BIBLES NET. COM

Matthew Henry’s Commentary – Second Samuel, Chapter XIII

Matthew Henry’s Complete Commentary

on the Whole Bible

Back to Biblesnet.com Home Page


[Table of Contents]

[Previous]

[Next]

Matthew Henry
Commentary on the Whole Bible (1708)




S E C O N D   S A M U E L

CHAP. XIII.



     

The righteous God had lately told David, by Nathan the prophet, that,

to chastise him for his son in the matter of Uriah, he would “raise up

evil against him out of his own house,”

(ch. xii. 11).

And here, in the very next chapter, we find the evil beginning to rise;

henceforward he was followed with one trouble after another, which made

the latter part of his reign less glorious and pleasant than the former

part. Thus God chastened him with the rod of men, yet assured him that

his “loving-kindness he would not utterly take away.” Adultery and

murder were David’s sins, and those sins among his children (Amnon

defiling his sister Tamar, and Absalom murdering his brother Amnon)

were the beginnings of his punishment, and the more grievous because he

had reason to fear that his bad example might help to bring them to

these wickednesses. In this chapter we have,

I. Amnon ravishing Tamar, assisted in his plot to do it by Jonadab his

kinsman, and villainously executing it,

ver. 1-20.

II. Absalom murdering Amnon for it,

ver. 21-39.

Both were great griefs to David, and the more because he was

unwittingly made accessory to both, by sending Tamar to Amnon and Amnon

to Absalom.






















Amnon’s Incest. B. C. 1032.

     

1 And it came to pass after this, that Absalom the son of David

had a fair sister, whose name was Tamar; and Amnon the son of

David loved her.

  2 And Amnon was so vexed, that he fell sick for his sister

Tamar; for she was a virgin; and Amnon thought it hard for him

to do any thing to her.

  3 But Amnon had a friend, whose name was Jonadab, the son of

Shimeah David’s brother: and Jonadab was a very subtle man.

  4 And he said unto him, Why art thou, being the king’s son,

lean from day to day? wilt thou not tell me? And Amnon said unto

him, I love Tamar, my brother Absalom’s sister.

  5 And Jonadab said unto him, Lay thee down on thy bed, and make

thyself sick: and when thy father cometh to see thee, say unto

him, I pray thee, let my sister Tamar come, and give me meat, and

dress the meat in my sight, that I may see it, and eat it at

her hand.

  6 So Amnon lay down, and made himself sick: and when the king

was come to see him, Amnon said unto the king, I pray thee, let

Tamar my sister come, and make me a couple of cakes in my sight,

that I may eat at her hand.

  7 Then David sent home to Tamar, saying, Go now to thy brother

Amnon’s house, and dress him meat.

  8 So Tamar went to her brother Amnon’s house; and he was laid

down. And she took flour, and kneaded it, and made cakes in his

sight, and did bake the cakes.

  9 And she took a pan, and poured them out before him; but he

refused to eat. And Amnon said, Have out all men from me. And

they went out every man from him.

  10 And Amnon said unto Tamar, Bring the meat into the chamber,

that I may eat of thine hand. And Tamar took the cakes which she

had made, and brought them into the chamber to Amnon her

brother.

  11 And when she had brought them unto him to eat, he took

hold of her, and said unto her, Come lie with me, my sister.

  12 And she answered him, Nay, my brother, do not force me; for

no such thing ought to be done in Israel: do not thou this folly.

  13 And I, whither shall I cause my shame to go? and as for

thee, thou shalt be as one of the fools in Israel. Now therefore,

I pray thee, speak unto the king; for he will not withhold me

from thee.

  14 Howbeit he would not hearken unto her voice: but, being

stronger than she, forced her, and lay with her.

  15 Then Amnon hated her exceedingly; so that the hatred

wherewith he hated her was greater than the love wherewith he

had loved her. And Amnon said unto her, Arise, be gone.

  16 And she said unto him, There is no cause: this evil in

sending me away is greater than the other that thou didst unto

me. But he would not hearken unto her.

  17 Then he called his servant that ministered unto him, and

said, Put now this woman out from me, and bolt the door after

her.

  18 And she had a garment of divers colours upon her: for with

such robes were the king’s daughters that were virgins

apparelled. Then his servant brought her out, and bolted the door

after her.

  19 And Tamar put ashes on her head, and rent her garment of

divers colours that was on her, and laid her hand on her head,

and went on crying.

  20 And Absalom her brother said unto her, Hath Amnon thy

brother been with thee? but hold now thy peace, my sister: he

is thy brother; regard not this thing. So Tamar remained

desolate in her brother Absalom’s house.

     

We have here a particular account of the abominable wickedness of Amnon

in ravishing his sister, a subject not fit to be enlarged upon nor

indeed to be mentioned without blushing, that ever any man should be so

vile, especially that a son of David should be so. Amnon’s character,

we have reason to think, was bad in other things; if he had not

forsaken God, he would never have been given up to these vile

affections. Godly parents have often been afflicted with wicked

children; grace does not run in the blood, but corruption does. We do

not find that David’s children imitated him in his devotion; but his

false steps they trod in, and in those did much worse, and repented

not. Parents know not how fatal the consequences may be if in any

instance they give their children bad examples. Observe the steps of

Amnon’s sin.

     

I. The devil, as an unclean spirit, put it into his heart to lust after

his sister Tamar. Beauty is a snare to many; it was so to her. She was

fair, and therefore Amnon coveted her,

v. 1.

Those that are peculiarly handsome have no reason, on that account, to

be proud, but great reason to stand upon their watch. Amnon’s lust was,

1. Unnatural in itself, to lust after his sister, which even natural

conscience startles at and cannot think of without horror. Such a

spirit of contradiction there is in man’s corrupt nature that still it

desires forbidden fruit, and the more strongly it is forbidden the more

greedily it is desired. Can he entertain the thought of betraying that

virtue and honour of which, as a brother, he ought to have been the

protector? But what wickedness so vile as not to find admittance into

an unsanctified unguarded heart, left to itself?

2. It was very uneasy to him. He was so vexed that he could not gain an

opportunity to solicit her chastity (for innocent converse with her was

not denied him) that he fell sick,
v. 2.

Fleshly lusts are their own punishment, and not only war against the

soul, but against the body too, and are the rottenness of the

bones. See what a hard master sinners serve, and how heavy his yoke

is.

     

II. The devil, as a subtle serpent, put it into his head how to compass

this wicked design. Amnon had a friend (so he called him, but he was

really an enemy to him), a kinsman, that had in him more of David’s

blood (for he was his nephew) than of David’s spirit, for he was a

subtle man, cunning to carry on any bad design, especially an intrigue

of this nature,

v. 3.

     

1. He took notice that Amnon looked ill, and, being a subtle man,

concluded that he was love-sick

(v. 4),

and asks him, “Why art thou, being the king’s son, lean from day to

day? Why dost thou pine, being the king’s eldest son, and heir to

the crown. Being the king’s son,

(1.) “Thou hast the pleasures of the court to divert thee; take those

pleasures then, and with them drive away the sorrow, whatever it is.”

Content and comfort are not always to be found in royal palaces. With

much more reason may we ask dejected and disconsolate saints why they,

who are the children of the King of kings and heirs of the crown of

life, are thus lean from day to day.

(2.) “Thou hast the power of a prince to command what thou wantest and

wishest for; use that power therefore, and gratify thyself. Pine not

away for that which, lawful or unlawful, thou, being the king’s son,

mayest have. Quicquid libet licet–Your will is law.” Thus

Jezebel to Ahab in a like case

(1 Kings xxi. 7),

Dost not thou govern Israel? The abuse of power is the most

dangerous temptation of the great.

     

2. Amnon having the impudence to own his wicked lust, miscalling it

love (I love Tamar), Jonadab put him in a way to compass his

design,

v. 5.

Had he been what he pretended (Amnon’s friend), he would have startled

at the mention of such horrid wickedness, would have laid before him

the evil of it, what an offence it was to God and what a wrong to his

own soul to entertain such a vile thought, of what fatal consequence it

would be to him to cherish and prosecute it; he would have used his

subtlety to divert Amnon from it, by recommending some other person to

him, whom he might lawfully marry. But he seems not at all surprised at

it, objects not either the unlawfulness or the difficulty, the reproach

or so much as his father’s displeasure, but puts him in the way to get

Tamar to his bed-side, and then he might do as he pleased. Note, The

case of those is very miserable whose friends, instead of admonishing

and reproving them, flatter them and forward them in their sinful ways,

and are their counsellors and contrivers to do wickedly. Amnon is

already sick, but goes about; he must take upon him to be so ill (and

his thin looks will give colour enough to the pretence) as not to be

able to get up, and to have no appetite to any thing but just that

which pleases his fancy. Dainty meat is abhorred,

Job xxxiii. 20.

The best dish from the king’s table cannot please him; but, if he can

eat any thing, it must be from his sister Tamar’s fair hand. This is

what he is advised to.

     

3. Amnon followed these directions, and thus got Tamar within his

reach: He made himself sick,
v. 6.

Thus he lieth in wait secretly, as a lion in his den, to catch the

poor, and to draw them into his net,
Ps. x. 8-10.

David was always fond of his children, and concerned if any thing ailed

them; he no sooner hears that Amnon is sick than he comes himself to

visit him. Let parents learn hence to be tender of their children and

compassionate towards them. The sick child commonly the mother

comforteth

(Isa. lxvi. 13),

but let not the father be unconcerned. We may suppose that when

David came to see his sick son he gave him good counsel to make a right

use of his affliction, and prayed with him, which yet did not alter his

wicked purpose. At parting, the indulgent father asks, “Is there any

thing thou hast a mind to, that I can procure for thee?” “Yes, Sir,”

says the dissembling son, “my stomach is weak, and I know not of any

thing I can eat, unless it be a cake of my sister Tamar’s making, and I

cannot be satisfied that it is so unless I see her make it, and it will

do me the more good if I eat it at her hand.” David saw no reason to

suspect any mischief intended. God hid his heart from understanding in

this matter. He therefore immediately orders Tamar to go and attend her

sick brother,

v. 7.

He does it very innocently, but afterwards, no doubt, reflected upon it

with great regret. Tamar as innocently goes to her brother’s chamber,

neither dreading any abuse (why should she from a brother, a sick

brother?) nor disdaining, in obedience to her father and love to her

brother (though but her half-brother), to be his nurse,

v. 8, 9.

Though she was a king’s daughter, a great beauty

(v. 1),

and well dressed

(v. 18),

yet she did not think it below her to knead cakes and bake them, nor

would she have done this now if she had not been used to it. Good

house-wifery is not a thing below the greatest ladies, nor ought they

to think it a disparagement to them. The virtuous woman, whose husband

sits among the elders, yet works willingly with her hands,
Prov. xxxi. 13.

Modern ages have not been destitute of such instances, nor is it so

unfashionable as some would make it. Preparing for the sick should be

more the care and delight of the ladies than preparing for the nice,

charity more than curiosity.

     

4. Having got her to him, he contrives to have her alone; for the

adulterer (much more so vile an adulterer as this) is in care that

no eye see him,
Job xxiv. 15.

The meat is ready, but he cannot eat while he is looked at by those

about him; they must all be turned out,

v. 9.

The sick must be humoured, and think they have a privilege to command.

Tamar is willing to humour him; her chaste and virtuous soul has not

the least thought of that which his polluted breast is full of; and

therefore she makes no scruple of being alone with him in the inner

chamber,
v. 10.

And now the mask is thrown off, the meat is thrown by, and the wicked

wretch calls her sister, and yet impudently courts her to

come and lie with him,
v. 11.

It was a base affront to her virtue to think it possible to persuade

her to consent to such wickedness when he knew her behaviour to be

always exemplarily modest and virtuous. But it is common for those that

live in uncleanness to think others such as themselves, at least tinder

to their sparks.

     

III. The devil, as a strong tempter, deafens his ear to all the

reasonings with which she resisted his assaults and would have

persuaded him to desist. We may well imagine what a surprise and terror

it was to the young lady to be thus attacked, how she blushed and how

she trembled; yet, in this great confusion, nothing could be said more

pertinently, nor with greater strength of argument, than what she said

to him.

1. She calls him brother, reminding him of the nearness of the

relation, which made it unlawful for him to marry her, much more to

debauch her. It was expressly forbidden

(Lev. xviii. 9)

under a severe penalty,

Lev. xx. 17.

Great care must be taken lest the love that should be among relations

degenerate into lust.

2. She entreats him not to force her, which intimates that she would

never consent to it in any degree; and what satisfaction could he take

in offering violence?

3. She lays before him the great wickedness of it. It is

folly; all sin is so, especially uncleanness. It is wickedness

of the worst kind. Such abominations ought not to be committed in

Israel, among the professing people of God, that have better statutes

than the heathen have. We are Israelites; if we do such things, we are

more inexcusable than others, and our condemnation will be more

intolerable, for we reproach the Lord, and that worthy name

by which we are called.

4. She represents to him the shame of it, which perhaps might influence

him more than the sin of it: “For my part, whither shall I cause my

shame to go? If it should be concealed, yet I shall blush to think

of it as long as I live; and, if ever it be known, how shall I be able

to look any of my friends in the face? For thy part, thou shalt be

as one of the fools in Israel,” that is, “Thou wilt be looked upon

as an atrocious debauchee, the worst of men; thou wilt lose thy

interest in the esteem of all that are wise and good, and so wilt be

set aside as unfit to rule, though the first-born; for Israel will

never submit to the government of such a fool.” Prospect of shame,

especially everlasting shame, should deter us from sin.

5. To divert him from his wicked purpose at this time, and (if

possible) to get clear of him, she intimates to him that probably the

king, rather than he should die for love of her, would dispense with

the divine law and let him marry her: not as if she thought he had such

a dispensing power, or would pretend to it; but she was confident that,

upon notice given to the king by himself of this wicked desire, which

he would scarcely have believed from any one else, he would take an

effectual course to protect her from him. But all her arts and all her

arguments availed not. His proud spirit cannot bear a denial; but her

comfort, and honour, and all that was dear to her, must be sacrificed

to his brutish and outrageous lust,

v. 14.

It is to be feared that Amnon, though young, had long lived a lewd

life, which his father either knew not or punished not; for a man could

not, of a sudden, arrive at such a pitch of wickedness as this. But is

this his love to Tamar? Is this the recompence he gives her for her

readiness to attend him in his sickness? Will he deal with his sister

as with a harlot? Base villain! God deliver all that are modest and

virtuous from such wicked and unreasonable men.

     

IV. The devil, as a tormentor and betrayer, immediately turns his love

of her into hatred

(v. 15):

He hated her with great hatred, greatly, so it is in the margin,

and grew as outrageous in his malice as he had been in his lust.

     

1. He basely turned her out of doors by force; nay, as if he now

disdained to touch her with his own hands, he ordered his servant to

pull her out and bolt the door after her,
v. 17.

Now,

(1.) The innocent injured lady had reason to resent this as a great

affront, and in some respects (as she says,

v. 16)

worse than the former; for nothing could have been done more barbarous

and ill-natured, or more disgraceful to her. Had he taken care to

conceal what was done, her honour would have been lost to herself only.

Had he gone down on his knees and begged her pardon, it might have been

some little reparation. Had he given her time to compose herself after

the horrid confusion she was put into, she might have kept her

countenance when she went out, and so have kept her counsel. But to

dismiss her thus hurried, thus rudely, as if she had done some wicked

thing, obliged her, in her own defence, to proclaim the wrong that had

been done her.

(2.) We may learn from it both the malignity of sin (unbridled passions

are as bad as unbridled appetites) and the mischievous consequences of

sin (at last, it bites like a serpent); for here we find,

[1.] That sins, sweet in the commission, afterwards become odious and

painful, and the sinner’s own conscience makes them so to himself.

Amnon hated Tamar because she would not consent to his wickedness, and

so take part of the blame upon herself, but to the last resisted it,

and reasoned against it, and so threw all the blame upon him. Had he

hated the sin, and loathed himself for it, we might have hoped he was

penitent. Godly sorrow worketh indignation,
2 Cor. vii. 11.

But to hate the person he had abused showed that his conscience was

terrified, but his heart not at all humbled. See what deceitful

pleasures those of the flesh are, how soon they pass away, and turn

into loathing; see

Ezek. xxiii. 17.

[2.] That sins, secret in the commission, afterwards become open and

public, and the sinners themselves often make them so. Their own

tongues fall upon them. The Jewish doctors say that, upon the occasion

of this wickedness of Amnon, a law was made that a young man and a

young woman should never be alone together; for, said they, if the

king’s daughter be so used, what will become of the children of private

men?

     

2. We must now leave the criminal to the terrors of his own guilty

conscience, and enquire what becomes of the poor victim.

(1.) She bitterly lamented the injury she had received, as it was a

stain to her honour, though no real blemish to her virtue. She tore

her fine clothes in token of her grief, and put ashes upon her head, to

deform herself, loathing her own beauty and ornaments, because they had

occasioned Amnon’s unlawful love; and she went on crying for another’s

sin,

v. 19.

(2.) She retired to her brother Absalom’s house, because he was her own

brother, and there she lived in solitude and sorrow, in token of her

modesty and detestation of uncleanness. Absalom spoke kindly to her,

bade her pass by the injury for the present, designing himself to

revenge it,

v. 20.

It should seem by Absalom’s question (Has Amnon been with thee?)

that Amnon was notorious for such lewd practices, so that it was

dangerous for a modest woman to be with him; this Absalom might know,

and yet Tamar be wholly ignorant of it.










The Plot Against Amnon. B. C. 1032.

     

21 But when king David heard of all these things, he was very

wroth.

  22 And Absalom spake unto his brother Amnon neither good nor

bad: for Absalom hated Amnon, because he had forced his sister

Tamar.

  23 And it came to pass after two full years, that Absalom had

sheepshearers in Baal-hazor, which is beside Ephraim: and

Absalom invited all the king’s sons.

  24 And Absalom came to the king, and said, Behold now, thy

servant hath sheepshearers; let the king, I beseech thee, and his

servants go with thy servant.

  25 And the king said to Absalom, Nay, my son, let us not all

now go, lest we be chargeable unto thee. And he pressed him:

howbeit he would not go, but blessed him.

  26 Then said Absalom, If not, I pray thee, let my brother Amnon

go with us. And the king said unto him, Why should he go with

thee?

  27 But Absalom pressed him, that he let Amnon and all the

king’s sons go with him.

  28 Now Absalom had commanded his servants, saying, Mark ye now

when Amnon’s heart is merry with wine, and when I say unto you,

Smite Amnon; then kill him, fear not: have not I commanded you?

be courageous, and be valiant.

  29 And the servants of Absalom did unto Amnon as Absalom had

commanded. Then all the king’s sons arose, and every man gat him

up upon his mule, and fled.

     

What Solomon says of the beginning of strife is as true of the

beginning of all sin, it is as the letting forth of water; when once

the flood-gates are plucked up, an inundation follows; one mischief

begets another, and it is hard to say what shall be in the end

thereof.

     

I. We are here told how David resented the tidings of Amnon’s sin:

He was very wroth,
v. 21.

So he had reason to be, that his own son should do such a wicked thing

and draw him to be accessory to it. It would be a reproach to him for

not giving him a better education; it would be a blot upon his family,

the ruin of his daughter, a bad example to his kingdom, and a wrong to

his son’s soul. But was it enough for him to be angry? He ought to have

punished his son for it, and have put him to open shame; both as a

father and as a king he had power to do it. But the LXX. here adds

these words: But he saddened not the spirit of his son Amnon,

because he loved him, because he was his first-born. He fell into

Eli’s error, whose sons made themselves vile, and he frowned not on

them. If Amnon was dear to him, his punishing him would have been

so much the greater punishment to himself for his own uncleanness. But

he cannot bear the shame those must submit to who correct that in

others which they are conscious of in themselves, and therefore his

anger must serve instead of his justice; and this hardens sinners,

Eccl. viii. 11.

     

II. How Absalom resented it. He resolves already to do the part of a

judge in Israel; and, since his father will not punish Amnon, he will,

from a principle, not of justice or zeal for virtue, but of revenge,

because he reckons himself affronted in the abuse done to his sister.

Their mother was daughter to a heathen prince

(ch. iii. 3),

which perhaps they were upbraided with sometimes by their brethren, as

children of a stranger. As such a one Absalom thought his sister was

now treated; and, if Amnon thought her fit to be made his harlot, he

would think him fit to be made his slave. This enraged him, and nothing

less than the blood of Amnon will quench his rage. Here we have,

     

1. The design conceived: Absalom hated Amnon

(v. 22),

and he that hateth his brother is a murderer already, and, like

Cain, is of that wicked one,
1 John iii. 12, 15.

Absalom’s hatred of his brother’s crime would have been commendable,

and he might justly have prosecuted him for it by a due course of law,

for example to others, and the making of some compensation to his

injured sister; but to hate his person, and design his death by

assassination, was to put a great affront upon God, by offering to

repair the breach of his seventh commandment by the violation of his

sixth, as if they were not all alike sacred. But he that said, Do

not commit adultery, said also, Do not kill,
James ii. 11.

     

2. The design concealed. He said nothing to Amnon of this matter,

either good or bad, appeared as if he did not know it, and maintained

towards him his usual civility, only waiting for a fair opportunity to

do him a mischief. That malice is the worst,

(1.) Which is hidden closely, and has no vent given to it. If Absalom

had reasoned the matter with Amnon, he might have convinced him of his

sin and brought him to repentance; but, saying nothing, Amnon’s heart

was hardened, and his own more and more embittered against him;

therefore rebuking our neighbour is opposed to hating him in our

hearts,

Lev. xix. 17.

Let passion have vent and it will spend itself.

(2.) Which is gilded over with a show of friendship; so Absalom’s was,

his words smoother than butter but war in his heart. See

Prov. xxvi. 26.

(3.) Which is harboured long. Two full years Absalom nursed this root

of bitterness,

v. 24.

It may be, at first, he did not intend to kill his brother (for, if he

had, he might have had as fair an opportunity to do it as he had at

last), and only waited for an occasion to disgrace him or do him some

other mischief; but in time his hatred ripened to this, that he would

be no less than the death of him. If the sun going down once

upon the wrath gives such place to the devil (as is intimated,

Eph. iv. 26, 27),

what would the sunsets of two full years do?

     

3. The design laid.

(1.) Absalom has a feast at his house in the country, as Nabal had, on

occasion of his sheep-shearing,

v. 23.

Attentive as Absalom was to his person

(ch. xiv. 26),

and as high as he looked, he knew the state of his flocks and looked

well to his herds. Those who have no other care about their estates

in the country than how to spend them in the town take a ready way to

see the end of them. When Absalom had sheep-shearers he would himself

be with them.

(2.) To this feast he invites the king his father, and all the princes

of the blood

(v. 24),

not only that he might have this opportunity to pay his respects to

them, but that he might make himself the more respected among his

neighbours. Those that are akin to great folks are apt to value

themselves too much on their kindred.

(3.) The king would not go himself, because he would not put him to the

expense of his entertainment,

v. 25.

It seems Absalom had an estate in his own hands, on which he lived like

himself; the king had given it to him, but would have him to be a good

husband of it: in both these he is an example to parents, when their

children have grown up, to give them a competency to live upon,

according to their rank, and then to take care that they do not live

above it, especially that they be no way accessory to their doing so.

It is prudent for young house-keepers to begin as they can hold out,

and not to spend the wool upon the shearing of it.

(4.) Absalom got leave for Amnon, and all the rest of the king’s sons,

to come and grace his table in the country,

v. 26, 27.

Absalom had so effectually concealed his enmity to Amnon that David saw

no reason to suspect any design upon him in that particular invitation:

“Let my brother Amnon go;” but this would make the stroke more cutting

to David that he was himself drawn in to consent to that which gave the

opportunity for it, as before,

v. 7.

It seems, David’s sons, though grown up, continued to pay such a

deference to their father as not to go such a small journey as this

without leave. Thus ought children, even when they have become men and

women, to honour their parents, consult them, and do nothing material

without their consent, much less against their mind.

     

4. The design executed,

v. 28, 29.

(1.) Absalom’s entertainment was very plentiful; for he resolves that

they shall all be merry with wine, at least concludes that Amnon will

be so, for he knew that he was apt to drink to excess. But,

(2.) The orders he gave to his servants concerning Amnon, that they

should mingle his blood with his wine, were very barbarous. Had he

challenged him, and, in reliance upon the goodness of his cause and the

justice of God, fought him himself, though that would have been bad

enough, yet it would have been more honourable and excusable (our

ancient law, in some cases, allowed trial by battle); but to murder

him, as he did, was to copy Cain’s example, only that the reason made a

difference: Abel was slain for his righteousness, Amnon for his

wickedness. Observe the aggravations of this sin:–

[1.] He would have Amnon slain when his heart was merry with

wine, and he was consequently least apprehensive of danger, least

able to resist it, and also least fit to go out of the world; as if his

malice aimed to destroy both soul and body, not giving him time to say,

Lord, have mercy upon me. What a dreadful surprise hath death

been to many, whose hearts have been overcharged with surfeiting and

drunkenness!

[2.] His servants must be employed to do it, and so involved in the

guilt. He was to give the word of command–Smite Amnon; and then

they, in obedience to him, and, upon presumption that his authority

would bear them out, must kill him. What an impious defiance

does he bid to the divine law, when, though the command of God is

express, Thou shalt not kill, he bids them kill Amnon, with this

warrant, “Have not I commanded you? That is enough. Be

courageous, and fear neither God nor man.” Those servants are ill

taught who obey their masters in contradiction to God, and those are

wicked masters who have taught them to do so. Those are too obsequious

that will damn their souls to please their masters, whose big words

cannot secure them from God’s wrath. Masters must always command their

servants as those that know they also have a Master in heaven.

[3.] He did it in the presence of all the king’s sons, of whom

it is said

(ch. viii. 18)

that they were chief rulers; so that it was an affront to public

justice which they had the administration of, and to the king his

father whom they represented, and a contempt of that sword which should

have been a terror to his evil deeds, while his evil deeds, on the

contrary, were a terror to those that bore it.

[4.] There is reason to suspect that Absalom did this, not only to

revenge his sister’s quarrel, but to make way for himself to the

throne, which he was ambitious of, and which he would stand fair for if

Amnon the eldest son was taken off. When the word of command was given

Absalom’s servants failed not to execute it, being buoyed up with an

opinion that their master, being now next heir to the crown (for

Chileab was dead, as bishop Patrick thinks), would save them from harm.

Now the threatened sword is drawn in David’s house which should not

depart from it. First, His eldest son falls by it, himself

being, by his wickedness, the cause of it, and his father, by his

connivance, accessory to it. Secondly, All his sons flee from

it, and come home in terror, not knowing how far their brother

Absalom’s bloody design might extend. See what mischief sin makes in

families.











Amnon’s Death; Absalom’s Flight. B. C. 1032.

     

30 And it came to pass, while they were in the way, that

tidings came to David, saying, Absalom hath slain all the king’s

sons, and there is not one of them left.

  31 Then the king arose, and tare his garments, and lay on the

earth; and all his servants stood by with their clothes rent.

  32 And Jonadab, the son of Shimeah David’s brother, answered

and said, Let not my lord suppose that they have slain all the

young men the king’s sons; for Amnon only is dead: for by the

appointment of Absalom this hath been determined from the day

that he forced his sister Tamar.

  33 Now therefore let not my lord the king take the thing to his

heart, to think that all the king’s sons are dead: for Amnon only

is dead.

  34 But Absalom fled. And the young man that kept the watch

lifted up his eyes, and looked, and, behold, there came much

people by the way of the hill side behind him.

  35 And Jonadab said unto the king, Behold, the king’s sons

come: as thy servant said, so it is.

  36 And it came to pass, as soon as he had made an end of

speaking, that, behold, the king’s sons came, and lifted up their

voice and wept: and the king also and all his servants wept very

sore.

  37 But Absalom fled, and went to Talmai, the son of Ammihud,

king of Geshur. And David mourned for his son every day.

  38 So Absalom fled, and went to Geshur, and was there three

years.

  39 And the soul of king David longed to go forth unto

Absalom: for he was comforted concerning Amnon, seeing he was

dead.

     

Here is,

I. The fright that David was put into by a false report brought to

Jerusalem that Absalom had slain all the king’s sons,
v. 30.

It is common for fame to make bad worse; and the first news of such a

thing as this represents it as more dreadful than afterwards it proves.

Let us not therefore be afraid of evil tidings, while they want

confirmation, but, when we hear the worst, hope the best, at least hope

better. However, this false news gave as much affliction to David, for

the present, as if it had been true; he tore his garments, and lay

on the earth, while as yet it was only a flying story,

v. 31.

It was well that David had grace; he had need enough of it, for he had

strong passions.

     

II. The rectifying of the mistake in two ways:–

1. By the sly suggestions of Jonadab, David’s nephew, who could tell

him, Amnon only is dead, and not all the king’s sons

(v. 32, 33),

and could tell him too that it was done by the appointment of Absalom,

and designed from the day Amnon forced his sister Tamar. What a wicked

man was he, if he knew all this or had any cause to suspect it, that he

did not make David acquainted with it sooner, that means might be used

to make up the quarrel, or at least that David might not throw Amnon

into the mouth of danger by letting him go to Absalom’s house. If we do

not our utmost to prevent mischief, we make ourselves accessory to it.

If we say, Behold, we knew it not; doth not he that pondereth the

heart consider whether we did or no? See

Prov. xxiv. 11, 12.

It is well if Jonadab was not as guilty of Amnon’s death as he was of

his sin; such friends do those prove who are hearkened to as

counsellors to do wickedly: he that would not be so kind as to prevent

Amnon’s sin would not be so kind as to prevent his ruin, when, it

should seem, he might have done both.

2. By the safe return of all the king’s sons except Amnon. They and

their attendants were speedily discovered by the watch

(v. 34, 35),

and soon arrived, to show themselves alive, but to bring the certain

sad news that Absalom had murdered their brother Amnon. The grief David

had been in for that which was not made him the better able to bear

that which was, by giving him a sensible occasion, when he was

undeceived, to thank God that all his sons were not dead: yet that

Amnon was dead, and slain by his own brother is such a treacherous

barbarous manner, was enough to put the king and court, the king and

kingdom, into real mourning. Sorrow is never more reasonable than when

there is sin in the case.

     

III. Absalom’s flight from justice: Absalom immediately

fled,
v. 34.

He was now as much afraid of the king’s sons as they were of him; they

fled from his malice, he from their justice. No part of the land of

Israel could shelter him. The cities of refuge gave no protection to a

wilful murderer. Though David had let Amnon’s incest go unpunished,

Absalom could not promise himself his pardon for this murder; so

express was the law in this case, and so well known David’s justice,

and his dread of blood-guiltiness. He therefore made the best of his

way to his mother’s relations, and was entertained by his grandfather

Talmai, king of Geshur

(v. 37),

and there he was protected three years

(v. 38),

David not demanding him, and Talmai not thinking himself obliged to

send him back unless he were demanded.

     

IV. David’s uneasiness for his absence. He mourned for Amnon a good

while

(v. 37),

but, he being past recall, time wore off that grief: he was

comforted concerning Amnon. It also wore off too much his

detestation of Absalom’s sin; instead of loathing him as a murderer, he

longs to go forth to him,
v. 39.

At first he could not find in his heart to do justice on him; now he

can almost find in his heart to take him into his favour again. This

was David’s infirmity. Something God saw in his heart that made a

difference, else we should have thought that he, as much as Eli,

honoured his sons more than God.


[Table of Contents]

[Previous]

[Next]

Matthew Henry
Commentary on the Whole Bible (1708)


Back to Bibles Net . Com – Online Christian Library

Matthew Henry’s Complete Commentary – Free Download

Contact Us


Top