea of a God. They could not come by natural light

to the knowledge of the three persons in the Godhead (though some fancy

they have found footsteps of this in Plato’s writings), but they did

come to the knowledge of the Godhead, at least so much knowledge as was

sufficient to have kept them from idolatry. This was that truth which

they held in unrighteousness.

     

(2.) How they knew it: By the things that are made, which could

not make themselves, nor fall into such an exact order and harmony by

any casual hits; and therefore must have been produced by some first

cause or intelligent agent, which first cause could be no other than an

eternal powerful God. See

Ps. xix. 1;

Isa. xl. 26; Acts xvii. 24.

The workman is known by his work. The variety, multitude, order,

beauty, harmony, different nature, and excellent contrivance, of the

things that are made, the direction of them to certain ends, and the

concurrence of all the parts to the good and beauty of the whole, do

abundantly prove a Creator and his eternal power and Godhead. Thus did

the light shine in the darkness. And this from the creation of the

world. Understand it either,

[1.] As the topic from which the knowledge of them is drawn. To evince

this truth, we have recourse to the great work of creation. And some

think this ktisis kosmou, this creature of the

world (as it may be read), is to be understood of man, the

ktisis kat exochenthe most remarkable creature

of the lower world, called ktisis,
Mark xvi. 15.

The frame and structure of human bodies, and especially the most

excellent powers, faculties, and capacities of human souls, do

abundantly prove that there is a Creator, and that he is God. Or,

[2.] As the date of the discovery. It as old as the creation of the

world. In this sense apo ktiseos is most frequently used

in scripture. These notices concerning God are not any modern

discoveries, hit upon of late, but ancient truths, which were from the

beginning. The way of the acknowledgement of God is a good old way; it

was from the beginning. Truth got the start of error.

     

II. Their gross idolatry, notwithstanding these discoveries that God

made to them of himself; described here,

v. 21-23, 25.

We shall the less wonder at the inefficacy of these natural discoveries

to prevent the idolatry of the Gentiles if we remember how prone even

the Jews, who had scripture light to guide them, were to idolatry; so

miserably are the degenerate sons of men plunged in the mire of sense.

Observe,

     

1. The inward cause of their idolatry,

v. 21, 22.

They are therefore without excuse, in that they did know God, and from

what they knew might easily infer that it was their duty to worship

him, and him only. Though some have greater light and means of

knowledge than others, yet all have enough to leave them inexcusable.

But the mischief of it was that,

(1.) They glorified him not as God. Their affections towards

him, and their awe and adoration of him, did not keep pace with their

knowledge. To glorify him as God is to glorify him only; for there can

be but one infinite: but they did not so glorify him, for they set up a

multitude of other deities. To glorify him as God is to worship him

with spiritual worship; but they made images of him. Not to glorify God

as God is in effect not to glorify him at all; to respect him as a

creature is not to glorify him, but to dishonour him.

(2.) Neither were they thankful; not thankful for the favours in

general they received from God (insensibleness of God’s mercies is at

the bottom of our sinful departures from him); not thankful in

particular for the discoveries God was pleased to make of himself to

them. Those that do not improve the means of knowledge and grace are

justly reckoned unthankful for them.

(3.) But they became vain in their imaginations, en tois

dialogismoisin their reasonings, in their practical

inferences. They had a great deal of knowledge of general truths

(v. 19),

but no prudence to apply them to particular cases. Or, in their notions

of God, and the creation of the world, and the origination of mankind,

and the chief good; in these things, when they quitted the plain truth,

they soon disputed themselves into a thousand vain and foolish fancies.

The several opinions and hypotheses of the various sects of

philosophers concerning these things were so many vain imaginations.

When truth is forsaken, errors multiply in

infinituminfinitely.

(4.) And their foolish heart was darkened. The foolishness and

practical wickedness of the heart cloud and darken the intellectual

powers and faculties. Nothing tends more to the blinding and perverting

of the understanding than the corruption and depravedness of the will

and affections.

(5.) Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools,
v. 22.

This looks black upon the philosophers, the pretenders to wisdom and

professors of it. Those that had the most luxuriant fancy, in framing

to themselves the idea of a God, fell into the most gross and absurd

conceits: and it was the just punishment of their pride and

self-conceitedness. It has been observed that the most refined nations,

that made the greatest show of wisdom, were the arrantest fools in

religion. The barbarians adored the sun and moon, which of all others

was the most specious idolatry; while the learned Egyptians worshipped

an ox and an onion. The Grecians, who excelled them in wisdom, adored

diseases and human passions. The Romans, the wisest of all, worshipped

the furies. And at this day the poor Americans worship the thunder;

while the ingenious Chinese adore the devil. Thus the world by

wisdom knew not God,
1 Cor. i. 21.

As a profession of wisdom is an aggravation of folly, so a proud

conceit of wisdom is the cause of a great deal of folly. Hence we read

of few philosophers who were converted to Christianity; and Paul’s

preaching was no where so laughed at and ridiculed as among the learned

Athenians,

Acts xvii. 18-32.

Phaskontes einaiconceiting themselves to be wise.

The plain truth of the being of God would not content them; they

thought themselves above that, and so fell into the greatest

errors.

     

2. The outward acts of their idolatry,

v. 23-25.

(1.) Making images of God

(v. 23),

by which, as much as in them lay, they changed the glory of the

incorruptible God. Compare

Ps. cvi. 20; Jer. ii. 11.

They ascribed a deity to the most contemptible creatures, and by them

represented God. It was the greatest honour God did to man that he

made man in the image of God; but it is the greatest dishonour man has

done to God that he has made God in the image of man. This was what

God so strictly warned the Jews against,

Deut. iv. 15,

&c. This the apostle shows the folly of in his sermon at Athens,

Acts xvii. 29.

See

Isa. xl. 18, &c. xliv. 10,

&c. This is called

(v. 25)

changing the truth of God into a lie. As it did dishonour his

glory, so it did misrepresent his being. Idols are called lies, for

they belie God, as if he had a body, whereas he is a Spirit,

Jer. xxiii. 14; Hos. vii. 1.

Teachers of lies,
Hab. ii. 18.

(2.) Giving divine honour to the creature: Worshipped and served the

creature, para ton ktisavtabesides the

Creator. They did own a supreme Numen in their profession,

but they did in effect disown him by the worship they paid to the

creature; for God will be all or none. Or, above the Creator,

paying more devout respect to their inferior deities, stars, heroes,

demons, thinking the supreme God inaccessible, or above their worship.

The sin itself was their worshipping the creature at all; but this is

mentioned as an aggravation of the sin, that they worshipped the

creature more than the Creator. This was the general wickedness of the

Gentile world, and became twisted in with their laws and government; in

compliance with which even the wise men among them, who knew and owned

a supreme God and were convinced of the nonsense and absurdity of their

polytheism and idolatry, yet did as the rest of their neighbours did.

Seneca, in his book De Superstitione, as it is quoted by

Aug. de Civit. Dei, lib. 6, cap. 10 (for the book itself is

lost), after he had largely shown the great folly and impiety of the

vulgar religion, in divers instances of it, yet concludes, Quæ

omnia sapiens servabit tanquam legibus jussa, non tanquam diis

grata–All which a wise man will observe as established by law, not

imagining them grateful to the gods. And afterwards, Omnem istam

ignobilem deorum turbam, quam longo ævo longa superstitio

congessit, sic adorabimus, ut meminerimus cultum ejus magis ad morem

quam ad rem pertinere–All this ignoble rout of gods, which ancient

superstition has amassed together by long prescription, we will so

adore as to remember that the worship of them is rather a compliance

with custom than material in itself. Upon which Augustine observes,

Coleb at quod reprehendebat, agebat quod arguebat, quod culpabat

adorabat–He worshipped that which he censured, he did that which he

had proved wrong, and he adored what he found fault with. I mention

this thus largely because methinks it doth fully explain that of the

apostle here

(v. 18):

Who hold the truth in unrighteousness. It is observable that

upon the mention of the dishonour done to God by the idolatry of the

Gentiles the apostle, in the midst of his discourse, expresses himself

in an awful adoration of God: Who is blessed for ever. Amen.

When we see or hear of any contempt cast upon God or his name, we

should thence take occasion to think and speak highly and honourably of

him. In this, as in other things, the worse others are, the better we

should be. Blessed for ever, notwithstanding these dishonours

done to his name: though there are those that do not glorify him, yet

he is glorified, and will be glorified to eternity.

     

III. The judgments of God upon them for this idolatry; not many

temporal judgments (the idolatrous nations were the conquering ruling

nations of the world), but spiritual judgments, giving them up to the

most brutish and unnatural lusts. Paredoken autousHe

gave them up; it is thrice repeated here,

v. 24, 26, 28.

Spiritual judgments are of all judgments the sorest, and to be most

dreaded. Observe,

     

1. By whom they were given up. God gave them up, in a way of righteous

judgment, as the just punishment of their idolatry–taking off the

bridle of restraining grace–leaving them to themselves–letting them

alone; for his grace is his own, he is debtor to no man, he may give or

withhold his grace at pleasure. Whether this giving up be a positive

act of God or only privative we leave to the schools to dispute: but

this we are sure of that it is no new thing for God to give men up to

their own hearts’ lusts, to send them strong delusions, to let Satan

loose upon them, nay, to lay stumbling-blocks before them. And yet God

is not the author of sin, but herein infinitely just and holy; for,

though the greatest wickedness follow upon this giving up, the fault of

that is to be laid upon the sinner’s wicked heart. If the patient be

obstinate, and will not submit to the methods prescribed, but wilfully

takes and does that which is prejudicial to him, the physician is not

to be blamed if he give him up as in a desperate condition; and all the

fatal symptoms that follow are not to be imputed to the physician, but

to the disease itself and to the folly and wilfulness of the

patient.

     

2. To what they were given up.

     

(1.) To uncleanness and vile affections,
v. 24, 26, 27.

Those that would not entertain the more pure and refined notices of

natural light, which tend to preserve the honour of God, justly

forfeited those more gross and palpable sentiments which preserve the

honour of human nature. Man being in honour, and refusing to

understand the God that made him, thus becomes worse than the beasts

that perish,
Ps. xlix. 20.

Thus one, by the divine permission, becomes the punishment of another;

but it is (as it said here) through the lusts of their own

hearts–there all the fault is to be laid. Those who dishonoured

God were given up to dishonour themselves. A man cannot be delivered up

to a greater slavery than to be given up to his own lusts. Such are

given over, like the Egyptians

(Isa. xix. 4),

into the hand of a cruel lord. The particular instances of their

uncleanness and vile affections are their unnatural lusts, for which

many of the heathen, even of those among them who passed for wisemen,

as Solon and Zeno, were infamous, against the plainest and most obvious

dictates of natural light. The crying iniquity of Sodom and Gomorrah,

for which God rained hell from heaven upon them, became not only

commonly practised, but avowed, in the pagan nations. Perhaps the

apostle especially refers to the abominations that were committed in

the worship of their idol-gods, in which the worst of uncleannesses

were prescribed for the honour of their gods; dunghill service for

dunghill gods: the unclean spirits delight in such ministrations. In

the church of Rome, where the pagan idolatries are revived, images

worshipped, and saints only substituted in the room of demons, we hear

of these same abominations going barefaced, licensed by the pope

(Fox’s Acts and Monuments, vol. 1, p. 808), and not only

commonly perpetrated, but justified and pleaded for by some of their

cardinals: the same spiritual plagues for the same spiritual

wickednesses. See what wickedness there is in the nature of man. How

abominable and filthy is man! Lord, what is man? says David;

what a vile creature is he when left to himself! How much are we

beholden to the restraining grace of God for the preserving any thing

of the honour and decency of the human nature! For, were it not for

this, man, who was made but little lower than the angels, would make

himself a great deal lower than the devils. This is said to be that

recompence of their error which was meet. The Judge of all the

earth does right, and observes a meetness between the sin and the

punishment of it.

     

(2.) To a reprobate mind in these abominations,

v. 28.

     

[1.] They did not like to retain God in their knowledge. The

blindness of their understandings was caused by the wilful aversion of

their wills and affections. They did not retain God in their knowledge,

because they did not like it. They would neither know nor do any thing

but just what pleased themselves. It is just the temper of carnal

hearts; the pleasing of themselves is their highest end. There are many

that have God in their knowledge, they cannot help it, the light shines

so fully in their faces; but they do not retain him there. They say

to the Almighty, Depart

(Job xxi. 14),

and they therefore do not retain God in their knowledge because it

thwarts and contradicts their lusts; they do not like it. In their

knowledge–en epignosei. There is a difference between

gnosis and epignosis, the knowledge

and the acknowledgement of God; the pagans knew God, but did

not, would not, acknowledge him.

     

[2.] Answerable to this wilfulness of theirs, in gainsaying the truth,

God gave them over to a wilfulness in the grossest sins, here called a

reprobate mindeis adokimon noun, a mind void of

all sense and judgment to discern things that differ, so that they

could not distinguish their right hand from their left in spiritual

things. See whither a course of sin leads, and into what a gulf it

plunges the sinner at last; hither fleshly lusts have a direct

tendency. Eyes full of adultery cannot cease from sin,
2 Pet. ii. 14.

This reprobate mind was a blind scared conscience, past feeling,

Eph. iv. 19.

When the judgment is once reconciled to sin, the man is in the suburbs

of hell. At first Pharaoh hardened his heart, but afterwards God

hardened Pharaoh’s heart. Thus wilful hardness is justly punished with

judicial hardness.–To do those things which are not convenient.

This phrase may seem to bespeak a diminutive evil, but here it is

expressive of the grossest enormities; things that are not agreeable to

men, but contradict the very light and law of nature. And here he

subjoins a black list of those unbecoming things which the Gentiles

were guilty of, being delivered up to a reprobate mind. No wickedness

so heinous, so contrary to the light of nature, to the law of nations,

and to all the interests of mankind, but a reprobate mind will comply

with it. By the histories of those times, especially the accounts we

have of the then prevailing dispositions and practices of the Romans

when the ancient virtue of that commonwealth was so degenerated, it

appears that these sins here mentioned were then and there reigning

national sins. No fewer than twenty-three several sorts of sins and

sinners are here specified,

v. 29-31.

Here the devil’s seat is; his name is legion, for they are many. It was

time to have the gospel preached among them, for the world had need of

reformation.

     

First, Sins against the first table: Haters of God. Here

is the devil in his own colours, sin appearing sin. Could it be

imagined that rational creatures should hate the chief good, and

depending creatures abhor the fountain of their being? And yet so it

is. Every sin has in it a hatred of God; but some sinners are more open

and avowed enemies to him than others,

Zech. xi. 8.

Proud men and boasters cope with God himself, and put those

crowns upon their own heads which must be cast before his throne.

     

Secondly, Sins against the second table. These are especially

mentioned, because in these things they had a clearer light. In general

here is a charge of unrighteousness. This is put first, for every sin

is unrighteousness; it is withholding that which is due, perverting

that which is right; it is especially put for second-table sins, doing

as we would not be done by. Against the fifth commandment:

Disobedient to parents, and without natural

affectionastorgous, that is parents unkind and cruel

to their children. Thus, when duty fails on one side, it commonly fails

on the other. Disobedient children are justly punished with unnatural

parents; and, on the contrary, unnatural parents with disobedient

children. Against the sixth commandment: Wickedness (doing

mischief for mischief’s sake), maliciousness, envy, murder,

debate (eridoscontention), malignity,

despiteful, implacable, unmerciful; all expressions of that hatred

of our brother which is heart-murder. Against the seventh commandment:

Fornication; he mentions no more, having spoken before of other

uncleannesses. Against the eighth commandment: Unrighteousness,

covetousness. Against the ninth commandment: Deceit, whisperers,

back-biters, covenant-breakers, lying and slandering. Here are two

generals not before mentioned–inventors of evil things, and without

understanding; wise to do evil, and yet having no knowledge to do

good. The more deliberate and politic sinners are in inventing evil

things, the greater is their sin: so quick of invention in sin, and yet

without understanding (stark fools) in the thoughts of God. Here is

enough to humble us all, in the sense of our original corruption; for

every heart by nature has in it the seed and spawn of all these sins.

In the close he mentions the aggravations of the sins,

v. 32.

1. They knew the judgment of God; that is,

(1.) They knew the law. The judgment of God is that which his justice

requires, which, because he is just, he judgeth meet to be done.

(2.) They knew the penalty; so it is explained here: They knew that

those who commit such things were worthy of death, eternal death;

their own consciences could not but suggest this to them, and yet they

ventured upon it. It is a great aggravation of sin when it is committed

against knowledge

(James iv. 17),

especially against the knowledge of the judgment of God. It is daring

presumption to run upon the sword’s point. It argues the heart much

hardened, and very resolutely set upon sin.

2. They not only do the same, but have pleasure in those that do

them. The violence of some present temptation may hurry a man into

the commission of such sins himself in which the vitiated appetite may

take a pleasure; but to be pleased with other people’s sins is to love

sin for sin’s sake: it is joining in a confederacy for the devil’s

kingdom and interest. Syneudokousi: they do not only

commit sin, but they defend and justify it, and encourage others to do

the like. Our own sins are much aggravated by our concurrence with, and

complacency in, the sins of others.

     

Now lay all this together, and then say whether the Gentile world,

lying under so much guilt and corruption, could be justified before God

by any works of their own.


[Table of Contents]

[Previous]

[Next]

Matthew Henry
Commentary on the Whole Bible (1721)


Back to Bibles Net . Com – Online Christian Library

Matthew Henry’s Complete Commentary – Free Download

Contact Us


Top